The effects of study abroad on L2 vocabulary development
A meta-analysis
While research on second language (L2) vocabulary development after a study abroad (SA) experience has been
largely investigated, findings are still not clear-cut because of the multifaceted nature of vocabulary and the different
methodologies used when investigating its growth. For this reason, the aim of the present study was to elucidate the link between
SA and lexical development. A multilevel meta-analysis including 25 studies was conducted to examine the extent to which overall,
receptive vocabulary (RV) and productive vocabulary (PV) are impacted by a SA experience. A second objective was to determine
whether length of stay (LoS) in the target country has an effect on L2 vocabulary development. Results showed that international
stays have a significantly large impact on RV and overall vocabulary and a significantly moderate impact on PV. The analysis also
showed that LoS alone cannot be used as a predictor of gains in the students’ L2 vocabulary.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Literature search
- 3.2Eligibility criteria
- 3.3Coding
- 3.4The present database
- 3.5Data analysis
- 3.5.1Effect sizes and Cohen’s d
- 3.5.2Heterogeneity and publication bias
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Overall vocabulary development
- 4.2PV and RV development
- 4.3LoS and vocabulary development
- 5.Conclusion
-
References
References (70)
References
Assink, M., & Wibbelink, C. J. M. (2016). Fitting
three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial. The Quantitative Methods for
Psychology,
12
(3), 154–174.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction
to meta-analysis. John Wiley.
Borràs, J., & Llanes, À. (2019). Re-examining
the impact of study abroad on L2 development: A critical overview. The Language Learning
Journal,
49
(5), 527–540.
Borràs, J., & Llanes, À. (2020). L2
reading and vocabulary development after a short study abroad experience. VIAL: Vigo
International Journal of Applied
Linguistics,
17
1, 35–55.
Briggs, J. G. (2015). Out-of-class
language contact and vocabulary gain in a study abroad
context. System,
53
1, 129–140.
Cheng, J., & Matthews, J. (2018). The
relationship between three measures of L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and
reading. Language
Testing,
35
(1), 3–25.
Cheung, W. L. (2015). Meta-analysis:
A structural equation modelling approach. John Wiley.
Coleman, J. A. (2015). Social
circles during residence abroad: What students do, and who
with. In R. Mitchell, N. Tracy-Ventura, & K. McManus (Eds.), Social
interaction, identity and language learning during residence
abroad (pp. 33–51). European Second Language Association.
Collentine, J. (2004). The
effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development. Studies in Second
Language
Acquisition,
26
(2), 227–248.
Conroy, M. A. (2018). Contextual
factors in second language learning in a short-term study abroad programme in Australia. The
Language Learning
Journal,
46
(3), 311–328.
Dewey, D. P. (2004). A
comparison of reading development by learners of Japanese in intensive domestic immersion and study abroad
contexts. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition,
26
(2), 303–327.
Dewey, D. P. (2008). Japanese
vocabulary acquisition by learners in three contexts. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal
of Study
Abroad,
15
(1), 127–148.
Fitzpatrick, T. (2012). Tracking
the changes: Vocabulary acquisition in the study abroad context. The Language Learning
Journal,
40
(1), 81–98.
Fu, J., & Feng, Y. (2018). A
comparison of score aggregation methods for unidimensional tests on different dimensions. ETS
Research Report
Series,
1
1, 1–16.
Grey, S., Cox, J. G., Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2015). The
role of individual differences in the study abroad context: Cognitive capacity and language development during short-term
intensive language exposure. The Modern Language
Journal,
99
(1), 137–157.
Hardison, D. M. (2014). Changes
in second-language learners’ oral skills and socio affective profiles following study abroad: A mixed-methods
approach. The Canadian Modern Language
Review,
70
(4), 415–444.
Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A., & Ebert, D. D. (2021). Doing
meta-analysis with R: A hands-on guide. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
Hedges, L. V. (2009). Effect
sizes in studies with nested designs. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. Valentine (Eds.), The
handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd
ed.) (pp. 337–356). The Russell Sage Foundation.
Higgins, J. P. (2008). Commentary:
Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified. International
Journal of
Epidemiology,
37
(5), 1158–1160.
Higgins, J. P., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (2019). Cochrane
handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley.
Higgins, J. P., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying
heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in
Medicine,
21
(11), 1539–1558.
Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical
structures written at three grade levels (NCTE Report No. 3). National Council of Teachers of English. [URL]
Ife, A., Boix, G., & Meara, P. (2000). The
impact of study abroad on vocabulary development among different proficiency groups. Spanish
Applied
Linguistics,
4
(1), 55–84.
Isabelli-Garcia, C., Bown, J., Plews, J. L., & Dewey, D. P. (2018). State-of-the-art
article: Language learning and study abroad. Language
Teaching,
51
(4), 439–484.
Issa, B. I., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Bowden, H. W. (2020). Grammatical and lexical development during short-term study abroad: Exploring L2 contact and initial proficiency. The Modern Language Journal,
104
(4), 860–879.
Jiménez Jiménez, A. F. (2010). A
comparative study on second language vocabulary development: Study abroad vs. classroom
settings. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study
Abroad,
19
(1), 105–123.
Johnson, M. D., Acevedo, A., & Mercado, L. (2016). Vocabulary
knowledge and vocabulary use in second language writing. TESOL
Journal,
7
(3), 700–715.
Kim, J., Dewey, D. P., Baker-Smemoe, W., Ring, S., Westover, A., & Eggett, D. (2015). L2
development during study abroad in
China. System,
55
1, 123–133.
Kinginger, C. (2009). Language
learning and study abroad: A critical reading of research. Palgrave MacMillan.
Köylü, Z. (2021). The
ERASMUS sojourn: Does the destination country or pre-departure proficiency impact oral proficiency
gains? The Language Learning
Journal,
51
(1), 48–60.
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating
and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and
ANOVAs. Frontiers in
Psychology,
4
1, 1–12.
Leonard, K. R., & Shea, C. E. (2017). L2
speaking development during study abroad: Fluency, accuracy, complexity, and underlying cognitive
factors. The Modern Language
Journal,
101
(1), 179–193.
Li, S. (2014). The
effects of different levels of linguistic proficiency on the development of L2 Chinese request production during study
abroad. System,
45
1, 103–116.
Llanes, À., & Munoz, C. (2013). Age
effects in a study abroad context: Children and adults studying abroad and at home. Language
Learning,
63
(1), 63–90.
Martinsen, R., Baker, W., Dewey, D. P., Brown, J., & Johnson, C. (2010). Exploring
diverse settings for language acquisition and use: Comparing study-abroad, service learning abroad, and foreign language
housing. Applied Language
Learning,
20
(1–2), 45–69.
Matthews, J. (2018). Vocabulary
for listening: Emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency vocabulary
knowledge. System,
72
1, 23–36.
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring
second language vocabulary acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
Mitchell, R., Tracy-Ventura, N., & McManus, K. (2017). Anglophone
students abroad: Identity, social relationships and language
learning. Routledge.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning
vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic
complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2
writing. Applied
Linguistics,
24
(4), 492–518.
Oswald, F. L., & Plonsky, L. (2010). Meta-analysis
in second language research: Choices and challenges. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics,
30
1, 85–110.
Pastor, D. A., & Lazowski, R. A. (2018). On
the multilevel nature of meta-analysis: A tutorial, comparison of software programs, and discussion of analytic
choices. Multivariate Behavioral
Research,
53
(1), 74–89.
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic
reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell.
Pizziconi, B. (2017). Japanese
vocabulary development in and beyond study abroad: The timing of the year abroad in a language degree
curriculum. The Language Learning
Journal,
45
(2), 133–152.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2012). How
to do a meta-analysis. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research
methods in second language acquisition: A practical
guide (pp. 275–295). Wiley Blackwell.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How
big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language
Learning,
64
(4), 878–912.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (1985). Empirical
bayes meta-analysis. Journal of Educational
Statistics,
10
(2), 75–98.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing
vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
Schenker, T. (2018). Making
short-term study abroad count-effects on German language skills. Foreign Language
Annals,
51
(2), 411–429.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching
vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave MacMillan.
Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. (2004). Context,
contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad
contexts. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition,
26
(2), 173–199.
Serrano, R., Llanes, À., & Tragant, E. (2011). Analyzing
the effect of context of second language learning: Domestic intensive and semi-intensive courses vs. study abroad in
Europe. System,
39
(2), 133–143.
Serrano, R., Tragant, E., & Llanes, À. (2012). A
longitudinal analysis of the effects of one year abroad. The Canadian Modern Language
Review,
68
(2), 138–163.
Tracy-Ventura, N. (2017). Combining
corpora and experimental data to investigate language learning during residence abroad: A study of lexical
sophistication. System,
71
1, 35–45.
Tracy-Ventura, N., Huensch, A., & Mitchell, R. (2021). Understanding
the long-term evolution of L2 lexical diversity: The contribution of a longitudinal learner
corpus. In B. Le Bruyn & M. Paquot (Eds.), Learner
corpus research meets second language
acquisition (pp. 148–171). Cambridge University Press.
Tseng, W., Liu, Y., Hsu, Y., & Chu, H. (2021). Revisiting
the effectiveness of study abroad language programs: A multi-level meta-analysis. Language
Teaching Research, 1–45.
Tullock, B., & Ortega, L. (2017). Fluency
and multilingualism in study abroad: Lessons from a scoping
review. System,
71
1, 7–21.
Uchihara, T., & Saito, K. (2019). Exploring
the relationship between productive vocabulary knowledge and second language oral ability. The
Language Learning
Journal,
47
(1), 64–75.
Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting
meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical
Software,
36
(3), 1–48.
Xu, Y. (2019). Changes
in interlanguage complexity during study abroad: A
meta-analysis. System,
80
1, 199–211.
Zaytseva, V., Miralpeix, I., & Pérez-Vidal, C. (2021). Because
words matter: Investigating vocabulary development across contexts and modalities. Language
Teaching
Research,
25
(2), 162–184.
Zaytseva, V., Pérez-Vidal, C., & Miralpeix, I. (2018). Vocabulary
acquisition during study abroad: A comprehensive review of the
research. In C. Sanz & A. Morales-Front (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of study abroad research and
practice (pp. 210–224). Routledge.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Köylü, Zeynep, Nurullah Eryılmaz, Carmen Pérez‐Vidal, Marjolijn Verspoor & Hana Gustafsson
2024.
Longitudinal Development of Holistic Formulaicity, Formulaic Sequences, and Lexical Complexity in Sojourner Diaries: A Dynamic Usage‐Based Perspective.
Language Learning
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.