Cover not available
Part of
Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning
Edited by Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska and Alex Boulton
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 69] 2015
► pp. 267–296

Applying data-driven learning to the web

| ATILF, CNRS & University of Lorraine
Data-driven learning typically involves the use of dedicated concordancers to explore linguistic corpora, which may require significant training if the technology is not to be an obstacle for teacher and learner alike. One possibility is to begin not with corpus or concordancer, but to find parallels with what ‘ordinary’ users already do. This paper compares the web to a corpus, regular search engines to concordancers, and the techniques used in web searches to data-driven learning. It also examines previous studies which exploit web searches in ways not incompatible with a DDL approach.
Keywords: data-driven learning, DDL, Google, Internet, search engines, web as corpus
Published online: 13 May 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.69.13bou
References (113)
References
Acar, A., Geluso, J. & Shiki, T. 2011. How can search engines improve your writing? CALL-EJ 12(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Adolphs, S. 2006. Introducing Electronic Text Analysis: A Practical Guide for Language and Literary Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Allan, R. 2009. Can a graded reader corpus provide ‘authentic’ input? ELT Journal 63(1): 23–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, L. 2011. AntConc, version 3. Tokyo: Waseda University. <[URL]> (17 February 2013).Google Scholar
Aston, G. 1997. Small and large corpora in language learning. In Practical Applications in Language Corpora, B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & J. Melia (eds), 51–62. Łódź: Łódź University Press.Google Scholar
Baroni, M. & Bernardini, S. (eds). 2006. Wacky! Working Papers on the Web as Corpus. Bologna: Gedit.Google Scholar
Bergh, G. 2005. Min(d)ing English language data on the web: What can Google tell us? ICAME Journal 29: 25–46.Google Scholar
Bernardini, S., Baroni, M. & Evert, S. 2006. A WaCky introduction. In Wacky! Working Papers on the Web as Corpus, M. Baroni & S. Bernardini (eds), 9–40. Bologna: Gedit.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Reppen, R. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boulton, A. 2010a. Data-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning 60(3): 534–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. Data-driven learning: On paper, in practice. In Corpus Linguistics in Language Teaching, T. Harris & M. Moreno Jaén (eds), 17–52. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2011a. Data-driven learning: The perpetual enigma. In Explorations across Languages and Corpora, S. Goźdź-Roszkowski (ed.), 563–580. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2011b. Bringing corpora to the masses: Free and easy tools for interdisciplinary language studies. In Corpora, Language, Teaching, and Resources: From Theory to Practice, N. Kübler (ed.), 69–96. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2012. Hands-on/hands-off: Alternative approaches to data-driven learning. In Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, J. Thomas & A. Boulton (eds), 152–168. Brno: Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar
Boulton, A. & Tyne, H. 2014. Des Documents Authentiques aux Corpus: Démarches pour l’Apprentissage des Langues. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Braun, S. 2005. From pedagogically relevant corpora to authentic language learning contents. ReCALL 17(1): 47–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Getting past ‘groundhog day’: Spoken multimedia corpora for student-centred corpus exploration. In Corpus Linguistics in Language Teaching, T. Harris & M. Moreno Jaén (eds), 75–97. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brezina, V. 2012. Use of Google Scholar in corpus-driven EAP research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(4): 319–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burnard, L. 2002. Where did we go wrong? A retrospective look at the British National Corpus. In Teaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis, B. Kettemann & G. Marko (eds), 51–70. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Buyse, K. & Verlinde, S. 2013. Possible effects of free on line data driven lexicographic instruments on foreign language learning: The case of Linguee and the Interactive Language Toolbox. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 95: 507–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, A. & O’Sullivan, Í. 2004. Corpus consultation and advanced learners’ writing skills in French. ReCALL 16(1): 158–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, J.-Y. 2010. Postsecondary EFL students’ evaluations of corpora with regard to English writing. SNU Journal of Education Research 19: 57–85. <[URL]> (11 April 2011).Google Scholar
Cheng, W. 2011. Exploring Corpus Linguistics: Language in Action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chinnery, G. 2008. You’ve got some GALL: Google-assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology 12(1): 3–11.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. 2014. A resource wish-list for data-driven learning in French. In Ecological and Data-Driven Perspectives in French Language Studies, H. Tyne, V. André, A. Boulton, C. Benzitoun & Y. Greub (eds), 257–292. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Conroy, M. 2010. Internet tools for language learning: University students taking control of their writing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 26(6): 861–882.Google Scholar
Cotos, E. 2014. Enhancing writing pedagogy with learner corpus data. ReCALL 26(2): 202–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. 2011. Internet Linguistics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, M. 2009. The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990-2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 159–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Google Scholar and COCA-Academic: Two very different approaches to examining academic English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12: 155–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dose, S. 2012. Scripted speech in the EFL classroom: The Corpus of American Television Series for teaching spoken English. In Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, J. Thomas & A. Boulton (eds), 103–121. Brno: Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar
Dudeney, G. 2000. The Internet and the Language Classroom. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ferris, D. & Roberts, B. 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. 1957. Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fletcher, W. 2007. Concordancing the web: Promise and problems, tools and techniques. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 25–45. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Forchini, P. 2012. Movie Language Revisited: Evidence from Multi- Dimensional Analysis and Corpora. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Frankenberg-Garcia, A. 2014. How language learners can benefit from corpora, or not. Recherches en Didactique des Langues et des Cultures, 11(1): 93-110.Google Scholar
Franz, A. & Brants, T. 2006. All our n-gram are belong to you. Google Machine Translation Team Research Blog. <[URL]> (6 June 2012).Google Scholar
Gao, Z.-M. 2011. Exploring the effects and use of a Chinese-English parallel concordancer. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(3): 255–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavioli, L. 2009. Corpus analysis and the achievement of learner autonomy in interaction. In Using Corpora to Learn about Language and Discourse, L. Lombardo (ed.), 39–71. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Geiller, L. 2014. How EFL students can use Google to correct ‘untreatable’ written errors. Eurocall Review 22(2): 26-45.Google Scholar
Geluso, J. 2013. Phraseology and frequency of occurrence on the web: Native speakers’ perceptions of Google-informed second language writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 26(2): 144–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghadessy, M., Henry, A. & Roseberry, R. (eds). 2001. Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Granger, S. 2010. How can data-driven learning be used in language teaching? In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds), 359–370. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Gries, S. 2009. Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hafner, C. & Candlin, C. 2007. Corpus tools as an affordance to learning in professional legal education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4): 303–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E. & Thomas, K. 2010. Trust on the web: How young adults judge the credibility of online content. International Journal of Communication 4: 468–494.Google Scholar
Hawkins, D. 1996. Hunting, grazing, browsing: A model for online information retrieval. ONLINE 20: n.p. <[URL]> (17 July, 2006 via <[URL]>).Google Scholar
Hoey, M. 2012. Lexical priming: The odd case of a psycholinguistic theory that generates corpus-linguistic hypotheses for both English and Chinese. Paper given at Corpus Technologies and Applied Linguistics . Suzhou: Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University, 28-30 June. DOI logo
Huang, H.-T. & Liou, H.-C. 2007. Vocabulary learning in an automated graded reading program. Language Learning & Technology 11(3): 64–82.Google Scholar
Hundt, M., Nesselhauf, N. & Biewer, C. (eds). 2007. Corpus Linguistics and the Web. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Johns, T. 1986. Micro-Concord: A language learner’s research tool. System 14(2): 151–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Whence and whither classroom concordancing? In Computer Applications in Language Learning, P. Bongaerts, P. de Haan, S. Lobbe & H. Wekker (eds), 9–27. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1990. From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. CALL Austria 10: 14–34.Google Scholar
. 1991. Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning. In Classroom Concordancing, T. Johns & P. King (eds), English Language Research Journal 4: 1–16.Google Scholar
. 1993. Data-driven learning: An update. TELL&CALL 2: 4–10.Google Scholar
. 1997. Contexts: The background, development and trialling of a concordance-based CALL program. In Teaching and Language Corpora, A. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery & G. Knowles (eds), 100–115. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Johns, T. & King, P. (eds). 1991. Classroom Concordancing. English Language Research Journal 4.Google Scholar
Johns, T., Lee, H.-C. & Wang, L. 2008. Integrating corpus-based CALL programs in teaching English through children’s literature. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(5): 483–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B. 2004. The editor’s department: On change in Language and change in language. Language 80(3): 381–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaszubski, P. 2006. Web-based concordancing and ESAP writing. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 41: 161–193.Google Scholar
