Cover not available
Part of
Language Acquisition Beyond Parameters: Studies in honour of Juana M. Liceras
Edited by Anahí Alba de la Fuente, Elena Valenzuela and Cristina Martínez Sanz
[Studies in Bilingualism 51] 2016
► pp. 125–145

Not just algunos, but indeed unos L2ers can acquire scalar implicatures in L2 Spanish

| University of Reading
| Rutgers University
| Indiana University
| University of Reading | UiT, the Arctic University of Norway
| University of Southampton | University of Iowa

This study examines interpretation of scalar implicatures (SI) in the L2 Spanish of native English advanced learners. Spanish is especially interesting since, unlike English, it has two indefinite determiners, unos and algunos, which ostensibly map to English some. However, each does not allow an implicature like English some. The complexity of the Spanish system is predicted to make Spanish particularly challenging. We present data from a Video Acceptability Judgment experiment where the subset – whole set distinction is applied to algunos/unos. The videos contain sets of 4 participants, in which 0, 3 or all 4 engage in an action. Test sentences are presented after the video clips in four target conditions: (a) algunos with 4 out of 4 (4/4) video, (b) algunos with 3 out of 4 (3/4) video, (c) unos with 4/4 video and (d) unos with 3/4 video. Judgments on the 4/4 video conditions, especially the algunos condition, indicate whether implicatures are projected or not. If participants are sensitive to the idiosyncratic restrictions on algunos for implicatures, one expects to find a distinction between algunos and unos in the 4/4 condition, and between 4/4 versus 3/4 conditions with algunos. Both participant groups (native speakers and advanced L2ers) perform the experiment similarly. Both groups make the two relevant distinctions to the same degree.

Keywords: scalar, implicature, algunos , unos
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.(Scalar) implicatures
    • 2.1Spanish plural indefinites with contrasting properties: Algunos and unos
  • 3.Acquisition of scalar implicatures
    • 3.1Child monolinguals
    • 3.2Adult L2 Acquisition
  • 4.The present study
    • 4.1Research questions and hypotheses
    • 4.2Methodology
      • 4.2.1Participants
      • 4.2.2Materials
        • 4.2.2.1Language background questionnaire
        • 4.2.2.2Truth-value video acceptability experiment
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Statistical models
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.51.06mil
References
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A.
(2007) Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 4, 657–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breheny, R., Katsos, N., & Williams, J.
(2006) Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition, 100(3), 434–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J., & Valenzuela, E.
(2008) Eventive and stative passives in L2 acquisition: A matter of aspect. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(3), 323–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, R.
(1998) Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications (pp. 179–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G., & McConnell-Ginet, S.
(2000) Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G.
(2004) Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and Beyond (pp. 39–103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S.
(2012) The Emergence of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., & Hathorn, J.
(2005) Quelque chose… de remarquable in English–French acquisition: Mandatory, informationally encapsulated computations in second language interpretation. Second Language Research, 21, 291–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, B.
(2012) Syntax and discourse in near-native French: Clefts and focus. Language Learning, 62, 902–930. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3 (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
(1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guasti, T. M., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gaulmini, A., & Meroni, L.
(2005) Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20 (5), 667–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gürel, A.
(2006) L2 acquisition of pragmatic and syntactic constraints in the use of overt and null subject pronouns. In Slabakova, R., Montrul, S., & Prévost, P. (Eds.), Inquiries in Linguistic Development (pp. 259–282). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, J.
(2001) The semantics of Spanish plural existential determiners. Probus, 13, 113–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H., & Schmid, M. S.
(2013) Perceived foreign accent in first language attrition and second language acquisition: The impact of age of acquisition and bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(2), 361–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, L.
(1972) On the Semantic Properties of the Logical Operators in English (Unpublished PhD dissertation). UCLA.Google Scholar
Iverson, M., Kempchinsky, P., & Rothman, J.
(2008) Interface vulnerability and knowledge of the subjunctive/indicative distinction with negated epistemic predicates in L2 Spanish. EUROSLA Yearbook, 8, 135–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laca, B., & Tasmowski, L.
(1996) Indéfini et quantification. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 25, 107–128.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(2011) Who is the Interface Hypothesis about? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 48–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
(2000) Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M.
(2009) L2 acquisition of scalar implicatures: Interpretation at the syntax-pragmatics interface. Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA) 2009. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
López Palma, E.
(2007) Plural indefinite descriptions with unos and the interpretation of number. Probus, 19, 235–266.Google Scholar
Noveck, I. A.
(2001) When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78, 165–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noveck, I., & Sperber, D.
(2007) The why and how of experimental pragmatics: the case of ‘scalar inferences’. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Advances in Pragmatics (pp. 184–212). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J.
(2003) Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86(3), 253–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J.
(2009) Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 951–973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., & Iverson, M.
(2010) Independent normative assessments for bi/multilingualism, where art thou. In M. Cruz-Ferreira (Ed.), Multilingual Norms (pp. 33–51.) Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R.
(2011) The mind-context divide: On acquisition at the linguistic interfaces. Lingua, 121(4), 568–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2010) Scalar implicatures in L2 acquisition. Lingua, 120, 2444–2462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., & Montrul, S.
(2003) Genericity and aspect in L2 acquisition. Language Acquisition, 11(3), 165–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., Kempchinsky, P., & Rothman, J.
(2012) Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax-discourse interface. Second Language Research, 28(3), 319–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F.
(2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986/1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford Blackwell.Google Scholar
Su, Y. E.
(2013) Scalar implicatures and downward entailment in child Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 22(2), 167–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Syrett, K., Austin, J., Sanchez, L., Germak, C., Lingwall, A., Perez-Cortes, S., Arias-Amaya, A., & Baker, H.
(2016) The influence of conversational context and the developing lexicon on the calculation of scalar implicatures. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. DOI logo issn 1879–9264Google Scholar
Vargas-Tokuda, M., Grinstead, J., & Gutiérrez-Rexach, J.
(2009) Context and the Scalar Implicatures of Indefinites in Child Spanish. In J. Grinstead (Ed.), Hispanic Child Languages (pp. 93–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villalta, E.
(1994) Plural indefinites in Spanish and distributivity. Ms. CNRS.Google Scholar
White, L.
(2011) The interface hypothesis: How far does it extend? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 108–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Cho, Jacee
2022. Crosslinguistic influence on L2 implicature computation for determiners. Journal of Second Language Studies 5:1 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Destruel, Emilie
2023. Processing pragmatic inferences in L2 French speakers. Second Language Research 39:4 ► pp. 969 ff. DOI logo
Feng, Shuo
2022. The computation and suspension of presuppositions by L1-Mandarin Chinese L2-English speakers. Second Language Research 38:4 ► pp. 737 ff. DOI logo
Feng, Shuo
2024. L2 tolerance of pragmatic violations of informativeness. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:2 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Feng, Shuo & Jacee Cho
2019. Asymmetries Between Direct and Indirect Scalar Implicatures in Second Language Acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
Feng, Shuo & Kailun Zhang
2024. Online processing and offline judgments of different types of presupposition triggers by second language speakers. Second Language Research DOI logo
Loredo, Rodrigo, Juan E. Kamienkowski & Virginia Jaichenco
2019. Rapid Access to Scalar Implicatures in Adjacency Pair Contexts: Experimental Evidence in Spanish. Languages 4:3 ► pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Miller, David & Jason Rothman
2020. You win some, you lose some: Comprehension and event-related potential evidence for L1 attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:4 ► pp. 869 ff. DOI logo
Ren, Wei
2022. Second Language Pragmatics, DOI logo
Snape, Neal & Hironobu Hosoi
2018. Acquisition of scalar implicatures. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Syrett, Kristen, Jennifer Austin, Liliana Sanchez, Christina Germak, Anne Lingwall, Silvia Perez-Cortes, Anthony Arias-Amaya & Hannah Baker
2017. The influence of conversational context and the developing lexicon on the calculation of scalar implicatures. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7:2 ► pp. 230 ff. DOI logo
Syrett, Kristen, Jennifer Austin & Liliana Sanchez
2021. Establishing upper bounds in English monolingual and Heritage Spanish-English bilingual language development. Language Acquisition 28:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Jun & Yan Wu
2023. Epistemic reasoning in pragmatic inferencing by non-native speakers: The case of scalar implicatures. Second Language Research 39:3 ► pp. 697 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.