Cover not available
Part of
Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition: In honor of Roumyana Slabakova
Edited by Jacee Cho, Michael Iverson, Tiffany Judy, Tania Leal and Elena Shimanskaya
[Studies in Bilingualism 55] 2018
► pp. 67–94

Chapter 3
Another look at L2 acquisition of French clitics and strong pronouns

 | West Virginia University
The present study investigated the L2 acquisition of French clitic and strong object pronouns by adult Anglophone learners. While most previous research has focused on French object clitics and acquisition of their placement, the current study reports on two experiments comparing acquisition of clitics with acquisition of strong pronouns, investigating how L2 knowledge of pronominalization is connected to knowledge of argument structure. A grammaticality judgment task with corrections was used to examine learners’ interlanguage in each experiment. Emerging knowledge of clitics appears not to be delayed when compared to knowledge of strong pronouns complements of prepositions. Additionally, acquiring target-like associations between argument structure and pronominalization in L2 French proved as challenging (if not more) as acquiring clitics’ non-canonical sentential position.
Keywords: French, clitics, strong pronouns, argument structure, accusative case
Article outline
  • French and English object pronouns
  • Previous L2 studies
  • Experiment 1
    • Method
    • Materials
    • Participants
    • Results
    • Grammatical sentences
    • Ungrammatical sentences
    • Discussion of Experiment 1
  • Experiment 2
    • Materials
    • Participants
    • Results
    • Discussion of Experiment 2
  • General discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.55.03shi
References (38)
References
Auger, J. (1994). Pronominal clitics in Quebec colloquial French: A morphological analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, PA.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. (1999). Italian/Romance clitics: Structure and derivation. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 543–580). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M. (1999). The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 145–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Delage, H., Durrleman, S., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2016). Disentangling sources of difficulty associated with the acquisition of accusative clitics in French. Lingua, 180, 1–24.Google Scholar
Duffield, N., White, L., Montrul, S., Bruhn de Garavito, J., & Prévost, P. (2002). Clitic placement in L2 French and Spanish: Evidence from sentence matching. The Journal of Linguistics, 38, 487–525.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
German, E. S., Herschensohn, J., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2015). Pronoun processing in Anglophone late L2 learners of French: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 34, 15–40.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granfeldt, J., & Schlyter, S. (2004). Cliticisation in the acquisition of French as L1 and L2. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories (pp. 333–370). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T. (2006). Object clitics and null objects in the acquisition of French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
(2009). A unified account of object clitics and referential null objects in French. Syntax, 12(3), 215–241.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Herschensohn, J. (1996). Case suspension and binary complement structure in French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Functional categories and the acquisition of object clitics in L2 French. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories (pp. 207–242). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoover, M., & Dwivedi, V. (1998). Syntactic processing by skilled bilinguals. Language Learning, 48, 1–29.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. (1995). Does English really have case? Journal of Linguistics, 31(2), 375–392.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, O. A. (1982). Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(1986). Three issues in the theory of clitics: Case, doubled NPs, and extraction in the syntax of pronominal clitics. Syntax and Semantics, 19, 15–42.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1975). French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, D., & Le Bras, Y. (2009). A frequency dictionary of French: Core vocabulary for learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, P. H., & Sag, I. A. (1997). French clitic movement without clitics or movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 15(3), 573–639.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renaud, C. (2010). On the nature of agreement in English-French acquisition: A processing investigation in the verbal and nominal domains (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, H. (1999). Clitics: A state of the art report. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 1–29). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roberge, Y. (1990). Syntactic recoverability of null arguments. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Rochat, D. (2013). Contrastes: Grammaire du français courant. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Schlyter, S. (1997). Formes verbales et pronoms objets chez des apprenants adultes de français en milieu naturel. Annales Littéraires de l’Université de Franche-Comté, 631, 273–293.Google Scholar
Schmitz, K., & Müller, N. (2008). Strong and clitic pronouns in monolingual and bilingual acquisition of French and Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11, 19–41.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2013). What is easy and what is hard in second language acquisition: A generative perspective. In M. P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutierrez-Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 5–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). The bottleneck of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 46(4), 543–559.Google Scholar
(2016). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sportiche, D. (1996). Clitic constructions. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 213–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). Pronominal clitic dependencies. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 679–708). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Strozer, J. (1976). Clitics in Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Towell, R., & Hawkins, R. D. (1994). Approaches to second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (1995). Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic inquiry, 26(1), 79–123.Google Scholar
White, L. (1996). Clitics in L2 French. In H. Clahsen, Generative perspectives on language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations and crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 335–368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. (1977). On clitics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar