Cover not available
Part of
Language Acquisition Beyond Parameters: Studies in honour of Juana M. Liceras
Edited by Anahí Alba de la Fuente, Elena Valenzuela and Cristina Martínez Sanz
[Studies in Bilingualism 51] 2016
► pp. 213–236

In search of the perfect tense

 | University of Toronto
 | University of Toronto
Across languages, the present perfect introduces a time interval whose right boundary extends to the present time (Todavía no ha llegado/‘She still has not arrived’), but there is variation as to whether perfect forms constitute marked or unmarked forms of past tense reference. We examine the acquisition of the present perfect in Mexican Spanish, a dialect where the perfect is highly marked. We explore patterns of use in present tense contexts in an elicitation study of 17 Mexican children (M = 5;7). Children perform well with the preterite, but use few perfect targets. Their most prominent response in perfect scenarios is not the preterite but the present tense, suggesting that to avoid the complexity of the perfect, children focus on the expression of the reference rather than the event time.
Keywords: L1 acquisition, Mexican Spanish, present perfect, tense and aspect
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Spanish present perfect
    • 2.1What is it?
    • 2.2How does it vary?
  • 3.Acquisition of the present perfect
  • 4.Study
    • 4.1Questions
    • 4.2Participants
    • 4.3Methods
    • 4.4Results
      • 4.4.1Experiment 1: Sentence repair task
      • 4.4.2Experiment 2: Preference-based elicitation task
      • 4.4.3Are children’s responses influenced by lexical class?
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 16 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.51.09mar
References (50)
References
Aguado, G. (1995). El desarrollo del lenguaje de 0 a 3 años. Madrid: Ciencias de la educación preescolar especial.Google Scholar
Antinucci, F., & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language, 3(2), 167–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bel, A. (2002). Early verbs and the acquisition of tense in Spanish and Catalan. In J.M. Liceras & A.T, P.érez-Leroux (Eds.), The Acquisition of Spanish Morphosyntax: The L1/L2 Connection (pp. 1–34). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K., & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language, 56, 386–412. http://dx.doi.org/DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bronckart, J. P., & Sinclair, H. (1973). Time, tense and aspect. Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 95–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cournane, A. (2011). Experimenting with innovation in the domain of modality. Ms. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Cuervo, M.C., & Markle LaMontagne, J. (2014, April). Building reference to the past: L1 acquisition of the Spanish present perfect. Paper presented at the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, London, Ontario, Canada.
Dahl, O. (1985). Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fintel, K. von, & Iatridou, S. (2005). Anatomy of a modal. In J. Gajewski, V. Hacquard, B. Nickel, & S. Yalcin (Eds.), New Work on Modality (pp. 63–121). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
García Fernández, L. (1999). Los complementos adverbiales temporales: La subordinación temporal. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Vol. 2; pp. 3130–3208). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V.C. (1986). The acquisition of the present perfect: Explaining differences in the speech of Scottish and American children. Journal of Child Language, 13, 537–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grinstead, J. (1998). Subjects, Sentential Negation and Imperatives in Child Spanish and Catalan. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). UCLA.Google Scholar
Hernández Pina, F. (1984). Teorías psicosociolingüísticas y su aplicación a la adquisición del español como lengua materna. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Hess Zimmermann, Karina. (2003). El desarrollo lingüístico en los años escolares: Análisis de narraciones infantiles (Unpublished PhD dissertation). El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Hodgson, M. (2003). The acquisition of Spanish perfective aspect: A study on children’s production and comprehension. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 29, 105–117.Google Scholar
Hout, A. van. (2001). Acquiring telicity cross-linguistically: On the acquisition of telicity entailments associated with transitivity. In M. Bowerman & P. Brown (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Learnability. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Howe, C. (2013). The Spanish Perfects. Pathways of Emergent Meaning. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, S. (2003). A little bit more on the English perfect. In A. Alexiadou, M. Rathert, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Perfect Explorations (pp. 133–152). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, S., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Pancheva, R. (2003). Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In A. Alexiadou, M. Rathert, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Perfect Explorations (pp. 153–204). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson-Maldonado, D., & Maldonado, R. (2001). Determinaciones semánticas de la flexión verbal en la adquisición temprana del español. In C. Rojas-Nieto & L. De León Pasquel (Eds.), La adquisición de la lengua materna español, lenguas mayas, euskera (pp. 165–200). México, DF: UNAM-Ciesas.Google Scholar
Jeschull, L. (2007). The pragmatics of telicity and what children make of it. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), (pp. 180–187). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Labelle, M., Godard, L., & Longtin, C.-M. (2002). Grammatical and situational aspect in French: a developmental study. Journal of Child Language 29, 301–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lope Blanch, J. M. (1961). Sobre el uso del pretérito en el español de México. Studio Philologica: Homenaje a Dámaso Alonso, II, pág. 373–385.Google Scholar
(1971). El habla de la ciudad de México: Materiales para su estudio. México. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).Google Scholar
(1976). El habla popular de México: Materiales para su estudio. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).Google Scholar
López Ornat, S. (1994). La adquisición de la lengua española. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Markle LaMontagne, J., & Cuervo, M.C. (2015). Perfecting the past. In R. Klassen, Juana M. Liceras, & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads. Theoretical Linguistics, Language Acquisition and Language Contact (pp. 191–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1971). Tense and time reference in English. In C. Fillmore & T. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics (pp. 97–113). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Montes, R. (1987). Secuencias de clarificación en conversaciones con niños (Morphe 3–4). Puebla, México: Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.Google Scholar
Montes, R. G. (1992). Achieving Understanding: Repair Mechanisms in Mother–Child Conversations (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Penner, Z., Schulz, P., & Wymann, K. (2003). Learning the meaning of verbs: What distinguishes language impaired from normally developing children? Linguistics, 41(2), 289–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pirvulescu, M., & Belzil, I. (2008). The acquisition of the past participle agreement in Québec French L1. Language Acquisition, 15(2), 75–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, P. (2003). The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguists and Philosophy, 26, 459–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of Symbolic Login. New York, NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Rojo, G., & Veiga, A. (1999). El tiempo verbal: Los tiempos simples. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Vol. 2; pp. 2867–2934). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Said, S. (1976). Variation in Usage of the Present Perfect Tense in the Spoken Spanish of Mexico City (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Schwenter, S. (1994b). ‘Hot news’ and the grammaticalization of perfects. Linguistics, 32, 995–1028. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S., & Torres Cacoullos, R. (2008). Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change, 20, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R (1995). The acquisition of tense/aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, 71, 743–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. (1994). Talking perfectly: Discourse origins of the present perfect. In W. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on Grammaticalization (pp. 119–133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, W. (2007). Child Language: The Parametric Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Squartini, M., & Bertinetto, P.M. (2000). The simple and compound past in Romance languages. In Östen Dahl (Ed.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe (pp. 403–39). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Swart, H.E. de (2009). A cross-linguistic discourse analysis of the perfect. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 2273–2307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valian, V. (2006). Young children’s understanding of present and past tense. Language Learning and Development, 2(4), 251–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vet, C. (1992). Le passé composé: contextes d’emploi et interprétation. Cahiers de Praxématique, 19, 37–59.Google Scholar
Wagner, L. (2001). Aspectual influences on early tense comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 28, 661–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weist, R. Lyytinen, P., Wysocka, J., & Atanassova, M. (1997). The interaction of language and though in children’s language acquisition: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language, 24, 81–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2010). Three factors in language variation. Lingua, 120, 1160–1177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar