Cover not available
Part of
Corpus Approaches to Social Media
Edited by Sofia Rüdiger and Daria Dayter
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 98] 2020
► pp. 41–62

Chapter 2
The control and censorship of linguistic resources in an online Community of Practice

| University of Manchester
This research utilises a corpus of one million posts retrieved from Popheads, an online Reddit-based Community of Practice (CoP), to analyse the power dynamics associated with language censorship in online CoPs. In 2018, the moderators of the community banned the community-salient word wig (‘surprised’ or ‘impressed’). Ostensibly, this was a top-down performance of linguistic control where the officially-appointed moderators put a stop to the diffusion of a seemingly beloved part of the community’s shared linguistic repertoire. However, through a mixed-methods analysis of the events surrounding the banning of wig, this research shows that moderators have not unilaterally enforced linguistic censorship. Instead, moderators have seemingly responded to a call, led primarily by members with markers of unofficial power, to restrict usage.
Keywords: Community of Practice, Reddit, online communication, censorship, power
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Community of Practice framework
  • 3.The Popheads community
    • 3.1Power in the Popheads community
  • 4.Hypotheses
  • 5.Data
  • 6.Why wig?
  • 7.The lifespan of wig
    • 7.1The emergence and significance of wig
    • 7.2The backlash against wig
    • 7.3After the ban
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.98.02don
References (37)
References
Alam, Farhana. 2015. Glaswasian? A Sociophonetic Analysis of Glasgow-Asian Accent and Identity. PhD dissertation, University of Glasgow. <[URL]> (1 October 2019).
Baumgartner, Jason. 2019. Reddit Corpus. <[URL]> (1 October 2019).
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bunz, Ulla & Campbell, Scott W. 2004. Politeness accommodation in electronic mail. Communication Research Reports 21(1): 11–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, Sarah E., Giuliano, Traci A., White, Justin, Cantu, Lizette & Fraser, Kyle C. 2019. Sender gender influences emoji interpretation in text messages. Frontiers in Psychology 10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contu, Alessia & Willmott, Hugh. 2003. Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science 14(3): 283–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancey, Christine P. & Reidy, John. 2017. Statistics without Maths for Psychology, 7th edn. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Davies, Bethan. 2005. Communities of Practice: Legitimacy not choice. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9(4): 557–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duthler, Kirk W. 2006. The politeness of requests made via email and voicemail: Support for the hyperpersonal model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(2): 500–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High [Language in Society 27]. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Wenger, Étienne. 2005. Communities of Practice in sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9(4): 582–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Nini, Andrea & Guo, Diansheng. 2017. Analyzing lexical emergence in Modern American English online. English Language and Linguistics 21(1): 99–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet & Woodhams, Jay. 2013. Building interaction: The role of talk in joining a Community of Practice. Discourse & Communication 7(3): 275–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huffaker, David. 2010. Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. Human Communication Research 36(4): 593–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanters, L. F. J. M. 2017. Extracting relevant discussion from Reddit science AMAs. In Benelearn 2017: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Benelux Conference on Machine Learning, Wouter Duivesteijn, Mykola Pechenizkiy, George Fletcher, Vlado Menkovski, Eric Postma & Joaquin Vanschoren (eds), 11–18. <[URL]> (1 October 2019).
Kendall, Lori. 2008. “Noobs” and “Chicks” on animutation portal: Power and status in a Community of Practice. International Journal of Web Based Communities 4(4): 491–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, Brian W. 2014. Tracing the emergence of a Community of Practice: Beyond presupposition in sociolinguistic research. Language in Society 43(1): 61–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean & Wenger, Étienne. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Robert. 2011. Patterns of linguistic variation among Glaswegian adolescent males. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(2): 226–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDowelle, Onaje. 2018. What does wig mean, and why is everyone on Twitter saying it? Daily Dot. 16 November 2018, <[URL]> (1 October 2019).
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2008. Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice Among Latina Youth Gangs [New Directions in Ethnography 2]. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam & Strycharz, Anna. 2013. Communities of Practice. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Jack K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds), 428–447. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Emma. 2006. “You tell all the stories”: Using narrative to explore hierarchy within a Community of Practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(5): 611–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Communities of Practice and peripherality. In Language and Identities, Carmen Llamas & Dominic James Landon Watt (eds), 123–133. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ostermann, Ana Cristina. 2003. Communities of Practice at work: Gender, facework and the power of habitus at an all-female police station and a feminist crisis intervention center in Brazil. Discourse & Society 14(4): 473–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paechter, Carrie. 2006. Power, knowledge and embodiment in communities of sex/gender practice. Women’s Studies International Forum 29(1): 13–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robards, Brady. 2018. Belonging and neo-tribalism on social media site Reddit. In Neo-Tribes: Consumption, Leisure and Tourism, Anne Hardy, Andy Bennett & Brady Robards (eds), 187–206. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salminen-Karlsson, Minna. 2006. Situa. ting gender in situated learning. Scandinavian Journal of Management 22(1): 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shakeri, Sima. 2018. These were 2018’s hottest slang words – but should you use them? Huffington Post. 31 December 2018. <[URL]> (1 October 2019).
SpinXO. Username Generator. <[URL]> (19 February 2020).
Silva, Leiser, Goel, Lakshmi & Mousavidin, Elham. 2009. Exploring the dynamics of blog communities: The case of MetaFilter. Information Systems Journal 19(1): 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stommel, Wyke. 2008. Conversation analysis and Community of Practice as approaches to studying online community. Language@Internet 5(5). [URL] (1 October 2019).
Stommel, Wyke & Koole, Tom. 2010. The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies 12(3): 357–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Étienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witten, Kimberly Ann. 2014. Sociolinguistic Variation and Enregisterment in an Online Community of Practice: A Case Study of MetaFilter.com. PhD dissertation, University of York. <[URL]> (1 October 2019).
Yoo, Youngjin & Alavi, Maryam. 2004. Emergent leadership in virtual teams: What do emergent leaders do? Information and Organization 14: 27–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar