Part of
Learner Corpora and Language Teaching
Edited by Sandra Götz and Joybrato Mukherjee
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92] 2019
► pp. 101128
Aguado-Jiménez, Pilar, Pérez-Paredes, Pascual & Sánchez, Purificación
2012Exploring the use of multidimensional analysis of learner language to promote register awareness. System 40(1): 90–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexopoulou, Theodora, Michel, Marije Cornelie, Murakami, Akira & Meurers, Detmar
2017Task effects on linguistic complexity and accuracy: A large-scale learner corpus analysis employing natural language processing techniques. Language Learning 67(S1): 180–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany & Poonpon, Kornwipa
2011Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly 45(1): 5–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boulton, Alex
2009Testing the limits of data-driven learning: Language proficiency and training. ReCALL 21(1): 37–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bulté, Bram & Housen, Alex
2012Defining and operationalising L2 complexity, Alex Housen, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder (eds), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency. Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA [Language Learning & Language Teaching 32], 21–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing 26: 42–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, Heidi & Sinicrope, Castle
2008Advancedness and the development of relativization in L2 German: A curriculum-based longitudinal study, Lourdes Ortega & Heidi Byrnes (eds), The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities, 109–138. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carlsen, Cecilie
2012Proficiency level – a fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora. Applied Linguistics 33(2): 161–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Danqi & Manning, Christopher
2014A Fast and Accurate Dependency Parser using Neural Networks, Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 740–750. Doha, Qatar: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díez-Bedmar, María Belén
2010aAnalysis of the Written Expression in English in the University Entrance Examination at the University of Jaén. PhD dissertation, Universidad de Jaén.Google Scholar
2010bFrom secondary school to university: The Use of the English article system by Spanish learners. In Exploring Corpus Linguistics in English Language Teaching, Begoña Belles-Fortuno, Mari Carmen Campoy & Lluisa Gea-Valor (eds), 45–55. Castelló: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
2012The use of the common European framework of reference for languages to evaluate compositions in the English exam section of the university admission examination. Revista de Educación 357: 55–79.Google Scholar
2015Article use and criterial features in Spanish EFL writing: A pilot study from CEFR A2 to B2 levels. In Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 70], Marcus Callies & Sandra Götz (eds), 163–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díez-Bedmar, María Belén & Papp, Szilvia
2008The use of the English article system by Chinese and Spanish learners. In Linking up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Szilvia Papp & María Belén Díez-Bedmar (eds), 147–175. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díez-Bedmar, María Belén & Pérez Paredes, Pascual
2012A cross-sectional analysis of the use of the English articles in Spanish learner writing. In Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research [Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 4], Yukio Tono, Yuji Kawaguchi & Makoto Minegishi (eds), 139–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. O’Donnell, Matthew Brook & Römer, Ute
2013Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning 63(s1): 25–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., Römer, Ute & O’Donnell, Matthew Brook
2016Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing: cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Foster, Pauline & Tavakoli, Parvaneh
2009Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity. Language Learning 59(4): 866–896. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gablasova, Dana, Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony
2017Exploring learner language through corpora: Comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information. Language Learning 67(S1):130–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Dagneaux, Estelle, Meunier, Fanny & Paquot, Magali
2009The International Corpus of Learner English, Version 2. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. & Filipović, Luna
2012Criterial Features in L2 English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania & Díez-Bedmar, María Belén
Forthcoming. Article use in Russian and Spanish learner writing at CEFR B1 and B2 levels: effects of proficiency, native language, and specificity, Bert. S. W. Le Brun & Magali Paquot eds Learner Corpora and Second Language Acquisition Cambridge CUP
Kyle, Kris
2016Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine Grained Indices of Syntactic Complexity and Usage-based Indices of Syntactic Sophistication. PhD Dissertation, Georgia State University. [URL]> (24 March 2017).
Lu, Xiaofei
2010Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(4): 474–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly 45(1): 36–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, John M. & Ortega, Lourdes
2009Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes
2003Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 24(4): 492–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pendar, Nick & Chapelle, Carol A. A.
2008Investigating the promise of learner corpora: Methodological issues. CALICO Journal 25: 189–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual
2004Learner oral corpora and network-based language teaching. In How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], John M. Sinclair (ed.), 249–269. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez Paredes, Pascual & Díez-Bedmar, María Belén
2012Intensifying adverbs in learner writing. In Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research [Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 4], Yukio Tono, Yuji Kawaguchi & Makoto Minegishi (eds), 105–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual & Sánchez-Tornel, María
2014Adverb use and language proficiency in young learners’ writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 192: 178–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual, Guillamón, Carlos & Aguado, Pilar
2018Language teachers’ perceptions on the use of OER language processing technologies in MALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayson, Paul
2008From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4): 519–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Wmatrix: A Web-based Corpus-processing Environment. Computing Department, Lancaster University. [URL]> (1 February 2016).
Robinson, Peter, Mackey, Alison, Gass, Susan & Schmidt, Richard
2012Attention and awareness in second language acquisition. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Susan Gass & Alison Mackey (eds), 247–267. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Richard
1990The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11: 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Approach to Child Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tono, Yukio & Díez-Bedmar, María Belén
2014Focus on learner writing at the beginning and intermediate stages: The ICCI corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19(2): 163–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rijn, Jacolien, van Rijn, Hedderik & Hendriks, Petra
2012How WM load influences pronoun interpretation. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Nele Rußwinkel, Uwe Drewitz & Hedderick van Rijn (eds), 101–102. Berlin: Universitaetsverlag der TU Berlin.Google Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus & Schäfer, Lade
2002The effect of leavener errors on pos tag errors during automatic POS tagging. Southern African Linguistic and Applied Language Studies, 20(4), 325–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn, Lowie, Wander & Van Dijk, Marijn
2008Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal 92(2): 214–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vyatkina, Nina
2012The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study. The Modern Language Journal 96(4): 576–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Specific syntactic complexity: Developmental profiling of individuals based on an annotated learner corpus. The Modern Language Journal 97(S1): 11–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, Kate, Inagaki, Shunki & Kim, Hae-Young
1998Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy & Complexity. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia, Francisco Gallardo-del-Puerto & Evelyn Gandón-Chapela
2020. The Primary Education Learners’ English Corpus (PELEC): Design and compilation. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Picoral, Adriana, Shelley Staples & Randi Reppen
2021. Automated annotation of learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 7:1  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.