Part of
Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language: Contemporary perspectives
Edited by Martin Howard and Pascale Leclercq
[Studies in Bilingualism 50] 2017
► pp. 105143
Amiot, D.
2002Re- préfixe aspectuel ? In Temps et aspect: De la grammaire au lexique [Cahiers Chronos 10], V. Lagae, A. Carlier & C. Benninger (eds), 1–20. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1983Transfer to somewhere. In Language Transfer in Language Learning, S. Gass & L. Selinker (eds), 177–201. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Andorno C.
2005Additive and restrictive particles in Italian as a second language. Embedding in the verbal utterance structure. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 405–460. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andorno, C. & Benazzo, S.
2014L’acquisition L2 de langues proches : l’Expression de la continuation et de l’itération en français et en italien L2. In Marqueurs discursifs dans les langues romanes: Une approche contrastive, M. Borreguero Zuloaga & S. Gómez-Jordana Ferary (eds), 424–448. Limoges: Lambert Lucas.Google Scholar
Apotheloz, D.
2005Re- et les différentes manifestations de l’itérativité. Pratiques 125–126: 48–71.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
2000Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning, and Use. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baroni, M.
2007I sensi di ri-: Un’indagine preliminare. In Miscellanea di studi linguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani, R. Maschi, N. Penello & P. Rizzzolatti (eds), 163–171. Udine: Forum.Google Scholar
Benazzo, S.
2003The interaction between verb morphology and temporal adverbs of contrast. A longitudinal study in French, English and German L2. In Information Structure, Linguistic Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26], C. Dimroth & M. Starren (eds), 187–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benazzo, S., Andorno, C., Interlandi, G. & Patin, C.
Benazzo, S., Dimroth C., Perdue, C. & Watorek, M.
2004Le rôle des particules additives dans la construction de la cohésion discursive en langue maternelle et en langue étrangère. Langages 155: 76–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benazzo, S. & Starren, M.
2007L’émergence de moyens grammaticaux pour exprimer les relations temporelles en L2. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 25: 129–158.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P.M.
1991Il verbo. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Vol. II, L. Renzi & G. Salvi (eds), 13–62. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Borillo, A.
1984La négation et les modifieurs temporels: Une fois de plus encore. Langue Française 62: 37–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. & Lambert, M.
2003Information structure in narratives and the role of grammaticised knowledge. A study of adult French and German learners of English. In Information Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26], C. Dimroth & M. Starren (eds), 267–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C.
2006The impact of grammaticalised temporal categories on ultimate attainment in advanced L2-acquisition. In Educating for Advanced Foreign Language Capacities. Constructs, Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, H. Byrnes (ed), 40–53. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J.
2001The effect of linguistic distance, L2 status and age on cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition. In Cross-linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition, J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen & U. Jessner (eds), 8–20. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
1976Aspect: An Introduction to Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Coseriu, E.
1952Sistema, norma y habla. Montevideo: U. de la República.Google Scholar
De Angelis, G.
2007Third or Additional Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual MattersGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, R., Klein, W. & Noyau, C.
(eds) 1995The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimroth, C.
2002Topics, assertions, and additive words: How L2 learners get from information structure to target-language syntax. Linguistics 40(4): 891–923. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006The Finite Story. Nijmegen: Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics. [URL]
Dimroth, C., Andorno, C., Benazzo, S. & Verhagen, J.
2010Given claims about new topics. How Romance and Germanic speakers link changed and maintained information in narrative discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12): 3328–3344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F.
1996A functional-typological approach to second language acquisition theory. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia eds), 195–211. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C.
2006Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 Acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics 27(2): 164–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S. & Pavlenko, A.
2007Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, C.
1983Wieder éin wieder? Zur Semantik von wieder. In Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds), 97–120. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A. & Crocco Galèas G.
(eds) 1995From Pragmatics to Syntax: Modality in Second Language Acquisition. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Giuliano P.
2012Discourse cohesion in narrative texts: The role of additive means in Italian L1 and L2. In Comparative Perspectives on Language Acquisition, M. Watorek, S. Benazzo & M. Hickmann (eds), 375–401. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, G.
2001Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production and acquisition. In Cross-linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition, J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen & U. Jessner (eds), 8–20. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kellerman E.
