Cover not available
Article published In:
Register Studies
Vol. 5:1 (2023) ► pp.111–135

An experimental approach to colloquiality perception in L1 and L2 Spanish

| University of Wyoming
Most studies on register have only approached it from the point of view of production rather than perception. However, features associated with less formal registers could vary in production and perception, particularly in the case of L2. Here an experimental methodology is used to look at five morphosyntactic linguistic features commonly considered more colloquial in Spanish and compare their effect in perceiving a sentence as more or less formal in two different groups of Spanish speakers, L1 and L2. Results show differences between the two groups, in the effect and weight of some of the experimental conditions and their interactions. These differences can be explained in terms of register input received in the classroom and perceptibility and processing impact of some of the features. The paper concludes with a discussion of the methodological challenges of this type of study as well as how it can complement register production studies.
Keywords: colloquial Spanish, L2 register, L1 register, register perception, explicit instruction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Register acquisition and perception in L2
    • 2.1Relevance of register acquisition
    • 2.2Colloquiality and perception in L2
  • 3.Notions of colloquial language
  • 4.Previous findings on registers and colloquiality in Spanish
    • 4.1Some implications of notions and empirical findings for an approach to colloquiality
  • 5.Methods
    • 5.1Test design: Selection of colloquial features
    • 5.2Test design: Format
    • 5.3Participants
    • 5.4Tabulation and statistical treatment
  • 6.Results
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusions: Colloquiality perception in L2 and L1, challenges and future
    • 8.1Implications for teaching and future research
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 January 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20025.che
References (48)
References
Asención-Delaney, Y. (2014). A multi-dimensional analysis of advanced written L2 Spanish. In T. Berber Sardinha and M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 240–269). N.Y: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asención-Delaney, Y., & Collentine, J. (2011). A multidimensional analysis of a written L2 Spanish corpus. Applied linguistics, 32 (3), 299–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bachelor, J., & Barros García, M. (2019). A comparison of heritage learners and L2 learners of Spanish: A study on compliment sequences in the classroom. Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 4 (1), 21–40.Google Scholar
Beinhauer, W. (1963). El español coloquial. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1975). Introduction to class, codes and control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1989). A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27 (1), 3–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993). Using register-diversified corpora for general language studies. Computational linguistics, 19 (2), 219–241.Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J. K., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2006). Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora, 1 (1), 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? Tesol Quarterly, 45 (1), 5–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briz, A. (1996). El español coloquial: situación y uso. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Camacho, L. (2009). El español coloquial en contexto académico. In A. Vera Luján and I. Martínez Martínez (Eds.), Actas del XX Congreso Internacional de la ASELE (pp. 332–346). Centro Virtual Cervantes.Google Scholar
Colombi, M. C. (2015). Academic and cultural literacy for heritage speakers of Spanish: A case study of Latin@ students in California. Linguistics and Education, 32 1, 5–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortés, L. (2002). Bibliografía sobre el español hablado. Oralia: análisis del discurso oral, 5 1, 377–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Criado de Val, M. (1980). Estructura general del coloquio. Madrid: Sociedad General Español de Librerías.Google Scholar
Dacosta Cea, V. (2005). Las marcas de uso de los diccionarios de español con vistas al desarrollo pragmático de los alumnos de español L2. In M. A. Castillo Carballo, O. Cruz Moya, J. M. García Platero, J. P. Mora Gutiérrez / M. R. Cordero Rafoo (Eds.), Las gramáticas y los diccionarios en la enseñanza del español como segunda lengua: realidad y deseo (pp. 252–258). Sevilla: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2002). Un corpus anotado de 100.000.000 de palabras del español histórico y moderno. Procesamiento del lenguaje natural, 291, 21–27.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The 2010s Communicative language teaching in the 21st century: The ‘principled communicative approach’. Perspectives, 36 (2), 33–43.Google Scholar
DuBois, S. (2019). Are L2 speakers allowed to use colloquialisms? L1 attitudes tToward Spanish L2 sSpeakers’ uUse of iInformal Llexical iItems (Doctoral dissertation, UC Santa Barbara).
