An account of insubordinated adverbial clauses in Brazilian Portuguese: Chapter 7. Illocution as a unit of reference for spontaneous speech

Bossaglia, Giulia; Mello, Heliana; Raso, Tommaso

doi:10.1075/scl.94.07bos

Part of

In Search of Basic Units of Spoken Language: A corpus-driven approach
Edited by Shlomo Izre'el, Heliana Mello, Alessandro Panunzi and Tommaso Raso
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 94] 2020
► pp. 221–256

Chapter 7
Illocution as a unit of reference for spontaneous speech

An account of insubordinated adverbial clauses in Brazilian Portuguese

Giulia Bossaglia | Federal University of Minas Gerais / FAPEMIG / CNPq

Heliana Mello | Federal University of Minas Gerais / FAPEMIG / CNPq

Tommaso Raso | Federal University of Minas Gerais / FAPEMIG / CNPq

In this paper we propose a synchronic, corpus-based account of insubordination, through the analysis of adverbial clauses in Brazilian Portuguese spontaneous speech at the syntax/prosody interface. The segmentation of the speech flow through prosodic cues is crucial to analyse linguistic and, specifically, syntactic relations in spoken language. Besides, it is through prosody that illocutionary and informational values are conveyed in speech. Our claim is that insubordination can be studied without assuming the existence of a grammaticalization path or main clause ellipsis processes, given that through specific illocutionary prosodic profiles, syntactically dependent clauses are assigned pragmatic autonomy.

Keywords: spontaneous speech, speech segmentation, illocution, syntax/prosody interface, insubordination, adverbial clauses, Brazilian Portuguese

Article outline

1.Introduction
2.Subordination and insubordination
3.The analysis of spontaneous speech
- 3.1The segmentation of speech
- 3.2Speech segmentation and illocution
- 3.3Speech segmentation and information units (IUs)
4.The corpus
5.Data analysis
- 5.1Types of adverbial conjunctions
- 5.2Non-canonical characteristics of adverbial clauses in spoken bp
  - 5.2.1Apparent adverbial subordinators
- 5.3Distribution of adverbial subordinators/adverbial clauses
  - 5.3.1Adverbial clause in the same IU of the main clause
  - 5.3.2Adverbial clause in a dedicated IU
    - 5.3.2.1Topic/Comment pattern, Multiple Comments, and Bound Comments
  - 5.3.3Adverbial clauses in a dedicated utterance: Insubordination
    - 5.3.3.1“Semi”-insubordinated versus fully insubordinated adverbial clauses
6.Final remarks
Acknowledgements
Notes
Glossary
References

Published online: 18 June 2020

https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.94.07bos

References (100)

References

Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Avanzi, M. (2007). Regards croisés sur la notion de macro-syntaxe. Revue Tranel (Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique), 47, 39–58.

Aviles, A., Hale, K., & Salamanca, D. (1987). Insubordinated complements in Miskitu. Manuscript, MIT. Retrieved from <[URL]>

Barth-Weingarten, D. (2016). Intonation units revisited. Cesura in talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., & Conrad, S. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Blanche-Benveniste, C., Bilger, M., Rouget, Ch., & Eynde, K. van den. (1990). Le français parlé. Etudes grammaticales. Paris: Editions du CNRS.

Bossaglia, G. (2014). Interface entre sintaxe e articulação informacional na fala espontânea: Uma comparação baseada em corpus entre português e italiano. Caligrama: Revista de Estudos Românicos, 19(2), 35–60.

(2015). Pragmatic orientation of syntax in spontaneous speech: A corpus-based comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and Italian adverbial clauses. CHIMERA: Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies, 2, 1–34.

Cavalcante, F. (2015). The topic unit in spontaneous American English: A corpus-based study (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Cavalcante, F., & Ramos, A. (2016). The American English spontaneous speech minicorpus. CHIMERA: Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies, 3(2), 99–124.

Chafe, W. L. (1984). How people use adverbial clauses. Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 437–449.

(1988). Linking intonation units in spoken English. In J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (pp. 1–27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1996). Intonation and clause combining in discourse: The case of because. Pragmatics, 6(3), 389–426.

Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Thompson, S. A. (2000). Concessive patterns in conversation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (Eds.), Cause, condition, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (pp. 381–410). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Cresti, E. (1994). Information and intonational patterning in Italian. In B. Ferguson, H. Gezundhajt, & P. Martin (Eds.), Accent, intonation et modèles phonologiques (pp. 99–140). Toronto: Mélodie.

(2000). Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.

(2005). Notes on lexical strategy, structural strategies and surface clause indexes in the C-ORAL-ROM spoken corpora. In E. Cresti & M. Moneglia (Eds.), C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance Languages (pp. 209–256). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2009). La Stanza: un'unità di costruzione testuale del parlato. In A. Ferrari (Ed.), Sintassi storica e sincronica dell’italiano. Subordinazione, coordinazione, giustapposizione. Atti del X Congresso della Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana, vol 2 (pp. 713–732). Firenze: Firenze University Press.

(2011). The definition of focus in Language into Act Theory (L-AcT). In H. Mello, A. Panunzi, & T. Raso (Eds.), Pragmatics and prosody, illocution, modality, attitude, information patterning and speech annotation (pp. 39–82). Firenze: Firenze University Press.

(2014). Syntactic properties of spontaneous speech in the Language into Act Theory: Data on Italian complements and relative clauses. In T. Raso & H. Mello (Eds.), Spoken corpora and linguistic studies (pp. 365–410). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2018). The illocution-prosody relationship and the Information Pattern in spontaneous speech according to the Language into Act Theory (L-AcT). In M. Heinz & M. C. Moroni (Eds.), Prosody: Grammar, information structure, interaction. Linguistik online, 88(1), 33–62.

(this volume). The pragmatic analysis of speech and its illocutionary classification according to Language into Act Theory. In S. Izre’el, H. Mello, A. Panunzi, & T. Raso (Eds.), In search of basic units of spoken language: A corpus-driven approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Cresti, E., & Gramigni, P. (2004). Per una linguistica corpus based dell’italiano parlato: Le unità di riferimento. In F. Albano Leoni, F. Cutugno, M. Pettorino, & R. Savy (Eds.), Atti del convegno “Il parlato italiano”, Napoli, 13-15/02/2003 CD-ROM. Napoli: M. D’Auria.

Cresti, E., & Moneglia, M. (Eds.). (2005). C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Cresti, E., Nascimento, F. B. do, Moreno-Sandoval, A., Veronis, J., Martin, P., & Choukri, K. (2004). The C-ORAL-ROM CORPUS. A multilingual resource of spontaneous speech for romance languages. In LREC 2004, 575–578. Retrieved from <[URL]>

Cristofaro, S. (2005). Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2005). Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Debaisieux, J.-M. (2004). Les conjonctions de subordination: Mots de grammaire ou mots du discours? Le cas de parce que. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique, 15–16, 51–67.

(2013). Autour de parce que et de puisque. In J.-M. Debaisieux (Ed.), Analyses linguistiques sur corpus: Subordination et insubordination en français, (pp. 185–248). Paris: Hermès-Lavoisier.

Debaisieux, J.-M. & Deulofeu, J. (2004). Fonctionnement microsyntaxique de modifieur ar fonctionnement macrosyntaxique en parataxe de constructions introduites par que et parce que en français parlé, avec extension au cas de che e perché en italien parlé. In F. Albano Leoni, F. Cutugno, M. Pettorino, & R. Savy (Eds.), Atti del convegno “Il parlato italiano”, Napoli, 13-15/02/2003. Napoli: M. D’Auria. Retrieved from <[URL]>

Debaisieux, J.-M., & Martin, Ph. (this volume). Syntactic and Prosodic segmentation in spoken French. In S. Izre’el, H. Mello, A. Panunzi, & T. Raso (Eds.), In search of basic units of spoken language: A corpus-driven approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Decat, M. B. N. (1993). “Leite com manga, morre!”: da hipotaxe adverbial no português em uso (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pontifícia Universidade Católica, São Paulo, Brazil).

