Cover not available
Part of
Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language: Contemporary perspectives
Edited by Martin Howard and Pascale Leclercq
[Studies in Bilingualism 50] 2017
► pp. 1–25

Introduction
Tense, aspect and modality in second language acquisition

An overview

editor
| University College Cork
| Paul Valéry University Montpellier
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The L2 learner’s tense-aspect system: Emergence of tense-aspect markers
    • 2.1Acquisition and use of tense-aspect verb morphology: The case of the past tenses
    • 2.2Grammatical aspect
    • 2.3Inherent lexical aspect
    • 2.4Factors constraining the L2 learner’s variable use of TAM morphology
    • 2.5Acquisition and use of TAM verb morphology: The expression of futurity and modality
    • 2.6Cross-linguistic influence in the L2 acquisition of tense-aspect-modality
    • 2.7Input issues in the study of L2 tense-aspect-modality acquisition
  • 3.The contribution of this volume
    • 3.1Chapter synopses
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.50.01how
References (89)
References
Adamson, H., Fonseca-Greber, B., Kataoka, K., Scardino, V. & Takano, S. 1996. Tense marking in the English of Spanish-speaking adolescents. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation [Studies in Bilingualism 10], R. Bayley & D. Preston (eds), 121–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. 1991. Developmental sequences: the emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 2], T. Huebner & C. Ferguson (eds), 305–324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In Progression and Regression in Language: Sociocultural, Neuropsychological and Linguistic Perspectives, K. Hyltenstam & Å. Viberg (eds), 309–339. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. & Shirai, Y. 1995. Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16: 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P. & Bylund, E. 2013. Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science 37(2): 286–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayoun, D. 2001. The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of passé composé and imparfait. Modern Language Journal 85: 226–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. The effectiveness of written recasts in the second language acquisition of aspectual distinctions in French: A follow-up study. Modern Language Journal 88: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. The acquisition of tense and aspect in L2 French from a Universal Grammar perspective. In Tense and Aspect in Romance Languages. Theoretical and Applied Perspectives [Studies in Bilingualism 29], D. Ayoun & R. Salaberry (eds), 79–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. The Second Language Acquisition of French Tense, Aspect, Mood and Modality [AILA Applied Linguistics Series 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. The acquisition of future temporality by L2 French learners. Journal of French Language Studies 24: 181–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1992. The use of adverbials and natural order in the development of temporal expression. International Review of Applied Linguistics 30: 299–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Reverse-order reports and the acquisition of tense: beyond the principle of chronological order. Language Learning 44: 243–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. A narrative perspective on the development of the tense/aspect system in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 263–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. Another piece of the puzzle. The emergence of the present perfect. Language Learning 47: 375–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. Narrative structure and lexical aspect: conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 471–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning and Use [Language Learning Monographs 2]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2004a. The emergence of grammaticalized future expression in longitudinal production data. In Form-meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition, B. Van Patten, J. Williams, S. Rott & M. Overstreet (eds), 129–154. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005. Tracking the elusive imperfect in adult second language acquisition: Refining the hunt. In Aspectual Inquiries, P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (eds), 397–419. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartning, I. 1998. Procédés de grammaticalisation dans l’acquisition des prédications verbales en français parlé. Travaux de Linguistique 36: 223–234.Google Scholar
2005. ‘Je ne pense pas que ce soit vrai’. Le subjonctif un trait tardif dans l’acquisition du français L2. In Hommage à Jane Nystedt, M. Metzeltin (ed), 31–49. Vienna: Drei Eidechsen.Google Scholar
Bartning, I. & Schlyter, S. 2004. Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. Journal of French Language Studies 14: 281–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayley, R. 1996. Competing constraints on variation in the speech of adult Chinese learners of English. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation [Studies in Bilingualism 10], R. Bayley & D. Preston (eds), 97–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behrens, B., Flecken, M. & Carroll, M. 2013. Progressive attraction: on the use and grammaticalization of progressive aspect in Dutch, Norwegian, and German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 25(2): 95–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergström, A. 1997. L’influence des distinctions aspectuelles sur l’acquisition des temps du passé en français langue seconde. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 9: 52–82.Google Scholar
Carroll, M., Natale, S. & Starren, M. 2008. Acquisition du marquage du progressif par des apprenants germanophones de l’italien et néerlandophones du français. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 26: 31–50.Google Scholar
Carroll, M., Weimar, K., Flecken, M., Lambert, M. & von Stutterheim, C. 2012. Tracing trajectories: Motion event construal by advanced L2 French-English and L2 French-German speakers. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 3(2): 202–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, L. & White, J. 2014. The quantity and quality of language practice in typical interactive pair/group tasks. TESL Canada 31(8): 47–67.Google Scholar
Coppetiers, R. 1987. Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language 63(3): 544–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, R., Klein, W. & Noyau, C. 1995. The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimroth, C. 2005. The Finite Story. [URL]
Edmonds, A. & Gudmestad, A. 2015. What the present can tell us about the future: a variationist analysis of future-time expression in native and non-native French. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 6(1): 15–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flecken, M., von Stutterheim, C. & Carroll, M. 2014. Grammatical aspect influences motion event perception: Evidence from a cross-linguistic, non-verbal recognition task. Language and Cognition 6: 45–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A. 1992. Grammaticalisation processes in the area of temporal and modal relations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14(3): 279–319.Google Scholar
Harley, B. 1992. Patterns of second language development in French immersion. Journal of French Language Studies 2: 159–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, H. 1999. The acquisition of temporal reference in first and second language acquisition: what children already know and adults still have to learn and vice versa. Psychology of Language and Communication 3(1): 41–60.Google Scholar
Hilberink-Schulpen, B., Nederstigt, U. & Starren, M. 2014. Grammatical preferences in aspect marking in first language and second language: The case of first language Dutch, English, and German and first language Dutch and second language English, and first language Dutch and second language German. Applied Psycholinguistics 35(6): 969–1000. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax, T. Givón (ed.), 213–241. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Housen, A. 2000. Verb semantics and the acquisition of tense aspect morphology in English. Studia Linguistica 54(2): 249–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. 2002. Les interrelations entre les facteurs contextuels contraignant l’emploi variable des temps du passé. Une étude d’apprenants avancés du français. Revue française de linguistique appliquée VII(2): 31–42.Google Scholar
2005. The emergence and use of the ‘plus-que-parfait’ in advanced French Interlanguage. In Focus on French as a Foreign Language: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, J.-M. Dewaele (ed.), 63–87. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2006. The expression of number and person through verb morphology in French interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics 44(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Morpho-syntactic development in the expression of modality: The subjunctive in French L2 acquisition. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 11(3): 171–192.Google Scholar
2009. Expressing irrealis in L2 French: A preliminary study of the conditional and tense-concordancing in L2 acquisition. Issues in Applied Linguistics 17(2): 113–135.Google Scholar
2012. From tense and aspect towards modality – the acquisition of future, conditional and subjunctive morphology in L2 French. A preliminary study. In Tense, Aspect and Mood in First and Second Language Acquisition, E. Labeau & I. Saddour (eds), 201–223. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Izquierdo, J. & Collins, L. 2008. The facilitative role of L1 influence in tense-aspect marking: A comparison of hispanophone and Anglophone learners of French. Modern Language Journal 92(3): 350–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, M. 1987. Developmental patterns of past tense acquisition among foreign language learners of French. In Foreign Language Learning: A Research Perspective, B. VanPatten, T. Dvorak & J. Lee (eds), 52–60. Cambridge MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kihlstedt, M. 1998. La référence au passé dans le dialogue. Etude de l’acquisition de la temporalité chez des apprenants dits avancés de français. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University / Akademitryk.Google Scholar
2002. Reference to past events in dialogue. The acquisition of tense and aspect by advanced learners of French. In The L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 27], R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (eds), 322–361). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klein, W. & Perdue, C. 1997. The basic variety. Or couldn’t natural languages be much simpler? Second Language Research 13(4): 310–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labeau, E. 2005. Beyond the Aspect Hypothesis. Tense-Aspect Development in Advanced L2 French. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lambert, M., Carroll, M., von Stutterheim, C. 2003. La subordination dans les récits d’apprenants avancés francophones et germanophones de l’anglais. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 19: 41–67.Google Scholar
Lambert, M., Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C. 2008. Acquisition en L2 des principes d’organisation de récits spécifiques aux langues. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 26: 11–29.Google Scholar
Leclercq, P. 2008. L’influence de la langue maternelle chez les apprenants adultes quasi-bilingues dans une tâche contrainte de verbalisation. Etude de l’expression du déroulement en français et en anglais. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 26: 51–69.Google Scholar
2009. The influence of L1 French on near-native French learners of English: The case of simultaneity. In The Advanced Learner Variety: The Case of French, E. Labeau & F. Myles (eds.), 269–289. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Leclercq, P. & Lenart, E. 2015. Rôle de la subordination pour construire les chaînes événementielles du récit chez des apprenants avancés du français L2. In Relatives et autres subordonnées - regards croisés en linguistique, acquisition et didactique, P. Trévisiol-Okamura & M. Kaheraoui (eds), 79–102. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. 1989. Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McManus, K. 2015. L1-L2 differences in the acquisition of form-meaning pairings: a comparison of English and German learners of French. Canadian Modern Language Review 71(2): 51–77.Google Scholar
McManus, K. & Mitchell, R. 2015. Subjunctive use and development in French L2: a longitudinal study. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 6(1): 42–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mifka-Profozic, N. 2015. Effects of corrective feedback in L2 acquisition of tense-aspect verbal morphology. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 6(1): 149–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. & Slabakova, R. 2002. Acquiring morphosyntactic and semantic properties of preterit and imperfect tenses in L2 Spanish. In The Acquisition of Spanish Morphosyntax. The L1-L2 Connection, A. Pérez-Leroux & J. Liceras (eds), 113–149. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nadasdi, T., Mougeon, R. & Rehner, K. 2003. Emploi du futur dans le français parlé des élèves d’immersion française. Journal of French Language Studies 13(2): 195–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Natale, S. 2013. Linkage in narratives: a comparison between monolingual speakers of French and Italian, and early and late French-Italian bilinguals. International Review of Applied Linguistics 51(3): 151–169.Google Scholar
Noyau, C. 1990. Le développement de la temporalité dans l’acquisition initiale d’une langue étrangère: Apports d’une recherche translinguistique. In La temporalità nell’acquisizione di lingue seconde, G. Bernini & A. Giacalone Ramat (eds), 219–238. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. 1993a. Adult Language Acquisition : Crosslinguistic Perspectives, Vol. 2. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1993b. Comment se rendre compte de la logique d’acquisition d’une langue étrangère par l’adulte. Etudes de linguistique appliquée 92: 8–22.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. & Klein, W. 1992. Why does the production of some learners not grammaticalize? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14: 259–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, S. & Turpin, D. 1999. Does the futur have a future in (Canadian) French? Probus 11(1): 133–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T. 1984. Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organisation of narrative texts. Linguistics 22: 779–809.Google Scholar
Saddour, I. 2010. Relating Two Simultaneous Events in Discourse: The Role of Ongoingness Devices in L1 Tunisian Arabic, L1 French and L2 French by Tunisian Learners. PhD dissertation, Aston University, Birmingham.Google Scholar
2012. Expressing simultaneity using aspect: A comparison of native French Tunisian Arabic and Tunisian learners’ oral productions. In Space and Time across Languages and Cultures, Vol. I [Human Cognitive Processing 36], L. Filipović, K. Jaszczolt & M. Jaszczolt (eds), 325–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, R. 2000. The acquisition of English past tense in an instructional setting. System 28(1): 135–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Development of Past Tense Morphology in L2 Spanish [Studies in Bilingualism 22] .Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Marking Past Tense in Second Language Acquisition: A Theoretical Model. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Salaberry, R. & Comajoan, L. 2013. Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salsbury, T. & Bardovi-Harlig, I. 2000. Oppositional talk and the acquisition of modality in L2 English. In Social and Cognitive Factors in Second Language Acquisition. Selected Proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum, B. Swierzbin, M. Anderson, C. Klee & E. Tarone (eds), 57–76. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schlyter, S. 1990. The acquisition of French temporal morphemes in adults and in bilingual children. In La temporaliá nell’acquisizione di lingue seconde, G. Bernini & A. Giacalone Ramat (eds), 293–308. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B. 2004. At the Same Time… The Expression of Simultaneity in Learner Varieties. PhD dissertation [Nijmegen, MPI Series in Psycholinguistics].Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. 2002. Recent research on the acquisition of aspect: an embarrassment of riches? Second Language Research 18(2): 172–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. & Montrul, S. 2002. On viewpoint aspect and its L2 acquisition: a UG perspective. In The L2 Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 27], R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (eds), 363–398. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1967. Verbs and times. In Linguistics in Philosophy, Z. Vendler (ed.), 97–121. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., Andermann, M., Carroll, M., Flecken, M. & Schmiedtová, B. 2012. How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data and memory performance. Linguistics 50(2): 833–867.Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., Bouhaous, A. & Carroll, M. To appear. From time to space. The impact of aspectual categories on the construal of motion events: The case of Tunisian Arabic and Modern Standard Arabic. Linguistics.
von Stutterheim, C., Flecken, M. & Carroll, M. (eds). 2013. Principles of Information Organization in Language Use: On the L2 Acquisition of Complex Conceptual Structures. Special issue of International Review of Applied Linguistics 51(2).Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Nüse, R. 2003. Processes of conceptualization in language production: language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics 41(5): 851–881.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. 1985. Variability in tense marking: A case for the obvious. Language Learning 35: 229–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, R. 1991. Variation in Interlanguage Morphology. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Díez-Bedmar, María Belén
2021. The Use of the Progressive in Light of the AH in Monolingual EFL-Instructed Spanish Learners at University Level: A Longitudinal Learner Corpus-Based SLA Study. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 87 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Mañas, Iban, Elisa Rosado, Natalia Fullana & Svetlana Alexeeva
2021. Imperfect Spanish Meanings Acquisition by Advanced Russian Learners. Evidence from Acceptability Judgements Data. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 87 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Tono, Yukio
2020. Review of Fuchs, Robert and Valentin Werner. 2019. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ISBN: 978-9-027-20715-9. https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.108. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2018. Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2020. Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.