Keller, F. & Lapata, M. 2003. Using the web to obtain frequencies for unseen bigrams. Computational Linguistics 29(3): 459–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. & Miceli, T. 2001. An evaluation of intermediate students’ approaches to corpus investigation. Language Learning & Technology 5(3): 77–90.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A. 2001. Web as corpus. In Corpus Linguistics: Readings in a Widening Discipline, G. Sampson & D. McCarthy (eds), 471–473. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2005. Language is never, ever, ever random. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2): 263–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Googleology is bad science. Computational Linguistics 33(1): 147–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, A. & Grefenstette, G. (eds). 2003. Web as Corpus . Computational Linguistics 29(3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kübler, N. 2011. Working with corpora for translation teaching in a French-speaking setting. In New Trends in Corpora and Language Learning, A. Frankenberg-Garcia, L. Flowerdew & G. Aston (eds), 62–80. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lam, Y. 2000. Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second-language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review 56(3): 390–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. & Hulstijn, J. 2001. Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics 22(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. 1997. Teaching and language corpora: A convergence. In Teaching and Language Corpora, A. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery & G. Knowles (eds), 1–23. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Leńko-Szymańska, A. 2014. Is this enough? A qualitative evaluation of the effectiveness of a teacher-training course on the use of corpora in language education. ReCALL 26(2): 260–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. & Oakey, D. 2004. Communication with a purpose: Exploiting the Internet to promote language learning. In ICT and Language Learning: Integrating Pedagogy and Practice, A. Chambers, J. Conacher & J. Littlemore (eds), 95–119. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.Google Scholar
Lüdeling, A., Evert, S. & Baroni, M. 2007. Using web data for linguistic purposes. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 7–24. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. 2008. Accessing and interpreting corpus information in the teacher education context. Language Teaching 41(4): 563–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., Xiao, R. & Tono, Y. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Milton, J. 2006. Resource-rich web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers. In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, K. Hyland & F. Hyland (eds), 123–137. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondorf, B. 2007. Recalcitrant problems of comparative alternation and new insights emerging from Internet data. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 211–232. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H. 2000. The Use and Abuse of EFL Dictionaries. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, Í. & Chambers, A. 2006. Learners’ writing skills in French: Corpus consultation and learner evaluation. Journal of Second Language Writing 15(1): 49–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, K. 2012. Learner-corpus interaction: A locus of microgenesis in corpus-assisted L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 33(4): 361–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, K. & Kinginger, C. 2010. Writing/thinking in real time: Digital video and corpus query analysis. Language Learning & Technology 14(3): 31–50.Google Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, P., Sánchez Tornel, M., Alcaraz Calero, J. & Aguada Jiménez, P. 2011. Tracking learners’ actual uses of corpora: Guided vs. non-guided corpus consultation. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(3): 233–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philip, G. 2011. ‘…and I dropped my jaw with fear’: The role of corpora in teaching phraseology. In Corpora, Language, Teaching, and Resources: From Theory to Practice, N. Kübler (ed.), 49–68. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Quaglio, P. 2009. Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 36]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renouf, A., Kehoe, A. & Banerjee, J. 2007. WebCorp: An integrated system for web text search. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 47–67. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robb, T. 2003. Google as a quick ‘n’ dirty corpus tool. TESL-EJ 7(2): n.p. <[URL]> (1 July, 2007).Google Scholar
Rodgers, O., Chambers, A. & LeBaron, F. 2011. Corpora in the LSP classroom: A learner-centred corpus of French for biotechnologists. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(3): 392–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohdenburg, G. 2007. Determinants of grammatical variation in English and the formation/confirmation of linguistic hypotheses by means of Internet data. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 191–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Römer, U. 2010. Using general and specialised corpora in English language teaching: Past, present and future. In Corpus-based Approaches to English Language Teaching, M.-C. Campoy, B. Bellés-Fortuño & M.-L. Gea-Valor (eds), 18–35. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, A. 2007. Exploring constructions on the web: A case study. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer (eds), 67–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rundell, M. 2000. The biggest corpus of all. Humanising Language Teaching 2(3): n.p. <[URL]> (7 June 2012).Google Scholar
