Part of
Corpora and the Changing Society: Studies in the evolution of English
Edited by Paula Rautionaho, Arja Nurmi and Juhani Klemola
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 96] 2020
► pp. 251276
References

Corpora and text collections

ARCHER = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers. Version 3.2
1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013/2016Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California; modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. [URL]
BYU-BNC = Davies, Mark
2004–BYU-BNC (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). [URL]
A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760
2006Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University). [URL]
CEN = The Corpus of English Novels. De Smit, Hendrik
comp.). [URL]
CLMET3.0 = The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, version 3.0. De Smet, Hendrik, Diller, Hans-Jürgen & Tyrkkö, Jukka
comps). [URL]
COCA = Davies, Mark
2008–The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990–2015. [URL]
COHA = Davies, Mark
2010–The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. [URL]
Early English Prose Fiction
1997–2015 Ed. by Holger Klein et al. Chadwyck-Healey. ProQuest LLC. [URL]
ECCO-TCP = Eighteenth Century Collections Online
EEBO = Davies, Mark
2017Early English Books Online. Part of the SAMUELS project. [URL]
Eighteenth-century Fiction (1700–1780)
1996–2015Chadwyck-Healey (ProQuest Company). [URL]
Evans-TCP = Evans Early American Imprints
G&M = Globe and Mail
1844–presentProQuest Historical Newspapers. [URL]
Google Books
Hansard = Alexander, Marc & Davies, Mark
2015–British Parliament – Hansard 1803–2005. Part of the SAMUELS project. [URL]
The Lampeter Corpus of Early Modern English Tracts
1998Compiled by Josef Schmied, Claudia Claridge & Rainer Siemund (University of Chemnitz). [URL]
OB = The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674–1913. Hitchcock, Tim, Shoemaker, Robert, Emsley, Clive, Howard, Sharon & McLaughlin, Jamie et al.
(eds) <[URL] version 7.0, March 2012.
TIME = Davies, Mark
2007–TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s–2000s. [URL]

Other references

Aijmer, Karin
1997 I think – an English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter
2007Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31(3): 569–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1): 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2008The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, Ted
2000Interview of Gerald Gazdar. On Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar 3 November 2000, Cambridge, UK [URL]> (1 May 2018).
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2000Data in pragmatics: Spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(2): 175–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finegan, Edward & Biber, Douglas
1995 That and zero complementisers in Late Modern English: Exploring ARCHER from 1650–1990. The Verb in Contemporary English, Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 241–257. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Google Books Ngram Viewer
. [URL]. See Michel et al. 2011.
Goldberg, Adele E. & van der Auwera, Johan
2012This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica Historica 46(1): 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
2008Projectability and clause combining in interaction. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 99–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2011Explaining diverging evidence: The case of clause-initial I think . In Converging Evidence: Methodological and Theoretical Issues for Linguistic Research [Human Cognitive Processing 33], Doris Schönefeld (ed.), 81–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kearns, Kate
2007Epistemic verbs and zero complementizer. English Language and Linguistics 11(3): 475–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto-Alanko, Päivi & Rissanen, Matti
2002 We give you to wit: Semantics and grammaticalisation of the verb wit in the history of English. In Variation Past and Present: VARIENG Studies on English for Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Matti Rissanen (eds), 13–32. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark
2012This is not to say that I don’t think that it isn’t illogical. Language Log 3 November 2012, <[URL]> (10 September 2018).
López-Couso, María José
2007Auxiliary and negative cliticisation in Late Modern English. In ‘Of varying language and opposing creeds’: New Insights into Late Modern English, Javier Pérez-Guerra, Dolores González-Álvarez & Jorge L. Bueno Alonso (eds), 301–323. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English
. [URL]> (10 September 2018).
Macmillan Dictionary
. [URL]> (10 September 2018).
MED = Middle English Dictionary
1952–2001Hans Kurath et al. (eds). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
. [URL]> (10 September 2018).
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Presser Aiden, Aviva, Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, Joseph P., Hoiberg, Dale, Clancy, Dan, Norvig, Peter, Orwant, Jon, Pinker, Steven, Nowak, Martin A., & Lieberman Aiden, Erez
2011Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014), 176–182.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Colette
2006The use of videlicet in Early Modern English slander depositions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 7(2): 245–263.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED = Oxford English Dictionary Online
2000–Michael Proffitt (ed.). 3rd edn. Oxford: OUP. [URL]> (30 May 2019).
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
1991On the history of that/zero of object clause links in English. In English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds), 272–289. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schilperood, Joost & Verhagen, Arie
1998Conceptual dependency and the clausal structure of discourse. In Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap, Jean-Pierre König (ed.), 141–163. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
2002“Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1): 125–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony
1991A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2: Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Walker, James A.
2009On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: A variationist study of that . Linguistics 47(1): 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2001Subordination and discourse segmentation revisited, or: Why matrix clauses may be more dependent than complements. In Text Representation: Linguistic and Psychological Aspects, [Human Cognitive Processing 8], Ted J. M. Sanders, Joost Schilperood & Wilbert Spooren (eds), 337–357. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watt, Ian
2001/1957The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar