Part of
Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns
Edited by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63] 2014
► pp. 173205
Angermeyer, S. & Singler, J.V
2003The case for politeness: Pronoun variation in co-ordinate NPs in object position. Language Variation and Change 15: 171–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aston, G. & Burnard, L
1998The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with Sara. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Baayen, R.H
2008Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W. & Weiber, R
2008Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung, 12th edn. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Biber, D
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Burnard, L
2007BNC User Reference Guide. Oxford: University of Oxford. [URL] (21 October 2011).Google Scholar
Burridge, K
2004Synopsis: morphological and syntactic variation in the Pacific and Australasia. In Kortmann et al. (eds), 1116–1131.
Butt, M
2006Theories of Case. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooper, C
[1685] 1968 Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae [English Linguistics 1500–1800. A Collection of Facsimile Reprints [86]], R.C. Alston. Menston: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Crawley, M.J
2007The R Book. Chichester: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, D
1993English Historical Syntax. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dik, S.C
1978Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.Google Scholar
1989The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part I: The Structure of the Clause. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part II: Complex and Derived Constructions, K. Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, J
1985A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1986Grammatically deviant prestige constructions. In A Festschrift for Sol Saporta, M. Brame, H. Contreras & F. Neumayer. (eds), 92–129. Seattle WA: Noit Amrofer.Google Scholar
: 1978It’s I, it’s me: A case for syntax. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia. 10: 67–80.Google Scholar
Field, A
2009Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (and sex and drugs and rock ’n’ roll), 3rd edn. Los Angeles CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Field, A., Miles, J. & Field, Z
2012Discovering Statistics Using R. Los Angeles CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S
1996The Oxford English Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gries, S.T
2008Statistik für Sprachwissenschaftler. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
2009Statistics for Linguists with R: A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. & Guéron J
1999English Grammar: A Generative Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, M
1981It’s I, it’s me: Further Reflections. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 13: 17–20.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M
2006Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42: 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollmann, W.B
2009Grammatical change. In English Language: Description, Variation and Context, J. Culperer, F. Katamba, P. Kerswill, R. Wodak & T. McEnery (eds), 314–333. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Hopkins, E.A
1975Clefts and case: Two Sources of interference for FL learners. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 8: 27–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, M
1999Ghanaian Pidgin English in its West African Context. A Sociohistorical and Structural Analysis [Varieties of English around the World G24]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum G
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hudson, R
1995Does English really have case? Journal of Linguistics 31: 375–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O
1933Essentials of English Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, G
1986‘Us Anglos are a cut above the field’: On objective pronouns in nominative contexts. English Studies: A Journal of English Language and Literature 67: 445–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, B., Schneider, E., Burridge, K., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C
(eds) 2004A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphosyntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol II: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R
1990How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Phonology and morphology. In A History of the English Language, R. Hogg & D. Denison (eds), 43–108. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., Paul Rayson & Wilson, A
2001Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English – Based on the British National Corpus. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Maier, G
2012The Distribution of Pronoun Case Forms in Subject Predicative Complements: A Corpus- and Web-Based Study of Pronoun Case Variation. PhD dissertation, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
2013As the case may be: A corpus-based approach to pronoun case variation in subject-predicative complements in British and American English. In Proceedings of ICAME 31 [Varieng: Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English], J. Mukherjee & M. Huber (eds), 228–245. Giessen: University of Giessen.Google Scholar
Mayerthaler, W
1981Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., Xiao, R. & Tono, Y
2006Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, J
2006Spoken and written English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts & A. McMahon (eds), 670–691. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M.B
2004Appalachian English: morphology and syntax. In Kortmann et al. (eds), 245–280.Google Scholar
Paddock, H
1991The actuation problem for gender change in Wessex versus Newfoundland. In Dialects of English. Studies in Grammatical Variation, P. Trudgill & J.K. Chambers (eds), 29–46. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1994From CASE to FOCUS in the pronouns of some Wessex-based dialects of English. In Function and Expression in Functional Grammar, E. Engberg-Pedersen, L. Falster Jakobson & L.S. Rasmussen (eds), 255–264. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pampel, F.C
2000Logistic Regression: A Primer (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 132. Thousand Oaks US: Sage.Google Scholar
Pietsch, L
2007Nominative subjects of non-finite constructions in Hiberno-English. In Connectivity in Grammar and Discourse [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 5], J. Rehbein, C. Hohenstein & L. Pietsch (eds), 165–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009English in Ireland: Grammar in Language Contact. PhD dissertation, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
Poussa, P
1997Derivation of it from þat in eastern dialects of British English. In Linguistic History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, R. Hickey & S. Puppel (eds), 691–699. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Quinn, H
2005The Distribution of Pronoun Case Forms in English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 82]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Pronoun forms. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39], P. Peters, P. Collins & A. Smith (eds), 31–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radford, A
2009Analysing English Sentences: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shorrocks, G
1992Case assignment in simple and coordinate constructions in Present-Day English. American Speech 67: 432–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, A
1991Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2004Person. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobin, N
1997Agreement, Default Rules, and Grammatical Viruses. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 318–343.Google Scholar
Swan, M
2005Practical English Usage, 3rd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sweet, H
1875Words, logic and grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society: 470–503.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B
2006Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English. A Corpus Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P
2004The dialect of East Anglia: morphology and syntax. In Kortmann et al.(eds), 142–153.
Wagner, S
2002We ‘don’ ‘say ‘she, ‘do us? Pronoun Exchange – a feature of English dialects? Manuscript, Universität Freiburg 2002 [URL] (22 July 2010).
2004English dialects in the Southwest: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann et al. (eds), 154–174.
Wales, K
1996Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Weinert, R. & Miller, J
1996Cleft constructions in spoken language. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 173–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Bevacqua, Luca & Tatjana Scheffler
2020. Form variation of pronominal it-clefts in written English. Linguistics Vanguard 6:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.