Article published In:
Register in L1 and L2 Language Development
Edited by Bethany Gray and Jesse Egbert
[Register Studies 3:2] 2021
► pp. 279298
Anthony, L.
(2019a) AntConc (Version 3.5.8). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from [URL]
(2019b) EncodeAnt (Version 1.2.1). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from [URL]
Berber Sardinha, T.
(2017) Lexical Priming and Register Variation. In M. Pace-Sigge & K. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lexical Priming: Applications and Advances (pp. 189–229). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernardini, S.
(2004) Corpora in the classroom: An overview and some reflections on future developments. In J. M. Sinclair (Ed.), How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching (pp. 15–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(1991) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Register as a Predictor of Linguistic Variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8 (1), 9–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. M.
(2009) Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BNC Consortium
(2007) The British National Corpus (Version 3 BNC XML ed.): Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. URL: [URL]
Boulton, A., & Cobb, T.
(2017) Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Language Learning, 67 (2), 348–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S.
(2015) Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20 (2), 139–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles, M.
(2012) ‘Proper vocabulary and juicy collocations’: EAP students evaluate do-it-yourself corpus-building. English for Specific Purposes, 31 1, 93–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W., Warren, M., & Xu, X.-F.
(2003) The language learner as language researcher: putting corpus linguistics on the timetable. System, 31 (2), 173–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T.
(2000, 2020) The Compleat Lexical Tutor (Version 8.3), from [URL]
Conrad, S.
Coxhead, A.
(2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34 (2), 213–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
(2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 600 million words, 1990-present. Retrieved 25 February, 2020, from [URL]
Ferguson, C.
(1983) Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society, 12 (2), 153–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fligelstone, S.
(1993) Some reflections on the question of teaching, from a corpus linguistics perspective. ICAME, 17 1, 97–109.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L.
(2015) Data-driven learning and language learning theories: Whither the twain shall meet. In A. Leńko-Szymańska & A. Boulton (Eds.), Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardie, A.
(2012) CQPweb: Combining Power, Flexibility and Usability in a Corpus Analysis Tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17 (3), 380–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M.
(2005) Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jeaco, S.
(2017a) Concordancing Lexical Primings: The rationale and design of a user-friendly corpus tool for English language teaching and self-tutoring based on the Lexical Priming theory of language. In M. Pace-Sigge & K. J. Patterson (Eds.), Lexical Priming: Applications and Advances (pp. 273–296). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Helping Language Learners Put Concordance Data in Context: Concordance Cards in The Prime Machine. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 7 (2), 22–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020a) Calculating and Displaying Key Labels: The texts, sections, authors and neighbourhoods where words and collocations are likely to be prominent. Corpora, 15 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020b) DIY needs analysis and specific text types: Using The Prime Machine to explore vocabulary in readymade and homemade English corpora. In M. Dodigovic & M. P. Agustín-Llach (Eds.), Vocabulary in Curriculum Planning: Needs, Strategies and Tools: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johns, T.
(1991) Should you be persuaded: Two samples of data-driven learning materials. In T. Johns & P. King (Eds.), Classroom Concordancing (Vol. 41, pp. 1–13). Birmingham: Centre for English Language Studies, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P., & Tugwell, D.
(2004) The Sketch Engine. Paper presented at the 2003 International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, Beijing.
Kreyer, R.
(2008) Corpora in the classroom and beyond. In B. Barber & F. Zhang (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Computer-Enhanced Language Acquisition and Learning (pp. 422–437). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. Y. W.
(2001) Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning and Technology, 5 (3), 37–72.Google Scholar
Mair, C.
(2002) Empowering non-native speakers: the hidden surplus value of corpora in Continental English departments. In B. Kettemann, G. Marko & T. McEnery (Eds.), Teaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis (pp. 119–130). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Nini, A.
(2019) The Multi-Dimensional Analysis Tagger. In T. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues (pp. 67–94). London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, M.
(2008) Developing WordSmith. International Journal of English Studies, 8 (1), 95–106.Google Scholar
(2020) WordSmith Tools (Version 8). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar