Part of
Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages
Edited by Patrick Rebuschat
[Studies in Bilingualism 48] 2015
► pp. 349384
References (128)
References
Baldwin, K.B., & Kutas, M. (1997). An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. Psychophysiology, 34(1), 74–86. doi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barber, H.A., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical gender and number agreement in spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 137–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, L. (2013). Adjectives that aren't: An ERP-theoretical analysis of adjectives in spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Chicago.
Batterink, L., Karns, C.M., & Neville, H. (2012). Dissociable mechanisms supporting awareness: The P300 and gamma in a linguistic attentional blink task. Cerebral Cortex, 22(12), 2733–2744. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batterink, L., Karns, C.M., Yamada, Y., & Neville, H. (2010). The role of awareness in semantic and syntactic processing: An ERP attentional blink study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(11), 2514–2529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batterink, L., & Neville, H.J. (2013a). The human brain processes syntax in the absence of conscious awareness. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(19), 8528–8533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013b). Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(6), 936–951. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C.C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decisions, and semantic priming. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 60(4), 343–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentin, S. (1987). Event-related potentials, semantic processes, and expectancy factors in word recognition. Brain and Language, 31(2), 308–327.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentin, S., & Peled, B. (1990). The contribution of task-related factors to ERP repetition effects at short and long lags. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 359–366.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowden, H.W., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M.T. (2013). Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2492–2511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P. (2007). ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(2), 161–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S., King, J.W., & Kutas, M. (1998a). ERPs and domain specificity: Beating a straw horse. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(6), 653–672. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1998b). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(1), 21–58. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deacon, D., Dynowska, A., Ritter, W., & Grose-Fifer, J. (2004). Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: Implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology, 41(1), 60–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C.J. Doughty, & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Doughty, C.J. (2003). Instructed SLA. In C.J. Doughty, & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C. (2007). The associate-cognitive CREED. In B. VanPatten, & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 77–95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Morgan-Short, K. (2011). Learning without awareness reconsidered: A replication of williams (2005)<br />. In G. Granena, J. Koeth, S. Lee-Ellis, A. Lukyanchenko, G. Prieto Botana & E. Rhoades (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2010 second language research forum: Reconsidering SLA research, dimensions, and directions (pp. 18–28). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2011). Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1-L2 syntactic similarity. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 379–399.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(1), 226–248. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., Foucart, A., Carrasco, H., & Herschensohn, J. (2009). Processing of grammatical gender in french as a first and second language: Evidence from ERPs. EUROSLA Yearbook, 9(1), 76–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., & Foucart, A. (2008). The effect of phonological realization of inflectional morphology on verbal agreement in french: Evidence from ERPs. Acta Psychologica, 128(3), 528–536. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A.D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 78–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A.D., Steinhauer, K., & Pfeifer, E. (2002). Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(1), 529–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A.D., & Frisch, S. (2000). Verb argument structure processing: The role of verb-specific and argument-specific information. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 476–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A.D., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(1), 157–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillon Dowens, M., Guo, T., Guo, J., Barber, H.A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Gender and number processing in chinese learners of spanish - evidence from event related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49(7), 1651–1659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillon Dowens, M., Vergara, M., Barber, H.A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1870–1887. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gouvea, A.C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Poeppel, D. (2010). The linguistic processes underlying the P600. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(2), 149–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunter, T.C., Stowe, L.A., & Mulder, G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology, 34(6), 660–676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P., Baggio, G., & Willems, R.M. (2009). Semantic unification. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (IV ed., pp. 819–836). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Hagoort, P., & Brown, C.M. (1999). Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(6), 715–728. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia, 38(11), 1531–1549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 439–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A.D. (2002). Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 339–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A., Mueller, J., & Clahsen, H. (2006). Morphological processing in a second language: Behavioral and event-related brain potential evidence for storage and decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(1), 121–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A. (2001). What's different in second-language processing? evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 251–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A., Eckstein, K., & Friederici, A.D. (2004). Brain signatures of syntactic and semantic processes during children's language development. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1302–1318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A.D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Processing a second language: Late learners' comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 123–141. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hama, M., & Leow, R.P. (2010). Learning without awareness revisited: Extending williams (2005). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(3), 465–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holcomb, P.J., Grainger, J., & O'Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6), 938–950. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holcomb, P.J., & Neville, H.J. (1990). Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5(4), 281–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holcomb, P.J., Reder, L., Misra, M., & Grainger, J. (2005). The effects of prime visibility on ERP measures of masked priming. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(1), 155–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isel, F. (2007). Syntactic and referential processes in second-language learners: Event-related brain potential evidence. Neuroreport, 18(18), 1885–1889. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(2), 159–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E. (2007). Event-related potentials and language processing: A brief overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 571–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kappenman, E.S., & Luck, S.J. (2012). ERP components: The ups and downs of brainwave recordings. In S. Luck J., & E.S. Kappenman (Eds.), The oxford handbook of ERP components (pp. 3–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205–225. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, J.W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 376–395. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993). Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 573–633. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluender, R., & Münte, T.F. (1998). ERPS to grammatical and ungrammatical subject/object asymmetries in german wh-questions. [Abstract]. Poster Presented at the CUNY Conference on Sentence Processing, Newark, NJ.
Knowlton, B.J., & Moody, T.D. (2008). Procedural learning in humans. In J. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning & memory: A comprehensive reference, (Vol. 3): Memory systems (pp. 321–340). Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, G.R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, G.R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P.J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(1), 117–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., Neville, H.J., & Holcomb, P.J. (1987). A preliminary comparison of the N400 response to semabtic anomalies during reading, listening and singing. In R.J. Ellingson, N.M.F. Murray & A.M. Halliday (Eds.), Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology (pp. 325–330). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K.D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences - brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1983). Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory & Cognition, 11(5), 539–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, E.F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R.P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 557–584. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, J., & Williams, J.N. (2011). The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually-derived meanings<br />. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(1), 33–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2012). Constraints on implicit learning of grammatical form-meaning connections. Language Learning, 62(2), 634–662. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luck, S., J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martín-Loeches, M., Nigbur, R., Casado, P., Hohlfeld, A., & Sommer, W. (2006). Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: A brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in spanish. Brain Research, 1093(1), 178–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, G., & Nobre, A.C. (1993). Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology: Evoked Potentials, 88(3), 210–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, R., & Osterhout, L. (1996). Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(5), 495–523. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7(7), 703–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, J., Tanner, D., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., Inoue, K., Valentine, G., & Osterhout, L. (2010). Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60, 123–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Finger, I., Grey, S., & Ullman, M.T. (2012). Second language processing shows increased native-like neural responses after months of no exposure. Plos One, 7(3), e32974. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M.T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60(1), 154–193. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M.T. (2012). Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 933–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, J., & Holcomb, P.J. (2005). Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in english. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 963–981. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J.L. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing. Second Language Research, 21(2), 152–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J.L., Hahne, A., Fujii, Y., & Friederici, A.D. (2005). Native and nonnative speakers' processing of a miniature version of japanese as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 1229–1244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J.L. (2009). The influence of lexical familiarity on ERP responses during sentence comprehension in language learners. Second Language Research, 25(1), 43–76. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J.L., Hirotani, M., & Friederici, A.D. (2007). ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners. BMC Neuroscience, 8(18) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J.L., Oberecker, R., & Friederici, A.D. (2009). Syntactic learning by mere exposure an ERP study in adult learners. BMC Neuroscience, 10(89) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neville, H., Nicol, J.L., Barss, A., Forster, K.I., & Garrett, M.F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes - evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(2), 151–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oberecker, R., & Friederici, A.D. (2006). Syntactic event-related potential components in 24-month-olds' sentence comprehension. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 17(10), 1017–1021. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oberecker, R., Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A.D. (2005). Neural correlates of syntactic processing in two-year-olds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(10), 1667–1678. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ojima, S., Nakata, H., & Kakigi, R. (2005). An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: Effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2009). Cognition. Understanding second language acquisition (pp. 82–109). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., Allen, M.D., McLaughlin, J., & Inoue, K. (2002). Brain potentials elicited by prose-embedded linguistic anomalies. Memory & Cognition, 30(8), 1304–1312. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Hagoort, P. (1999). A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family: Counterarguments to coulson, king and kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(1), 1–14. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P.J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 785–806. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P.J., & Swinney, D.A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 786–803. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., McKinnon, R., Bersick, M., & Corey, V. (1996). On the language specificity of the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Is the syntactic positive shift a member of the P300 family? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 507–526. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L.A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 739–773. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., Poliakov, A., Inoue, K., McLaughlin, J., Valentine, G., Pitkanen, I., Hirschensohn, J. (2008). Second-language learning and changes in the brain. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(6), 509–521. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pakulak, E., & Neville, H.J. (2010). Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2728–2744. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Maturational constraints on the recruitment of early processes for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 2752–2765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polich, J. (2012). Neuropsychology of P300. In S.J. Luck, & E.S. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 159–188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., Hamrick, P., Sachs, R., Riestenberg, K., & Ziegler, N. (2013). Implicit and explicit knowledge of form-meaning connections: Evidence from subjective measures of awareness. In J. Bergsleithner, S. Frota & J.K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing: L2 studies and essays in honor of Dick Schmidt (pp. 255–275). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J.N. (2012). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(4), 829–856. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rolke, B., Heil, M., Streb, J., & Hennighausen, E. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology, 38(2), 165–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, S., Gugler, M.F., Friederici, A.D., & Hahne, A. (2006). The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of german and italian: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(12), 2030–2048. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rugg, M.D., & Coles, M.G.H. (1995). The ERP and cognitive psychology: Conceptual issues. In M.D. Rugg, & M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 27–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sabourin, L., & Haverkort, M. (2003). Neural substrates of representation and processing of a second language. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken & R.J. Towell (Eds.), The lexicon-syntax interface in second language acquisition (pp. 175–195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabourin, L., & Stowe, L.A. (2008). Second language processing: When are first and second languages processed similarly? Second Language Research, 24(3), 397–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54(1), 35–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attenion and awareness in foreign language learning (technical report #9) (pp. 1–63). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stafford, C.A., Bowden, H.W., & Sanz, C. (2012). Optimizing language instruction: Matters of explicitness, practice, and cue learning. Language Learning, 62(3), 741–768. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinhauer, K., & Connolly, J.F. (2008). Event-related potentials in the study of language. In Stemmer, B. & Whitaker, H. (Ed.), Handbook of the cognitive neuroscience of language (pp. 91–104). New York, NY: Elsvevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinhauer, K., & Drury, J.E. (2012). On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies. Brain and Language, 120(2), 135–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinhauer, K., White, E.J., & Drury, J.E. (2009). Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Second Language Research, 25(1), 13–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stenberg, G., Lindgren, M., Johansson, M., Olsson, A., & Rosén, I. (2000). Semantic processing without conscious identification: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(4), 973–1004. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swaab, T.Y., Ledoux, K., Camblin, C.C., & Boudewyn, M.A. (2012). Language related ERP components. In S.J. Luck, & E.S. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. (pp. 397–440). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, D., & van Hell, J.G. (2014). ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing. Neuropsychologia, 56, 289–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, D., Inoue, K., & Osterhout, L. (2013). Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, FirstView, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, D., McLaughlin, J., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L. (2013). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 367–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 173–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M.T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1-2), 231–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Hell, J.G., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26(1), 43–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Petten, C. (1995). Words and sentences: Event-related brain potential measures. Psychophysiology, 32(6), 511–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vogel, E.K., Luck, S.J., & Shapiro, K.L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(6), 1656–1674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voss, J.L., & Paller, K.A. (2009). An electrophysiological signature of unconscious recognition memory. Nature Neuroscience, 12(3), 349–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, K., & Lavric, A. (2008). Syntactic anomaly elicits a lexico-semantic (N400) ERP effect in the second language but not the first. Psychophysiology, 45(6), 920–925. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber-Fox, C.M., & Neville, H.J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(3), 231–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, E.J., Genesee, F., & Steinhauer, K. (2012). Brain responses before and after intensive second language learning: Proficiency based changes and first language background effects in adult learners. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e52318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 269–304. Retrieved from [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Xu, Emily Shimeng, Stephen Matthews, Virginia Yip, Patrick C. M. Wong & Nicola Molinaro
2024. Memory systems modulate crosslinguistic influence on third language morphosyntactic acquisition. PLOS ONE 19:7  pp. e0304572 ff. DOI logo
Faretta-Stutenberg, Mandy, Irene Finestrat & Kara Morgan-Short
2023. Chapter 7. Technology in cognitive research. In Methods in Study Abroad Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4],  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Suzuki, Yuichi, Hyeonjeong Jeong, Haining Cui, Kiyo Okamoto, Ryuta Kawashima & Motoaki Sugiura
2023. An fMRI validation study of the word-monitoring task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Exploring the role of explicit and implicit aptitudes in behavioral and neural processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:1  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Morgan‐Short, Kara, Irene Finestrat, Alicia Luque & David Abugaber
2022. Exploring New Insights Into Explicit and Implicit Second Language Processing: Event‐Related Potentials Analyzed by Source Attribution. Language Learning 72:2  pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Vandenberghe, Bert, Maribel Montero Perez, Bert Reynvoet & Piet Desmet
2022. Second Language Vocabulary Learning through Ecologically Valid Classroom Practice Can Be Indexed by Event‐Related Potentials (ERPs). A Conceptual Replication Study. Mind, Brain, and Education 16:2  pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Morgan‐Short, Kara
2021. Considering the updated Input Hypothesis from a neurolinguistic perspective: A response to Lichtman and VanPatten. Foreign Language Annals 54:2  pp. 324 ff. DOI logo
Yilmaz, Yucel & Gisela Granena
2021. IMPLICITNESS AND EXPLICITNESS IN COGNITIVE ABILITIES AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:3  pp. 523 ff. DOI logo
Angelovska, Tanja & Dietmar Roehm
2020. Neurolinguistic Implications for L2 Learning and Teaching. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Granena, Gisela
2020. Implicit Language Aptitude, DOI logo
Mackey, Alison
2020. Interaction, Feedback and Task Research in Second Language Learning, DOI logo
Curcic, Maja, Sible Andringa & Folkert Kuiken
2019. The Role of Awareness and Cognitive Aptitudes in L2 Predictive Language Processing. Language Learning 69:S1  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Roehm, Dietmar & Tanja Angelovska
2019. Neurolinguistic Accounts ofL2Learning and Teaching. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Faretta-Stutenberg, Mandy & Kara Morgan-Short
2018. The interplay of individual differences and context of learning in behavioral and neurocognitive second language development. Second Language Research 34:1  pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Loewen, Shawn & Masatoshi Sato
2018. Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching 51:3  pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Suzuki, Yuichi & Robert DeKeyser
2017. The Interface of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge in a Second Language: Insights From Individual Differences in Cognitive Aptitudes. Language Learning 67:4  pp. 747 ff. DOI logo
Andringa, Sible & Patrick Rebuschat
2015. NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE STUDY OF IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT LEARNING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37:2  pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Morgan-Short, Kara, ZhiZhou Deng, Katherine A. Brill-Schuetz, Mandy Faretta-Stutenberg, Patrick C. M. Wong & Francis C. K. Wong
2015. A VIEW OF THE NEURAL REPRESENTATION OF SECOND LANGUAGE SYNTAX THROUGH ARTIFICIAL LANGUAGE LEARNING UNDER IMPLICIT CONTEXTS OF EXPOSURE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37:2  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.