Cover not available
Part of
Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism: In honor of Aafke Hulk
Edited by Elma Blom, Leonie Cornips and Jeannette Schaeffer
[Studies in Bilingualism 52] 2017
► pp. 231–258

Complexity and production/comprehension asymmetries in the acquisition of wh-questions in French

Comparing second language acquisition and language impairment in children

 | Imagerie et cerveau Inserm 930, Université François Rabelais, Tours
 | Imagerie et cerveau Inserm 930, Université François Rabelais, Tours
 | Regional University Hospital Center (CHRU), Tours
 | Regional University Hospital Center (CHRU), Tours
Assuming that production places a greater burden on processing than comprehension, this study explores the hypothesis that both the degree of linguistic computational complexity entailed in a particular structure and the processing capacity of the speakers determine if and when production/comprehension asymmetries will surface. Elicited production and comprehension of French wh-questions were studied in 29 English-speaking children acquiring French as a second language (L2) and 27 French-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment, aged 6 to 12. Results confirm the hypothesis and underline the fundamental role of complexity in language acquisition, pointing to implications for the effects of first language transfer, age of onset and length of exposure in L2 acquisition, and on differences between children with and without language pathology.
Keywords: child L2 acquisition, computational complexity, French, length of exposure, processing capacity, production-comprehension asymmetry (asymmetries), Specific Language Impairment, transfer/L1 transfer wh-questions, working memory
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.French wh-questions
    • 2.1French wh-questions and the DCM
    • 2.2French Wh-questions and the issues of norm and frequency
  • 3.Acquisition of wh-question strategies
  • 4.Research questions
  • 5.The study
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Tasks
      • 5.2.1Standardized tests
      • 5.2.2Experimental tasks
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Production
      • 6.1.1Wh-fronting vs. in situ (in non-subject questions)
      • 6.1.2Wh-fronting strategies
    • 6.2Comprehension
    • 6.3Correlation analyses in the L2 data
  • 7.Discussion and conclusion
    • 7.1Frequency in production of wh-strategies and computational complexity
    • 7.2Production-comprehension symmetries and asymmetries
    • 7.3L2 factors and computational complexity
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.52.11pre
References (53)
References
De Agostini, M., Metz-Lutz, M. -N., van Hout, A., Chavance, M., Deloche, G., Pavao-Martins, I., & Dellatolas, G. (1998). Batterie d’évaluation du langage oral de l’enfant aphasique (ELOLA): standardisation française (4–12 ans). Revue de Neuropsychologie, 8, 319–367.Google Scholar
Bonnesen, M., & Kroffke, S. (2007). The acquisition of questions in L2 German and French by children and adults. Working Papers in Multilingualism, 83.Google Scholar
Cheng, L. (2009). Wh-in-situ, from the 1980’s to now. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 767–791. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L., & Rooryck, J. (2000). Licensing wh-in-situ. Syntax, 3, 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chillier, L., Arabatzi, M., Baranzini, L., Cronel-Ohayon, S., Deonna, T., Dubé, S., Franck, J., Frauenfelder, U., Hamann, C., Rizzi, L., Starke, M., & Zesiger, P. (2001). The acquisition of French pronouns in normal children and in children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). In Proceedings of early lexicon acquisition (CDRom), Lyon, France.Google Scholar
Contemori, C., & Garraffa, M. (2010). Comparison of modalities in SLI syntax: A study on the comprehension and production of non-canonical sentences. Lingua, 120, 1940–1955. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coveney, A. (1996). Variability in Spoken French: A sociolinguistic study of interrogation and negation. Exeter: Elm Bank.Google Scholar
Deevy, P., & Leonard, L. (2004). The comprehension of wh-questions in children with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 802–815. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delage, H., Monjauze, C., Hamann, C., & Tuller, L. (2008). Relative clauses in atypical acquisition of French. In Gavarró, A. & Freitas, M. J. (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2007 (pp. 166–176). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Déprez, V. (1988). Stylistic inversion and verb movement. In Proceedings of ESCOL 1988 (pp. 71–82). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119, 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2004). The acquisition of Relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language, 31, 661–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geveler, J., & Mülller, N. (2016). Wh-fronting and wh-in-situ in the acquisition of French: Really variants? In P. Guirraro-Fuentes, K. Schmitz, & N. Müller (Eds.), The acquisition of French in multilingual contexts (pp. 51–71). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Grimm, A., Müller, A., Hamann, C., & Ruigendijk, E. (Eds.). (2011). Production-comprehension asymmetries in child language. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T. (2005). Comprehension and production of French object clitics by child second language learners and children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 363–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T. (2000). An excursion into interrogatives in early English and Italian. In M. -A. Friedemann & L. Rizzi (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax (pp. 105–128). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Hahne, A. (2001). What’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 251–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C. (2000). The acquisition of constituent questions and the requirements of interpretation. In M. -A. Friedemann & L. Rizzi (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax (pp. 170–201). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
(2006). Speculations about early syntax: The production of wh-questions by normally developing French children and French children with SLI. The Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 5, 143–189.Google Scholar
