Cover not available
Article published In:
Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education
Vol. 3:2 (2018) ► pp.191–219

What difference does it make?

Examining English proficiency gain as an outcome of participation in ERASMUS study abroad programmes in the UK

 | University of Oxford
 | University of Oxford
Direct effects of participation in study abroad on linguistic proficiency have been notoriously difficult to differentiate from mere participant, time and study effects. This study examines English proficiency gains among 136 advanced-level German university students who applied for an ERASMUS exchange and either studied at a British university or continued to study at home. Participants completed C-tests of English language proficiency and comprehensive questionnaires at baseline, after three and nine months. After the first three months, those studying abroad had made significantly higher proficiency gains than the ERASMUS applicants who continued to study at home. During the subsequent six months, linguistic progress among the study abroad participants slowed and between-group differences were no longer significant. The results further substantiate hypotheses on significant linguistic benefits of participation in study abroad for advanced L2 learners, while also highlighting the need to facilitate sustained linguistic progress among exchange students, particularly during more extended stays.
Keywords: study abroad, ERASMUS, linguistic outcomes, L2 proficiency, advanced learners
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Research question
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1The study abroad programme
    • 4.2Participants
    • 4.3Instruments
      • 4.3.1The C-test
      • 4.3.2The questionnaires
    • 4.4Data collection and analysis procedures
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Overall L2 proficiency gain during the first three months (late September to December)
    • 5.2Overall L2 proficiency gain during the subsequent six months (January to June)
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Implications for practice
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.16020.hes
References (75)
References
Allen, H. W., & Herron, C. (2003). A mixed-methodology investigation of the linguistic and affective outcomes of summer study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 36(3), 370–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allison, P. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 201, 93–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asano, Y. (2014). Misst ein C-Test das, was er messen soll? In R. Grotjahn (Ed.), Language testing and evaluation, Volume 34: Der C-Test/The C-Test: Aktuelle Tendenzen/Current trends (pp. 76–98). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Avello, P., & Lara, A. R. (2014). Phonological development in L2 speech production during study abroad programmes differing in length of stay. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.), Second language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp.137–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Babaii, E., & Ansary, H. (2001). The C-test: A valid operationalization of reduced redundancy principle? System, 29(2), 209–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, Vol. 51 (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Blair, I. V., Park, B., & Bachelor, J. (2003). Understanding intergroup anxiety: Are some people more anxious than others? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 61, 15–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beattie, J., Valls-Ferrer, M., & Pérez-Vidal, C. (2014). Listening performance and onset level in formal instruction and study abroad. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.), Second language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp. 195–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1967). Foreign language proficiency levels attained by language majors near graduation from college. Foreign Language Annals, 1(2), 131–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clément, R. (1986). Second language proficiency and acculturation: An investigation of the effects of language status and individual characteristics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 51, 271–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. A. (1996). Studying languages: A survey of British and European students: The proficiency, background, attitudes and motivations of students of foreign languages in the United Kingdom and Europe. London: CILT.Google Scholar
(1998). Language learning and study abroad: The European perspective. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 4(2), 167–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collentine, J. (2004). The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 227–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Study abroad research: Findings, implications, and future directions. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 218–233). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalecki, M., & Willits, F. K. (1991). Examining change using regression analysis: Three approaches compared. Sociological Spectrum, 11(2), 127–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1991). Foreign language development during a semester abroad. In B. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp. 104–199). Lexington: Heath.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2014). Research on language development during study abroad. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.), Second language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp. 313–326). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dewey, D. P. (2004). A comparison of reading development by learners of Japanese in intensive domestic immersion and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 303–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Japanese vocabulary acquisition by learners in three contexts. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 151, 127–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Campos, M. (2004). Context of learning in the acquisition of Spanish second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 249–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Katona, L. (1992). Validation of the C-test amongst Hungarian EFL learners, Language Testing, 91, 187–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyson, A. P. (1988). The year abroad: The effect on linguistic competence of the year spent abroad by students studying French, German and Spanish at degree level. London: Central Bureau for Educational Visits and Exchanges.Google Scholar
