References
Barbosa, P. A. (2013). Semi-automatic
and automatic tools for generating prosodic descriptors for prosody
research. In B. Bigi & D. Hirst (Eds.), TRASP
2013
Proceedings (Vol. 13, pp. 86–89). Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barbosa, P., & Raso, T. (2018). Spontaneous
speech segmentation: Functional and prosodic aspects with applications for automatic
segmentation. Revista de Estudos da
Linguagem, 26(4), 1361–1396.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bossaglia, G., Mello, H., & Raso, T. (this
volume). Illocution as a unit of reference for spontaneous
speech: An account for insubordinated adverbial clauses in Brazilian
Portuguese. In S. Izre’el, H. Mello, A. Panunzi, & T. Raso (Eds.), In
search of basic units of spoken language: A corpus-driven
approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Campbell, W. N. (1992). Syllable-based
segmental duration. In G. Bailly, C. Benoıt, & T. R. Sawallis (Eds.), Talking
machines: Theories, models, and
designs (pp. 221–224). Amsterdam: North-Holland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cavalcante, F. (2016). The
topic unit in spontaneous American English (Unpublished
Master’s thesis). Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cavalcante, F. (2018). The Information Unit of Topic: A Crosslinguistic, Statistical Study Based on Spontaneous Speech Corpora (Unpublished PhD Dissertation). Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cresti, E. (2000). Corpus
di italiano
parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cresti, E. (2009). La Stanza: un'unità di costruzione testuale del parlato. In A. Ferrari (Ed.), Sintassi storica e sincronica dell’italiano. Subordinazione, coordinazione, giustapposizione. Atti del X Congresso della Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana, vol 2 (pp. 713–732). Firenze: Firenze University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cresti, E. (2011). The
definition of focus in Language into Act Theory
(L-AcT). In H. Mello, A. Panunzi, & T. Raso, Pragmatics
and prosody, illocution, modality, attitude, information patterning and speech
annotation (pp. 39–82). Firenze: Firenze University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cresti, E. (2018). The
illocution-prosody relationship and the information pattern in spontaneous speech
according to the Language into Act
Theory. In M. Heinz & M. C. Moroni (Eds.), Prosody:
Grammar, information structure, interaction. Linguistik
Online, 88(1), 33–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cresti, E. (this
volume). The pragmatic analysis of speech and its
illocutionary classification according to Language into Act
Theory. In S. Izre’el, H. Mello, A. Panunzi, & T. Raso (Eds.), In
search of basic units of spoken language: A corpus-driven
approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cresti, E., & Moneglia, M. (this
volume). Some notes on the excerpts according to
L-AcT. In S. Izre’el, H. Mello, A. Panunzi, & T. Raso (Eds.), In
search of basic units of spoken language: A corpus-driven
approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Du Bois, J. W., Chafe, W. L., Meyer, C., & Thompson, S. A. (2000–2005). Santa
Barbara corpus of spoken American English, Part
1–4. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring
nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological
Bulletin, 76, 378–382. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frosali, F. F. (2008). L’unità
di informazione di ausilio dialogico: Valori percentuali, caratteri intonativi, lessicali
e morfo-sintattici in un corpus di italiano parlato
(C-ORAL-ROM). In E. Cresti (Ed.), Prospettive
nello studio del lessico
italiano (pp. 417–424). Firenze: Firenze University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giani, D. (2004). Una
strategia di costruzione del testo parlato: L’introduttore
locutivo. In F. A. Leoni, F. Cutugno, M. Pettorino, & R. Savy (Eds.), Atti
del convegno “Il parlato italiano” Napoli, 13–15.02
2003 (pp. 84–97). Napoli: M. D‟Auria.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
t’Hart, J. (1981). Differential
sensitivity to pitch distance, particularly in
speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 69(3), 811–821. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maia Rocha, B., & Raso, T. (2011). A
unidade informacional de introdutor locutivo no português do Brasil: Uma primeira
descrição baseada em corpus
. Domínios de
Linguagem, 5(1), 327–343.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mittmann, M., & Barbosa, P. A. (2016). An
automatic speech segmentation tool based on multiple acoustic
parameters. CHIMERA: Romance Corpora and Linguistic
Studies, 3(2), 133–147.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moneglia, M. (2005). The
C-ORAL-ROM resource. In E. Cresti & M. Moneglia (Eds.), C-ORAL-ROM:
Integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance
languages (pp. 1–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moneglia, M., & Raso, T. (2014). Notes
on language into act
theory. In T. Raso & H. Mello (Eds.), Spoken
corpora and linguistic
studies (pp. 468–495). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quené, H. (2007). On
the just noticeable difference for tempo in speech. Journal
of
Phonetics, 35(3), 353–362. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raso, T., Cavalcante, F., & Mittmann, M. (2017). Prosodic
forms of the topic information unit in a cross-linguistic perspective: A first
survey. In A. De Meo & F. M. Dovetto, La
comunicazione parlata/Spoken
communication (pp. 473–498). Roma: Aracne.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raso, T., Ferrari, L. Uso dei Segnali Discorsivi in corpora di parlato spontaneo italiano e brasiliano. In: Ferroni, R., Birello, M. (forthcoming). La competenza discorsiva a lezione di lingua straniera. Roma: Aracne![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raso, T., Mittmann, M., & Oliveira Mendes, A. C. (2015). O
papel da pausa na segmentação prosódica de corpora de
fala. Revista de Estudos da
Linguagem, 23(3), 883–922. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raso, T., & Rocha, B. (2017). Illocution
and attitude: On the complex interaction between prosody and pragmatic
parameters. Journal of Speech
Science, 5, 5–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rocha, B., & Raso, T. (2016). The
interaction between illocution and attitude, and its consequences for the empirical study
of illocutions. In C. Bardel & A. De Meo (Eds.), Parler
les langues romanes: Proceedings of the international GSCP conference (Stockholm,
2014) (pp. 69–88). Napoli: Università degli Studi L’Orientale.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Senn, P., Kompis, M., Vischer, M., & Haeusler, R. (2005). Minimum
audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with
bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech
processors. Audiology and
Neurotology, 10, 342–352. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silber-Varod, V. (2011). The
SpeeCHain perspective: Prosody-syntax interface in spontaneous spoken
Hebrew (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Tel- Aviv University, Israel.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Teixeira, B. H. (2018). Correlatos
fonético-acústicos de fronteiras prosódicas na fala
espontânea (Unpublished Master’s
thesis). Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Teixeira, B. H., Barbosa, P., & Raso, T. (2018). Automatic
detection of prosodic boundaries in Brazilian Portuguese spontaneous
speech. In A. Villavicencio, V. Moreira, A. Abad, H. Caseli, P. Gamallo, C. Ramisch, H. G. Oliveira, & G. H. Paetzold (Eds.), Computational
processing of the Portuguese
language (pp. 429–437). New York, NY: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Teixeira, B. H., & Mittmann, M. M. (2018). Acoustic
models for the automatic identification of prosodic boundaries in spontaneous
speech. Revista de Estudos da
Linguagem, 26(4), 1455–1488.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tucci, I. (2004). L’inciso:
Caratteristiche morfosintattiche e intonative in un corpus di
riferimento. In F. A. Leoni, F. Cutugno, M. Pettorino, & R. Savy (Eds.), Atti
del convegno “Il parlato
italiano” (CD-ROM -14 p.). Napoli: M. D’Auria.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)