Cover not available
Part of
Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary discourse across time and space
Edited by Minna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 111] 2023
► pp. 277–307

Chapter 10
Language variation in parliamentary speech in Suriname

| Institute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences
| Utrecht University
Surinamese Dutch is widely considered to be distinct from Netherlandic Dutch varieties, but grammatical differences remain understudied. The primary aim of this chapter is to explore some of the claims made in the literature about how the grammar of Surinamese Dutch differs from Netherlandic Dutch, using spoken data from the Surinamese parliament. We also introduce an exploratory method that uses automatic speech-to-text software to efficiently construct a corpus of spoken-language data, avoiding some of the pitfalls associated with working with spoken language data. We explore constructions involving the particle er ‘there’, word order, and non-standard imperfective constructions in the Surinamese Dutch data. Our analyses illustrate that pinpointing characteristic differences between Surinamese and Netherlandic Dutch is extremely nuanced.
Keywords: Dutch, Sranan, Surinamese parliament, speech-to-text, imperfective, word order
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1A brief linguistic history of Suriname
    • 1.2Dutch in Suriname
    • 1.3De Nationale Assemblée
  • 2.Corpus construction and analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Overview of the dataset
    • 3.2The particle er ‘there’
    • 3.3Word order
    • 3.4Imperfective marking
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.111.10bor
References (60)
References
Alexander, Marc & Davies, Mark. 2015. The Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. <[URL]> (5 February 2022).
Algemeen Bureau voor de Statistiek. 1999. Huishoudens in Suriname. Suriname in cijfers: 181-1999/0. Paramaribo: Algemeen Bureau voor de Statistiek.Google Scholar
. 2005. Zevende algemene volks- en woningtelling in Suriname, landelijke resultaten, Vol. I: Demografische en sociale karakteristieken [Suriname in Cijfers 213, 2005/02]. Paramaribo: Algemeen Bureau voor de Statistiek.Google Scholar
. 2006. Zevende algemene volks- en woningtelling in Suriname, Districtsresultaten, Vol. I: Paramaribo [Suriname in Cijfers 224, 2006/06]. Paramaribo: Algemeen Bureau voor de Statistiek.Google Scholar
Arends, Jacques. 1989. Syntactic Developments in Sranan: Creolization as a Gradual Process. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit ti Nijmegen.Google Scholar
. 2002. The history of the Surinamese Creoles I: A socio-historical survey. In Atlas of the Languages of Suriname, Ethne Carlin & Jacques Arends (eds), 115–130. Leiden: KITLV Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, Paul (ed.). 2004. Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borges, Robert. 2013. The Life of Language: Dynamics of Language Contact in Suriname. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Borges, Robert & Gast, Volker. In preparation. A Multi-modal Corpus of European Parliament.
Borges, Robert, Muysken, Pieter, Villerius, Sophie & Yakpo, Kofi. 2017. The tense-mood-aspect systems of the languages of Suriname. In Boundaries and Bridges: Language Contact in Multilingual Ecologies, Kofi Yakpo & Pieter C. Muysken (eds), 311–362. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans & Corver, Norbert. 2016. Syntax of Dutch: Verbs and Verb Phrases, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans, Corver, Norbert & Vos, Riet. 2015. Syntax of Dutch: Verbs and Verb Phrases, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruyn, Adrienne. 1995. Grammaticalization in Creoles: The Development of Determiners and Relative Clauses in Sranan. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne & Arends, Jacques. 2002. Atlas of the Languages of Suriname. Leiden: KITLV.Google Scholar
Cavar, Damir. 2016. Elan2split. <[URL]> (5 February 2022).
Charry, Eddy. 1983. Een sociolinguïstische verkenning van het Surinaams-Nederlands. In De talen van Suriname: Achtergronden en ontwikkelingen, Eddy Charry, Geert Koefoed & Pieter Muysken (eds), 138–161. Muiderberg: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter, Korhonen, Minna, Kotze, Haidee, Smith, Adam & Yao, Xinyue. 2021. Diachronic register change: A corpus-based study of Australian English, with comparisons across British and American English. Register Studies 3(1): 33–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bies, Renata. 1990. Taalproblemen in De Nationale Assemblée van Suriname. In Confli(c)t, ABLA Papers 14: Proceedings of the International Symposium Contact + Confli(c)t, Brussels, 2–4 June 1988, Peter H. Nelde (ed.), 9–22. Brussels: ABLA.
