En route to acquiring novel principles of temporal information organisation in the target language, second language (L2) learners exhibit a capacity to build temporal constructions of their own, which are not necessarily fixed in the principles of either their source or their target language system. This study surveys hitherto unattested interlanguage phenomena found in the phasal segmentation patterns of two intermediate-level learner groups with unrelated source languages, and identifies analogies of shared developmental patterns. Film verbalisations and acceptability judgements (AJ) were used to elicit responses from Czech and Hungarian intermediate learners of English, and their analyses yielded a threefold benefit. They generated representative degrees of granularity for each group who experiment with new segmentation techniques. They also showed that the ways in which learners partition events in production (pronounced digression from the target) do not directly replicate patterns in acceptability judgements (closer approximation to the target). And thirdly, overlaps and contrasts between learner and native control speaker preferences for phasal partitioning varied in close relation to specific aspectual properties inherent to the verbs used. The combination of production features and acceptability judgements from L2 groups with distant L1s provides an informative mosaic of how learners at intermediate L2 proficiency strive for an optimal fit when combining available linguistic elements to express specific event phases.
Article outline
1.Introduction
2.Empirical context
2.1Grammatical aspect and event segmentation across L1s
2.2Research on event segmentation in learner varieties
3.Central notions and theoretical grounding
4.Structural contrasts in the source and the target languages
5.Research questions and hypotheses
6.Method
6.1Participants
6.2Instruments
6.3Analysis
7.Results
7.1Production
7.2Acceptability judgements
8.Discussion
8.1Learner-specific modification of granularity degrees
8.2Non-standard decomposition of events – overgeneralised inceptive phase marking
8.3Discrepancy between acceptability judgements and production
8.4Variation in judgements linked to verb type
8.5L1-specific segmentation and its influence on L2
Abondolo, D.1998. Hungarian. In The Uralic Languages, D. Abondolo (ed.), 428–456. Routledge: London.
Allan, D.2004. Oxford Placement Test 2. Oxford: OUP.
Athanasopoulos, P. & Bylund, E.2013. Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A crosslinguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science 37: 286–309.
Bardovi-Harlig, K.1992. The relationship between form and meaning: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 13: 253–278.
Berman, R. & Slobin, D.1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bialystok, E.1982. On the relationship between knowing and using forms. Applied Linguistics 3: 181–206.
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N., Essegbey, J. & Kita, S.2011. The macro-event property: The segmentation of causal chains. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, J. Bohnemeyer & E. Pederson (eds), 43–67. Cambridge: CUP.
Boroditsky, L. & Trusova, E.2003. Cross-linguistic differences in the representation of events: Verb aspect and completion in English and Russian. In Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, R. Alterman & D. Kirsch (eds), 13–19. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bylund, E.2011. Ultimate attainment of event segmentation and temporal structuring patterns in speakers of L2 Swedish. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8: 29–53.
Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C.2003. Typology and information organisation: Perspective taking and language–specific effects in the construal of events. In Typology and Second Language Acquisition, A. Giacalone Ramat (ed), 365–402. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Chaudron, C.2003. Data collection in SLA research. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds), 762–828. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cook, V.2002. Background to the L2 user. In Portraits of the L2 User, V. Cook (ed), 1–28. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Council of Europe2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: CUP.
Csirmaz, A.2004. Perfective and imperfective in Hungarian: (Invisible) differences. In Proceedings of Console XII, S. Blaho, L. Vicente & M. de Vos (eds). University of Leiden. Presented at Console XII. Patras, Greece, December 12–14, 2003.
Ellis, N.2006. Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics 27: 164–194.
Ellis, N. & Sagarra, N.2010. Learned attention effects in L2 temporal reference: The first hour and the next eight semesters. Language Learning 60(2): 85–108.
Ellis, R.2004. The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning 54: 227–275.
Ellis, R.2005. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 141–172.
Givón, T.1991. Serial verbs and the mental reality of ‘event’. In Approaches to Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 19], E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds), 81–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gutiérrez, X.2013. The construct validity of grammaticality judgement tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35: 423–449.
Habel, C. & Tape, H.1999. Processes of segmentation and linearization in describing events. In Processes in Language Production, R. Klabunde & C. von Stutterheim (eds), 117–153. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
Kiefer, F.2006. Aspektus és akcióminőség: különös tekintettel a magyar nyelvre (Aspect and Aktionsart: With particular attention to Hungarian), Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Klein, W.2009. How time is encoded. In The Expression of Time, W. Klein & P. Li (eds), 39–82. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Klein, W.1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.
Klein, W. & Perdue, C.1997. The basic variety. Or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?Second Language Research 13(4): 301–347.
Klein, W. & von Stutterheim, C.1987. Quaestio und referentielle Bewegung in Erzählungen. Linguistische Berichte 109: 163–183.
Levelt, W.1999. Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In The Neurocognition of Language, C. Brown & P. Hagoort (eds), 83–120. Oxford: OUP.
Noyau, C., de Lorenzo, C., Kihlstedt, M., Paprocka, U., Sanz Espinar, G. & Schneider, R.2005. Two dimensions of the representation of complex event structures: granularity and condensation. Towards a typology of textual production in L1 and L2. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 157–201. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Pavlenko, A.2014. The Bilingual Mind and What it Tells us about Language and Thought. Cambridge: CUP.
Short, D.2002. Czech. The Slavonic Languages, B. Comrie & G. Corbett (eds), 455–532. London: Routledge.
Schmiedtová, B.2013. Traces of L1 patterns in the event construal of Czech advanced speakers of L2 English and L2 German. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51(2): 87–116.
Schmiedtová, B., von Stutterheim, C. & Carroll, M.2011. Language-specific patterns in event construal of advanced second language speakers. In Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages, A. Pavlenko (ed.), 66–107. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Schmiedtová, B.2004. At the Same Time: The Expression of Simultaneity in Learner Varieties. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Slobin, D.1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.
Sorace, A.1996. The use of acceptability judgements in second language acquisition research. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds), 375–409. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Speer, N., Swallow, K. & Zacks, J.2003. Activation of human motion processing areas during event perception. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 3: 335-345.
Starren, M.2001. The Second Time: The Acquisition of Temporality in Dutch and French as a Second Language. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series 50.
Sugaya, N. & Shirai, Y.2007. The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 1–38.
Swain, M.1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in Second Language Acquisition, S. Gass & C. Madden (eds), 236–244. Rowley MA: Newbury House.
Takács, E.2012. A progresszív jelentéstartalom konstruálásának sajátosságai a magyarban [Idiosyncracies of the progressive aspect in Hungarian]. Magyar Nyelvről 136: 325–335.
Talmy, L.1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.
Tolentino, L. & Tokowicz, N.2011. Across languages, space and time: A review of the role of cross-language similarity in L2 (morpho)syntactic processing as revealed by fMRI and ERP methods. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33: 91–125.
Tomlin, R.1987. Linguistic reflections of cognitive events. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], R. Tomlin (ed), 455–479. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tremblay, A.2005. Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the use of grammaticality judgement tasks in linguistic theory. Second Language Studies 24: 129–167.
Trenkic, D., Mirkovic, J. & Altmann, J.2014. Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17: 237–257.
Vendler, Z.1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66: 143–160.
von Stutterheim, C., Bouhaous, A., Carroll, M. & Sahonenko, N.2012. Grammaticalized temporal categories, language specificity, and macroplanning in expository texts. Linguistics 50: 341–371.
von Stutterheim, C. & Lambert, M.2005. Cross–linguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 203–230. Berlin: De Gruyter.
von Stutterheim, C. & Nüse, R.2003. Processes of conceptualisation in language production: Language–specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 41(5): 851–881.
Zacks, J., Braver, T., Sheridan, M., Donaldson, D., Snyder, A., Ollinger, J., Buckner, R. & Raichle, M.2001. Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience 4(66): 651–655.
Zacks, J. & Swallow, K.2007. Event segmentation. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16: 80–84.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Vanek, Norbert
2024. Working Memory and English Language Learning: Implications for Classroom-Based Research. In Cognitive and Educational Psychology for TESOL [Springer Texts in Education, ], ► pp. 17 ff.
Vanek, Norbert & Haoruo Zhang
2024. Event Boundaries Stretched and Compressed by Aspect: Temporal Segmentation in a First and a Second Language. Language Learning 74:S1 ► pp. 104 ff.
Tang, Mengmeng, Norbert Vanek & Leah Roberts
2021. Crosslinguistic influence on English and Chinese L2 speakers’ conceptualization of event series. International Journal of Bilingualism 25:1 ► pp. 205 ff.
Kermer, Franka
2020. A Cognitive Grammar Perspective on Temporal Conceptualization in SLA. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 55:s1 ► pp. 223 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.