Part of
Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics: New approaches to variability and change
Edited by Susanne Flach and Martin Hilpert
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 105] 2022
► pp. 257283
References (30)
References
Baayen, R. Harald & Ramscar, Michael. 2015. Abstraction, storage, and native discriminative learning. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar S. Divjak (eds), 100–120. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias, Gries, Stefan Th., & Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2014. The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide 35(1): 7–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boulesteix, Anne-Laure, Janitza, Silke, Hapfelmeier, Alexander, Van Steen, Kristel & Strobl, Carolin. 2015. Letter to the editor: On the term ‘interaction’ and related phrases in the literature on Random Forests. Briefings in Bioinformatics 16(2): 338–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daelemans, Walter & van den Bosch, Antal. 2005. Memory-Based Language Processing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daelemans, Walter, Zavrel, Jakub, van der Sloot, Ko, & van den Bosch, Antal. 2018. TiMBL: Tilburg Memory-Based Learner. Version 6.4 Reference Guide. ILK Technical Report – ILK 11–01. <[URL]> (4 April 2022).
Deshors, Sandra C. 2020. English as a Lingua Franca: A random forests approach to particle placement in multi-participant interactions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30(2): 214–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
To appear. Contextualizing past tenses in L2: Combined effects and interactions in the present perfect vs. simple past alternation. Applied Linguistics. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Gries, Stefan Th. 2016. Profiling verb complementation constructions across New Englishes: A two-step random forests analysis to ing vs. to complements. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21(2): 192–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deshors, Sandra C. & Gries, Stefan Th. 2020. Mandative subjunctive vs. should in world Englishes: A new take on an old alternation. Corpora 15(2): 213–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar S., Arppe, Antti & Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2016. Machine meets man: Evaluating the psychological reality of corpus-based probabilistic models. Cognitive Linguistics 27(1): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gower, J. C. 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27(4): 857–871. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2020. On classification trees and random forests in corpus linguistics: Some words of caution and suggestions for improvement. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16(3): 517–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Statistics For Linguistics with R, 3rd rev. and ext. edn. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Adelman, Allison S. 2014. Subject realization in Japanese conversation by native and non-native speakers: Exemplifying a new paradigm for learner corpus research. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New empirical and theoretical paradigms, Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), 35–54. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Deshors, Sandra C. 2014. Using regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: Two suggestions. Corpora 9(1): 109–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. There’s more to alternations than the main diagonal of a 2×2 confusion matrix: Improvements of MuPDAR and other classificatory alternation studies. ICAME Journal 44: 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, Benedikt, Bernaisch, Tobias, & Gries, Stefan Th. 2017. Empirical perspectives on two potential epicenters: The genitive alternation in Asian Englishes. ICAME Journal 41: 111–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klavan, Jane & Divjak, Dagmar S. 2016. The cognitive plausibility of statistical classification models: Comparing textual and behavioral evidence. Folia Linguistica 50(2): 355–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolbe-Hanna, Daniela & Baldus, Lina. 2018. The choice between -ing and to complement clauses in English as first, second and foreign language. Paper presented at ICAME 39, University of Tampere.
Lester, Nicholas A. 2019. That’s hard: Relativizer use in spontaneous L2 speech. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5(1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milin, Petar, Divjak, Dagmar S., Dimitrijević, Strahinja & Baayen, R. Harald. 2016. Towards cognitively plausible data science in language research. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4): 507–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podani, János. 1999. Extending Gower’s general coefficient of similarity to ordinal characters. Taxon 48: 331–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schweinberger, Martin. 2020. A corpus-based analysis of differences in the use of very for adjective amplification among native speakers and learners of English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6(2): 163–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torgo, Luis. 2011. Data Mining with R: Learning with Case Studies. Boca Raton FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werner, Valentin, Fuchs, Robert, & Götz, Sandra. 2020. L1 influence vs. universal mechanisms: An SLA-driven corpus study on temporal expression. In Learner Corpora and Second Language Acquisition Research, Bert Le Bruyn & Magali Paquot (eds), 39–66. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Marvin N., Ziegler, Andreas, & König, Inke R. 2016. Do little interactions get lost in dark random forests? BMC Bioinformatics 17(145). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie & Gries, Stefan Th. 2015. Prenominal adjective order preferences in Chinese and German L2 English: A multifactorial corpus study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5(1): 122–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Particle placement in learner English: Measuring effects of context, first language, and individual variation. Language Learning 69(4): 873–910. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Explaining individual variation in learner corpus research: Some methodological suggestions. In Learner Corpora and Second Language Acquisition Research, Bert Le Bruyn & Magali Paquot (eds), 191–213. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Granger, Sylviane
2024. From early to future learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 10:2  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.