Aarts, Bas & McMahon, April (eds). 2006. The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, Svenja. 2008. Corpus and Context: Investigating Pragmatic Functions in Spoken Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 30]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, Svenja & Carter, Ronald. 2013. Spoken Corpus Linguistics: From Monomodal to Multimodal. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 1996. Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin & Rühlemann, Christoph (eds). 2015. Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, James. 1995. Natural Language Understanding, 2nd edn. Redwood City CA: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Allen, James & Core, Mark. 1997. Draft of DAMSL: Dialog Act Markup in Several Layers. <[URL]>
Alexandersson, Jan, Buschbeck-Wolf, Bianka, Fujinami, Tsutomu, Kipp, Michael, Koch, Stephan, Maier, Elisabeth, Reithinger, Norbert, Schmitz, Birte & Siegel, Melanie. 1997. Dialogue Acts in VERBMOBIL-2. VM-Report 204, DFKI GmbH.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1990. Spoken English and the dictionary. In The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research, Jan Svartvik (ed.). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Anne, Bader, Miles, Bard, Ellen, Boyle, Elizabeth, Doherty, Gwyneth, Garrod, Simon, Isard, Stephen, Kowtko, Jacqueline, McAllister, Jan, Miller, Jim, Sotillo, Catherine, Thompson, Henry & Weinert, Regina. 1991. The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language and Speech 32: 351–366.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Ion & Aretoulaki, Maria. 2003. Natural language interaction. In Mitkov (ed.), 629–648.Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. <[URL]>
Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkins, Sue & Rundell, Michael. 2008. The Oxford Guide to Practical Lexicography. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell & Heritage, John. 1984/2006. Jefferson’s transcript notation. In Structures of Social Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.). Cambridge: CUP. Reprinted in Adam Jaworski & Nicholas Coupland (eds). 2006. The Discourse Reader, 2nd edn, 158–165. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Barnbrook, Geoff. 1996. Language and Computers: A Practical Introduction to the Computer Analysis of Language. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Beesley, Kenneth & Karttunen, Lauri. 2003. Finite State Morphology. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Benson, James & Greaves, William. 1981. Field of discourse: Theory and application. Applied Linguistics II(1).Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Reppen, Randi. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 1997. Approches de la langue parlée en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Bradley, Neil. 1998. The XML Companion. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2000. Lexical-functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian & Yule, George. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Burnard, Lou. 1995. The Text Encoding Initiative: An overview. In Leech, Myers & Thomas (eds), 69–81.Google Scholar
Bussmann, Hadumod. 1996. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics, Gregory Trauth & Kerstin Kazzazi (trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam, Holloway King, Tracy, Niño, María-Eugenia & Segond, Frédérique. 1999. A Grammar Writer’s Cookbook. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Callies, Marcus. 2013. Advancing the research agenda of interlanguage pragmatics: The role of learner corpora. In Romero-Trillo (ed.), 9–36. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Carletta, Jean, Isard, Amy, Isard, Stephen, Kowtko, Jacqueline, Doherty-Sneddon, Gwyneth & Anderson, Anne. 1996. HCRC Dialogue Structure Coding Manual. HCRC Technical Report 82. Edinburgh: Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Carroll, John. 2003. Parsing. In Mitkov (ed.), 233–248.Google Scholar
Carstensen, Kai-Uwe, Ebert, Christian, Endriss, Cornelia, Jekat, Susanne, Klabunde, Ralf & Langer, Hagen (eds). 2004. Computerlinguistik und Sprachtechnologie: Eine Einführung, 2nd edn. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1984. How people use adverbial clauses. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Claudia Brugman & Monika Macaulay (eds), 437–449. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
. 1993. Prosodic and functional units of language. In Edwards & Lampert (eds).Google Scholar
. 1995. Adequacy, user-friendliness, and practicability in transcribing. In Leech, Myers & Thomas (eds), 54–61.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cloeren, Jan. 1999. Tagsets. In van Halteren (ed.), 37–54.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2006. Clause types. In Aarts & McMahon (eds), 72–92. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2009. Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Core, Mark, Ishizaki, Masato, Moore, Johanna, Nakatani, Christine, Reithinger, Norbert, Traum, David & Tutiya, Syun. 1998. The Report of the Third Workshop of the Discourse Resource Initiative. Chiba: Chiba University and Kazusa Academia Hall.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm (ed).1977. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1992. Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela. 2000. Corpus di Italiano Parlato. Firenze: Accademia delle Crusca.Google Scholar
. 2014. Syntactic properties of spontaneous speech in the language into act theory: Data on Italian complements and relative clauses. In Raso & Mello (eds), 365–410.Google Scholar
Crichton, Charles. (Dir.). 1988. A Fish Called Wanda. [Motion Picture]. UK/USA: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.Google Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2009. The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): Design architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 195–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeRose, Steven. 1988. Grammatical category disambiguation by statistical optimization. Computational Linguistics 14(1): 31–39.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jane. 1993. Principles and contrasting systems of discourse transcription. In Edwards & Lampert (eds), 3–31.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jane & Lampert, Martin (eds). 1993. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, Bergen, Benjamin & Zinken, Jörg (eds). 2007. The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Eileen (ed.). 2007. Corpus Linguistics Beyond the Word: Corpus Research from Phrase to Discourse. Amsterdam: Rodopi.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flöck, Ilka & Geluykens, Ronald. 2015. Speech acts in corpus pragmatics: A quantitative contrastive study of directives in spontaneous and elicited discourse. In Romero-Trillo (ed.), 7–37.Google Scholar
Francis, Gill & Hunston, Susan. 1992. Analysing everyday conversation. In Coulthard (ed.), 123–161.Google Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson & Kučera, Henry. 1979. Manual of information to accompany a standard sample of present-day edited American English, for use with digital computers. First published 1964, revised and augmented 1979. Providence RI: Department of Linguistics, Brown University.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1996. Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6(2): 167–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Towards a theory of discourse markers. In Fischer (ed.), 189–204.Google Scholar
Garside, Roger, Leech, Geoffrey & McEnery, Anthony (eds). 1997. Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Garside, Roger, Leech, Geoffrey & Sampson, Geoffrey (eds). 1987. The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-based Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Geis, Michael. 1995. Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction: Toward a Theory of Conversational Competence. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, Dafydd. 2000. Computational lexicography. In van Eynde & Gibbon (eds), 1–39.
Gibbon, Dafydd, Mertins, Inge & Moore, Roger(eds). 2000. Handbook of Multimodal and Spoken Language Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, De Cock, Sylvie, & Granger, Sylviane (eds). 2010. Louvain International Database of Spoken Interlanguage (LINDSEI). Louvain: UCL Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Godfrey, John & Holliman, Edward. 1997. Switchboard-1 Release 2. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. <[URL]> (14 September 2017).
Goldberg, Adele. 2007[2003]. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to Language. In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, Vyvyan Evans, Benjamn Bergen & Jorg Zinken (eds). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1996. Transparent vision. In Ochs, Schegloff & Thompson (eds), 370–404.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Biber, Douglas. 2015. Stance markers. In Aijmer & Rühlemann (eds), 219–248.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael & Carroll, Susanne. 1978. Language and Situation. London: Routledge and K. Paul.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds). 1988. Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John. 1997. Mind Design II, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hazadiah, M.D. 1991. The Structure of Topic. PhD Thesis: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Heeman, Peter & Allen, James. 1995. The TRAINS 93 Dialogues. Technical Report. University of Rochester, Rochester NY, USA.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 2015. Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 88: 88–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs Erhard, Kübler, Sandra, Kordoni Valia & Müller Frank. 2000. Robust chunk parsing for spontaneous speech. In Verbmobil: Foundations of Speech-to-Speech Translation, Wolfgang Wahlster (ed.), 163–182. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry. 2006. Abduction in natural language understanding. In Horn & Ward (eds), 724–741.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence & Ward, Gregory. 2006[2004]. The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2007. Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 6(2): 173–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, Nancy. 2007. Preparation and analysis of linguistic corpora. In Schreibmann, Siemens & Unsworth (eds), 289–305.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam & Coupland, Nikolas (eds). 2006. The Discourse Reader, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jekat, Susanne, Klein, Marion, Maier, Elisabeth, Maleck, Ilona, Mast, Marion, Quantz, Joachim. 1995. Dialogue Acts in VERBMOBIL. VM-Report 65, DFKI GmbH.Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig. 1995. The approach of the Text Encoding Initiative to the encoding of spoken discourse. In Leech, Myers & Thomas (eds), 82–98.Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey & Goodluck, Helen. 1978. Manual of information to accompany the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen corpus of British English, for use with digital computers. Oslo: Department of English, Oslo University.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas. 1993. The discourse marker well: A relevance-theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 19(5): 435–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1611–1635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Smith, Sara W. 1998. And people just you know like ‘wow’: Discourse markers as negotiation strategies. In Jucker & Ziv (eds), 171–202.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Ziv, Yael (eds). 1998. Discourse Markers: Description and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Discourse markers: Introduction. In Jucker & Ziv (eds), 1–12.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel. 2006. Pragmatics and computational linguistics. In Horn & Ward (eds), 578–604.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel & Martin, James. 2000. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel, Shriberg, Liz & Biasca, Debra. 1997. Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL Shallow-Discourse-Function Annotation Coder Manual. <[URL]>
Kallen, Jeffrey & Kirk, John. 2012. SPICE-Ireland: A User’s Guide. Queen’s University Belfast, Trinity College Dublin, and Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.Google Scholar
Klein, Marion. 1999. Standardisation efforts on the level of dialogue act in the MATE Project. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop “Towards Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging”, 35–41.Google Scholar
Knight, Dawn, Evans, David, Carter, Ronald & Adolphs, Svenia. 2009. HeadTalk, HandTalk and the corpus: Towards a framework for multi-modal, multi-media corpus development. Corpora 4(1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knight, Dawn. 2011. Multimodality and Active Listenership: A Corpus Approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Knowles, Gerald. 1987. Patterns of Spoken English: An Introduction to English Phonetics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. The Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Eyes, Elizabeth. 1997. Syntactic annotation: treebanks. In R. Garside, G. Leech & T. McEnery (eds). Corpus annotation: linguistic information from computer text corpora. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Myers, Greg & Thomas, Jenny (eds). 1995. Spoken English on Computer: Transcription, Mark-up and Application. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Rayson, Paul & Wilson, Andrew. 2001. Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Weisser, Martin, Wilson, Andrew & Grice, Martine. 2000. Survey and guidelines for the representation and annotation of dialogue. In Handbook of Multimodal and Spoken Language Systems, Dafydd Gibbon, Inge Mertins & Roger K. Moore (eds). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Weisser, Martin. 2003. Generic speech act annotation for task-oriented dialogues. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference [UCREL Technical Papers 16], Dawn Archer, Paul Rayson, Andrew Wilson & Tony McEnery (eds). Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
. 2013. The SPAADIA Annotation Scheme. <[URL]>
Leicher, Sheryl & Maynard, Carson. 2007. Pragmatic annotation of an academic spoken corpus for pedagogical purposes. In Fitzpatrick (ed.), 107–115.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael. 1998. Taming the spoken language: Genre theory and pedagogy. The Language Teacher Online. <[URL]> (1 September 2009).
Mann, William & Thompson, Sandra. 1987. Rhetorical structure theory: Description and construction of text structures. In Natural Language Generation: New Results in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology and Linguistics, Gerard Kempen (ed.). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, Christopher & Schütze, Hinrich. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Mitchell, Santorini, Beatrice & Marcinkiewicz, Mary Ann. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics 19. (page references refer to downloaded version).Google Scholar
Marshall, Ian. 1987. Tag selection using probabilistic methods. In Garside, Leech & Sampson (eds), 42–56.Google Scholar
Matthiesen, Christian M. I. M. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In Haiman & Thompson (eds), 275–330.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Wilson, Andrew. 1996. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Xiao, Richard & Tono, Yukio. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob. 1993. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Miller, James & Weinert, Regina. 1998. Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin. 1974/1997. A framework for representing knowledge. Reprinted in Mind Design II, John Haugeland (ed.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mitkov, Ruslan (ed.). 2003. The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Moneglia, Massimo. 2011. Spoken corpora and pragmatics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11(2): 479–519.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Gerald. 2002. International Corpus of English Markup Manual for Spoken Texts. London: University College London, Survey of English Usage. <[URL]> (12 November 2016).
