Adger, D., & Harbour, D
(2007) The syntax and syncretisms of the person case constraint. Syntax, 10, 2–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, E
(2003) The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2005) Strong and weak person restrictions: A feature checking analysis. In L. Heggie, & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), Clitic and affix combinations (pp. 199–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, M
(1988) Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Béjar, S
(2003) Phi-syntax: A theory of agreement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.
Béjar, S., & ezáč, M
(2003). Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects. In A.T. Pérez-Leroux, & Y. Roberge (Eds.), Romance linguistics: Theory and acquisition (pp. 49–61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(1), 35–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, J.D
(2008) Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In D. Harbour, D. Adger, & S. Béjar (Eds.), Phi-theory: Phi features across interfaces and modules (pp. 295–328). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonet, E
(1991) Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(1994) The person-case constraint: A morphological approach. In H. Harley, & C. Phillips (Eds.), The morphology-syntax connection, number 22 in MIT working papers in linguistics (pp. 33–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brockelmann, C
(1960) Arabische Grammatik. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopadie.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M
(1999) The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 145–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N
(2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagareka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cuervo, M.C
(2003) Datives at large. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
de Sacy, A.I.S
(1905) Grammaire arabe (Vol. 2, 3rd edn). Société anonyme de l’imprimerie rapide, Tunis, (first edition 1810).Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, A
(1988) Agreement in Arabic, binding and coherence. In M. Barlow, & C.A. Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in natural language: Approaches, theories, descriptions (pp. 107–158). Stanford, CT: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Halle, M., and Marantz, A
(1993) Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale, & S. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, H. & Ritter, E
(2002) Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language, 78(3), 482–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howell, M.S
(1880) A grammar of the classical Arabic language in four parts. Allahabad: North-Western Provinces and Oudh Government Press.Google Scholar
Jahn, G
(1900) Ŝıbawaihi’s Buch ü ber die Grammatik (Vol. 2). Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.Google Scholar
Lane, E.W
(1863) An Arabic-English lexicon. London: Williams and Norgate, London.Google Scholar
Marantz, A
(1991) Case and licensing. In G. Westphal, B. Ao, & H.-R. Chae (Eds.), Proceedings of ESCOL ’91 (pp. 234–253). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
McFadden, T
(2004) The position of morphological case in the derivation: A study on the syntax-morphology interface. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Nevins, A
(2007) The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25, 273–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J
(2007) The object agreement constraint. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25, 315–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, D.M
(1971) Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D
(2012). Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.Google Scholar
Postal, P.M
(1990) French indirect object demotion. In P. M.Postal, & B.D. Joseph (Eds.), Studies in relational grammar 3 (pp. 104–200). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Preminger, O
(2010) Failure to agree is not a failure: φ -Agreement with post-verbal subjects in Hebrew. In J. van Craenenbroeck, & J. Rooryck (Eds.), Linguistic variation yearbook (Vol. 9, pp. 241–278). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011a) Agreement as a fallible operation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
(2011b) Asymmetries between person and number in syntax: A commentary on Baker’s SCOPA. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29, 917–937. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, L
(2002) Introducing arguments. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Reckendorf, H
(1895) Die Syntaktischen Verhä ltnisse des Arabischen. Leiden: 1895–1898.Google Scholar
ezáč, M
(2003). The fine structure of cyclic agree. Syntax, 6(2), 156–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Escaping the person case constraint: Reference-set computation in the φ -system. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 6, 97–138.Google Scholar
(2008) The syntax of eccentric agreement: The person case constraint and ansolutive displacement in Basque. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 26, 61–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Phi-features and the modular architecture of language. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Sibawayh, A. i. U
(1881) Le Livre de Ŝıbawaihi, traité Arabe, Volume 1. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, J., & van Koppen, M
(2002) The locality of agreement and the CP-domain. Handout, GLOW 25, April 9–11 2002.Google Scholar
Walkow, M
(2011) Person effects and the representation of third person: an argument from Barcelońı Catalan. In J. Berns, H. Jacobs, & T. Scheer (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Nice 2009 (pp. 343–361). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012a) Goals, big and small. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
(2012b) The syntax of the person case constraint drives morphological impoverishment of clitics. In J. Choi, E.A. Hogue, J. Punske, D. Tat, J. Schertz, & A. Trueman (Eds.), Proceedings of the poster session of 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, volume 20 of Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics. Phoenix, AZ: University of Arizona Linguistics Circle.Google Scholar
(2013) Locating variation in person restrictions. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 19(1), article 28.Google Scholar
Wright, W
(1874) A grammar of the Arabic language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Foley, Steven & Maziar Toosarvandani
2020. Extending the Person-Case Constraint to Gender: Agreement, Locality, and the Syntax of Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.