(1999). Por uma abordagem da (in)dependência de cláusulas à luz da noção de “unidade informacional”. Scripta (Lingüística e Filologia), 2(4), 23–38.

(2001). Orações adjetivas explicativas no português brasileiro e no português europeu: Aposição rumo ao ‘desgarramento’. Scripta (Lingüística e Filologia), 5(9), 104–118.

(2004). Orações relativas apositivas: SNs ‘soltos’ como estratégia de focalização e argumentação. Veredas, 8(1–2), 79–101.

Diessel, H. (2001). The ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses: A typological study. Language, 77(3), 433–455.

(2005). Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics, 43(3), 449–470.

Du Bois, J., Chafe, W. L., Meyer, C., & Thompson, S. (2000–2005). Santa Barbara corpus of spoken American English, Parts 1–4. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.

Evans, N. (2007). Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness. Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 366–431). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(2009). Insubordination and the grammaticalisation of interactive presuppositions. Paper presented at Methodologies in determining morphosyntactic change conference, Museum of Ethnography, Osaka, March 2009. Retrieved from <[URL]>

Evans, N., & Watanabe, H. (2016). Insubordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Firenzuoli, V., & Signorini, S. (2003). L’unità informativa di topic: Correlati intonativi. In G. Marotta (Ed.), La coarticolazione (pp. 177–184). Pisa: ETS.

Foley, W. A., & Van Valin Jr., R. D. (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ford, C. E. (1993). Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Giani, D. (2004). Una strategia di costruzione del testo parlato: l’Introduttore locutivo. In F. Albano Leoni, F. Cutugno, M. Pettorino, & R. Savy (Eds.), Atti del convegno “Il parlato italiano”, Napoli, 13-15/02/2003. Napoli: M. D’Auria.

Givón, T. (1991). Isomorphism in grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in Language, 15(1), 85–114.

(2001). Syntax: An introduction. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Gras, P. (2011). Gramática de construcciones en interacción. Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain).

(2013). Entre la gramática y el discurso: valores conectivos de que inicial átono en español. In D. Jacob & K. Ploog (Eds.), Autour de que. El entorno de que (pp. 81–112). Bern: Peter Lang.

Groupe Lambda-l (1975). Car, parce que, puisque. Revue Romane, 10, 248–280.

Günthner, S. (2000). From concessive connector to discourse marker: The use of obwohl in everyday German interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & B. Kortmann (Eds.), Cause, condition, concession, contrast: cognitive and discourse perspectives (pp. 439–468). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Haiman, J. (1978). Conditionals are topics. Language, 54(3), 564–589.

(1983). Iconic and economic motivation. Language, 59(4), 781–819.

’t Hart, J., Collier, R., & Cohen, A. (1990). A perceptual study on intonation: an experimental approach to speech melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hellbernd, N., & Sammler, D. (2016). Prosody conveys speaker’s intentions: Acoustic cues for speech act perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 88, 70–86.

Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. (2008). Projectability and clause combining in interaction. In R. Laury (Ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp. 99–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Inbar, A. (2016). Is subordination viable? The case of Hebrew ʃɛ ‘that’. CHIMERA: Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies, 3(2), 287–310.

Izre’el, S. (this volume). The basic unit of spoken language and the interface between prosody, discourse and syntax: A view from spontaneous spoken Hebrew. In S. Izre’el, H. Mello, A. Panunzi, & T. Raso (Eds.), In search of basic units of spoken language: A corpus-driven approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kortmann, B. (1997). Adverbial subordination. A typology and history of adverbial subordinators based on European languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2004). Grammaticalization of syntactic incompleteness: Free conditionals in Italian and other languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 17, 189–215.

(2010). Free conditionals in discourse: The forming of a construction. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 33(1), 50–85.