Niemann, Heinrich, Nöth, Elmar, Harbeck, Stefan & Warnke, Volker. 1997. Topic Spotting Using Subword Units. Verbmobil-Report 205. F.A.U. Erlangen-Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds). 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne, Clancy, Brian & Adolphs, Svenja. 2011. Introducing Pragmatics in Use. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ooi, Vincent. 1998. Computer Corpus Lexicography. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. 1990. Modality and the English Modals, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2001. Mood and Modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Power, Richard. 1979. The organization of purposeful dialogues. Linguistics 17 (1–2): 105–52.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Raso, Tommaso & Mello, Heliana (eds). 2014. Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 61]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roark, Brian & Sproat, Richard. 2007. Computational Approaches to Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús (ed.). 2013. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013: New Domains and New Methodologies. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jésus (ed.). 2015. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015: Current Approaches to Discourse and Translation Studies. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph. 2006. Coming to terms with conversational grammar: ‘Dislocation’ and ‘dysfluency’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(4): 385–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 697–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salton, Gerard & Buckley, Christopher. 1988. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management 24(5): 513–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice. 1995. Part of Speech Tagging Guidelines for the Penn Treebank Project, 3rd revision, 2nd printing. <[URL]>
Schank, Roger & Abelson, Robert. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schreibmann, Susan, Siemens, Ray & Unsworth, John (eds). 2007. A Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter. 1985. Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories: An Introduction to Government-Binding Theory, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, and Lexical-Functional Grammar [Lecture Notes 3]. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423, 623–656, July, October 1948. page no. refers to reprint downloadable from <[URL]> (9 July 2008).
Shannon, Claude & Weaver, Warren. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Chicago IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Rita, Briggs, Sarah, Ovens, Janine & Swales, John. 2002. The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1992. Priorities in discourse analysis. In Coulthard (ed.), 79–88.Google Scholar
. 2005. Corpus and text – Basic principles. In Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice, Martin Wynne (ed.), 1–16. Oxford: Oxbow Books: <[URL]> (26 October 2016).
Sinclair, John & Coulthard, Malcolm. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John & Mauranen, Anna. 2006. Linear Unit Grammar: Integrating Speech and Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1995. Relevance, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperberg-McQueen, Michael & Burnard, Lou (eds). 1994. Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange (TEI P3). Chicago IL: Association for Computers and the Humanities/Association for Computational Linguistics/Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard. 1992. Morphology and Computation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1994. An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan (ed.). 1990. The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Szabó, Zoltán (ed.). 2005. Semantics versus Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Jasper & Carletta, Jean. 1996. The SGML Representation of the HCRC Map Task Corpus. Technical Report, Human Communication Research Centre, 2 Buccleugh Place, Edinburgh EH8 8LW, Scotland.Google Scholar
van Eynde, Frank & Gibbon, Dafydd. 2000. Lexicon Development for Speech and Language Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Halteren, Hans (ed.). 1999. Syntactic Wordclass Tagging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, Cognition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Weisser, Martin. 2002. Determining generic elements in dialogue. Language, Information and Lexicography 12–13: 131–156. 25th December, 2003. Institute of Language and Information Studies, Yonsei University.Google Scholar
. 2003. SPAACy – A semi-automated tool for annotating dialogue acts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(1): 63–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Tagging dialogues in SPAACy. In Traitement Automatique des Langues: Le traitement automatique des corpus oraux, Jean Véronis (ed.), Vol. 45–n° 2/2004. 131–157.Google Scholar
. 2009. Essential Programming for Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. Annotating Dialogue Corpora Semi-Automatically: A Corpus-Based Approach to Pragmatics. Habilitation thesis, University of Bayreuth.Google Scholar
. 2015. Speech act annotation. In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, Karin Aijmer & Christoph Rühlemann (eds), 84–113. Cambridge: CUP. Chapter DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2016a. Practical Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction to Corpus-Based Language Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016b. DART – The dialogue annotation and research tool. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(2): 355–388. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2016c. Profiling agents & callers: A dual comparison across speaker roles and British vs. American English. In Talking at Work: Corpus-based Explorations of Workplace Discourse, Lucy Pickering, Eric Friginal & Shelley Staples (eds), 99–26. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2016d. Updating the LINDSEI for pragmatic analysis and evaluation. Paper presented at the Third Asia Pacific Corpus Linguistics Conference (APCLC 2016) , on 22nd October.
. 2017. Annotating the ICE Corpora pragmatically – Preliminary issues & steps. ICAME Journal 41: 181–214. DOI logo.Google Scholar
West, Michael. 1953. A General Service List of English Words. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne. 2000. Intonation in Text and Discourse: Beginnings, Middles, and Ends. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan. 2006. Relevance Theory. In Horn & Ward (eds), 607–632.Google Scholar