Part of
Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language: Contemporary perspectives
Edited by Martin Howard and Pascale Leclercq
[Studies in Bilingualism 50] 2017
► pp. 145182
References (58)
References
Abondolo, D. 1998. Hungarian. In The Uralic Languages, D. Abondolo (ed.), 428–456. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Allan, D. 2004. Oxford Placement Test 2. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P. & Bylund, E. 2013. Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A crosslinguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science 37: 286–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1992. The relationship between form and meaning: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 13: 253–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. & Slobin, D. 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. 1982. On the relationship between knowing and using forms. Applied Linguistics 3: 181–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N., Essegbey, J. & Kita, S. 2011. The macro-event property: The segmentation of causal chains. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, J. Bohnemeyer & E. Pederson (eds), 43–67. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. & Trusova, E. 2003. Cross-linguistic differences in the representation of events: Verb aspect and completion in English and Russian. In Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, R. Alterman & D. Kirsch (eds), 13–19. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bylund, E. 2011. Ultimate attainment of event segmentation and temporal structuring patterns in speakers of L2 Swedish. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8: 29–53.Google Scholar
Carroll, M. & Lambert, M. 2003. Information structure in narratives and the role of grammaticised knowledge: A study of adult French and German learners of English. In Information Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26], C. Dimroth & M. Starren (eds), 267–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C. 2003. Typology and information organisation: Perspective taking and language–specific effects in the construal of events. In Typology and Second Language Acquisition, A. Giacalone Ramat (ed), 365–402. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. 2003. Data collection in SLA research. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds), 762–828. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. 2002. Background to the L2 user. In Portraits of the L2 User, V. Cook (ed), 1–28. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Council of Europe 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Csirmaz, A. 2004. Perfective and imperfective in Hungarian: (Invisible) differences. In Proceedings of Console XII, S. Blaho, L. Vicente & M. de Vos (eds). University of Leiden. Presented at Console XII. Patras, Greece, December 12–14, 2003.Google Scholar
Dietrich, R., Klein, W. & Noyau, C. 1995. The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. 2006. Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics 27: 164–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. & Sagarra, N. 2010. Learned attention effects in L2 temporal reference: The first hour and the next eight semesters. Language Learning 60(2): 85–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. 2004. The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning 54: 227–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 141–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 1991. Serial verbs and the mental reality of ‘event’. In Approaches to Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 19], E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds), 81–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, X. 2013. The construct validity of grammaticality judgement tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35: 423–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gyllstad, H., Granfeldt, J., Bernardini, P. & Källkvist, M. 2014. Linguistic correlates to communicative proficiency levels of the CEFR. EUROSLA Yearbook 14: 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habel, C. & Tape, H. 1999. Processes of segmentation and linearization in describing events. In Processes in Language Production, R. Klabunde & C. von Stutterheim (eds), 117–153. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Kiefer, F. 2006. Aspektus és akcióminőség: különös tekintettel a magyar nyelvre (Aspect and Aktionsart: With particular attention to Hungarian), Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Klein, W. 2009. How time is encoded. In The Expression of Time, W. Klein & P. Li (eds), 39–82. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klein, W. & Perdue, C. 1997. The basic variety. Or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler? Second Language Research 13(4): 301–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. & von Stutterheim, C. 1987. Quaestio und referentielle Bewegung in Erzählungen. Linguistische Berichte 109: 163–183.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. 1999. Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In The Neurocognition of Language, C. Brown & P. Hagoort (eds), 83–120. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Noyau, C., de Lorenzo, C., Kihlstedt, M., Paprocka, U., Sanz Espinar, G. & Schneider, R. 2005. Two dimensions of the representation of complex event structures: granularity and condensation. Towards a typology of textual production in L1 and L2. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 157–201. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A. 2014. The Bilingual Mind and What it Tells us about Language and Thought. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. 1987. Encoding events in Kalam and English: differing logics for reporting experience. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], R. Tomlin (ed.), 329–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Péter, M. 2008. Az aspektusról – más aspektusból (On aspect – from a different aspect). Magyar Nyelv 107: 428–452.Google Scholar
Rothstein, S. 2004. Structuring Events. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Short, D. 2002. Czech. The Slavonic Languages, B. Comrie & G. Corbett (eds), 455–532. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B. 2013. Traces of L1 patterns in the event construal of Czech advanced speakers of L2 English and L2 German. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51(2): 87–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmiedtová, B., von Stutterheim, C. & Carroll, M. 2011. Language-specific patterns in event construal of advanced second language speakers. In Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages, A. Pavlenko (ed.), 66–107. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B. 2004. At the Same Time: The Expression of Simultaneity in Learner Varieties. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 1996. The use of acceptability judgements in second language acquisition research. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds), 375–409. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Speer, N., Swallow, K. & Zacks, J. 2003. Activation of human motion processing areas during event perception. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 3: 335-345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starren, M. 2001. The Second Time: The Acquisition of Temporality in Dutch and French as a Second Language. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series 50.Google Scholar
Sugaya, N. & Shirai, Y. 2007. The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in Second Language Acquisition, S. Gass & C. Madden (eds), 236–244. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Takács, E. 2012. A progresszív jelentéstartalom konstruálásának sajátosságai a magyarban [Idiosyncracies of the progressive aspect in Hungarian]. Magyar Nyelvről 136: 325–335.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tolentino, L. & Tokowicz, N. 2011. Across languages, space and time: A review of the role of cross-language similarity in L2 (morpho)syntactic processing as revealed by fMRI and ERP methods. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33: 91–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R. 1987. Linguistic reflections of cognitive events. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], R. Tomlin (ed), 455–479. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A. 2005. Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the use of grammaticality judgement tasks in linguistic theory. Second Language Studies 24: 129–167.Google Scholar
Trenkic, D., Mirkovic, J. & Altmann, J. 2014. Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17: 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanek, N. 2012. Language-specific perspectives in reference to time in the discourse of Czech, English and Hungarian speakers. In Space and Time in Languages and Cultures, 1: Linguistic Diversity [Human Cognitive Processing 36], L. Filipović & K. Jaszczolt (eds), 135–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66: 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., Bouhaous, A., Carroll, M. & Sahonenko, N. 2012. Grammaticalized temporal categories, language specificity, and macroplanning in expository texts. Linguistics 50: 341–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Lambert, M. 2005. Cross–linguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 203–230. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Nüse, R. 2003. Processes of conceptualisation in language production: Language–specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 41(5): 851–881.Google Scholar
Zacks, J., Braver, T., Sheridan, M., Donaldson, D., Snyder, A., Ollinger, J., Buckner, R. & Raichle, M. 2001. Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience 4(66): 651–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zacks, J. & Swallow, K. 2007. Event segmentation. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16: 80–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Vanek, Norbert
2024. Working Memory and English Language Learning: Implications for Classroom-Based Research. In Cognitive and Educational Psychology for TESOL [Springer Texts in Education, ],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Vanek, Norbert & Haoruo Zhang
2024. Event Boundaries Stretched and Compressed by Aspect: Temporal Segmentation in a First and a Second Language. Language Learning 74:S1  pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Mengmeng, Norbert Vanek & Leah Roberts
2021. Crosslinguistic influence on English and Chinese L2 speakers’ conceptualization of event series. International Journal of Bilingualism 25:1  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Kermer, Franka
2020. A Cognitive Grammar Perspective on Temporal Conceptualization in SLA. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 55:s1  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.