Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy

A corpus-driven approach to English progressive forms, functions, contexts and didactics

Author
ORCID logoUte Römer-Barron | University of Hanover
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027222893 | EUR 130.00 | USD 195.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027294296 | EUR 130.00 | USD 195.00
 
Google Play logo
This book presents a large-scale corpus-driven study of progressives in 'real' English and 'school' English, combining an analysis of general linguistic interest with a pedagogically motivated one. A systematic comparative analysis of more than 10,000 progressive forms taken from the largest existing corpora of spoken British English and from a small corpus of EFL textbook texts highlights numerous differences between actual language use and textbook language concerning the distribution of progressives, their preferred contexts, favoured functions, and typical lexical-grammatical patterns. On the basis of these differences, a number of pedagogical implications are derived, the integration of which then leads to a first draft of an innovative concept of teaching progressives - a concept which responds to three key criteria in pedagogical description: typicality, authenticity, and communicative utility. The analysis also demonstrates that many existing accounts of the progressive are inappropriate in several respects and that not enough attention is being paid to lexical-grammatical relations.

! Winner of the "Wissenschaftspreis Hannover 2006" for outstanding research monographs !

[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 18] 2005.  xiv + 328 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“This is an impressive piece of work based on a very large empirical investigation. Methodologically it is sound and innovative, and theoretically highly interesting. Römer is to be congratulated on a very solid and inspiring piece of research that should not be bypassed by anyone working on the progressive in English, corpus-driven linguistics, lexical grammar or corpus-based didactics.”
“Ute Römer has presented a highly inspiring, well-written, and corpus driven investigation of the English progressive. She has considered the forms, contexts, functions, lexical aspects and didactic dimensions of progressives in great depth. Her study provides a new empirical description based on quantitative analyses of a very comprehensive dataset and shows the wealth and necessary information corpus linguistics has to offer in the description of the English language. Her excellent study and its results cannot be ignored and should be considered by a wide audience.”
“The study is [...] a highly significant contribution to the field of corpus-driven language teaching in that it compares the functions and contexts of naturally occurring progressive forms to the progressive taught in German English language classes. Besides the impressive data base, the merits of this unique study lie specifically in the detailed and systematic theoretical description and discussion of language patterning.
The presented analysis of the English progressive lends itself for similar studies on other lexicogrammar items, the results of which may then be used to rewrite existent grammar-oriented pedagogical descriptions of language from a lexical-grammatical perspective.
The author has indeed gone to great lengths to present the wealth of data and interpretations in a holistic and, as far as language style is concerned, attractive way that hopefully makes this research accessible to a wide research and teaching community.”
“Ute Römer analyses massive quantities of real speech to reveal not only the variation which traditional linguistics assigns to dialects, but also the variation which is a common everyday feature of Standard English speech. Ute Römer is perfectly positioned and qualified to remain in the forefront of English corpus linguistics.”
“Römer's book shows that the traditional separation into grammar on the one hand, and the lexicon on the other doesn't do justice to the complexity of the data. The progressive is not a uniform grammatical phenomenon, but partly lexically driven.”
“Ute Römer’s book is an insightful resource for every reader who is either curious about language forms and usage, or has an interest in the studying or teaching of languages. [...] Overall, the work by Römer provides a solid empirical overview of progressive verb forms in contemporary spoken British English. The discussion of both corpus linguistic research and language teaching is quite evident and beneficial to the reader. The author aptly explores how progressives are used in communicative situations, teaching materials, and in language textbooks to provide the reader with a wealth of information on the use of progressive verbs.”
“Overall, this volume has many strengths. In addition to the impressive analysis of the data and the detailed presentation of results, this work succeeds in demonstrating how evidence from corpus linguistic research can be used to inform and change language teaching.”
Cited by

