Cover not available
Part of
Lexicalization patterns in color naming: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Ida Raffaelli, Daniela Katunar and Barbara Kerovec
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 78] 2019
► pp. 213–236

Complex color denomination in French and Occitan

 | University of Oxford
 | University of Lyon
 | Lattice, CNRS, ENS & Université Sorbonne Nouvelle
In this chapter, we investigate color naming in French and Occitan. It is well known that French, compared to other Romance languages, has a tendency to be very analytic. This raises the following question: do speakers of French and other Romance languages (here, Occitan) differ in morphological strategies used to express meaning in the semantic domain of color? To investigate this question, we compare the color descriptions provided by speakers of French (N = 20) and speakers of Occitan (N = 20). The results show some striking differences between the two languages in lexical and morphosyntactic strategies used to name colors. Speakers of Occitan employ secondary color terms using a variety of derivational suffixes, which are absent from the French data despite their existence in the language.
Keywords: color naming, Romance, French, Occitan, experimental studies, morphological complexity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Color naming strategies in French and Occitan
    • 3.1Simple terms: Primary terms and analogy
    • 3.2Derived terms
    • 3.3Compounds
    • 3.4Modifying expressions
    • 3.5Complex descriptions
  • 4.Naming strategies and variation among participants
  • 5.Discussion and concluding remarks
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.78.10bac
References (37)
References
Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Carlier, A. (2007). From Preposition to Article. The grammaticalization of the French partitive. Studies in Language, 31 (1), 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlier, A., & Lamiroy, B. (2014). The Romance partitive. In Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive Cases and Related Categories (pp. 477–518). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2018). The emergence of the grammatical paradigm of nominal determiners in French and in Romance: Comparative and diachronic perspectives. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 63 (2), 141–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Mulder, W. & Lamiroy, B. (2012). Gradualness of grammaticalization in Romance. The position of French, Spanish and Italian. In K. Davidse, T. Breban, L. Brems, & T. Mortelmans (Eds.), Grammaticalization and Language Change: New reflections (pp. 199–226). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doebler, W. M. (2010). Ciascun saria di color vinto: The Philology and Philosophy of Terms for Color and Light in Occitan and Italian Poetry from the Troubadours through Petrarch. (Ph.D. dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Dubois, D., & Grinevald, C. (1999). Pratiques de la couleur et dénominations. Faits de langues 14, 11–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). En voir de toutes les couleurs : processus de dénomination des couleurs et constructions cognitives. In C. Vandeloise (Ed.), Langues et cognition (pp. 79–113). Paris: Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Dworkin, S. N. (2016a). A diachronic overview of color terms in the Romance languages: the lexical stability of the Latin color vocabulary. In J. P. Silvestre, E. Cardeira, A. Villalva (Eds.), Colour and colour naming: crosslinguistic approaches (pp. 9–20). Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa, Universidade de Aveiro.Google Scholar
(2016b). La estabilidad léxica: la pervivencia de los nombres de los colores del latín en español y en las otras lenguas romances. In A. L. Serena, A. Narbona & S. del Rey Quesada (Eds.), El español a través del tiempo: Estudios ofrecidos a Rafael Cano Aguilar (pp. 245–257). Seville: Ediciones de la Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
Fagard, B., & Mardale, A. (2012). The pace of grammaticalization and the evolution of prepositional systems: Data from Romance. Folia Linguistica, 46 (2), 303–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fagard, B. (2011). Conjonctions et grammaticalisation : le cas des langues romanes. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 19, 79–102.Google Scholar
Grossmann, M. (1988). Colori e lessico. Studi sulla struttura semantica degli aggettivi di coloure in catalano, castigliano, italiano, romeno, latino ed ungherese. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Heider, E. R., & Olivier, D. C. (1972). The structure of the color space in naming and memory for two languages. Cognitive Psychology, 3 (2), 337–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P., & Traugott, E. (2003 [1993]). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P., Berlin, B., & Marrifiend, W. (1991). Biocultural implications of systems of colour naming. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 1, 12–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P., & McDaniel, C. K. (1978). The Linguistic Significance of the Meanings of Basic Color Terms, Language, 54, 610–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, G. (2007). Adjectifs de couleur et gradation : une énigme… « très » colourée. Travaux de linguistique, 55 (2), 9–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristol, A. M. (1978). Color. Les langues romanes devant le phénomène de la couleur. Zurich: Francke Berne.Google Scholar
König, E., & Gast, V. (2007). Understanding English-German contrasts. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Lamiroy, B. (1999). Auxiliaires, langues romanes et grammaticalisation. Langages, 135, 33–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Le syntagme prépositionnel en français et en espagnol: une question de grammaticalisation? Langages, 143, 91–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Degrés de grammaticalisation à travers les langues de même famille. Bulletin de la Societe de Linguistique de Paris, 19, 167–192.Google Scholar
Lamiroy, B., & Pineda, A. (2017). The pace of grammaticalization in Romance. The position of Catalan. Linguisticae Investigationes, 40 (2), 304–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, A., Jordan, F., & Dunn, M. (2015). Semantic systems in closely related languages. Language Sciences, 49, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, C. (2006). Grammaticalisation et changement linguistique. Brussels: De Boeck-Duculot.Google Scholar
Molinier, C. (2001). Les adjectifs de couleur en français. Eléments pour une classification. Revue romane, 36(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
(2005). Sur la forme et le statut des adjectifs de couleur suffixés. Le français moderne, LXXXIII (2), 145–156.Google Scholar
(2006). Les termes de couleurs en français. Essai de classification sémantico-syntaxique. Cahiers de Grammaire, 50, 259–275.Google Scholar
Mora, L, & Lécrivain, C. (2004). Les adjectives suffixés colorés : entre la péjoration restrictive et la péjoration exhaustive. Estudios de Lengua y Literatura Frascesas, 15, 23–42.Google Scholar
Noailly, M. (2005). L’intensité de la couleur. Remarques sur l’emploi de très devant bleu, rouge, vert, jaune. In I. Choi-Jonin, M. Bras, A. Dagnac, & M. Rouquier (Eds.), Questions de classification en linguistique : méthodes et descriptions (pp. 263–273). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ott, A. G.. (1899). Étude sur les couleurs en vieux français. Paris: É. Bouillon.Google Scholar
Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., Davies, I. R., & Shapiro, L. R. (2005). Color categories: Evidence for the cultural relativity hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 50 (4), 378–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberson, D., Davies, I. R., & Davidoff, J. (2000). Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a Stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129 (3), 369–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwegler, Armin. 1990. Analyticity and Syntheticity: A Diachronic Perspective with Special Reference to Romance Languages. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tesnière, L. (1928 [1918]). Statistique des langues de l’Europe. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar