Over the last three decades, several studies have applied corpus-analytical techniques to investigate the ways in which ‘stance’ is expressed in spoken and written discourse. Corpus research has shown that there are strong differences among registers in their reliance on the different types of stance expressions. In general, spoken registers express stance to a much greater extent than written registers. Based on analysis of the Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English, the present paper explores some of the ways in which prosody interacts with lexico-grammatical structure in the expression of stance. Two major types of stance devices are explored: stance adverbials and stance verb+complement clause constructions. The analysis will focus on the extent to which these stance devices are marked with prosodic prominence (shown by pitch, length, and amplitude) in comparison to other propositional information in the same utterance. These findings will be interpreted relative to two overall goals: 1. to investigate the ways in which prosodic patterns vary across the different types and functions of stance expressions, and 2. to explore the possibility of a general ‘prosody of stance’ in English.
1990Some functions of the booster. In Svartik (ed.), 193–209.
Anthony, Laurence
2011AntConc, Version 3.2.3w. Tokyo: Waseda University. [URL]
Aijmer, Karin
1997I think – An English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic languages. Historical and Comparative Perspective, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barton, Ellen
1993Evidentials, argumentation, and epistemological stance. College English 55: 745–769.
Beach, Richard & Anson, Chris M
1992Stance and intertextuality in written discourse. Linguistics and Education 4: 335–357.
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, Douglas
1995Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: CUP.
2006bStance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5: 97–116.
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Reppen, Randi
1998Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP.
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
1988Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11: 1–34.
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
1989Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9: 93–124.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Bolinger, Dwight
1978Intonation across languages. In Universals of Human Language II, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 471–524. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Brazil, David
1997The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.
Chafe, Wallace L
1986Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Chafe & Nichols (eds), 261–72.
Chafe, Wallace L. & Nichols, J
(eds)1986Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Charles, Maggie
2003‘This mystery…’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 313–326.
Charles, Maggie
2006The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics 27(3): 492–518.
Cheng, Winnie
2011Exploring Corpus Linguistics: Language in Action. New York NY: Routledge.
Cheng, Winnie, Greaves, Christopher & Warren, Martin
2003Geologists’ implicit persuasive strategies and the construction of evaluative evidence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 273–290.
Grabe, William & Kaplan, Robert B
1997On the writing of science and the science of writing: Hedging in science text and elsewhere. In Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schroder (eds), 151–167. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Holmes, Janet
1988Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics 9: 20–44.
Hunston, Susan
1993Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 57–73. London: Pinter.
Hunston, Susan
1994Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), 191–218. London: Routledge.
Hunston, Susan & Thompson, Geoff
(eds)2000Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: OUP.
Hyland, Ken
1994HeHedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes 13: 239–256.
Hyland, Ken
1996aTalking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication 13: 251–281.
Hyland, Ken
1996bWriting without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics 17: 433–54.
Hyland, Ken
1998aBoosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text 18(3): 349–383.
1984Intensity. In Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), 43–70. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Lindemann, Stephanie & Mauranen, Anna
2001“It’s just real messy”: The occurrence and function of just in a corpus of academic speech. English for Specific Purposes 20: 459–475.
Martin, James R
2000Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In. Hunston & Thompson (eds), 142–175.
Martin, James R
2003Introduction. Text 23(2): 171–181.
Martin, James R. & White, Peter R.R
2005Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mauranen, Anna
2003“A good question.” Expressing evaluation in academic speech. In Domain-specific English: Textual practices across communities and classrooms, Guiseppina Cortese & Philip Riley (eds), 115–140. Bern: Peter Lang.
Mauranen, Anna & Bondi, Marina
2003aEvaluative language use in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4): 269–71.
Mauranen, Anna & Bondi, Marina
(eds)2003bEvaluation in Academic Discourse. Special issue of Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4).
Meyer, Paul G
1997Hedging strategies in written academic discourse: Strengthening the argument by weakening the claim. In Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schroder (eds), 21–41. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Ochs, Elinor
(ed.)1989The Pragmatics of Affect. Special issue of Text 9.
2000Patterns of Stance in English. PhD dissertation, Northern Arizona University.
Silver, Marc
2003The stance of stance: A critical look at ways stance is expressed and modeled in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 359–374.
Swales, John M. & Burke, Amy
2003“It’s really fascinating work”: Differences in evaluative adjectives across academic registers. In Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, Pepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Stenström, Anna Britta
1990Pauses in monologue and dialogue. In Svartvik (ed.), 211–252.
Svartvik, Jan
(ed.)1990The London-Lund Corpus of spoken English: Description and Research. Lund: Lund University Press.
Thompson, Geoff & Hunston, Susan
2000Evaluation: An introduction. In Hunston & Thompson (eds), 1–27.
Tucker, Paul
2003Evaluation in the art-historical research article. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4): 291–312.
Varttala, Teppo
2003Hedging in scientific research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. In Domain-specific English: Textual Practices across Communities and Classrooms, Guiseppina Cortese & Philip Riley (eds), 141–174. Bern: Peter Lang.
Wichmann, Anne
2005Please – from courtesy to appeal: The role of intonation in the expression of attitudinal meaning. English Language and Linguistics 9(2): 229–253.
Wichmann, Anne, Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne Marie & Aijmer, Karin
2010How prosody reflects semantic change: A synchronic case study of of course. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Hubert Cuyckens, Kristin Davidse & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds), 103–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah
2002Register and prosodic variation, a cross language comparison. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1495–1536.
Cited by
Cited by 10 other publications
Elliott, Arielle V & William S Horton
2023. Typing speed and fluency as cues to uncertainty in the real-time production of written messages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Gut, Ulrike
2020. Spoken Corpora. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ► pp. 235 ff.
2019. A corpus-driven analysis of certainty stance adverbs: Obviously, really and actually in spoken native and learner English. Journal of Pragmatics 140 ► pp. 22 ff.
2018. Inferring stance in news broadcasts from prosodic-feature configurations. Computer Speech & Language 50 ► pp. 85 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.