Part of
Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns
Edited by Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63] 2014
► pp. 239262
References
Biber, D., Johansson S., Leech G., Conrad S. & Finegan E
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Carnie, A
2002Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chung, Y-S
2001 Tough Construction in English: A Construction Grammar Approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Collins Cobuild English Dictionary
1995 London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Curme, G.O
1931Syntax. Boston MA: D.C. Heath and company.Google Scholar
De Smet, H
2005A corpus of Late Modern English. ICAME Journal 29: 69–82.Google Scholar
Dowty, D
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. & Kay P
1995Construction Grammar. Ms.Google Scholar
Francis, G., Hunston S. & Manning E
(eds) 1998Collins Cobuild Grammar Patterns, 2: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Givón, T
2001Syntax, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUPGoogle Scholar
Hietaranta, P.S
1983In Defence of the Possibility of Sentential Tough Complements. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
1984Some functional aspects of the tough construction. Studia Neophilologica 56: 21–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirst, G
1987Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R
1975 Tough and the Trace Theory of Movement Rules. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 437–447.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O
1940A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part V. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, C
1987 Tough-movement in Present-Day British English: A corpus-based study. Studia Linguistica 41: 59–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nanni, D.L
1980On the surface syntax of constructions with easy-type adjectives. Language 56: 568–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
[URL] (fall 2012).
Postal, P.M
1971Cross-Over Phenomena. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1974On Raising. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Poutsma, H
1914A Grammar of Late Modern English: Part II – the parts of speech section I, A – nouns, adjectives and articles. Groningen: Noordhoof.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum S., Leech G. & Svartvik J
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, G
1996Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 149–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, P.S
1967The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, H
1898A New English Grammar, Part II: Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Visser, F.T
1966An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part 2: Syntactical Units with One Verb. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, M
1999Animacy and Reference: A Cognitive Approach to Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Agency and Impersonality: Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestations [Studies in Language Companion Series 78]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar