The case of focus
This article investigates the distribution of pronoun case forms (PCFs) in it-clefts and it BE-sentences in British and American English. Its particular interest is the occurrence of subject PCFs in these two constructions. Functional and pragmatic factors exerting an influence on the distribution are identified, such as first vs. third person, singular vs plural. All these factors are operationalized and quantified in the datasets. The findings confirm the hypothesis that subject PCFs have been re-functionalised as Focus markers in the two varieties examined. As the explanation of this refunctionalization, markedness reversal is put forward.
References (66)
References
Angermeyer, S. & Singler, J.V. 2003. The case for politeness: Pronoun variation in co-ordinate NPs in object position. Language Variation and Change 15: 171–209. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aston, G. & Burnard, L. 1998. The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with Sara. Edinburgh: EUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R.H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W. & Weiber, R. 2008. Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung, 12th edn. Berlin: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burnard, L. 2007. BNC User Reference Guide. Oxford: University of Oxford. [URL] (21 October 2011).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burridge, K. 2004. Synopsis: morphological and syntactic variation in the Pacific and Australasia. In Kortmann et al. (eds), 1116–1131.
Butt, M. 2006. Theories of Case. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cooper, C. [1685] 1968. Grammatica Linguae Anglicanae [English Linguistics 1500–1800. A Collection of Facsimile Reprints [86]], R.C. Alston. Menston: Scolar Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crawley, M.J. 2007. The R Book. Chichester: Wiley. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, D. 1993. English Historical Syntax. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dik, S.C. 1978. Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dik, S.C. 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part I: The Structure of the Clause. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dik, S.C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part II: Complex and Derived Constructions, K. Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emonds, J. 1985. A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emonds, J. 1986. Grammatically deviant prestige constructions. In A Festschrift for Sol Saporta, M. Brame, H. Contreras & F. Neumayer. (eds), 92–129. Seattle WA: Noit Amrofer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erdmann: 1978. It’s I, it’s me: A case for syntax. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia. 10: 67–80.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (and sex and drugs and rock ’n’ roll), 3rd edn. Los Angeles CA: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Field, A., Miles, J. & Field, Z. 2012. Discovering Statistics Using R. Los Angeles CA: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenbaum, S. 1996. The Oxford English Grammar. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, S.T. 2008. Statistik für Sprachwissenschaftler. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, S.T. 2009. Statistics for Linguists with R: A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, L. & Guéron J. 1999. English Grammar: A Generative Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, M. 1981. It’s I, it’s me: Further Reflections. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 13: 17–20.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, M. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42: 25–70. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollmann, W.B. 2009. Grammatical change. In English Language: Description, Variation and Context, J. Culperer, F. Katamba, P. Kerswill, R. Wodak & T. McEnery (eds), 314–333. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopkins, E.A. 1975. Clefts and case: Two Sources of interference for FL learners. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 8: 27–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, R. & Pullum G. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hudson, R. 1995. Does English really have case? Journal of Linguistics 31: 375–392. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, O. 1933. Essentials of English Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kjellmer, G. 1986. ‘Us Anglos are a cut above the field’: On objective pronouns in nominative contexts. English Studies: A Journal of English Language and Literature 67: 445–449. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kortmann, B., Schneider, E., Burridge, K., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C. (eds) 2004. A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphosyntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R.W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol II: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lass, R. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lass, R. 2006. Phonology and morphology. In A History of the English Language, R. Hogg & D. Denison (eds), 43–108. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, G., Paul Rayson & Wilson, A. 2001. Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English – Based on the British National Corpus. Harlow: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maier, G. 2012. The Distribution of Pronoun Case Forms in Subject Predicative Complements: A Corpus- and Web-Based Study of Pronoun Case Variation. PhD dissertation, University of Hamburg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maier, G. 2013. As the case may be: A corpus-based approach to pronoun case variation in subject-predicative complements in British and American English. In Proceedings of ICAME 31 [Varieng: Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English], J. Mukherjee & M. Huber (eds), 228–245. Giessen: University of Giessen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mayerthaler, W. 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McEnery, T., Xiao, R. & Tono, Y. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, J. 2006. Spoken and written English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts & A. McMahon (eds), 670–691. Malden MA: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montgomery, M.B. 2004. Appalachian English: morphology and syntax. In Kortmann et al. (eds), 245–280.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paddock, H. 1991. The actuation problem for gender change in Wessex versus Newfoundland. In Dialects of English. Studies in Grammatical Variation, P. Trudgill & J.K. Chambers (eds), 29–46. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paddock, H. 1994. From CASE to FOCUS in the pronouns of some Wessex-based dialects of English. In Function and Expression in Functional Grammar, E. Engberg-Pedersen, L. Falster Jakobson & L.S. Rasmussen (eds), 255–264. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pampel, F.C. 2000. Logistic Regression: A Primer (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 132. Thousand Oaks US: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pietsch, L. 2009. English in Ireland: Grammar in Language Contact. PhD dissertation, University of Hamburg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poussa, P. 1997. Derivation of it from þat in eastern dialects of British English. In Linguistic History and Linguistic Modelling: A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, R. Hickey & S. Puppel (eds), 691–699. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quinn, H. 2009. Pronoun forms. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39], P. Peters, P. Collins & A. Smith (eds), 31–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radford, A. 2009. Analysing English Sentences: A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shorrocks, G. 1992. Case assignment in simple and coordinate constructions in Present-Day English. American Speech 67: 432–444. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siewierska, A. 1991. Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siewierska, A. 2004. Person. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sobin, N. 1997. Agreement, Default Rules, and Grammatical Viruses. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 318–343.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swan, M. 2005. Practical English Usage, 3rd edn. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sweet, H. 1875. Words, logic and grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society: 470–503.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szmrecsanyi, B. 2006. Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English. A Corpus Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trudgill, P. 2004. The dialect of East Anglia: morphology and syntax. In Kortmann et al.(eds), 142–153.
Wagner, S. 2002. We ‘don’ ‘say ‘she, ‘do us? Pronoun Exchange – a feature of English dialects? Manuscript, Universität Freiburg, 2002. [URL] (22 July 2010).
Wagner, S. 2004. English dialects in the Southwest: Morphology and syntax. In Kortmann et al. (eds), 154–174.
Wales, K. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weinert, R. & Miller, J. 1996. Cleft constructions in spoken language. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 173–206. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Bevacqua, Luca & Tatjana Scheffler
2020.
Form variation of pronominal it-clefts in written English.
Linguistics Vanguard 6:1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.