Part of
Grammatical Change in English World-Wide
Edited by Peter Collins
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67] 2015
► pp. 119146
References (42)
References
Aarts, Bas, Close, Joanne & Wallis, Sean. 2013. Choices over time: Methodological issues in current change. In The English Verb Phrase: Corpus Methodology and Current Change, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Sean Wallis & Geoffrey Leech (eds), 14–45. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biewer, Carolin. 2011. Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English – a learner’s perspective. In Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 44], Joybrato Mukherjee & Marianne Hundt (eds), 7–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowie, Jill, Wallis, Sean & Aarts, Bas. 2013. Contemporary change in modal usage in spoken British English: Mapping the impact of ‘genre’. In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, &Johan Van der Auwera (eds), 57–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2009a. Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 2009b. Modals and quasi-modals in world Englishes. World Englishes 28: 281–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Quasi-modals and modals in Australian English fiction 1800-1999, with comparisons across British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 42: 7–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter & Peters, Pam. 2004. Australian English: Morphology and syntax. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol 2, Bernd Kortmann, Edgar Schneider, with Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds), 593–610. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter & Yao, Xinyue. 2012. Modals and quasi-modals in New Englishes. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide: Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 35–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter, Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga & Yao, Xinyue. 2014. Modality in Philippine English: A diachronic study. Journal of English Linguistics 42: 68–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 2010. Future time reference expressed by be to in present-day English. English Language and Linguistics 14: 271–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David. 2003. Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves. In Motives for Language Change, Ray Hickey (ed.), 54–70. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar. 2010. Modal verb usage at the interface of English and a related creole: A corpus-based study of can/could and will/would in Trinidadian English. Journal of English Linguistics 38: 105–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars, Smith Nicholas & Waibel, Birgit. 2007. The Part-of-Speech-Tagged ‘Brown’ Corpora: A Manual of Information, Including Pointers for Successful Use. Freiburg: Department of English, University of Freiburg. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2013. The demise of the being to V construction. Transactions of the Philological Society, published online 13 Nov 2013. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Leech, Geoffrey. 2012. ‘Small is beautiful’: On the value of standard reference corpora for observing recent grammatical change. In Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 175–188. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jankowski, Bridget. 2004. A transatlantic perspective of variation and change in English deontic modality. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 23: 85–113.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2003. Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961 – 1992. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, & Frank Palmer (eds), 223–240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The modals ARE declining: Reply to Neil Millar [2009]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16: 547–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Where have all the modals gone? On the declining frequency of modal auxiliaries in American and British English. In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan Van der Auwera (eds), 95–115. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Smith, Nicholas. 2005. Extending the possibilities of corpus-based research on English in the twentieth century: A prequel to LOB and F-LOB. ICAME Journal 29: 83–98.Google Scholar
. 2009. Change and constancy in linguistic change: How grammatical usage in written English evolved in the period 1931-1991. In Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments, Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds), 173–200. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, David. 2013. Contractions of English Semi-Modals: The Emancipating Effect of Frequency [New Ideas in Human Interaction / NIHIN] Freiburg: Universitätsbibliothek. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2012. From opportunistic to systematic use of the web as corpus: Do-support with got (to) in contemporary American English. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Traugott (eds), 245–255. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian & Leech, Geoffrey. 2006. Current changes. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts &April McMahon (eds), 318–342. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McArthur, Tom. 2003. World English, Euro-English, Nordic English. English Today 19(1): 54–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend & Bhatt, Rakesh M. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Varieties. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Millar, Neil. 2009. Modal verbs in Time: Frequency changes 1923-2006. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14: 191–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Friederike. 2008. From degrammaticalisation to regrammaticalisation? Current changes in the use of need . Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 33: 71–94.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2006. The decline of be to and the rise of be going to in Late Modern English: Connection or coincidence. In Anglistentag 2005 Bamberg: Proceedings, Christoph Houswitschka, Gabriele Knappe & Anja Müller (eds), 515–529. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk, Van Rooy, Bertus & Van der Auwera, Johan (eds) 2014. Special Issue: Diachronic Approaches to Modality in World Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics 42: 3–88.Google Scholar
Nokkonen, Soili. 2006. The semantic variation of need to in four recent British English corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(1): 29–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Seggewiß, Friederike. 2012. Current Changes in the English Modals: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Present-Day Spoken English. PhD dissertation, University of Freiburg.
Schneider, Edgar. 2007. Postcolonial Englishes: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas. 2003. Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds), 241–266. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taeymans, Martine. 2004. An investigation into the marginal modals DARE and NEED in British present-day English: A corpus-based approach. In Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 97–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2007. The modals of obligation/necessity in Canadian perspective. English World-Wide 28: 47–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter & Hannah, Jean. 2008 [1982]. International English: A Guide to Varieties of Standard English, 5th edn. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus. 1969. An Historical Syntax of the English Language III/1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony R. 1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Bohmann, Axel
2024. Future‐time reference in world Englishes. World Englishes 43:1  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Seoane, Elena & Lucía Loureiro-Porto
2024. A diachronic corpus-pragmatic approach to democratization. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:2  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Depraetere, Ilse
2022. Sources of Modal Necessity: The Case of Needto’. Journal of English Linguistics 50:4  pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Laliberté, Catherine
2022. A Diachronic Study of Modals and Semi-modals in Indian English Newspapers. Journal of English Linguistics 50:2  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Kranich, Svenja
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2021. Linguistic democratization in HKE across registers: The effects of prescriptivism. Research in Corpus Linguistics 9:2  pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Mair, Christian
2021. Recent advances in the corpus-based study of ongoing grammatical change in English. Text & Talk 41:5-6  pp. 763 ff. DOI logo
Laitinen, Mikko
2020. Empirical perspectives on English as a lingua franca (ELF) grammar. World Englishes 39:3  pp. 427 ff. DOI logo
Mair, Christian & Geoffrey N. Leech
2020. Current Changes in English Syntax. In The Handbook of English Linguistics,  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
HANSEN, BEKE
2017. The ICE metadata and the study of Hong Kong English. World Englishes 36:3  pp. 471 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.