Hendriks, P. (2014). Asymmetries between language production and comprehension. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2006). Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22, 369–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A. (1996). Parameter setting and the acquisition of wh-questions in L2 French. In P. Jordens & J. Lalleman (Eds.), Investigating second language acquisition (pp. 237–259). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A., & Zuckerman, S. (2000). The interaction between input and economy: Acquiring optionality in French Wh-questions. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), BULCD 24: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 438–449). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Jakubowicz, C. (2005). The language faculty: (Ab)normal development and interface constraints. Paper presented at GALA 2005, Siena, Italy.
(2011). Measuring derivational complexity: New evidence from typically-developing and SLI learners of L1-French. Lingua, 121, 339–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., & Nash, L. (2001). Functional categories and syntactic operations in (Ab)normal language acquisition. Brain and Language, 77, 321–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R., & Pollock, J. -Y. (2001). New thoughts on stylistic inversion. In A. Hulk & J. -Y. Pollock (Eds.), Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of Universal Grammar (pp. 107–161). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Khomsi, A., Khomsi, J., Parbeau-Guéno, A., & Pasquet, F. (2007). Bilan informatisé de langage oral au Cycle III et au collège (BILO3C). Paris: Editions du CPA.Google Scholar
Mathieu, E. (2004). The mapping of form and interpretation: The case of optional WH-movement in French. Lingua, 114, 1090–1132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, D., McKee, C., Cowart, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2015). The role of the language production system in shaping grammars. Language, 91, 415–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, J. (2002). Understanding the language difficulties of children with specific language impairments: Does working memory matter? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 77–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2000). Tense and temporality: A comparison between children learning a second language and children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43, 834–847. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plunkett, B. (1999). Targeting complex structure in French questions. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Tano (Eds.), BUCLD 23: Proceedings of the 23rd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 764–775). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2010). Understanding QU-questions. In P. Guijarro-Fuentes & L. Dominguez (Eds.), New directions in language acquisition: Romance languages in the generative perspective (pp. 387–414). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., Strik, N., & Tuller, L. (2014). Wh-questions in child L2 French: Interaction between derivational complexity, L1 properties, length of exposure, age of exposure, and the input. Second language Research, 30, 225–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P., Tuller, L., Scheidnes, M., Ferré, S., & Haiden, M. (2010). Computational complexity effects in the acquisition of wh-questions in child L2 French. In L. Dominguez & P. Guijarres-Fuentes (Eds.), New directions in language acquisition: Romance languages in the generative perspective (pp. 415–443). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Quillard, V. (2000). Interroger en français parlé. Etudes syntaxiques pragmatiques et sociolinguistiques. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Tours.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Semel, E., Wiig, E., & Secord, W. (2006). CELF-4 Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (4th UK ed.). London: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L. (2007). Cross-linguistic influence in the interpretation of anaphoric and cataphoric pronouns in English-Italian bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 225–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheidnes, M. (2012). Development of child L2 French: What is typical? Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Tours.Google Scholar
Scheidnes, M., & Tuller, L. (2016). Assessing successive bilinguals in two languages: A longitudinal look at English-speaking children in France. Journal of Communication Disorders 64, 45-61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., Serratrice, L., Filiaci, F., & Baldo, M. (2009). Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization: Testing the linguistic intuitions of older bilingual children. Lingua, 119, 460–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soriente, A. (2007). Cross-linguistic and cognitive aspects in the acquisition of WH-questions in an Italian-Indonesian bilingual child. In I. Kesckes & L. Albertazzi (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of bilingualism (pp. 325–362). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., Chrysomallis, M. -A., & Petraki, E. (2011). Subject–verb agreement, object clitics and wh-questions in bilingual French–Greek SLI: The case study of a French–Greek-speaking child with SLI. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25, 339–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik, N. (2008). Syntaxe et acquisition des phrases interrogatives en français et en néerlandais: Une étude contrastive. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Université Paris 8.Google Scholar
(2012). Wh-questions in child bilingual acquisition of French: Derivational complexity and cross-linguistic influence. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 57, 133–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strik, N., & Pérez-Leroux, A. T. (2011). Jij doe wat girafe? Wh-movement and inversion in Dutch-French bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 175–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H. K. J. (2005). Grammatical-SLI and the computational grammatical complexity hypothesis. Revue Fréquences, 17, 13–20.Google Scholar
van der Meulen, J. (2004). Syntactic movement and comprehension deficits in Broca’s aphasia. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
van Kampen, J. (1997). First steps in wh-movement. Delf: Eburon.Google Scholar
Yip, V., & Matthews, S. (2000). Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese-English bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 193–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

ABBOUD, Layal, Lina CHOUEIRI, Nour SEIFEDDINE & Laurice TULLER
2024. The emergence of subjects in Lebanese two-year-olds. Journal of Child Language 51:1 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Hamann, Cornelia
2015. Specific Language Impairment in German Children. In Specific Language Impairment [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 58], ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.