Eckes, T., & Grotjahn, R. (2006). A closer look at the construct validity of C-tests. Language Testing, 23(3), 290–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2014). ERASMUS+ Programme Guide (Version 2). Brussels: Directorate General Education and Culture.Google Scholar
(2015a). On the way to ERASMUS+. A statistical overview of the Erasmus Programme in 2012–13. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
(2015b). ERASMUS – Facts, figures & trends. The European Union support for student and staff exchanges and university cooperation in 2013–2014. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European UnionGoogle Scholar
European Union (2014). ERASMUS impact study. Effects of mobility on the skills and employability of students and the internationalisation of higher education institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Freed, B. F. (1995). What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent? In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 123–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). An overview of issues and research in language learning in a study abroad setting. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 4(2), 31–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grey, S., Serafini, E. J., Cox, J. G., & Sanz, C. (2015). The role of individual differences in the study abroad context: Cognitive capacity and language development during short-term intensive language exposure. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 137–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grotjahn, R. (2010). Der C-Test: Beiträge aus der aktuellen Forschung. Einleitung und Übersicht über den Band. In R. Grotjahn (Ed.), The C-Test: Contributions from current research (pp. viiii–xxix). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2014). Der C-Test: Aktuelle Tendenzen/The C-Test: Current trends. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hessel, G. (2015). From vision to action: Inquiring into the conditions for the motivational capacity of ideal second language selves. System, 521, 103–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. (2000). Foreign language learners who venture abroad are better than learners who don’t, right? On the role of ‘study abroad’ in second language acquisition. Pages, 71, 75–87.Google Scholar
(2003). The effects of study abroad on the formal expression of past time by the advanced language learner. Teangeolas, 401, 45–54.Google Scholar
(2004). The effects of a ‘year abroad’ programme on the development of verb morphology for the expression of past time: A lexical approach. Teanga: The Irish Yearbook of Applied Linguistics, 201, 29–52.Google Scholar
(2005). Second language acquisition in a study abroad context: A comparative investigation of the effects of study abroad and foreign language instruction on the L2 learner’s grammatical development. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in Instructed Second Language Acquisition (pp. 495–530). Berlin: Mouton deGruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huebner, T. (1995). The effects of overseas language programs: Report on a case study of an intensive Japanese course. In B. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (171–193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juan-Garau, M., Salazar-Noguera, J., & Prieto-Arranz, J. I. (2014). English L2 learners’ lexico-grammatical and motivational development at home and abroad. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.), Second language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp.235–258). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kabbazbashi, N. (2013). An investigation into the effects of topic and background knowledge of topic on second language speaking performance assessment in language proficiency interviews (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oxford University, Worcester College.Google Scholar
Keijzer, M. (2007). Last in first out? An investigation of the regression hypothesis in Dutch emigrants in Anglophone Canada (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam (LOT dissertation series Nr. 163).Google Scholar
Kinginger, C. (2008). Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. The Modern Language Journal Monograph Series, Vol. 11.Google Scholar
(2015). Language learning and study abroad (2nd ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maiworm, F., & Teichler, U. (2002). The students’ experience. In U. Teichler (Ed.), ERASMUS in the SOCRATES programme (pp. 83–116). Bonn: Lemmens.Google Scholar
Marriott, H. (1995). The acquisition of politeness patterns by exchange students in Japan. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 197–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milton, J., & Meara, P. (1995). How periods abroad affect vocabulary growth in a foreign language. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 107/1081, 17–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., Tracy-Ventura, N., & McManus, K. (Eds.) (2015). Social interaction, identity and language learning during residence abroad. Eurosla Monographs Series, Vol. 41. European Second Language Association.Google Scholar
