Cover not available
Part of
Learner Corpora and Language Teaching
Edited by Sandra Götz and Joybrato Mukherjee
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 92] 2019
► pp. 191–217

English intonation of advanced learners

A contrastive interlanguage analysis

| Justus Liebig University Giessen

Adopting a corpus-based approach within the autosegmental-framework, this paper reports on a study on L2 learners’ intonational deviances of edge tones within intonational units in spontaneous speech in monologues and dialogues derived from a “Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis” (CIA) (cf. Granger 1996, 2015). The analysis reveals that German, Spanish, and British speakers of English deviate from each other in their intonational phrasing and pitch heights in utterance-final and -medial position. The learners break their utterances into considerably more intonation phrases (IP) and intermediate phrases (ip) than native-speakers. While the British native-speakers (n = 10) mainly stick to the usage of falls within IPs and ips, the German learners (n = 10) frequently use rising tones and the Spanish learners (n = 10) frequently use falling tones.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Prosody and learner corpus linguistics
    • 2.1The form of intonation
    • 2.2Previous research on L2 prosody
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Corpus data
    • 3.2The learner profiles
    • 3.3Linguistic and non-linguistic variables
    • 3.4Prosodic annotation of the corpora
    • 3.5Statistical tests
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 6 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.92.10pug
References
Aguilar, Lourdes, de-la-Mota, Carme & Prieto, Pilar
2015 Sp_ToBI. Training material: Boundary tones. [URL]> (20 August 2015).
Altenberg, Bengt
1987 Prosodic Patterns in Spoken English: Studies in the Correlation between Prosody and Grammar for Text-to-speech Conversation. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Backman, Nancy
1979 Intonation errors in second-language pronunciation of eight Spanish-speaking adults learning English. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 4: 239–265.Google Scholar
Barron, Anne
2002 Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics: Learning how to Do Things with Words in a Study Abroad Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 108]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Ayers Elam, Gayle
1997 Guidelines for ToBI Labelling, version 3. The Ohio State University Research Foundation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Pierrehumbert, Janet
1986 Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernardini, Silvia
2004 Corpora in the classroom: an overview and some reflections on future developments. In How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 12], John Sinclair (ed.), 15–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Best, Catherine T.
1995 A direct-realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, Winifred Strange (ed.), 171–204. Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2015 Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. (Version: 5.3.69). [Computer Software]. [URL]> (15 March 2015).
Brand, Christiane & Kämmerer, Susanne
2006 The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage (LINDSEI): Compiling the German component. In Corpus Technology and Language Pedagogy. New Resources, New Tools, New Methods, Sabine Braun, Kurt Kohn & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds), 127–140. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian
1977 Listening to Spoken English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Canepàri, Luciano
2010 The Pronunciation of English around the World: Geo-Social Applications of the Natural Phonetics & Tonetics Method. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2005 A Handbook of Phonetics. Natural Phonetics: Articulatory, Auditory & Functional. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1987 Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cucchiarini, Catia, Strik, Helmer & Boves, Lou
2002 Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6): 2862–2873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cock, Sylvie
2004 Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures (BELL) New Series 2: 225–246.Google Scholar
Diáz-Campos, Manuel
2004 Context of learning in the acquisition of Spanish second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(2): 249–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Draxler, Christoph
2008 Korpusbasierte Sprachverarbeitung: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Esser, Jürgen
1992 Englische Prosodie: Eine Einführung, 3rd edn. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1978 Contrastive intonation of German and English. Phonetica 35: 41–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, James E.
1995 Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, Winifred Strange (ed.), 233–277. Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Anthony
1984 German Intonation: An Outline. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1981 Fall-rise intonations in German and English. In Contrastive aspects of English and German, Charles V. J. Russ (ed.), 55–72. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Freed, Barbara F.
