2010 “Fields and Settings: French il and ça Impersonals in Copular Complement Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 21–3, 443–500.
Allen and Greenough’s New Latin Grammar for Schools and Colleges: Founded on Comparative Grammar
1888 Updated by Anne Mahoney. Newburyport, Mass.: R. Pullins 2001.
Bantam New College Italian & English Dictionary
1976 New York: Bantam Books. Fourth printing 1980.
Barlow, Michael, and Suzanne Kemmer
1994 “A Schema-Based Approach to Grammatical Description.” In The Reality of Linguistic Rules (Vol. 26, Studies in Language Companion Series), Susan D. Lima, Roberta Corrigan, and Gregory K. Iverson (eds.). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 19–42.
Battaglia, Salvatore
. Grande dizionario della lingua italiana. (Various dates 1961–2000) Torino: Unione Tipografico.
Benveniste, Émile
1966 “La nature des pronoms.” Problèmes de linguistique générale, 1. n.p.: Gallimard, pp. 251–257.
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder
2012 “A Usage-based Theory of Grammatical Status and Grammaticalization.” Language 88: 1–44.
Brunet, Jacqueline
1994Grammaire critique de l’italien 12: Un si ou deux. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.
Burzio, Luigi
1981Intransitive verbs and Italian auxiliaries. Doctoral diss., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Butler, Christopher S., and Francisco Gonzálvez-García
1982Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.
Cinque, Guglielmo
1988On si constructions and the theory of Arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 521–581.
Collins Sansoni Italian Dictionary
1981 2nd ed. Firenze: Sansoni.
Contini-Morava, Ellen
1995 “Introduction: On Linguistic Sign Theory.” In Contini-Morava, Ellen, and Barbara Sussman Goldberg (eds.), pp. 1–39.
Contini-Morava, Ellen
2011 “And Now for Something Completely Different: Reid on English Verb Number.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29 (Topic/Comment Special: Phi-feature Inflection and Agreement), 1147–1162.
Contini-Morava, Ellen, and Barbara Sussman Goldberg
(eds.)1995Meaning as Explanation: Advances in Linguistic Sign Theory, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Contini-Morava, Ellen, Robert S. Kirsner, and Betsy Rodríguez-Bachiller
1991 “I pronomi riflessivi.” Ch. XII of Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, a cura di Lorenzo Renzi, vol. I, Bologna: Il Mulino, third edition.
2004 “Impersonal si Constructions. How Semantics Determines Agreement.” In: K. Moulton & M. Wolf (eds). Proceedings of NELS 34: 61–73.
D’Alessandro, Roberta
2006 “Is Impersonal si in Italian Definite or Indefinite?.” WECOL 2004 (Proceedings of the Thirty-third Western Conference On Linguistics, edited by M. T. Martínez, A. Alcazár, and R. M. Hernández): 64.
D’Alessandro, Roberta
2008Impersonal “si” Contructions: Agreement and Interpretation. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Davis, Joseph
1992Italian egli and lui: Grammatical Meaning and Inference. Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, New York. UMI 9313892.
Davis, Joseph
1995a “Italian Pronouns and the Virtue of Relative Meaninglessness.” In Contini-Morava, Ellen, and Barbara Sussman Goldberg (eds.), pp. 423–440.
Davis, Joseph
1995b “The Linguistic Sign as Unifying Principle Behind Syntactic Peculiarities: The Italian Clitic ne.” CLS 31: Papers from the 31st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 2: The Parasession on Clitics, 79–90.
Davis, Joseph
2000 “On Abstinence and Abdication: Italian si.” Paper presented at the 6th International Conference of Columbia School Linguistics, Feb. 2000, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J.
2004a “The Linguistics of William Diver and the Linguistics of Ferdinand de Saussure.” In History of Linguistics in Texts and Concepts. Vol. 1, Gerda Haßler and Gesina Volkmann (eds.), Münster: Nodus, pp. 307–326.
1993 “The Existence of Synonyms in a Language: Two Forms but One, or Rather Two, Meanings?” Linguistics 31: 521–538.
De Mauro, Tullio
2000Grande dizionario italiano dell’uso. Torino: Unione Tipografico.
Diver, William
1969/2012 “The System of Relevance of the Homeric Verb.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp. 135–159.
Diver, William
1970/2012 “Avoidance of the Obvious: The Pronoun as a Minimax Solution.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp. 247–263.
Diver, William
1974/2012 “Substance and Value in Linguistic Analysis.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp. 23–45.
Diver, William
1975/2012 “The Nature of Linguistic Meaning.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp. 47–63.
Diver, William
1984 “The Grammar of Greek and the Grammar of Latin.” Unpublished MS, Department of Linguistics, Columbia University. Various dates for class use.
Diver, William
1986 “The Latin Precursors of the ‘Romance Reflexive.’” In Studies in Romance Linguistics, Oswaldo Jaeggli and Carmen Silva-Corvalàn (eds.), Dordrecht: Foris. Reprinted in Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 8 (1987): 115–141.
Diver, William
1986/2012 “Latin se.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp. 279–289.
Diver, William
1987/2012 “The Dual.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp. 87–99.
Diver, William
1990/2012 “The Elements of a Science of Language.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp. 65–84.
Diver, William
1992a/2012 “The Latin Demonstratives.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp. 265–277.
Diver, William
1992b/2012 “The Subjunctive Without Syntax.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp. 183–193.
Diver, William
1995/2012 “Theory.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp. 445–519.
Diver, William, and Joseph Davis
2012 “Latin Voice and Case.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp.195–245.
Diver, William, Joseph Davis, and Wallis Reid
2012 “Traditional Grammar and its Legacy in Twentieth-Century Linguistics.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp. 371–443.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
1998 “Impersonal se constructions in Romance and the passivization of unergatives.” Linguistic Inquiry 29: 399–437.
Everaert, Martin
1986The Syntax of Reflexivization. Dordrecht: Foris.
García, Erica C.
1975The Role of Theory in Linguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
García, Erica C.
1983 “Context Dependence of Language and of Linguistic Analysis.” In Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, Flora Klein-Andreu (ed.), New York: Academic, pp. 181–207.
Garzanti. Dizionario Garzanti della lingua italiana: Edizione minore
1974 5th ed. n.p.: Aldo Garzanti.
Gildin, Bonny L.
1989Subject Order in French: A Signal-Meaning Analysis. Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, New York. UMI 9005873.
Goldberg, Barbara Sussman
1995 “The -ra and -se Opposition in Spanish.” In Contini-Morava, Ellen, and Barbara Sussman Goldberg (eds.), pp. 381–404.
Gorup, Radmila
1987The Semantic Organization of the Serbo-Croatian Verb. München: Otto Sagner. (Slavische Beiträge. 214.)
Gorup, Radmila
2006 “Se Without Deixis.” In Davis, Joseph, Radmila J. Gorup, and Nancy Stern (eds.), pp. 195–209.
Halliday, Michael, and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Huffman, Alan
1977 “Traditional Grammar vs. the French Verb – A Study of the French Compound Verb Tense Auxiliaries: avoir and être.” Columbia University Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 4: 79–125. Reprinted Summer 1978.
2006 “Diver’s Theory.” In Davis, Joseph, Radmila J. Gorup, and Nancy Stern (eds.), pp. 41–62.
Huffman, Alan
2012 “Introduction: The Enduring Legacy of William Diver.” In Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis (eds.), pp. 1–20.
Huffman, Alan, and Joseph Davis
(eds.)2012Language: Communication and Human Behavior. The Linguistic Essays of William Diver. Leiden / Boston: Brill.
Janssen, Theo A. J. M.
1995 “Deixis from a Cognitive Point of View.” In Contini-Morava, Ellen, and Barbara Sussman Goldberg (eds.), pp. 245–270.
Kirnser, Robert S.
1969 “The Role of zullen in the Grammar of Modern Standard Dutch.” Lingua 24: 101–154.
Kirsner, Robert S.
1972On Deixis and Degree of Differentiation in Modern Standard Dutch. Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, New York. UMI 739027.
Kirsner, Robert S.
1979 “Deixis in Discourse: An Exploratory Quantitative Study of the Modern Dutch Demonstrative Adjectives.” In Discourse and Syntax: Vol. 12. Syntax and Semantics, Talmy Givón (ed.). New York: Academic Press, pp. 355–375.
1993 “From Meaning to Message in Two Theories: Cognitive and Saussurean Views of the Modern Dutch Demonstratives. In Conceptualiz;ation and Mental Processing in Language, R. Geiger and B. Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.). [Cognitive Linguistics Research 3]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 81–114.
Kirnser, Robert S.
1996 “The Human Factor and the Insufficiency of Invariant Meanings.” In Towards a Calculus of Meaning: Studies in Markedness, Distinctive Features, and Deixis, Edna Andrews and Yishai Tobin (eds.). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 83–106.
1976The Two Si’s of Italian: An Analysis of the Reflexive, Inchoative, and Indefinite Subject Sentences in Modern Italian. Georgetown University, reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.
1982 “The Unaccusative Hypothesis and the ‘Inherent Clitic’ Phenomenon in Italian.” Papers from the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 18, 530–541. Republished in Italian as Chapter 2 of Rosen 2012.
Rosen, Carol
1987 “Star Means Bad: A Syntactic Divertimento for Italianists.” Italica 64(3): 443–476. Republished in Italian as Chapter 1 of Rosen 2012.
Rosen, Carol
2012Dal giardino della sintassi: Florilegio grammaticale italiano. Pisa: ETS.
Russi, Cinzia
2008Italian Clitics: An Empirical Study. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sabar, Nadav
2016A Meaning Hypothesis to Explain Speakers’ Choice of the Sign look. Ph.D. diss., The City University of New York, New York.
Saccon, Graziella
1993 “Some Differences in Auxiliary Selection Between Italian and Italian Dialects.” Paper presented at the American Association of Italian Studies, April 15–18, 1993, University of Texas, Austin.
1987 “Three Sign-Oriented Linguistic Theories: A Contrastive Approach”. In Descriptio Linguistica, H. Bluhme & G. Hammarström (eds.). Tübingen: Gunther Narr, pp. 51–75.
Tobin, Yishai
1990Semiotics and Linguistics. London / New York: Longman.
Tobin, Yishai
1997Phonology as Human Behavior: Theoretical Implications and Clinical Applications. Durham / London: Duke University Press.
Wanner, Dieter
1977 “On the Order of Clitics in Italian.” Lingua 43: 101–128.
Wanner, Dieter
1987a “Clitic Pronouns in Italian: A Linguistic Guide.” Italica 64, No. 3: 410–442.
Wanner, Dieter
1987bThe Development of Romance Clitic Pronouns: From Latin to Old Romance (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 3.) Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wehr, Barbara
1995SE-Diathese im italienischen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Zubin, David
1979 “Discourse Function of Morphology: The Focus System in German.” In Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, Talmy Givón and C. Li (eds.). New York: Academic, pp. 469–504.
Zubin, David, and K. -M. Köpke
1981 “Gender: A Less than Arbitrary Grammatical Category.” Chicago Linguistic Society 17: 439–449.
Zwicky, Arnold M.
1977On Clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.