Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-native Scientific Writing

Applying a corpus-based study to language teaching

| University of Oxford
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027203731 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027269522 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00
 
This book presents an investigation of lexical bundles in native and non-native scientific writing in English, whose aim is to produce a frequency-derived, statistically- and qualitatively-refined list of the most pedagogically useful lexical bundles in scientific prose: one that can be sorted and filtered by frequency, key word, structure and function, and includes contextual information such as variations, authentic examples and usage notes. The first part of the volumediscusses the creation of this list based on a multimillion-word corpus of biomedical research writing and reveals the structure and functions of lexical bundles and their role in effective scientific communication. A comparative analysis of a non-native corpus highlights non-native scientists’ difficulties in employing lexical bundles. The second part of the volume explores pedagogical applications and provides a series of teaching activities that illustrate how EAP teachers or materials designers can use the list of lexical bundles in their practice.
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 65]  2014.  ix, 212 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
ix
Introduction, aims and scope
1–5
Lexical bundles in native and non-native scientific writing
7
Theory and applications of phraseology and lexical bundles
9–40
Investigating lexical bundles in biomedical research writing
41–61
Target bundles: Frequency, structure and functions
63–109
Target bundles in non-native expert scientific writing
111–150
Part 2
Pedagogical applications of the study
151
Pedagogical utility of the list of target bundles
153–160
Specific activities for the teaching of lexical bundles in scientific discourse
161–178
Conclusions and recommendations
179–183
References
185–207
Index
208–212
“I would recommend this book to researchers in English for Academic Purposes who would further explore lexical bundles in academic English, as well as instructors of scientific writing and non-native/non-expert authors who would promote the use of lexical bundles in their students’ or their own writing.”
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2020.  In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], Crossref logo
Bestgen, Yves
2018. Evaluating the frequency threshold for selecting lexical bundles by means of an extension of the Fisher's exact test. Corpora 13:2  pp. 205 ff. Crossref logo
Chang, Miao-Hsia & Shu-Kai Hsieh
2017. A corpus-based study of the recurrent lexical bundle ka li kong ‘let (me) tell you’ in Taiwanese Southern Min conversations. Chinese Language and Discourse 8:2  pp. 174 ff. Crossref logo
Chen, Howard Ho-Jan & Hongyin Tao
2019.  In Computational and Corpus Approaches to Chinese Language Learning [Chinese Language Learning Sciences, ],  pp. 57 ff. Crossref logo
García Salido, Marcos, Marcos Garcia & Margarita Alonso-Ramos
2019.  In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11755],  pp. 144 ff. Crossref logo
Grabowski, Łukasz
2018.  In Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 82],  pp. 57 ff. Crossref logo
Hsu, Chan-Chia & Shu-Kai Hsieh
2018. Identifying lexical bundles in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 19:4  pp. 525 ff. Crossref logo
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2018. Academic lexical bundles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:4  pp. 383 ff. Crossref logo
Jalilifar, Alireza, Seyed Mohammad Ghoreishi & Seyed Abbas Emam Roodband
2016. Developing an inventory of core lexical bundles in English research articles: a cross-disciplinary corpus-based study. Journal of World Languages 3:3  pp. 184 ff. Crossref logo
Kashiha, Hadi & Swee Heng Chan
2015. A Little Bit About: Differences in Native and Non-native Speakers’ Use of Formulaic Language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 35:4  pp. 297 ff. Crossref logo
Kopaczyk, Joanna & Jukka Tyrkkö
2018.  In Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 82],  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Pan, Fan & Chen Liu
2019. Comparing L1-L2 differences in lexical bundles in student and expert writing. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 37:2  pp. 142 ff. Crossref logo
Pizarro Sánchez, Isabel
2017.  In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191],  pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo
Qi, Hui & Fan Pan
2020. Lexical bundle variation across moves in abstracts of medical research articles. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 38:2  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Schneider, Gerold & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
2016. Detecting innovations in a parsed corpus of learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2  pp. 177 ff. Crossref logo
Tyrkkö, Jukka & Joanna Kopaczyk
2018.  In Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 82],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana
2019.  In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner, Crossref logo
Yoo, Isaiah WonHo & Yu Kyoung Shin
2020. Determiner Use in English Quantificational Expressions: A Corpus‐Based Study. TESOL Quarterly 54:1  pp. 90 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

ReferencesThe requested document (/db/data/shared.benjamins.com/references/scl/scl.65.refs.xml) was not found
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFX – Computational linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2014021966 | Marc record