Cover not available
Part of
Questioning Theoretical Primitives in Linguistic Inquiry: Papers in honor of Ricardo Otheguy
Edited by Naomi Shin and Daniel Erker
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 76] 2018
► pp. 157–188

Ditransitives and the English System of Degree of Control

A Columbia School analysis

 | The City College of New York and Graduate Center, CUNY
The English System of Degree of Control (Diver, 1984) is a Columbia School hypothesis that posits invariant meanings for word order signals in what are traditionally called transitive and ditransitive sentences. In this paper, the Control System is shown to account for speakers’ choices between two constructions that seem, on introspection, to be equivalent: push the wall and give the wall a push. The Control meanings do not only describe a set of uses. Instead, by distinguishing between the linguistic system, on the one hand, and its use, on the other, the meanings of the Control System provide an explanation for the distribution of forms and the choices that speakers make in order to meet their communicative goals.
Keywords: ditransitive, English, Columbia School, Control System, grammar
Article outline
  • Ditransitives in Construction Grammar
  • Theoretical preliminaries: Columbia School linguistics
    • Signals and meanings
  • English System of Degree of Control
    • Phase I: Two-participant events
    • Phase II: Three-participant events
    • Comparing Phase I and Phase II
  • Data: Gave the wall a push
  • Data: Pushed the wall
  • Patterns of distribution
  • Other contextual factors
    • ‘Giving the book a read’ and other types of examples
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
  • Data Sources
  • Appendix
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.76.08ste
References (53)
References
Boogaart, R. & Foolen, A. (2015). Discussion of Robert S. Kirsner, Qualitative-quantitative Analyses of Dutch and Afrikaans Grammar and Lexicon. Nederlandse Taalkunde 20.2: 215–217.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, C. & Gonzálvez-García, F. (2014). Exploring functional-cognitive space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton ,Publishers.Google Scholar
Colleman, T., & De Clerck, B. (2008). Accounting for ditransitive constructions with envy and forgive. Functions of Language, 15(2), 187–215.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K. U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honour of Günter Radden (pp. 49–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. (2004). Revisiting the gap between meaning and message. In E. Contini-Morava, R. S. Kirsner, & B. Rodríguez-Bachiller (Eds.), Cognitive and communicative approaches to linguistic analysis (pp. 155–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diver, W. (1969) [2012]. The system of relevance of the homeric verb. In A. Huffman & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior (pp. 135–160). Leiden/Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
(1974) [2012]. Substance and value in linguistic analysis. Semiotext(e) 1.11-30. Revised and reprinted in A. Huffman & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior: The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 23–45), (2012). Leiden/Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
(1984). The grammar of modern English (Unpublished ms).Google Scholar
(1995) [2012]. The elements of a science of a language. In A. Huffman & J. Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior: The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 65–84). Leiden/Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
Diver, W. & Davis, J. (2012). Latin voice and case. In A. Huffman & Joseph, Davis (Eds.), Language: Communication and human behavior: The linguistic essays of William Diver (pp. 195–246). Leiden/Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. (2001). The definite article, accessibility, and the construction of discourse referents. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 333–378.Google Scholar
García, E. (1975). The role of theory in linguistic analysis: The Spanish pronoun system. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.). (2007). The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, G. (1974). Semantics and syntactic regularity. Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, A. (1996). The instrumental nature of linguistic meaning and the human factor in language. New York, NY: New York University, International Linguistic Association, April.Google Scholar
(1997). The categories of grammar: French lui and le. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Modern English: A Columbia School grammar (Unpublished ms).Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1988). An overview of Cognitive Grammar. In Brygida, Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 127–161). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Cognitive Grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 421–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, J. (1996). Give: A Cognitive Linguistic study. Berlin and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R. (2002). Saussurean anti-nomenclaturism in grammatical analysis. In W. Reid, R. Otheguy, & N. Stern (Eds.), Signal, meaning, and message: Perspectives on sign-based linguistics (pp. 373–403). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, B. H. (1965) [1979]. Subject and object in modern English. In Jorge, Hankamer (Ed.), Outstanding dissertations in linguistics series. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Reid, W. (1991). Verb and noun number in English: A functional explanation. London and New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
(2011). The communicative function of English verb number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29, 1087–1146.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(This volume). The Justification of Linguistic Categories.
Saussure, F. (1916) [1972]. Course in general linguistics. Translated by Roy Harris. La Salle, IL: Open Court Classics.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stern, N. (2016). Word order as a signal of meaning: English reflexive pronouns and why we behave ourselves. In L. Rolston (Ed.), University of Washington working papers in linguistics (pp. 111–119). Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Data Sources
9a2a. Hug? On [URL]. December 24, (2010). Retrieved from [URL] July 15, (2017).
Abrams, Peter. (2000). Crying wolf. Random House Publishing Group. Retrieved from [URL], July 15, (2017).Google Scholar
Betancourt, John Gregory. (1988). The blind archer. Wildside Press LLC. Retrieved from [URL], July 15, (2017).Google Scholar
Cain, Chelsea. (2014). One kick. Simon and Schuster. Retrieved from [URL], July 15, (2017).Google Scholar
Cohen, Gary (Broadcaster). SNY-TV, April 24, (2013), 10:20 pm.
ContractorTalk.com.Roof saggy wall pushed out. October (2006). Retrieved from [URL], July 15, (2017).
Dargis, Manohla. (2009). A tragic ballerina dances again, her shoes now redder than ever. The New York Times. Retrieved from [URL], November 5, (2009).Google Scholar
Doughty, Francis Worcester. (1892). Mirrikh, or a woman from Mars. Retrieved from [URL], July 15, (2017).Google Scholar
Exercises-Chapter 1. Wilsonje.faculty.mjc.edu, Week1and2answers.pdf, Retrieved from [URL], July 15, (2017).
Giuclea, Andrea. Cristina Neagu: An 8 Worth a 10. Medium. March 17, (2016). Retrieved from [URL], July 15, (2017).
Gronker. Legend of Zelda: Weight gain interactive. Retrieved from [URL], July 15, (2017).Google Scholar
High Winds Create ‘Ice Tsunami’ on Mille Lacs Lake. CBS Minnesota. May 11, (2013). Retrieved from [URL] July 15, (2017).Google Scholar
Lee, Matthew (2003). Predatory lending: Toxic credit in the global inner city. Inner City Press. Retrieved from [URL], July 15, (2017).Google Scholar
Mako-chan. Once upon a time. On [URL]. May 5, (2004) (updated September 25, 2004). Retrieved from [URL], July 15, 2017.Google Scholar
Nukeble (submitted by) on Reddit (2016). A successfull (sic) Lucid Dream – Full Control. Retrieved from [URL], July 15, 2017.
Omens. A WordPress blog. Retrieved from [URL], February 10, 2014.
Porteus, H. M. (2009). Sandy the flipper dragon. Dorrance Publishing. Retrieved from [URL], July 15, 2017.Google Scholar
Robinson, Marilynne. (2004). Gilead. Picador.
Saly, Judith & John Saly, eds. The wall within. Pathmark Guide Lecture No. 47. 1996 ed. February 27, (1959).Google Scholar
Slater, Lauren, ed by Marina Benjamin. A raccoon of my own, Aeon. Nd. Retrieved from [URL], July 15, 2017.Google Scholar
Soulsenpie. Black Knight. Historical fiction on Wattpad (‘a free online storytelling community where users post written works’). Retrieved from [URL], July 15, 2017
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hesseltine, Kelli & Joseph Davis
2020. The communicative function of adjective-noun order in English. <i>WORD</i> 66:3 ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.