A new angle on infinitival and of -ing complements of afraid, with evidence
from the TIME Corpus
This article argues that an approach based on semantic roles offers a new approach to the variation between to infinitival and of -ing complements of the adjective afraid. While the semantic role of the higher subject does not appear to vary, control theory makes it possible to investigate the semantic role of the lower subject. No absolute rules can be given, but regularities that are of statistical significance can be observed. The study draws on the first three decades of the TIME Corpus for authentic data. The results shed light on the semantic interpretation of to infinitival and -ing complements in subject control constructions and open a new perspective on the relevance of semantic roles to argument selection.
References (25)
References
Allerton, D. 1988. ‘Infinitivitis’ in English. In Essays on the English Language and Applied Linguistics on the Occasion of Gerhard Nickel’s 60th Birthday, J. Klegraf, D. Nehls & G. Nickel (eds), 11–23. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, A. 1970. Agent, experiencer, and controllability. In Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation, S. Kuno (ed.), 203–237. Cambridge MA: Harvard University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, D. 1968. Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 2: 119–127.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carnie, A. 2007. Syntax. Malden MA: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faulhaber, S. 2011. Verb Valency Patterns. A Challenge for Semantics-Based Accounts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gruber, J. 1967.
Look and see
. Language 43: 937–947. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hundt, M. 2004. Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 8: 47–69. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, O. 1940[1961].
A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part V: Syntax, Vol. IV. London & Copenhagen: George Allen and Unwin & Ejnar Munksgaard.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
OED, The Oxford English Dictionary. 1989. Prepared by J. Simpson and E. Weiner, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohdenburg, G. 1995. On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies 76: 367–388. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohdenburg, G. 2006. The role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system. In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, C. Dalton-Puffer, D. Kastovsky, N. Ritt & H. Schendle (eds), 143–166. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rudanko, J. 1989. Complementation and Case Grammar. Albany NY: SUNY Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rudanko, J. 2006. Watching English Grammar change. English Language and Linguistics 10: 31–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rudanko, J. 2010a. Explaining grammatical variation and change: A case study of complementation in American English over three decades. Journal of English Linguistics 38: 4–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rudanko, J. 2010b. Change and variation in complement selection: A case study from recent English, with evidence from large corpora. In Corpus-Linguistic Applications: Current Studies, New Directions, S. Wulff, S. Gries & M. Davies (eds), 47–66. Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rudanko, J. 2011. Changes in Complementation in British and American English. Houndmills: Palgrave. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sag, I. & Pollard, C. 1991. An integrated theory of complement control. Language 67: 63–113. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, J. 2003. Meaning and context. In Motivation in Language. Studies in Honour of Günter Radden, H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven & K. Panther (eds), 27–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vosberg, U. 2003a. The role of extractions and horror
aequi in the evolution of -ing complements in Modern English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (eds), 305–327. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vosberg, U. 2003b. Cognitive complexity and the establishment of -ing constructions with retrospective verbs in Modern English. In Insights into Late Modern English, M. Dossena & C. Jones (eds), 197–220. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vosberg, U. 2003c. Zur Ablösung von Infinitiven durch -ing-Formen als Verbkomplemente im modernen Englischen. In Mehrsprachigkeit – Sprachkompetenz – Translation, L. Zybatow (ed.), 515–525. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vosberg, U. 2006. Die Grosse Komplementverschiebing. Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Duffley, Patrick & Ryan Fisher
2021.
To‐Infinitive and Gerund‐Participle Clauses with the Verbs Dread and Fear.
Studia Linguistica 75:1
► pp. 72 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Ruohonen, Juho & Juhani Rudanko
2019.
Comparing explanatory principles of complement selection statistically: a case study based on Canadian English.
Studia Neophilologica 91:3
► pp. 296 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.