de Bies, Renata, Martin, Willy & Smedts, Willy. 2009. Prisma woordenboek Surinaams-Nederlands. Amsterdam: Prisma.Google Scholar
de Kleine, Christa. 1999. A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Surinamese Dutch as Spoken by the Creole Population of Paramaribo, Suriname. New York NY: City University of New York.Google Scholar
. 2002. Surinamese Dutch. In Atlas of the Languages of Suriname, Eithne B. Carlin & Jacques Arends (eds), 209–232. Leiden: KITLV.Google Scholar
. 2007. A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Surinamese Dutch. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
De Nationale Assemblée. 1990. Reglement van orde voor De Nationale Assemblée. Paramaribo: De Nationale Assemblée. <[URL]> (5 February 2022).
den Besten, Hans & Hinskens, Frans. 2005. Diversificatie van het Nederlands door taalcontact. Nederlandse Taalkunde 10(3/4): 283–309.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit. 1989. On language death in Eastern Africa. In Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death, Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), 13–31. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eersel, Hein. 1983. Varieteiten van het Creools in Suriname. In De talen van Suriname: Achtergronden en ontwikkelingen, Eddy Charry, Geert Koefoed & Pieter Muysken (eds), 163–169. Muiderberg: Coutinho.Google Scholar
. 2007. Niet in andermans kleren: Nederlands in Suriname. Tijdschrift van de Surinaamse Vereniging van Neerlandici 12: 11–15.Google Scholar
. 2012. De Surinaamse taalsituatie in 2011. The Academic Journal of Suriname 3: 227–234.Google Scholar
Essed-Fruin, Eva. 1983. De veranderende status van het Sranan. In De Talen van Suriname: Achtergronden en ontwikkelingen, Eddy Charry, Geert Koefoed & Pieter C. Muysken, (eds), 47–52. Muiderberg: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1959. Diglossia. WORD 15(2): 325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fišer, Darja & Lenardic, Jakob. 2018. Parliamentary corpora in the CLARIN infrastructure. In Selected Papers from the CLARIN Annual Conference 2017, Budapest, 18–20 September 2017 (Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings 147:7, s. 75–85). <[URL]> (5 February 2022).
Gast, Volker & Borges, Robert. 2023. Nouns, verbs and oher parts of speech in translation and interpreting: Evidence from English speeches made in the European parliament and their German translations and interpretations. Languages 8(1), 39. <[URL]> (19 June 2023). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geerts, Guido (ed.). 1984. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Gobardhan-Ramvocus, Lila. 2001. Onderwijs als sleutel tot maatschappelijke vooruitgang: Een taal- en onderwijsgeschiedenis van Suriname, 1651–1975. Zutphen: Walkburg.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan, Speelman, Dirk & Geeraerts, Dirk. 2008. National variation in the use of er ‘there’: Regional and diachronic constraints on cognitive explanations. In Cognitive Sociolinguistics, Gitte Kristiansen & René Dirven (eds), 153–204. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirst, Graeme, Feng, Vanessa Wei, Cochrane, Christopher & Naderi, Nona. 2014. Argumentation, ideology, and issue framing in parliamentary discourse. ArgNLP. <[URL]> (14 February 2022).Google Scholar
Kotze, Haidee & van Rooy, Bertus. 2020. Democratisation in the South African parliamentary Hansard? A study of change in modal auxiliaries. Special issue of Language Sciences. New Perspectives on Democratisation 79: 101264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroon, Sjaak & Yağmur, Kutlay. 2012. Meertaligheid in het onderwijs in Suriname: Een onderzoek naar praktijken, ervaringen en opvattingen van leerlingen en leerkrachten als basis voor ontwikkeling van een taalbeleid voor het onderwijs in Suriname. The Hague: Nederlandse Taalunie.Google Scholar
