Cover not available
Part of
Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning
Edited by Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska and Alex Boulton
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 69] 2015
► pp. 63–84

Learning phraseology from speech corpora

| School of Languages and Literatures, Translation and Interpreting University of Bologna
There is substantial evidence that phraseology is key to fluency in speech production and reception, particularly in cognitively/affectively demanding contexts like interpreting. Yet most second language speakers have limited repertoires of phraseological items, lacking knowledge of their lexicogrammatical, functional, and also of their prosodic aspects. Speech corpora which align transcripts with audio can readily be constructed from subtitled video materials, and learners can use these to view and hear concordanced data. Examples are provided for phraseological items documented in a one million-word corpus of talks from the TED – Ideas worth spreading site (www.ted.com), analysed using WordSmith Tools (Scott 2012). Activities for performance with and by learners are also suggested, aimed at increasing their phraseological awareness and expanding their repertoires.
Keywords: interpreting, phraseology, speech corpora, subtitles, TED talks
Published online: 13 May 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.69.04ast
References (63)
References
Arnon, I. & Snider, N. 2010. More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62(1): 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, M. 2006. Prosody and idioms in English. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10): 1580–1597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aston, G. 2001. Corpora in language pedagogy: An overview. In Learning with Corpora, G. Aston (ed.), 7–45. Houston TX: Athelstan.Google Scholar
Bardovi–Harlig, K. & Vellenga, H. 2012. The effect of instruction on conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. System 40(1): 77–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S. 1999. Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In Out of Corpora, S. Oksefjell & H. Hasselgard (eds), 181–189. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Cortes, V. 2004. ‘If you look at…’: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1976. Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1: 1–14.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 2002. Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 215–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. 1988. Punctuation and the prosody of written language. Written Communication 5(4): 395–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. 2012. Mining a year of speech. Presentation at TGE Adonis, Orleans, 5 April. <[URL]> (8 May 2014).
Conklin, K. & Schmitt, N. 2008. Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics 29(1): 72–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A. & Walls, R. 2012. TED talks, vocabulary, and listening for EAP. TESOLANZ Journal 20(1): 55–67.Google Scholar
Crossley, S. & Salsbury, T. 2011. The development of lexical bundle accuracy and production in English second language speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 49(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. 2012. Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 17–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, B. 2007. Cognitive processes as evidence of the idiom principle. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(1): 25–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, P. 2001. Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing, M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (eds), 75–93. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gavioli, L. & Aston, G. 2001. Enriching reality: Language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT Journal 55(3): 238–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gile, D. 1997. Conference interpreting as a cognitive management problem. In Cognitive Processes in Translation and Interpreting, J. Danks, G. Shreve, S. Fountain & M. McBeath (eds), 196–214. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Glavitsch, U., Simon, K. & Szakos, J. 2011. SpeechIndexer: A flexible software for audio–visual language learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, Informatics, and Cybernetics; International Symposium on Integrating Research, Education, and Problem-Solving (post-conference edition), N. Callaos, H.-W. Chu, J. Horne & F. Welsch (eds), 91–94. <[URL]> (8 May, 2014).
Gray, B. & Biber, D. 2013. Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1): 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greaves, C. 2009. ConcGram 1.0. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hasselgren, A. 1994. Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(2): 237–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, L. 2007. The song in the booth: Formulaic interpreting and oral textualisation. Interpreting 9(1): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, K. 1996. Smooth Talkers: The Linguistic Performance of Auctioneers and Sportscasters. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2004. Formulaic performance in conventionalised varieties of speech. In Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use [Language Learning and Language Teaching 9], N. Schmitt (ed.), 37–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiper, K., Columbus, G. & Schmitt, N. 2009. Acquiring phrasal vocabulary. In Advances in Language Acquisition, S. Foster-Cohen (ed.), 216–240. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lin, P. 2010a. The phonology of formulaic sequences: A review. In Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communication, D. Wood (ed.), 174–193. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2010b. The Prosody of Formulaic Language. PhD dissertation, University of Nottingham.