(2016). Insubordinated conditionals in spoken and non-spoken Italian. In N. Evans, & H. Watanabe, (Eds.), Insubordination (pp. 145–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Maia Rocha, B., & Raso, T. (2011). A unidade informacional de introdutor locutivo no português do Brasil: Uma primeira descrição baseada em corpus. Domínios de Linguagem, 5(1), 327–343.

Martin, Ph. (2004). Winpitch corpus, a text to speech alignment tool for multimodal corpora. In LREC 2004, 537–540. Retrieved from <[URL]>

Mello, H. (2014). Methodological issues for spontaneous speech corpora compilation: The case of C-ORAL-BRASIL. In T. Raso & H. Mello (Eds.), Spoken corpora and linguistic studies (pp. 27–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Mello, H., & Raso, T. (2011). Illocution, modality, attitude: Different names for different categories. In H. Mello, A. Panunzi, & T. Raso (Eds.), Pragmatics and prosody, illocution, modality, attitude, information patterning and speech annotation (pp. 1–18). Firenze: Firenze University Press.

Miller, J. E., & Weinert, R. (1998). Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mithun, M. (2005). On the assumption of the sentence as the basic unit of syntactic structure. In Z. Frajzyngier, A. Hodges, & D. S. Rood (Eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories (pp. 169–183). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2008). The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language, 84(1), 264–280.

(this volume). Prosody and the organization of information in Central Pomo, a California indigenous language. In S. Izre’el, H. Mello, A. Panunzi, & T. Raso (Eds.), In search of basic units of spoken language: A corpus-driven approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Mittmann, M. M. (2012). O C-ORAL-BRASIL e o estudo da fala informal: Um novo olhar sobre o tópico no Português Brasileiro (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil).

Mittmann, M. M., & Barbosa, P. (2016). An automatic speech segmentation tool based on multiple acoustic parameters. CHIMERA: Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies, 3(2), 133–147.

Moeschler, J. (1996). Parce que et l’enchaînement conversationnel. In C. Muller (Ed.), Dépendance et intégration syntaxique: Subordination, coordination, connexion (pp. 285–292). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

Moneglia, M. (2011). Spoken corpora and pragmatics. Revista Brasileira de Linguistica Aplicada, 11(2), 479–519.

Moneglia, M., & Raso, T. (2014). Notes on the Language into Act Theory. In T. Raso, & H. Mello (Eds.), Spoken corpora and linguistic studies (pp. 468–495). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Moraes, J. A., & Rilliard, A. (2014). Illocution, attitudes and prosody: A multimodal analysis. In T. Raso & H. Mello (Eds.), Spoken corpora and linguistic studies (pp. 233–270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Panunzi, A., & Gregori, L. (2011). DB-IPIC. An XML database for the representation of information structure in spoken language. In H. Mello, A. Panunzi, & T. Raso (Eds.), Pragmatics and prosody: Illocution, modality, attitude, information patterning and speech annotation (pp. 133–150). Florence: Firenze University Press.

Panunzi, A., & Mittmann, M. (2014). The IPIC resource and a cross-linguistic analysis of information structure in Italian and Brazilian Portuguese. In T. Raso, & H. R. Mello, Spoken corpora and linguistic studies (pp. 129–151). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Raso, T. (2014). Prosodic constraints for discourse markers. In T. Raso, & H. Mello (Eds.), Spoken corpora and linguistic studies (pp. 412–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Raso, T., Cavalcante, F., & Mittmann, M. M. (2017). Prosodic forms of the topic information unit in a cross-linguistic perspective. A first survey. In A. De Meo, & F. Dovetto (Eds.), La comunicazione parlata. Proceeding of the international SLI-GSCP conference, Napoli, 13–15 June 2016 (pp. 445–468). Roma: Aracne.

Raso, T. & Mello, H. (Eds.). (2012). C-ORAL-BRASIL I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: UFMG.

Raso, T., & Mittmann, M. M. (2012). As principais medidas da fala. In T. Raso & H. Mello (Eds.), C-ORAL-BRASIL I: Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal (pp. 177–221). Belo Horizonte: UFMG.

Raso, T., Mittmann, M. M., & Oliveira, A. C. (2015). O papel da pausa na segmentação prosódica de corpora de fala. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 23(3), 883–922.

Raso, T., & Rocha, B. (2017). Illocution and attitude: On the complex interaction between prosody and pragmatic parameters. Journal of Speech Sciences, 5(2), 5–27.

Raso, T., & Vieira, M. A. (2016). A description of dialogic units/discourse markers in spontaneous speech corpora based on phonetic parameters. CHIMERA: Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies, 3(2), 221–249.

Rocha, B. (2016). Uma metodologia empírica para a identificação e descrição de ilocuções e a sua aplicação para o estudo da Ordem em PB e italiano (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil).

Rocha, B., & Raso, T. (2016). The interaction between illocution and attitude, and its consequences for the empirical study of illocutions. In C. Bardel & A. De Meo (Eds.), Parler les langues romanes. Proceedings of the International GSCP Conference, Stockholm, 9–12 April 2014 (pp. 69–88). Napoli: Università degli Studi L’Orientale.

Sansiñena, M. S., De Smet, H., & Cornillie, B. (2015). Between subordinate and insubordinated. Paths toward complementizer-initial main clauses. Journal of Pragmatics, 77, 3–19.

Schwenter, S. A. (1996). Sobre la sintaxis de una construcción coloquial: Oraciones independientes con si. Anuari de Filologia, 21, 87–100.

Schwenter, S. (2016a). Independent si-clauses in Spanish. In N. Evans & H. Watanabe (Eds.), Insubordination (pp. 89–11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

(2016b). Meaning and interaction in Spanish independent si-clauses. Language Sciences, 58, 22–34.

Simone, R. (2009). Espaces instables entre coordination et subordination. In A. Ferrari (Ed.), Sintassi storica e sincronica dell’italiano. Subordinazione, coordinazione, giustapposizione, Atti del X Congresso della Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana, Basilea, 30/06–03/07, (pp. 119–144). Firenze: Cesati.

Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, S., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2005). The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 481–505.

Tucci, I. (2004). L’inciso: Caratteristiche morfosintattiche e intonative in un corpus di riferimento. In F. Albano Leoni, F. Cutugno, M. Pettorino, & R. Savy (Eds.), Atti del convegno “Il parlato italiano”, Napoli, 13-15/02/2003 CD-ROM. Napoli: M. D’Auria.

(2010). Obiter dictum. La funzione informativa delle unità parentetiche. In M. Pettorino, A. Giannini, I. Chiari, & F. Dovetto (Eds.), La comunicazione parlata. Atti del GSCP (pp. 635–654). Napoli: Università degli Studi L’Orientale.

Van linden, A., & Van de Velde, F. (2014). (Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic-pragmatic values. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 226–250.

Verhagen, A. (2000). Concession implies causality, though in some other space. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (Eds.), Cause, condition, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (pp. 361–380). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Wide, C. (2014). Constructions as resources in interactions: Syntactically unintegrated att “that” – clauses in spoken Swedish. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman, & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar (pp. 353–380). Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.

Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Order by:

Cresti, Emanuela

2021. The Appendix of Comment according to Language into Act Theory. CHIMERA: Revista de Corpus de Lenguas Romances y Estudios Lingüísticos 8 ► pp. 45 ff.

Izre'el, Shlomo

2020. The basic unit of spoken language and the interfaces between prosody, discourse and syntax. In In search of basic units of spoken language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 77 ff.

Kibrik, Andrej A., Nikolay A. Korotaev & Vera I. Podlesskaya

2020. Russian spoken discourse. In In search of basic units of spoken language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 35 ff.

Raso, Tommaso, Plínio A. Barbosa, Frederico A. Cavalcante & Maryualê M. Mittmann

2020. Segmentation and analysis of the two English excerpts. In In search of basic units of spoken language [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 94], ► pp. 309 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

audio