1977Towards a characterisation of the strategy of transfer in second language learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 21: 58–145.Google Scholar
1978Giving learners a break: Native language intuitions about transferability. Working Papers in Bilingualism 15: 59–92.Google Scholar
1983Now you see it now you don’t. In Language Transfer in Language Learning, S. Gass & L. Selinker (eds), 112–134. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Klein, W.
1994Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klein, W. & Perdue, C.
1997The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13(4): 301–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein W. & von Stutterheim C.
1991Text structure and referential movement. Sprache und Pragmatik 22: 1–32.Google Scholar
Klein, W. & von Stutterheim C.
2002Quaestio and L-perspectivation. In Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse [Human Cognitive Processing 9], C.F. Graumann & W. Kallmeyer (eds), 59–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A.
2004Telicity and the meaning of objective case. In The Syntax of Time, J. Guéron & J. Lecarme, (eds) 389–423. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Labov W.
1972Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Mosegaard Hansen, M.B.
2002La polysémie de l’adverbe encore. Travaux de Linguistique 44: 143–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004La polysémie de l’adverbe toujours. Travaux de Linguistique 49(2): 39–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murcia-Serra, J.
2003Acquiring linkage between syntactic, semantic and informational roles in narratives by Spanish learners of German. In Information Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26], C. Dimroth & M. Starren (eds), 289–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nederstigt, U.
2003Auch and noch in Child and Adult German. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noyau, C., de Lorenzo, C., Kihlstedt, M., Paprocka, U., Sanz, G. & Schneider, R.
2003Two dimensions of the representation of complex event structures: granularity and condensation. Towards a typology of textual production in L1 and L2. In The Structure of Learner Language, H. Hendriks (ed.), 157–201. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Odlin, T.
2003Cross-linguistic influence. In The Handbook of L2 Acquisition, C.H. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds), 436–486. London: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perdue, C., Benazzo, S. & Giuliano, J.
2002When finiteness gets marked: The relation between morphosyntactic development and use of scopal items in adult language acquisition. Linguistics 40(4): 849–890. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart T.
1984Principles of Gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22(6): 779–809.Google Scholar
Riégel, M., Pellat, J.C. & Rioul, R.
1994Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Ringbom, H. & Jarvis, S.
2009The importance of cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. In The Handbook of Language Teaching, M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (eds), 106–118. London: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry R. & Shirai Y.
(eds) 2002The L2 Acquisition of Tense and Aspect Morphology [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 27]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmiedtová, B., von Stutterheim, C. & Carroll, M.
2010Implications of language-specific patterns in event construal of advanced L2 speakers. In Naming the World in Two Languages. Languages and Cognition in the Bilingual Mind, A. Pavlenko (ed), 29–65. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Starren, M.
2001The Second Time. The Acquisition of Temporality in Dutch and French as a Second Language. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
von Stechow, A.
1996The different readings of wieder ‘again’: A structural account. Journal of Semantics 13: 87–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Klein, W.
1987A concept-oriented approach to second language studies. In First and Second Language Acquisition Processes, C. Pfaff (ed.), 191–205. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., Andermann, M., Carroll, M., Flecken, M. & Schmiedtová, B.
2012How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in the early phases of language production. Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data and memory performance. Linguistics 50(4): 833–869. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, J.
1998Phasal adverbials in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, J. van der Auwera (ed.) 25–145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Patten, B.
2004Input processing in SLA. In Processing Instruction. Theory, Research, and Commentary, B. VanPatten (ed.), 5–31. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Vegnaduzzo, M.
2000Ancora and additive words. In Adverbs and Adjunction, A. Alexiadou & P. Svenonius (eds), 177–200. Potsdam: Institut für Linguistik, Potsdam University.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z.
1957Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2): 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Ambrosini, Maria Vittoria & Paolo Della Putta
2021. Problemi di apprendimento di tre perifrasi fra spagnolo e italiano. Osservazioni acquisizionali e proposte pedagogiche. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 28  pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Anastasio, Simona
2023. Motion event construal in L2 French and Italian: from acquisitional perspectives to pedagogical implications. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Anastasio , Simona
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2018. Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2020. Tense and aspect in Second Language Acquisition and learner corpus research. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108],  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Rosemeyer, Malte
2022. À nouveauandde nouveauin spoken and written French. Journal of French Language Studies 32:1  pp. 76 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.