Expert Advisory Group on Language Engineering Standards. (1996). Preliminary recommendations on text typology. EAGLES Document EAG-TCWG-TTYP/P.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2012). Frequency-based accounts of second language acquisition. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.) The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 193–210). N.Y: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fernández Jódar, R. (2019). Sobre las preferencias léxicas en los registros coloquial y formal en L1 y L2. Studia Romanica Posnaniensia, 46 (4), 149–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, E., & Weigle, S. (2014). Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26 1, 80–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Cardona, J. (2020). Is the university Lecture lecture a cConversation?: A Register register Analysis analysis Based based on Linguistic linguistic Features features and Situational situational Characteristics characteristics (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wyoming).
García-Cardona, J. & Checa-García, I. (2019). La coloquialidad en la adaptación cinematográfica del texto teatral: una propuesta de estudio interdisciplinario con el ejemplo de “Bajarse al moro”. Trasvases entre la literatura y el cine, 1 1, 129–150.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1997). Communicative competence. In J. J. Gumperz Sociolinguistics (pp. 39–48). Palgrave: London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holgado Lage, A. M. & Serrano Reyes, P. (2011). El texto coloquial en la clase de español l2/le: explotación orientada a la enseñanza-aprendizaje de los marcadores conversacionales. In J. De Santiago Guervós et al. (Eds.), Del texto a la lengua: La aplicación de los textos a la enseñanza-aprendizaje del español L2-LE (pp. 427–438). Salamanca: Kadmos.Google Scholar
Leal Rivas, N. (2020). La competencia lecto-crítica en entornos digitales: una visión holística para L2/LE. Contextos Educativos: Revista de Eeducación, 25 1, 71–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. Y. W. (2001). Genres, registers, text types, domains and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle Language. Learning & Technology, 5 (3), 37–72.Google Scholar
Levshina, N. (2015). How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López Serena, A. (2007). El concepto de español coloquial: vacilación terminológica e indefinición del objeto de estudio. Oralia, 10 1, 161–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno Fernández, F. (1998). Principios de sociolingüística y sociología del lenguaje. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Narbona Jiménez, A. (1986). Problemas de sintaxis coloquial andaluza. Revista de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística, 16 (1), 229–270.Google Scholar
(1992). Hacia una sintaxis del español coloquial. In N. Sánchez Albornoz (Ed.) Congreso de la Lengua Española (1992. Sevilla), 721–740. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes.Google Scholar
(2012). Los estudios sobre el español coloquial y la lingüística. Revista Española de Lingüística, 42 (2), 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parodi, G. (2005). Lingüística de corpus y análisis multidimensional: exploración de la valoración en el corpus PUCV-2003. Revista Española de Lingüística, 35 (1), 45–76.Google Scholar
(2007). Variation across register in Spanish: Exploring the El Grial PUCV Corpus. In G. Parodi (Ed.), Working with Spanish corpora (pp. 11–53). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2010, 2010b). University academic genres: A miscellaneous discourse. In G. Parodi (Ed.), Academic and professional discourse genres in Spanish (pp. 83–100). Amsterdamm, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Variation across university genres in seven disciplines: A corpus-based study on academic written Spanish. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20 (4), 469–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Porroche Ballesteros, M. (1998). La variedad coloquial como objeto de estudio en las clases de español lengua extranjera. In ASELE (Ed.) El Español como lengua extranjera: aspectos generales: edición facsimilar de las actas de las primeras Jornadas Pedagógicas y del Primer Congreso Nacional de ASELE (Asociación para la Enseñanza del Español como Lengua Extranjera) (pp. 2554–264). Málaga: Imagraf.Google Scholar
(2009). Aspectos de gramática del español coloquial para profesores de español como L2. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Potowski, K. (2002). Experiences of Spanish heritage speakers in university foreign language courses and implications for teacher training. Adfl Bulletin, 33 (3), 35–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reppen, R. (1994). Variation in elementary student language: A multidimensional perspective. Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
Reynolds, D. W. (2005). Linguistic correlates of second language literacy development: Evidence from middle-grade learner essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(1), 19–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Domínguez, M. M. (2000). Los códigos y los registros: dos conceptos sociolingüísticos y su aplicación a la enseñanza del lenguaje oral. Lenguaje y textos, 16 1, 9–16.Google Scholar
Vigara Tauste, A. M. (1992). Morfosintaxis del español coloquial. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar