Part of
Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language: Contemporary perspectives
Edited by Martin Howard and Pascale Leclercq
[Studies in Bilingualism 50] 2017
► pp. 145182
Abondolo, D.
1998Hungarian. In The Uralic Languages, D. Abondolo (ed.), 428–456. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Allan, D.
2004Oxford Placement Test 2. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P. & Bylund, E.
2013Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A crosslinguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science 37: 286–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
1992The relationship between form and meaning: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 13: 253–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. & Slobin, D.
1994Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E.
1982On the relationship between knowing and using forms. Applied Linguistics 3: 181–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N., Essegbey, J. & Kita, S.
2011The macro-event property: The segmentation of causal chains. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, J. Bohnemeyer & E. Pederson (eds), 43–67. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. & Trusova, E.
2003Cross-linguistic differences in the representation of events: Verb aspect and completion in English and Russian. In Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, R. Alterman & D. Kirsch (eds), 13–19. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bylund, E.
2011Ultimate attainment of event segmentation and temporal structuring patterns in speakers of L2 Swedish. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8: 29–53.Google Scholar
Carroll, M. & Lambert, M.
2003Information structure in narratives and the role of grammaticised knowledge: A study of adult French and German learners of English. In Information Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26], C. Dimroth & M. Starren (eds), 267–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C.
2003Typology and information organisation: Perspective taking and language–specific effects in the construal of events. In Typology and Second Language Acquisition, A. Giacalone Ramat (ed), 365–402. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C.
2003Data collection in SLA research. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds), 762–828. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, V.
2002Background to the L2 user. In Portraits of the L2 User, V. Cook (ed), 1–28. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Council of Europe
2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Csirmaz, A.
2004Perfective and imperfective in Hungarian: (Invisible) differences. In Proceedings of Console XII, S. Blaho, L. Vicente & M. de Vos (eds). University of Leiden. Presented at Console XII. Patras, Greece, December 12–14, 2003.Google Scholar
Dietrich, R., Klein, W. & Noyau, C.
1995The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.
2006Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics 27: 164–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. & Sagarra, N.
2010Learned attention effects in L2 temporal reference: The first hour and the next eight semesters. Language Learning 60(2): 85–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
2004The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning 54: 227–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 141–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
1991Serial verbs and the mental reality of ‘event’. In Approaches to Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 19], E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds), 81–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, X.
2013The construct validity of grammaticality judgement tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35: 423–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gyllstad, H., Granfeldt, J., Bernardini, P. & Källkvist, M.
Habel, C. & Tape, H.
1999Processes of segmentation and linearization in describing events. In Processes in Language Production, R. Klabunde & C. von Stutterheim (eds), 117–153. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Kiefer, F.
2006Aspektus és akcióminőség: különös tekintettel a magyar nyelvre (Aspect and Aktionsart: With particular attention to Hungarian), Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Klein, W.
2009How time is encoded. In The Expression of Time, W. Klein & P. Li (eds), 39–82. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klein, W. & Perdue, C.
1997The basic variety. Or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler? Second Language Research 13(4): 301–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. & von Stutterheim, C.
1987Quaestio und referentielle Bewegung in Erzählungen. Linguistische Berichte 109: 163–183.Google Scholar
Levelt, W.
1999Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In The Neurocognition of Language, C. Brown & P. Hagoort (eds), 83–120. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Noyau, C., de Lorenzo, C., Kihlstedt, M., Paprocka, U., Sanz Espinar, G. & Schneider, R.
2005Two dimensions of the representation of complex event structures: granularity and condensation. Towards a typology of textual production in L1 and L2. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 157–201. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A.
2014The Bilingual Mind and What it Tells us about Language and Thought. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Pawley, A.
1987Encoding events in Kalam and English: differing logics for reporting experience. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], R. Tomlin (ed.), 329–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Péter, M.
2008Az aspektusról – más aspektusból (On aspect – from a different aspect). Magyar Nyelv 107: 428–452.Google Scholar
Rothstein, S.
2004Structuring Events. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Short, D.
2002Czech. The Slavonic Languages, B. Comrie & G. Corbett (eds), 455–532. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B.
2013Traces of L1 patterns in the event construal of Czech advanced speakers of L2 English and L2 German. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51(2): 87–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmiedtová, B., von Stutterheim, C. & Carroll, M.
2011Language-specific patterns in event construal of advanced second language speakers. In Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages, A. Pavlenko (ed.), 66–107. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B.
2004At the Same Time: The Expression of Simultaneity in Learner Varieties. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D.
1996From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds), 70–96. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sorace, A.
1996The use of acceptability judgements in second language acquisition research. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds), 375–409. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Speer, N., Swallow, K. & Zacks, J.
2003Activation of human motion processing areas during event perception. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 3: 335-345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starren, M.
2001The Second Time: The Acquisition of Temporality in Dutch and French as a Second Language. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series 50.Google Scholar
Sugaya, N. & Shirai, Y.
2007The acquisition of progressive and resultative meanings of the imperfective aspect marker by L2 learners of Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29: 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
1985Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in Second Language Acquisition, S. Gass & C. Madden (eds), 236–244. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Takács, E.
2012A progresszív jelentéstartalom konstruálásának sajátosságai a magyarban [Idiosyncracies of the progressive aspect in Hungarian]. Magyar Nyelvről 136: 325–335.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tolentino, L. & Tokowicz, N.
2011Across languages, space and time: A review of the role of cross-language similarity in L2 (morpho)syntactic processing as revealed by fMRI and ERP methods. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33: 91–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R.
1987Linguistic reflections of cognitive events. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], R. Tomlin (ed), 455–479. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A.
2005Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the use of grammaticality judgement tasks in linguistic theory. Second Language Studies 24: 129–167.Google Scholar
Trenkic, D., Mirkovic, J. & Altmann, J.
2014Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17: 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanek, N.
2012Language-specific perspectives in reference to time in the discourse of Czech, English and Hungarian speakers. In Space and Time in Languages and Cultures, 1: Linguistic Diversity [Human Cognitive Processing 36], L. Filipović & K. Jaszczolt (eds), 135–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z.
1957Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66: 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., Bouhaous, A., Carroll, M. & Sahonenko, N.
2012Grammaticalized temporal categories, language specificity, and macroplanning in expository texts. Linguistics 50: 341–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Lambert, M.
2005Cross–linguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, H. Hendriks (ed.), 203–230. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. & Nüse, R.
2003Processes of conceptualisation in language production: Language–specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 41(5): 851–881.Google Scholar
Zacks, J., Braver, T., Sheridan, M., Donaldson, D., Snyder, A., Ollinger, J., Buckner, R. & Raichle, M.
2001Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience 4(66): 651–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zacks, J. & Swallow, K.
2007Event segmentation. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16: 80–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Kermer, Franka
2020. A Cognitive Grammar Perspective on Temporal Conceptualization in SLA. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 55:s1  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Mengmeng, Norbert Vanek & Leah Roberts
2021. Crosslinguistic influence on English and Chinese L2 speakers’ conceptualization of event series. International Journal of Bilingualism 25:1  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Vanek, Norbert & Haoruo Zhang
2024. Event Boundaries Stretched and Compressed by Aspect: Temporal Segmentation in a First and a Second Language. Language Learning 74:S1  pp. 104 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.