. 2012. Sound evidence: The missing piece of the jigsaw in formulaic language research. Applied Linguistics 33(3): 342–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. The prosody of formulaic expressions in the IBM/Lancaster Spoken English Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4): 561–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. 2011. WinPitch: A multimodal tool for speech analysis of endangered languages. In Interspeech-2011, 3273–3276.Google Scholar
Mel’cuk, I. 1998. Collocations and lexical functions. In Phraseology, A. Cowie (ed.), 23–53. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Millar, N. 2011. The processing of malformed formulaic language. Applied Linguistics 32(2): 129–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nation, P. 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nattinger, J. 1980. A lexical phrase grammar for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 14(3): 337–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nattinger, J. & De Carrico, J. 1992. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nesi, H. & Basturkmen, H. 2006. Lexical bundles and discourse signaling in academic lectures. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(3): 283–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, M.B., Römer, U. & Ellis, N. 2013. The development of formulaic sequences in first and second language writing: Investigating effects of frequency, association, and native norm. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1): 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ong, W. 1982. Orality and Literacy. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parry, M. 1971. The Making of Homeric Verse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. & Syder, F. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Language and Communication, J. Richards & R. Schmidt (eds), 191–225. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2000. The one clause at a time hypothesis. In Perspectives on Fluency, H. Riggenbach (ed.), 163–191. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pigada, M. & Schmitt, N. 2006. Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language 18(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Raupach, M. 1984. Formulae in second language speech production. In Second Language Production, H. Dechert, D. Möhle & M. Raupach (eds), 114–137. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Römer, U. 2011. Observations on the phraseology of academic writing: Local patterns – local meanings? In The Phraseological View of Language: A Tribute to John Sinclair, T. Herbst, S. Faulhaber & P. Uhrig (eds), 211–227. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. 2012. WordSmith Tools 6.0. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, R. & Ellis, N. 2010. An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics 31(4): 487–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH. 1987. Collocation: A progress report. In Language Topics, II: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, R. Steele & T. Threadgold (eds), 319–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2004. Interview with John Sinclair, conducted by Wolfgang Teubert. In English Collocation Studies: The OSTI report, R. Krishnamurthy, R. Daley, S. Jones & J. Sinclair (eds), xvii–xxix. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2008. The phrase, the whole phrase and nothing but the phrase. In Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, S. Granger & F. Meunier (eds), 407–410. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Strik, H., Hulsbosch, M. & Cucchiarini, C. 2010. Analyzing and identifying multiword expressions in spoken language. Language Resources and Evaluation 44(1-2): 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P. 2011. Pausing patterns: Differences between L2 learners and native speakers. ELT Journal 65(1): 71–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vogel Sosa, A. & MacFarlane, J. 2002. Evidence for frequency-based constituents in the mental lexicon: Collocations involving the word ‘of’. Brain and Language 83(2): 227–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walczyk, J., Griffith, D., Yates, R., Visconte, S., Simoneaux, B. & Harris, L. 2012. Lie detection by inducing cognitive load: Eye movements and other cues to the false answers of ‘witnesses’ to crimes. Criminal Justice and Behavior 39(7): 887–909. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. 2006. English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 231–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zahar, R., Cobb, T. & Spada, N. 2001. Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. Canadian Modern Language Review 57(4): 541–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Boers, Frank, Thuy Bui, Julie Deconinck, Hélène Stengers & Averil Coxhead
2023. Helping learners develop autonomy in acquiring multiword expressions. The Modern Language Journal 107:1 ► pp. 222 ff. DOI logo
Gaber, Mahmoud
2023. How to master phraseology and automate the documentation process: a technological solution for interpreter training in the Spanish&lt;&gt;Arabic combination. Romanica Olomucensia 35:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Yinyin
2023. Phrasal verbs in European Parliament conference English: a corpus-based pedagogical list. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Yinyin
2024. Multiword constructions in European Parliament conference English: a corpus-driven pedagogical list. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Corpas Pastor, Gloria
2022. Interpreting Tomorrow? How to Build a Computer-Assisted Glossary of Phraseological Units in (Almost) No Time. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13528], ► pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Corpas Pastor, Gloria & Fernando Sánchez Rodas
2021. Chapter 1. Now what?. In Corpora in Translation and Contrastive Research in the Digital Age [Benjamins Translation Library, 158], ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Thuy, Frank Boers & Averil Coxhead
2020. Extracting multiword expressions from texts with the aid of online resources. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 171:2 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.