Scheffler, P. 2007. When intuition fails us: The world wide web as a corpus. Glottodidactica 33: 137–145.Google Scholar
Sha, G. 2010. Using Google as a super corpus to drive written language learning: A comparison with the British National Corpus. Computer Assisted Language Learning 23(5): 377–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharoff, S. 2006. Creating general-purpose corpora using automated search engine queries. In WaCKy! Working Papers on the Web as Corpus, M. Baroni & S. Bernardini (eds), 63–98. Bologna: Gedit.Google Scholar
Shei, C. 2008a. Web as corpus, Google, and TESOL: A new trilogy. Taiwan Journal of TESOL 5(2): 1–28.Google Scholar
. 2008b. Discovering the hidden treasure on the Internet: Using Google to uncover the veil of phraseology. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(1): 67–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. 2001. Preface. In Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 5], M. Ghadessy, A. Henry & R. Roseberry (eds), vii–xv. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Reading Concordances: An Introduction. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
. (ed.). 2004. How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Corpus and text: Basic principles. / Appendix: How to build a corpus. In Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice, M. Wynne (ed.), 5–24 / 95–101. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Smith, S. 2011. Learner construction of corpora for general English in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(4): 291–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sockett, G. & Toffoli, D. 2012. Beyond learner autonomy: A dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL 24(2): 138–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D., Bernardini, S. & Aston, G. 2004. Ten years of TaLC. In Corpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], G. Aston, S. Bernardini & D. Stewart (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y.-C. 2007. Learner perceptions of a concordancing tool for academic writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 20(4): 323–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Todd, R. 2001. Induction from self-selected concordances and self-correction. System 29(1): 91–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyne, H. 2012. Corpus work with ordinary teachers: Data-driven learning activities. In Input, Process and Product: Developments in Teaching and Language Corpora, J. Thomas & A. Boulton (eds), 136–151. Brno: Masaryk University Press.Google Scholar
Volk, M. 2002. Using the web as corpus for linguistic research. In Tähendusepüüdja: Catcher of the Meaning – A Festschrift for Professor Halduur Oim, R. Pajusalu & T. Hennoste (eds), n.p. Tartu: University of Tartu. <[URL]> (25 March 2006).Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G. 2000. On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics 21(1): 3–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, J. 1998. Concordances in the classroom without a computer. In Materials Development in Language Teaching, B. Tomlinson (ed.), 44–66. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wu, S., Franken, M. & Witten, I. 2009. Refining the use of the web (and web search) as a language teaching and learning resource. Computer Assisted Language Learning 22(3): 249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, H. & Jo, J. 2014. Direct and indirect access to corpora: An exploratory case study comparing students’ error correction and learning strategy use in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology 18(1): 96–117.Google Scholar
Young, B. 2011. The grammar voyeur: Using Google to teach English grammar to advanced undergraduates. American Speech 86(2): 247–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Zare, Javad, Sedigheh Karimpour & Khadijeh Aqajani Delavar
2023. Classroom concordancing and English academic lecture comprehension: an implication of data-driven learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 36:5-6 ► pp. 885 ff. DOI logo
Crosthwaite, Peter & Brett Steeples
2022. Data-driven learning with younger learners: exploring corpus-assisted development of the passive voice for science writing with female secondary school students. Computer Assisted Language Learning ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zare, Javad & Sedigheh Karimpour
2022. Classroom Concordancing and Second Language Motivational Self-System: A Data-Driven Learning Approach. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Boulton, Alex
2021. Chapter 1. Research in data-driven learning. In Beyond Concordance Lines [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 102], ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Mohanachandran, Dileep Kumar, Cheng Tat Yap, Zohr Ismaili & Normala S. Govindarajo
2021. Smart University and Artificial Intelligence. In The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Implementation of Artificial Intelligence for Growing Business Success [Studies in Computational Intelligence, 935], ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Ben Amor, Olfa & Faiza Derbel
2020. The Identification of English Non-finite Structures Using NooJ Platform. In Formalizing Natural Languages with NooJ 2019 and Its Natural Language Processing Applications [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1153], ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Charles, Maggie
2018. Corpus Tools for Writing Students. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Boulton, Alex & Tom Cobb
2017. Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta‐Analysis. Language Learning 67:2 ► pp. 348 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.