Cited by 71 other publications

., Lalehkhojasteh & Jayakaran Mukundan
2011. A Pedagogic Corpus Analysis: Modal Auxiliary verbs in Malaysian English Textbooks. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 1:2  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
AI, HAIYANG & XIAOYE YOU
2015. The grammatical features of English in a Chinese Internet discussion forum. World Englishes 34:2  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Arhar Holdt, Špela, Iztok Kosem & Polona Gantar
2017. Corpus-Based Resources for L1 Teaching: The Case of Slovene. In Handbook on Digital Learning for K-12 Schools,  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Arizavi, Saleh & Yazdan Choubsaz
2019. To Use or Not to Use the Shorter Forms: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Apologetic Expressions “Sorry and I’m sorry” in American Spoken English Discourse. Corpus Pragmatics 3:1  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen
2017. Beyond individual form-meaning associations in L2 Tense-Mood-Aspect research. In Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 50],  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Llorenç Comajoan-Colomé
2022. The relation of second language acquisition, instructed second language acquisition, and language teaching from the lens of second language tense-aspect. Language Teaching 55:3  pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Basterrechea, María & Regina Weinert
2017. Examining the Concept of Subordination in Spoken L1 and L2 English: The Case of If‐Clauses. TESOL Quarterly 51:4  pp. 897 ff. DOI logo
Cheng, Winnie & Martin Warren
2007. Checking Understandings: Comparing Textbooks and a Corpus of Spoken English in Hong Kong. Language Awareness 16:3  pp. 190 ff. DOI logo
CHILDS, CLAIRE
2021. The grammaticalisation ofneverin British English dialects: Quantifying syntactic and functional change. Journal of Linguistics 57:3  pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Peter
2015. Recent diachronic change in the progressive in Philippine English. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 67],  pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Collins1, Peter
2008. The Progressive Aspect in World Englishes: A Corpus-based Study. Australian Journal of Linguistics 28:2  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Zooming in on Verbs in the Progressive: A Collostructional and Correspondence Analysis Approach. Journal of English Linguistics 45:3  pp. 260 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Paula Rautionaho
2018. The progressive versus non-progressive alternation. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 39:3  pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Dose-Heidelmayer, Stefanie & Sandra Götz
2016. The progressive in spoken learner language: A corpus-based analysis of use and misuse . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 54:3  pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Díez-Bedmar, María Belén
2021. The Use of the Progressive in Light of the AH in Monolingual EFL-Instructed Spanish Learners at University Level: A Longitudinal Learner Corpus-Based SLA Study. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 87  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
EDWARDS, ALISON
2014. The progressive aspect in the Netherlands and the ESL/EFL continuum. World Englishes 33:2  pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Frazier, Stefan & Hahn Koo
2019. The Use of the English Progressive Form in Discourse: An Analysis of a Corpus of Interview Data. Corpus Pragmatics 3:2  pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2018. The use of stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2020. The use of stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108],  pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Furuta, Yae
2012. A Corpus-Driven Approach to English Expressions Based on Comparison. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 2:1  pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Furuta, Yae
2013. Postpositive Past Participles Used on Their Own. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity  pp. 514 ff. DOI logo
Gabriele, Alison, José Alemán Bañón, Beatriz López Prego & Alonso Canales
Giampieri, Patrizia
2018. The Web as Corpus and Online Corpora for Legal Translations. Comparative Legilinguistics 33:1  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2022. Reflections on applied cognitive corpus linguistics. Pedagogical Linguistics 3:2  pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Golfetto, Marco
2022. Arabic as a Language of Politics: A Case Study in Corpus-based Teaching. Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation (LCM Journal) 8:2 DOI logo
Götz, Sandra
2015. Tense and aspect errors in spoken learner English. In Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 70],  pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Harwood, Nigel
2014. Content, Consumption, and Production: Three Levels of Textbook Research. In English Language Teaching Textbooks,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Jamal, Javeria, Asmara Shafqat & Ehtsham Afzal
2021. Teachers’ perceptions of incorporation of corpus-based approach in English language teaching classrooms in Karachi, Pakistan. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ) 5:1  pp. 611 ff. DOI logo
Keck, Casey & YouJin Kim
Kirk, John M.
2015. The progressive in Irish English. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 67],  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Laitinen, Mikko & Magnus Levin
Lam, Phoenix
2009. The making of a BNC customised spoken corpus for comparative purposes. Corpora 4:2  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Le Foll, Elen
2021. Register variation in school EFL textbooks. Register Studies 3:2  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Le Foll, Elen
2022. “I’m putting some salt in my sandwich”.. In Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 105],  pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Le Foll, Elen
2023. The Potential Impact of EFL Textbook Language on Learner English: A Triangulated Corpus Study. In Demystifying Corpus Linguistics for English Language Teaching,  pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Li, Lexi Xiaoduo
2022. Improving Modal Verb Treatment in English Textbooks Used by Chinese Learners: A Corpus-Based Approach. SAGE Open 12:1  pp. 215824402210799 ff. DOI logo
Lindley, Jori
