Cover not available
Part of
Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction: Studies in honor of Bill VanPatten
Edited by Michael J. Leeser, Gregory D. Keating and Wynne Wong
[Studies in Bilingualism 62] 2021
► pp. 125–150

Chapter 4
When more is better

Higher L1/L2 similarity, L2 proficiency, and working memory facilitate L2 morphosyntactic processing

| Rutgers University
This chapter investigates the role of first language (L1) transfer, second language (L2) proficiency, and working memory (WM) on processing subject-verb number agreement in Spanish. Intermediate and advanced English and Romanian learners of Spanish and Spanish monolinguals completed a WM test and a reading eye-tracking task with sentences with adjacent subject-verb number agreement/disagreement. Results revealed that all groups were sensitive to violations but processed them differently, depending on their L1 (the less morphologically rich, the more reliance on subjects), proficiency (the more advanced, the more reliance on verbs), and WM (the higher the span, the more sensitivity to violations). These findings indicate that higher L1/L2 similarity, L2 proficiency, and WM facilitate L2 verbal morphosyntactic processing.
Keywords: subject-verb agreement, number agreement, L1 transfer, L2 proficiency, working memory, L2 morphosyntactic processing
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Background
    • L1 transfer and L2 processing of subject-verb number agreement
    • Proficiency level and L2 processing of subject-verb number agreement
    • Working memory and L2 processing of subject-verb number agreement
  • The current study
  • Experiment
    • Participants
    • Materials and procedure
    • Scoring
  • Results
    • Gaze duration
    • Total time
    • First pass fixation count
    • Total fixation count
    • Summary of reading time data
    • Picture interpretation and verb bias
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 17 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.62.04sag
References (40)
References
Armstrong, A., Bulkes, N., & Tanner, D. (2018). Quantificational cues modulate the processing of English subject-verb agreement by native Chinese speakers: An ERP study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 731–754. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barrouillet, P., & Camos, V. (2007). The time-based resource-sharing model of working memory. In N. Osaka, R. H. Logies, & M. D’ Esposito (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of working memory (pp. 59–80). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biondo, N., Vespignani, F., Rizzi, L., & Mancini, S. (2018). Widening agreement processing: A matter of time, features and distance. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33, 890–911. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P. (2007). ERP signatures of subject-verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 161–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLuca, V., Miller, D., Pliatsikas, C., & Rothman, J. (2019). Brain adaptations and neurological indices of processing in adult second language acquisition. In J. W. Schwieter (Eds.), The handbook of the neuroscience of multilingualism (pp. 170–196). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Douglas, B., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.Google Scholar
Experiment Builder. (2019). V1.10.165. Developed by SR Research Limited.Google Scholar
Faretta-Stutenberg, M. (2014). Individual differences in context: A neurolinguistics investigation of WM and L2 development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Morgan-Short, K. (2018). The interplay of individual differences and context of learning in behavioral and neurocognitive second language development. Second Language Research, 34, 67–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foote, R. (2011). Integrated knowledge of agreement in early and late English-Spanish bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 187–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonteneau, E., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Rizzi, L. (1998). On the contribution of ERPs to the study of language comprehension. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, 68, 111–124.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Barkhuysen, P. N. (2006). Language production and working memory: The case of subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 181–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jegerski, J. (2016). Number attraction effects in near-native Spanish sentence comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltsa, M., Tsimpli, I. A., Marinis, T., & Stavrou, M. (2016). Processing coordinate subject-verb agreement in L1 and L2 Greek. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keating, G. D. (2009). Sensitivity to violations of gender agreement in native and non-native Spanish: An eye-movement investigation. Language Learning, 59, 503–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). The effects of linear distance and working memory on the processing of gender agreement in Spanish. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in second language processing and parsing (pp. 113–134). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenth, R. (2019). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.4.1. <[URL]>
Mancini, S., Molinaro, N., Rizzi, L., & Carreiras, M. (2011). A person is not a number: Discourse involvement in subject-verb agreement computation. Brain Research, 1410, 64–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, J. M., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 703–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, A., Scott Jarvis, E., O’Malley, M., & Konstantinova, I. (2015). Working memory measures and L2 proficiency. In Z. Wen, M. B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 270–284). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60, 154–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R. A., & Cavanaugh, J. E. (2019). Ordered quantile normalization: A semiparametric transformation built for the cross-validation era. Journal of Applied Statistics, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. V 3.6.1. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. <[URL]>
Reichle, R. V., Tremblay, A., & Coughlin, C. A. (2013). Working-memory capacity effects in the processing of non-adjacent subject-verb agreement: An event-related brain potentials study. In E. Voss, S-J. D. Tai, & Z. Li (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2011 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 54–69). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, E., & Reglero, L. (2015). Heritage and L2 processing of person and number features: Evidence from Spanish subject-verb agreement. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages, 2, 11–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (2006). The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 2030–2048. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagarra, N. (2008). Working memory and L2 processing of redundant grammatical forms. In Z. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 133–147). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2014). Absence of morphological transfer in beginners. In Z. Han & R. Rast (Eds.), First exposure to a second language: Learners’ initial input processing (pp. 139–170). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Longitudinal effects of working memory on L2 grammar and reading abilities. Second Language Research, 33, 341–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Ellis, N. (2013). From seeing adverbs to seeing morphology: Language experience and adult acquisition of L2 tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 261–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. (2010). The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number agreement processing in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua, 20, 2022–2039. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagarra, N., & LaBrozzi, R. (2018). Benefits of study abroad on L2 morphosyntactic processing, and of working memory on L2 semantic processing. In C. Sanz & A. Morales-Front (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of study abroad research and practice (pp. 149–164). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., & Aust, F. (2016). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. R package version 0.16-1. <[URL]>
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(2015). Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 113–134). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., & Leeser, M. J. (2012). Missing verbal inflections as a representational problem: Evidence from self-paced reading. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 109–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. A. (1997). WAIS-III, WMS-III technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Yao, P., & Chen, B. (2017). Cross-linguistic differences affect late Chinese-English learners’ on-line processing of English tense and aspect. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21, 268–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Casper, Rachel, Zenaida Aguirre-Muñoz, Michael Spivey & Heather Bortfeld
2024. Spanish–English bilingual heritage speakers processing of inanimate sentences. Frontiers in Language Sciences 3 DOI logo
Rattanasak, Sonthaya, Nattama Pongpairoj & Kiel Christianson
2024. Effects of working memory capacity and distance-based complexity on agreement processing: a crosslinguistic competition account. Applied Linguistics Review 15:3 ► pp. 1151 ff. DOI logo
Lozano-Argüelles, Cristina, Nuria Sagarra & Joseph V. Casillas
2023. Interpreting experience and working memory effects on L1 and L2 morphological prediction. Frontiers in Language Sciences 1 DOI logo
Fernández-Arroyo, Laura, Nuria Sagarra & Kaylee Fernández
2022. Differential effects of language proficiency and use on L2 lexical prediction. The Mental Lexicon 17:2 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.