1995 What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent? In Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context [Studies in Bilingualism 9], Barbara F. Freed (ed.), 123–148. Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, Christoph, Meisenburg, Trudel & Selig, Maria
2013 Spanisch: Phonetik und Phonologie. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, De Cock, Sylvie & Granger, Sylviane
(eds) 2010 LINDSEI: Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage, handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Götz, Dieter
1986 Intonation an der Hochschule. Die Neuen Sprachen 85 (5–6): 465–477.Google Scholar
Götz, Sandra & Mukherjee Joybrato
2018 The effect of the study abroad variable in spoken learner language: A pseudo-longitudinal study on spoken German learner English. In Learner Corpus Research: New Perspectives and Applications, Vaclav Brezina & Lynne Flowerdew (eds), 47–65. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther
1998 Comparative Intonational Phonology: English and German. Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Intonation: Theory, Models, and Applications. Athens, Greece, 157–160.Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther, Post, Brechtje, Nolan, Francis & Farrar, Kimberley
2000 Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English. Journal of Phonetics 28: 161–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane
1996 From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. In Languages in Contrast: Text-Based Cross-Linguistic Studies, Karin Aijmer, Bengt Altenberg & Mats Johansson (eds), 37–51. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
2015 Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1): 7–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Dagneaux Estelle & Meunier, Fanny
2002 International Corpus of Learner English. Louvain: UCL.Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Dagneaux, Estelle, Meunier, Fanny & Paquot, Magali
(eds) 2009 International Corpus of Learner English, Version 2, handbook + CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Grice, Martine & Bauman, Stefan
2007 An introduction to intonation – Functions and models. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 25–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T.
2009 Statistics for Linguistics with R. Trends in Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grover, Cynthia, Jamieson, Donald G. & Dobrovolsky, Michael B.
1987 Intonation in English, French and German: Perception and production. Language and Speech 30: 277–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, Ulrike
2010 The LeaP corpus. A phonetically annotated corpus of non-native speech. [URL]> (10 August 2015).
2009 Non-Native Speech: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Phonological and Phonetic Properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Learner corpora in second language prosody research and teaching. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 145–167. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, Ulrike, Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J.
2007 Bridging research on phonetic descriptions with knowledge from teaching practice – The case of prosody in non-native speech. In Non-Native Prosody, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 3–21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirschfeld, Ulla & Trouvain, Jürgen
2007 Teaching prosody in German as foreign language. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 171–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Ulla
2003 Phonologie und Phonetik in Deutsch als Fremdsprache. In Deutsch als Fremdsprache: Wissenschaftsanspruch – Teilbereiche – Bezugsdisziplinen, Claus Altmayer & Roland Forster (eds), 189–233. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hirst, Daniel, De Looze, Céline, Auran, Cyril, & Bouzon, Caroline
2010 Aix-MARSEC database. [URL]> (12 January 2016).
Hothorn, Torsten & Zeileis, Achim
2015 partykit: A Modular Toolkit for Recursive Partytioning in R. Journal of Machine Learning Research 16: 3905–3909. [URL]> (12 January 2016).
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt & Zeileis, Achim
2006 Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3): 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José I.
2005 The Sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2002 Intonation in Spanish and the other Ibero-Romance Languages: Overview and Status Quaestionis. In Romance Phonology and Variation [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 217], Caroline Wiltshire & Joaquim Camps (eds), 101–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenner, Bryan R. A.
1976 Interlanguage and foreign accent. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 1: 166–195.Google Scholar
Jilka, Matthias
2007 Different manifestations and perceptions of foreign accent in intonation. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 77–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2000 The Contribution of Intonation to the Perception of Foreign Accent. PhD dissertation, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Johns, Tim
1994 From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar, Terence Odlin (ed.), 27–45. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele
1981 Pragmatische Aspekte in der Interimsprache. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Keller-Cohen, Deborah
1979 Systematicity and variation in the non-native child’s acquisition of conversational skills. Language Learning 29: 27–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang & Perdue, Clive
1997 The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13: 301–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1966 The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lado, Robert
1957 Linguistics across Cultures. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lafford, Barbara A.
2004 The effect of the context of learning on the use of communication strategies by learners of Spanish as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(2): 201–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1997 Teaching and language corpora: A convergence. In Teaching and Language Corpora, Anne Wichmann, Steven Fligelstone, Tony McEnery & Gerald Knowles (eds), 1–23. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Li, Aike & Post, Brechtje
2014 L2 Acquisition of prosodic properties of speech rhythm – Evidence from L1 Mandarin and German Learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36(2): 223–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loveday, Leo J.
1982 The Sociolinguistics of Learning and Using a Non-Native Language. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Mehlhorn, Grit
2007 Individual pronunciation coaching and prosody. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 211–236. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mennen, Ineke & de Leeuw, Esther
2014 Beyond segments: Prosody in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36: 183–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mennen, Ineke
2007 Phonological and phonetic influences in non-native intonation. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 53–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2004 Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics 32: 543–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mennen, Ineke, Schaeffler, Felix & Dickie, Catherine
2014 Second language acquisition of pitch range in German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36: 303–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Missaglia, Federica
2007 Prosodic training for adult Italian learners of German: The Contrastive Prosody Method. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürgen Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 237–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mora, Joan C. & Valls-Ferrer, Margalida
2012 Oral fluency, accuracy, and complexity in formal instruction and study abroad learning contexts. TESOL Quarterly 46(4): 610–41.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato
2001 Form und Funktion prosodisch-syntaktischer Präsentationsstrukturen im gesprochenen Englisch. PhD dissertation, University of Bonn.Google Scholar
2002 Korpuslinguistik und Englischunterricht: Eine Einführung. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009 Anglistische Korpuslinguistik: Eine Einführung. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1992 Intonation and discourse type. Text 12: 397–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odlin, Terence
1989 Language transfer: cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual
2010 The death of the adverb revisited: Attested uses of adverbs in native and non-native comparable corpora of spoken English. In Exploring New Paths in Language Pedagogy. Lexis and Corpus-Based Language Teaching, Maria Moreno Jaén, Fernando Serrano Valverde & Maria Calzada Pérez (eds), 157–172. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Pickering, Lucy
2004 The structure and function of intonational paragraphs in native and nonnative speaker instructional discourse. English for Specific Purposes 23: 19–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet
1980 The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Puga, Karin
In progress. English Prosody of Advanced Learners: A Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis with Language-pedagogical Implications. PhD dissertation, University of Giessen.
Pürschel, Heiner
1975 Pause und Kadenz: Interferenzerscheinungen bei der englischen Intonation deutscher Sprecher. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
2015 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Version 3.2.3 [URL]> (5 January 2016).
Raith, Joachim
1986 Prosodie: Englisch als Fremdsprache, Deutsch als Basissprache. Die Neueren Sprachen 85: 478–496.Google Scholar
Ramírez Verdugo, Dolores
2002 Non-native interlanguage intonation systems: A study based on a computerized corpus of Spanish learners of English. ICAME Journal 26: 115–132.Google Scholar
Roach, Peter J.
2009 [1991] English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rogers, Henry
2000 The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Rüdiger, Sofia
2016 Cuppa coffee? Challenges and opportunities of compiling a conversational English corpus in an Expanding Circle setting. In Selected Contributions from the Methods and Linguistic Theories Symposium A Blend of MaLT 2015, Hanna Christ, Daniel Klenovšak, Lukas Sönning & Valentin Werner (eds), 49–71. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.Google Scholar
Scuffil, Michael
1982 Experiments in Comparative Intonation: A Case-Study of English and German. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Kim, Beckman, Mary E., Pitrelli, John F., Ostendorf, Maria, Wightman, Colin, Price, Patti, Pierrehumbert, Janet & Hirschberg, Julia
1992 ToBI: A standard scheme for labeling prosody. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Banff, 867–879.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan
(ed.) 1990 The London Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research [Lund Studies in English 82]. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Towell, Richard
2002 Relative degrees of fluency. A comparative case study of advanced learners of French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 40(2): 117–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, Pavel & Baker, Wendy
2007 Learning prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech: The effect of experience on child learners’ acquisition of five suprasegmentals. Applied Psycholinguistics 28: 251–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Els, Theo & de Bot, Kees
1987 The role of intonation in foreign accent. Modern Language journal 71: 147–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, John C.
2006 English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Willems, Nico
1982 English Intonation from a Dutch Point of View. Ambach: Intercontinental Graphics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa
1976 Speech events and natural speech: Some implications for sociolinguistic methodology. Language in Society 5(2): 189–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wrembel, Magdalena
2007 Metacompetence-based approach to the teaching of L2 prosody: practical implications. In Non-Native Prosody – Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, Jürge Trouvain & Ulrike Gut (eds), 189–209. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar