Cover not available
Part of
Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language: Contemporary perspectives
Edited by Martin Howard and Pascale Leclercq
[Studies in Bilingualism 50] 2017
► pp. 27–52

Chapter 1
Beyond individual form-meaning associations in L2 Tense-Mood-Aspect research

| Indiana University
This paper explores steps we might take as researchers to shift our focus from individual tense-aspect form-meaning associations to focus increasingly on how tense-aspect form-meaning associations fit together to form L2 tense-aspect systems and how they may be aided or constrained by the interlanguage more generally. The chapter begins by first considering what we know thus far about the second language acquisition of tense and aspect from functional perspectives. The chapter then presents three areas for investigation with the potential for addressing the goal of investigating L2 TMA systems rather than individual form-meaning associations. Moving from within the tense-mood-aspect system outward, the paper first considers exploring the interactions of individual form-to-meaning and meaning-to-form mappings with other tense-mood-aspect mappings in the system, then considers the text-types in which various tense-mood-aspect devices occur, and finally takes into account other linguistic systems to consider how the realization of tense-mood-aspect morphology might be constrained by a learner’s L2 phonology or proficiency with the spelling system of the L2.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Functional analyses
    • 2.1Tense-Mood-Aspect systems
    • 2.2Expanding our understanding of how future fits into two additional subsystems: Progressive and modality
  • 3.Tense-Mood-Aspect and text type
    • 3.1Narrative discourse
    • 3.2Non-narrative discourse
    • 3.3Descriptions
    • 3.4Arguments
    • 3.5Irrealis: Hypothetical and future texts
  • 4.The realization of Tense-Mood-Aspect and constraints of pronunciation and spelling
    • 4.1Studies of oral production
    • 4.2Comparison of oral and written production of the same text
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • References
Published online: 15 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.50.02bar
References (91)
References
Aksu-Koç. A. & von Stutterheim, C. 1994. Temporal relations in narrative: Simultaneity. In Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study, R.A. Berman & D.I. Slobin (eds), 393–455. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y. 1996. The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds) 527–570. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J.I. 1987. The markedness differential hypothesis and syllable structure difficulty. In Interlanguage Phonology: The Acquisition of a Second Language Sound System, G. Ioup & S. Weinberger (eds), 279–291. Cambridge MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1992. The telling of a tale: Discourse structure and tense use in learner’s narratives. In Pragmatics and Language Learning (Vol. 3), L.F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (eds), 144–161. Urbana-Champaign IL: Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Bardovi Harlig, K. 1994. Reverse order reports and the acquisition of tense: Beyond the principle of chronological order. Language Learning 44: 243–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1995. A narrative perspective on the development of the tense/aspect system in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17: 263–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. Another piece of the puzzle: The emergence of the present perfect. Language Learning 47: 375–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 471–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning, and Use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2004a. Monopolizing the future: How the go-future breaks into will’s territory and what it tells us about SLA. EUROSLA Yearbook 4: 177–201.Google Scholar
2004b. The emergence of grammaticalized future expression in longitudinal production data. In Form-meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition, B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott & M. Overstreet (eds), 115–137. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005a. The future of desire: Lexical futures and modality in L2 English future expression. In 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, L. Dekydtspotter & R. Sprouse (eds), 1–12. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
2005b. Tracking the elusive imperfect in adult second language acquisition: Refining the hunt. In Aspectual Inquiries, P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (eds), 397–419. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. After process, then what? A longitudinal investigation of the progressive prototype in L2 English. In Development of Tense, Aspect and Mood in L1 and L2, E. Labeau & I. Saddour (eds), 135–155. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2013. Research design: From text to task. In Research Design and Methodology in Studies on Second Language Tense and Aspect, R. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (eds), 219–269. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayley, R.J. 1994. Interlanguage variation and the quantitative paradigm: Past tense marking in Chinese-English. In Research Methodology in Second Language Acquisition, S. Gass, A. Cohen & E. Tarone (eds), 157–181. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bell, P., Trofimovich, P. & Collins, L. 2015. Kick the ball or kicked the ball? Perception of the past morpheme -ed by second language learners. Canadian Modern Language Review 71: 26–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergström, A. 1995. The Expression of Past Temporal Reference by English-Speaking Learners of French. PhD dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, State College PA.Google Scholar
Berman, R.A. & Verhoeven, L. 2002. Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities. Written Language & Literacy 5: 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Binnick, R.I. 1991. Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. & Pagliuca, W. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cardoso, W., Collins, L. & White, J. 2012. Phonological input enhancement via text-to-speech synthesizers: The L2 acquisition of English simple past allomorphy. Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics.
Carroll, M. & Lambert, M. 2006. Reorganizing principles of information structure in advanced L2s: A study of French and German learners of English. In Educating for Advanced Foreign Language Capacities, H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp & K. Sprang (eds), 54–73. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, M. & von Stutterhiem, C. 2003. Typology and information organisation: Perspective taking and language-specific effects in the construal of events. In Typology and Second Language Acquisition, A. Giacalone Ramat (ed), 365–402. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Comajoan, L. 2013. Defining and coding data: Narrative discourse grounding in L2 studies. In Research Design and Methodology in Studies on Second Language Tense and Aspect, R. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (eds), 309–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö. 1984. Temporal distance: Remoteness distinctions in tense-aspect systems. In Explanations for Language Universals, B. Butterworth, B. Comrie &. Ö. Dahl (eds), 105–122. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
2000. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, R. Klein, W. & Noyau, C. 1995. The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, N. & Terborg, H. 1991. Modality and second language learning. In Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 2], T. Huebner & C.A. Ferguson (eds), 347–384. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doolan, S. & Miller, D. 2012. Generation 1.5 written error patterns: A comparative study. Journal of Second Language Writing 21: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dry, H. (1981). Sentence aspect and the movement of narrative time. Text 1: 233–40.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983. The movement of narrative time. Journal of Literary Semantics 12: 19–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. 1987. Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, S. 1985. Discourse functions of tense-aspect oppositions in narrative: Toward a theory of grounding. Linguistics 23: 851–882. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, E. & Weigle, S. In press. Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing.
Georgakopoulou, A. & Goutsos, D. 2000. Mapping the world of discourse: The narrative vs. non-narrative distinction. Semiotica 131: 113–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A. 1992. Grammaticalization processes in the area of temporal and modal relations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14: 297–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A. & Crocco Galèas, G. (eds). 1995. From Pragmatics to Syntax: Modality in Second Language Acquisition. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Goad, H., White, L. & Steele, J. 2003. Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48: 243–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gudmestad, A. & Geeslin, K. 2013. Second-language development of variable forms of future-time expression in Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, S. Beaudrie & A.M. Carvalho (eds),63–75. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Gudmestad, A. 2012. Acquiring a variable structure: An interlanguage analysis of second language mood use in Spanish. Language Learning 62: 373–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gudmestad, A. Edmonds, A. & Donaldson, B. 2014, May. Variable future-time reference in French conversation: A qualitative comparison of native and nonnative speakers. Paper presented to the Conference on The Expression of Temporality by L2 Learners of French and English, Montpellier, France.
Hasbún, L. 1995. The Role of Lexical Aspect in the Acquisition of Tense and Grammatical Aspect in Spanish as a Foreign Language. Phd dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax, T. Givón (ed.), 213–241. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Howard, M. 2008. Morpho-syntactic development in the expression of modality: The subjunctive in French L2 acquisition. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 11: 171–192.Google Scholar
2012. From tense and aspect to modality – the acquisition of future, conditional and subjunctive morphology in L2 French: A preliminary study. In Development of Tense, Aspect and Mood in L1 and L2, E. Labeau & I. Saddour (eds), 201–223. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Kanwit, M. & Solon, M. 2013. Acquiring variation in future-time expression abroad in Valencia, Spain and Mérida, Mexico. In Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, J.E. Aaron, J. Cabrelli Amaro, G. Lord & A. de Prada Pérez (eds), 206–221. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Kanwit, M. 2014. The Acquisition of Future Expression in L2 Spanish. PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Kim, N-K. 1987. Korean. In The World’s Major Languages, B. Comrie (ed.), 139–156. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Klein, W. 1995. The acquisition of English. In The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism 7], R. Dietrich, W. Klein & C. Noyau (eds), 31–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. How time is encoded. In The Expression of Time, W. Klein & L. Ping (eds), 39–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. 2012. Speaking and writing tasks and their effects on second language performance. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, S.M. Gass & A. Mackey (eds), 364–377. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, J. Helm (ed), 12–44. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. 2003. Revisiting the comparative fallacy: A reply to Lakshmanan and Selinker, 2001. Second Language Research 19: 129–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leclercq, P. 2009. The influence of L2 French on near native French learners of English. The case of simulatenity. In The Advanced Learner Variety: The Case of French, E. Labeau & F. Myles (eds), 269–289. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S. 1987. Chinese. In The World’s Major Languages, B. Comrie (ed), 811–833. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Long, M. & Sato, C.J. 1984. Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: An interactionist perspective. In Interlanguage, A. Davies, C. Criper & A.P.R. Howatt (eds), 253–279. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
McManus, K. & Mitchell, R. 2014, May. The development of the subjunctive in French L2: A longitudinal study. Paper presented to the Conference on The Expression of Temporality by L2 Learners of French and English, Montpellier, France.
McManus, K., Tracy-Ventura, N., Mitchell, R., Richard, L. & Romero de Mills, P. 2014. Exploring the acquisition of the French subjunctive: Local syntactic context or oral proficiency? In Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA, P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds & H. Hilton (eds), 167–190. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. 1987. Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural language acquisition. In First and Second Language Acquisition Processes, C.W. Pfaff (ed), 206–224. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Moses, J. 2002. The Expression of Futurity by English-speaking Learners of French. PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Mossman, S. 2014, May. What will they say? The effect of task-type on L2 future expression. Paper presented to the Conference on The Expression of Temporality by L2 Learners of French and English, Montpellier, France.
Nyugen, D.-H. 1987. Vietnamese. In The World’s Major Languages, B. Comrie (ed.), 777–796. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ragnarsdóttir, H. Aparici, M. Cahasna-Amiaty, D. van Hell, J. & Viguié, A. 2002. Verbal structure and content in written discourse: Expository and narrative texts. Written Language & Literacy 5: 95–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T. 1984. Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22: 779–809.Google Scholar
Salsbury, T. 2000. The Acquisitional Grammaticalization of Unreal Conditionals and Modality in L2 English: A Longitudinal Perspective. PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Salsbury, T. & Bardovi-Harlig, K. 2000. Oppositional talk and the acquisition of modality in L2 English. In Social and Cognitive Factors in Second Language Acquisition: Selected Proceedings of the 1999 Second Language Research Forum, B. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M.E. Anderson, C.A. Klee & E. Tarone (eds), 57–76. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Sato, C.J. 1990. The Syntax of Conversation in Interlanguage Development. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. 1981. Tense variation in narrative. Language 57: 45–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmiedtová, B. 2004. At the Same Time…The Expression of Simultaneity in Learner Varieties. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. 1987. The expression of temporality in basilang speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9: 21–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.S. 2003. Modes of Discourse. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solon, M. & Kanwit, M. In press. The emergence of future verbal morphology in Spanish as a foreign language. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics.
Solt, S., Pugach, Y., Klein, E.C., Adams, K., Stoyneshka, I. & Rose, T. 2003. L2 perception and production of the English regular past: Evidence of phonological effects. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Brugos, L. Micciulla & C. Smith (eds), 553–564. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Stephany, U. 1995. Function and form of modality in first and second language acquisition. In From Pragmatics to Syntax: Modality in Second Language Acquisition, A. Giacalone Ramat & G. Crocco Galèas (eds), 105–120. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Sugaya, N. & Shirai, Y. 2007. The acquisition of resultative and progressive meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese: Transfer, universals, or multiple factors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Klein, W. 1987. A concept oriented approach to second language studies. In First and Second Language Acquisition Processes, C.W. Pfaff (ed.), 191–205. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
1989. Referential movement in descriptive and narrative discourse. In Language Processing in Social Context, R. Dietrich & C.F. Graumann (eds), 39–76. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Lambert, M. 2005. Cross-linguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendricks (ed.), 203–230. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. 1991. Narrative and description: Temporal reference in second language acquisition. In Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 2], T. Huebner & C.A. Ferguson (eds), 385–403. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. Modality: Function and form in discourse. In Modality in Language Acquisition, N. Dittmar & A. Reich (eds), 3–26. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vraciu, A. 2013. Exploring the upper limits of the aspect hypothesis: Tense-aspect morphology in the advanced English L2 variety. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition 4: 256–290. doiDOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, W. 1984. Unmarked tense in American Indian English. American Speech 59: 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985. Variability in tense marking: A case for the obvious. Language Learning 35: 229–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989. Systematic variability in second-language tense marking. In The Dynamic Interlanguage: Empirical Studies in Second Language Variation, M.R. Eisenstein (ed), 187–197. New York NY: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, W. & Hatfield, D. 1986. Interlanguage fads and linguistic reality: The case of tense marking. In Languages and Linguistics: The Interdependence of Theory, Data and Application, D. Tannen & J. Alatis (eds), 17–34. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Howard, Martin
2023. Chapter 10. Grammatical development during study abroad. In Methods in Study Abroad Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Chappell, Whitney & Matthew Kanwit
2022. DO LEARNERS CONNECT SOCIOPHONETIC VARIATION WITH REGIONAL AND SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:1 ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Díez-Bedmar, María Belén
2021. The Use of the Progressive in Light of the AH in Monolingual EFL-Instructed Spanish Learners at University Level: A Longitudinal Learner Corpus-Based SLA Study. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 87 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Tono, Yukio
2020. Review of Fuchs, Robert and Valentin Werner. 2019. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ISBN: 978-9-027-20715-9. https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.108. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
KANWIT, MATTHEW
2019. Beyond the Present Indicative: Lexical Futures as Indicators of Development in L2 Spanish . The Modern Language Journal 103:2 ► pp. 481 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.