2022. Connecting Grammatical Person, Humanness, and Discourse Functions: Always Progressives as a Case Study. Corpus Pragmatics 6:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Man Cao, Houlin Yu & Min Liu
2012. 2012 International Symposium on Information Technologies in Medicine and Education,  pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Markus, Manfred
2014. The pattern to be a-hunting from Middle 
to Late Modern English. In Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 63],  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
MERILÄINEN, LEA
2017. The progressive form in learner Englishes: Examining variation across corpora. World Englishes 36:4  pp. 760 ff. DOI logo
Meriläinen, Lea
2018. The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2  pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Meriläinen, Lea
2020. The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108],  pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Mukundan, Jayakaran, Abdolvahed Zarifi & Seyed Ali Rezvani Kalajahi
2016. Developing Reading Materials for ESL Learners. In Issues in Materials Development,  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Mâţă, Liliana & Andreia Irina Suciu
2011. Curricular innovative model focused on developing pedagogical competences of teachers of Language and communication. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 12  pp. 274 ff. DOI logo
Möller, Verena
2020. From pedagogical input to learner output. Pedagogical Linguistics 1:2  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Northbrook, Julian & Kathy Conklin
2018. “What are you talking about?”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:3  pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Paquot, Magali
2018. Corpus Research Methods for Language Teaching and Learning. In The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology,  pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Paulasto, Heli
2014. Extended uses of the progressive form in L1 and L2 Englishes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 35:3  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Romain, Laurence, Adnane Ez-zizi, Petar Milin & Dagmar Divjak
2022. What makes the past perfect and the future progressive? Experiential coordinates for a learnable, context-based model of tense and aspect. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2  pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Römer, Ute
2011. Corpus Research Applications in Second Language Teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Römer, Ute
2016. Teaming up and mixing methods: collaborative and cross-disciplinary work in corpus research on phraseology. Corpora 11:1  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Römer, Ute
2017. Language assessment and the inseparability of lexis and grammar: Focus on the construct of speaking. Language Testing 34:4  pp. 477 ff. DOI logo
Römer, Ute, Matthew Brook O'Donnell & Nick C. Ellis
2014. Second Language Learner Knowledge of Verb–Argument Constructions: Effects of Language Transfer and Typology. The Modern Language Journal 98:4  pp. 952 ff. DOI logo
Schnelle, Gohar, Mathilde Hennig, Carolin Odebrecht & Anke Lüdeling
2023. Historische Korpora in sprachhistorisch orientierter germanistischer Hochschullehre. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 145:2  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Shortall, Terry
2007. The L2 syllabus: corpus or contrivance?. Corpora 2:2  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2021.  I’m thinking and you’re saying: Speaker stance and the progressive of mental verbs in courtroom interaction. Text & Talk 41:2  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Trnová, Michaela
2021. Aspekty znalosti slovní zásoby v učebnicích anglického jazyka pro 2. stupeň ZŠ: pilotní výzkum. In Výzkum v didaktice cizích jazyků IV,  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Trnová, Michaela
2022. Patterns and Variation in English Language Discourse. 9th Brno Conference on Linguistics Studies in English,  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jessie Yi-jia
2014. An Empirical Analysis of Extended Meanings of Lexical Items in a H1N1 Corpus. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 4:3  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Williams, Christopher
2006. Review of Smitterberg ((2005)): The progressive in 19th-century English: A process of integration. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11:4  pp. 497 ff. DOI logo
Wolk, Christoph, Sandra Götz & Katja Jäschke
2021. Possibilities and Drawbacks of Using an Online Application for Semi-automatic Corpus Analysis to Investigate Discourse Markers and Alternative Fluency Variables. Corpus Pragmatics 5:1  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Tianqi & Min Wang
2022. Development of the progressive construction in Chinese EFL learners’ written production: From prototypes to marginal members. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2  pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Wulff, Stefanie & Ute Römer
2009. Becoming a proficient academic writer: shifting lexical preferences in the use of the progressive. Corpora 4:2  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Yunus, Kamariah
2017. Corpus Linguistics: Pedagogic Application in the 21st Century. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development 6:3 DOI logo
Zaki, Mai
2017. Corpus‐based teaching in the Arabic classroom: theoretical and practical perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:2  pp. 514 ff. DOI logo
Zeng, Xiaoyan, Yasuhiro Shirai & Xiaoxiang Chen
2021. Universals and transfer in the acquisition of the progressive aspect: Evidence from L1 Chinese, German, and Spanish learners’ use of the progressive-ingin spoken English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:2  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Zeng, Xiaoyan, Yasuhiro Shirai & Xiaoxiang Chen
2023. A corpus-based study of the acquisition of the English progressive by L1 Chinese learners: from prototypical activities to marked statives. Linguistics 61:3  pp. 749 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Xiaoyan
2023. The combined effects of a higher-level verb distribution and verb semantics on second language learners’ restriction of L2 construction generalization. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2016. References. Language Learning 66:S1  pp. 313 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Main BIC Subject

CF: Linguistics

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2005050253 | Marc record