Möhle, D., & Raupach, M. (1983). Planen in der Fremdsprache. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mora, J. C. (2014). The role of onset level on L2 perceptual phonological development after formal instruction and study abroad. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.), Second language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp. 167–194). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Opper, S., Teichler, U., & Carlson, J. (1990). The impact of study abroad programmes on students and graduates. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C. (2014). Study abroad and formal instruction contrasted: The SALA project. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.), Second language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp. 17–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C., & Barquin, E. (2014). Comparing progress in academic writing after formal instruction and study abroad. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.), Second language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp. 217–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Raatz, U., & Klein-Braley, C. (1982). The C-test – a modification of the cloze procedure. In T. Culhane, C. Klein-Braley, & D. K. Stevenson (Eds.), Practice and problems in language testing (pp. 113–138). Colchester: University of Essex, Department of Language and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rees, J., & Klapper, J. (2007). Analysing and evaluating the linguistic benefit of residence abroad for UK foreign language students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 331–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regan, V. (1995). The acquisition of sociolinguistic native speech norms. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 245–267). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regan, V., Howard, M., & Lemée, I. (2009). The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad context. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schauer, G. A. (2007). Finding the right words in the study abroad context: The development of German learners’ use of external modifiers in English. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(2), 193–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 173–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serrano, R., Llanes, À., & Tragant, E. (2011). Analyzing the effect of context of second language learning: Domestic intensive and semi-intensive courses vs. study abroad in Europe. System, 391, 133–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singleton, D., & Singleton, E. (2002). The C-test and L2 acquisition/processing research. In J. Coleman, R. Grotjahn, & U. Raatz (Eds.), University language testing and the C-test (pp. 143–168). Bochum: AKS Verlag.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1981). Some ethical questions about language testing. In C. Klein-Braley and D. K. Stevenson (Eds.), Practice and problems in language testing (pp. 186–213). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sutton, R. C., Miller, A. N., & Rubin, D. L. (2007). Research design in assessing learning outcomes of education abroad programs. In M. C. Bolen (Ed.), A guide to outcomes assessment in education abroad (pp. 23–59). Carlisle, PA: The Forum on Education Abroad.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2011). The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience in pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, 611, 904–939. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, W. L. (1953). Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 301, 415–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teichler, U. (1997). The ERASMUS experience. Major findings of the ERASMUS evaluation research. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
(2004). Temporary study abroad: The life of ERASMUS students. European Journal of Education, 39(4), 395–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theobald, R. & Freeman, S. (2014). Is it the intervention or the students? Using linear regression to control for student characteristics in undergraduate STEM education research. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 131, 41–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ushioda, E. (2014). Motivation, autonomy and metacognition. Exploring their interactions. In D. Lasagabaster, A. Doiz, & J. -M. Sierra (Eds.), Motivation and foreign language learning: From theory to practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Valls-Ferrer, M., & Mora, J. C. (2014). L2 fluency development in formal instruction and study abroad: The role of initial fluency level and language contact. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.), Second language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp. 111–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Verkuyten, M., Thijs, J., & Bekhuis, H. (2010). Intergroup contact and ingroup reappraisal: Examining the deprovincialization thesis. Social Psychological Quarterly, 731, 398–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wächter, B., & Maiworm, F. (2015). English-taught programmes in European higher education. The State of play in 2014. Bonn: Lemmens.Google Scholar
Willis, F. M., Doble, G., Sankarayya, U., & Smithers, A. (1977). Residence abroad and the student of modern languages: A preliminary survey. Bradford: University of Bradford, Modern Languages Centre.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Borràs, Judith
2024. Comparing L2 learning outcomes in traditional and English as a lingua franca study abroad contexts. The Language Learning Journal 52:4 ► pp. 414 ff. DOI logo
Howard, Martin
2023. Chapter 10. Grammatical development during study abroad. In Methods in Study Abroad Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Pérez-Vidal, Carmen & Cristina Sanz
2023. Chapter 1. Research methods in study abroad. In Methods in Study Abroad Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Moore, Ian, Carole Torgerson & Nadin Beckmann
2021. Systematic review measuring the efficacy of study abroad in undergraduate language learners on linguistic proficiency gains. Review of Education 9:3 DOI logo
Hessel, Gianna
2020. Overall L2 proficiency maintenance and development among returning ERASMUS study abroad participants. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 5:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.