Kruger, Haidee & Smith, Adam. 2018. Colloquialization versus densification in Australian English: A multidimensional analysis of the Australian Diachronic Hansard Corpus (ADHC). Australian Journal of Linguistics 38(3): 293–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Haidee, van Rooy, Bertus & Smith, Adam. 2019. Register change in the British and Australian Hansard (1901–2015). Journal of English Linguistics 47(3): 183–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Léglise, Isabelle & Migge, Bettina. 2015. Language practices and linguistic ideologies in Suriname: Results from a school survey. In In and Out of Suriname: Language, Mobility and Identity, Eithne B. Carlin, Isabelle Léglise, Bettina Migge & Paul B. Tjon Sie Fat (eds), 13–57. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Migge, Bettina & Léglise, Isabelle. 2011. On the emergence of new language varieties: The case of the Eastern Maroon Creole in French Guiana. In Variation in the Caribbean: From Creole Continua to Individual Agency [Creole Language Library 37], Lars Hinrichs & Joseph Farquharson (eds), 207–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Exploring Language in a Multilingual Context: Variation, Interaction and Ideology in Language Documentation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter C. 2013. Ethnolects of Dutch. In Dutch, Frans Hinskens & Johan Taeldeman (eds), 739–761. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rheault, Ludovic, Beelen, Kaspar, Cochrane, Christopher & Hirst, Graeme. 2016. Measuring emotion in parliamentary debates with automated textual analysis. PLOS ONE 11(12): e0168843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rybka, Konrad. 2017. Contact-induced phenomena in Lokono (Arawakan). In Boundaries and Bridges: Language Contact in Multilingual Ecologies, Kofi Yakpo & Pieter Muysken (eds), 257–282. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rys, Kathy, Heeringa, Wilbert, Sif Rutten, Janneke, Hinskens, Frans, de Caluwe, Johan, Belesar, Usha & Doerga, Sita. 2021. Staat van het Nederlands: Onderzoeksrapport 2021. The Hague: Nederlandse Taalunie.Google Scholar
Schoonhoven, Coen W. 1939. Het Nederlands in Suriname. Nieuwe Taalgids 32: 90–91, 155–169.Google Scholar
Sloetjes, Hans & Wittenburg, Peter. 2008. Annotation by category: ELAN and ISO DCR. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis & Daniel Tapias (eds). European Language Resources Association (ELRA). <[URL]> (14 February 2022).
Smith, Adam, Korhonen, Minna, Kotze, Haidee & van Rooy, Bertus. 2021. Modal and semi-modal verbs of obligation in the Australian, New Zealand and British Hansards: 1901–2015. In Exploring the Ecologies of World Englishes: Language, Society and Culture, Pam Peters & Kate Burridge (eds), 301–323. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Tjon Sie Fat, Paul. 2015. They might as well be speaking Chinese: The changing Chinese linguistic situation in Suriname under new migration. In In and Out of Suriname: Language, Mobility and Identity, Eithne B. Carlin, Isabelle Léglise, Bettina Migge & Paul B. Tjon Sie Fat (eds), 196–228. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Bergen, Geertje & de Swart, Peter. 2010. Scrambling in spoken Dutch: Definiteness versus weight as determinants of word order variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(2): 267–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen, van Koppen, Marjo & van den Bosch, Antal. 2019. A quantitative-theoretical analysis of syntactic microvariation: Word order in Dutch verb clusters. Language 95(2): 333–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Chantal & Coopmans, Peter. 2013. On the acquisition of daar and er. Linguistics in the Netherlands 30(1): 73–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villerius, Sophie. 2018. Development of Surinamese Javanese. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Westmaas, A.Y. 1983. De taalkeuze als meter van de intimiteits-relatie tussen veeltaligen. In De Talen van Suriname: Achtergronden en ontwikkelingen, Eddy Charry, Geert Koefoed & Pieter Muysken (eds), 169–187. Muiderberg: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1985. The concept of ‘diglossia’ in Caribbean Creole situations. Language in Society 14(3): 345–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald & Plag, Ingo. 2013. Sranan structure dataset. In Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (5 February 2022).Google Scholar
Yakpo, Kofi. 2017. Out of India: Language contact and change in Sarnami. In Boundaries and Bridges: Language Contact in Multilingual Ecologies, Kofi Yakpo & Pieter C. Muysken (eds), 129–150. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yakpo, Kofi & Muysken, Pieter. 2014. Language change in a multiple contact setting: The case of Sarnami (Suriname). In Pidgins and Creoles beyond Africa-Europe Encounters [Creole Language Library 47], Isabelle Buchstaller, Anders Holmberg & Mohammad Almoaily (eds), 101–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar