Part of
Time in Languages, Languages in Time
Edited by Anna Čermáková, Thomas Egan, Hilde Hasselgård and Sylvi Rørvik
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 101] 2021
► pp. 3966
Abrahams, Richard D.
1950Fixed order of coordinates: A study in comparative lexicography. The Modern Language Journal 34(4): 276–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benor, Sarah Bunin & Levy, Roger
2006The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language 82(2): 233–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Čermák, František
2010Binomials: Their nature in Czech and in general. In Phraseologie global – areal – regional. Akten der Konferenz EUROPHRAS 2008, Jarmo Korhonen, Wolfgang Mieder, Elisabeth Piirainen & Rosa Piñel (eds), 309–315. Tübingen: Narr. Google Scholar
Čermáková, Anna
2017 The GLARE 19th Century Children’s Literature Corpus in CLiC [Blog post]. [URL] (1 October 2019).
2018 ChiLit: The GLARE 19th Century Children’s Literature Corpus in CLiC [Blog post]. [URL] (1 October 2019).
Čermáková, Anna & Chlumská, Lucie
2017Expressing place in children’s literature. Testing the limits of the n-gram method in contrastive linguistics. In Cross-linguistic Correspondences. From Lexis to Genre [Studies in Language Companion Series 191], Thomas Egan & Hildegunn Dirdal (eds), 75–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaloupka, Otakar & Voráček, Jaroslav
1979Kontury české literatury pro děti a mláděž. Praha: Albatros. Google Scholar
Cooper, William E. & Ross, John Robert
1975World order. In Functionalism, Robin E. Grossman, L. James San & Timothy J. Vance (eds), 63–111. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society. Google Scholar
Craig, Lyn
2016Contemporary Motherhood: The Impact of Children on Adult Time. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2003Typology and Universals. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda
1985Legal discourse. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Teun A. Van Dijk (ed.), 273–291. London: Academia Press. Google Scholar
Dant, Doris R.
2013 Mom and Dad but Men and Women: The sequencing of sex-determined noun pairs in American English. In Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 57], Hilde Hasselgård, Jarle Ebeling & Signe Oksefjell Ebeling (eds), 35–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebeling, Jarle & Ebeling, Signe Oksefjell
2013Patterns in Contrast [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 58], Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giammarresi, Salvatore
2010Formulaicity and translation: A cross-corpora analysis of English formulaic binomials and their Italian translations. In Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communications, David Wood (ed.), 257–74. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar
Gustaffson, Marita
1975Binomial Expressions in Present-Day English. A Syntactic and Semantic Study. Turku: Turun Yliopisto. Google Scholar
Hegarty, Peter, Watson, Nila, Fletcher, Laura & McQueen, Grant
2011When gentlemen are first and ladies are last: Effects of gender stereotypes on the order of romantic partners’ names. British Journal of Social Psychology 50(1): 21–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto
1990Chapters on Legal English: Aspects Past and Present of the Language of the Law. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia. Google Scholar
Iliev, Rumen & Smirnova, Anastasia
2016Revealing word order: Using serial position in binomials to predict properties of the speaker. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45(2): 205–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jerrim, John & Moss, Gemma
2019The link between fiction and teenagers’ reading skills: International evidence from the OECD PISA study. British Educational Research Journal 45(1): 181–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1905Growth and Structure of the English Language. Leipzig: Teubner. Google Scholar
Klégr, Aleš & Čermák, Jan
2008Binomials in an historical English literary perspective: Shakespeare, Chaucer, Beowulf. In Shakespeare between the Middle Ages and Modernity: From Translator’s Art to Academic Discourse. A Tribute to Professor Martin Hilský, Aleš Klégr, Jan Čermák & Martin Procházka (eds). Prague: Charles University. Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna & Sauer, Hans
2017Binomials in the History of English. Fixed and Flexible. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude
1949Les Structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. Google Scholar
Lohmann, Arne
2014English Coordinate Constructions: A Processing Perspective on Constituent Order. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Love, Robbie, Dembry, Claire, Hardie, Andrew, Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony
2017The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 319–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Arne & Takada, Tayo
2014Order in NP conjuncts in spoken English and Japanese. Lingua 152: 48–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1959Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua 8: 113–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mollin, Sandra
2014The (Ir)reversibility of English Binomials [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 64]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon, Rosamund
1998Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English. Oxford: Clarendon. Google Scholar
Morgan, Emily & Levy, Roger
2016Abstract knowledge versus direct experience in processing of binomial expressions. Cognition 157: 384–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2013Gentlemen before ladies? A corpus-based study of conjunct order in personal binomials. Journal of English Linguistics 41(3): 212–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolajeva, Maria
2014Reading for Learning: Cognitive Approaches to Children’s Literature [Children’s Literature, Culture, and Cognition 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onishi, Kristine H., Murphy, Gregory L. & Bock, Kathryn
2008Prototypicality in sentence production. Cognitive Psychology 56(2): 103–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pordány, László
1986Irreversible binomials in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 36(1-4): 151–79. Google Scholar
Reynolds, Kim
2011Children’s Literature: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chantura, Anna, Conklin, Kathy & van Heuven, Walter J. B.
2011Seeing a phrase time and again matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 37(3): 776–784. Google Scholar
Sobkowiak, Włodzimierz
1993Unmarked-before-marked as a freezing principle. Language and Speech 36(4): 393–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tachihara, Karina & Goldberg, Adele E.
2019Cognitive accessibility predicts word order of couples’ names in English and Japanese. Cognitive Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Saundra & Hay, Jennifer
2002Fred and Wilma: A phonological conspiracy. In Gendered Practices in Language, Sarah Benor, Mary Rose, Devyani Sharma, Julie Sweetland & Quing Zhang (eds), 175–91. Stanford CA: CSLI. Google Scholar
Wright, Saundra K., Hay, Jennifer & Bent, Tessa
2005Ladies first? Phonology, frequency, and the naming conspiracy. Linguistics 43(3): 531–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Čermáková, Anna & Michaela Mahlberg

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.