Part of
Arabic in Contact
Edited by Stefano Manfredi and Mauro Tosco
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 6] 2018
► pp. 1936
References (19)
References
Dryer, M. (2013). Order of Subject, Object and Verb. In M. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL], Accessed on 2016-06-09.)Google Scholar
Field, F. (2002). Linguistic Borrowing in Bilingual Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardani, F., P. Arkadiev and N. Amiridze (2015). Borrowed morphology: An overview. In Gardani, F., P. Arkadiev and N. Amiridze (eds.), Borrowed Morphology. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macalister, R. A. S. (1914). The Language of the Nawar or Zutt, the Nomad Smiths of Palestine. London: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Haig, G. and E. Öpengin.(forthcoming). Kurmanji Kurdish in Turkey: Structure, varieties, and status. In C. Bulut (ed.), Linguistic Minorities in Turkey and Turkic Speaking Minorities of the Peripheries. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. DOI logo
Herin, B. (2012). The Domari language of Aleppo (Syria). Linguistic discoveries 10(2): 1–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). The northern dialects of Domari. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 164: 407–450.Google Scholar
Herin, Bruno. (2016). Elements of Domari dialectology. Mediterranean Language Review 23.33–73Google Scholar
Manfredi, S., M.-C. Siméone-Senelle, and M. Tosco (2015). Language contact, borrowing and codeswitching. In A. Mettouchi, M. Vanhove and D. Caubet (eds.), Corpus-based Studies of lesser-described Languages: the CorpAfroAs Corpus of spoken AfroAsiatic languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 283–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. (2007). Grammatical borrowing in Domari. In Y. Matras and J. Sakel (eds.), Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 151–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). A Grammar of Domari. (Mouton Grammar Library). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meakins, F. (2013). Mixed languages. In Y. Matras and P. Bakker, Contact Languages: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 159–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. (1999). Exploring metatypy: how does contact-induced typological change come about? Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Australian Linguistics Society . Perth.Google Scholar
Sakel, J. (2007). Types of loan: Matter and pattern. In Y. Matras and J. Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 15–29.Google Scholar
Souag, L. and F. Kherbache (2016). Syntactically conditioned code-switching? The syntax of numerals in Beni-Snous Berber. International Journal of Bilingualism 20(2): 97–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S. and T. Kaufman. (1988). Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tosco, M. and S. Manfredi. (2013). Pidgin and creoles. In J. Owens (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 495–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar