A shared linguistic system of multilingual representations
This chapter discusses multilingual linguistic
representations and probes the question of whether they
form a shared linguistic system. Recent psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic studies of multilingual individuals
suggest that this is indeed the case. Taking Minimalist morphosyntax
and Lardiere’s (2009)
feature reassembly as starting points, we consider whether a feature
bundle can be updated and re-assembled as a complete
unit in the third language, or whether it has to be broken down into
separate features which are updated separately. The latter
option makes sure that features from both known languages, if they
are acquired to a functional level, can exert cross-linguistic
influence (CLI). Restructuring each feature bundle
depends not just on the availability of facilitation, but on other
properties of the input which affect
what becomes intake in the additional grammar. Both experiential
factors (such as dominance and proficiency) and linguistic factors
(such as frequency in the input and complexity) can and do affect
the acquisition process.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic
findings on multilingualism
- 3.Models of language acquisition
- 4.Feature
bundles in third language acquisition
- 5.Multiple grammars
- 6.Activation
- 7.Other factors affecting L3 acquisition
- 8.Predictions
- 9.Conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References (58)
References
Abutalebi, J. & Green, D. W. (2007). Bilingual
language production: The neurocognition of language
representation and
control. Journal of
Neurolinguistics, 20(3), 242–275.
Amaral, L., & Roeper, T. (2014). Multiple
grammars and second language
representation. Second
Language
Research, 30(1), 3–36.
Angelovska, T., Roehm, D., & Weinmüller, S. (2020). Uncovering
transfer effects of dominance and proficiency in L3 English
acquisition using the visual moving window paradigm and
grammaticality
judgments. Applied
Linguistics
Review, 14(1), 115–143.
Bailey, C-Y. (1973). Variation
and linguistic
theory. Center for Applied Linguistics.
Blumenfeld, H., & Marian, V. (2013). Parallel
language activation and cognitive control during spoken word
recognition in
bilinguals. Journal of
Cognitive
Psychology 25, 547–567.
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic
persistence in language
production. Cognitive
Psychology, 18, 355–387.
Bohnacker, U. (2006). When
Swedes begin to learn German: From V2 to
V2. Second Language
Research, 22(4), 443–486.
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric
syntax. Foris.
Callan, D. E., Tajima, K., Callan, A. M. et al. (2003). Learning-induced
neural plasticity associated with improved identification
performance after training of a difficult second-language
phonetic
contrast. NeuroImage, 19(1), 113–124.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects
of the theory of syntax. The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures
on government and
binding. Foris.
Chomsky, N. (2000). The
architecture of
language. Oxford University Press.
Cook, V. (1992). Evidence
for multicompetence. Language
Learning, 42(4), 557–591.
Cook, V. (2002). Portraits
of the L2 user. Multilingual Matters.
Crain, S. (1991). Language
acquisition in the absence of
experience. Behavioral and
Brain
Science, 14, 597–612.
Culicover, P. W. (2013). Explaining
syntax: Representations, structures, and
computation. Oxford University Press.
Del Maschio, N. & Abutalebi, J. (2019). Language
organization in the bilingual and multilingual
brain. In J. Schwieter (Ed.), The
handbook of the neuroscience of
multilingualism (pp. 199–213). Wiley Blackwell.
Fallah, N., Jabbari, A., & Fazilatfar, A. M. (2016). Source(s)
of syntactic CLI: The case of L3 acquisition of English
possessives by Mazandarani–Persian
bilinguals. Second Language
Research, 32(2), 225–245.
Fernández-Berkes, É., & Flynn, S. (2023). Grammatical
mapping in L3 acquisition: A theory of
development. In M. M. Brown-Bousfield, S. Flynn, & É. Fernández-Berkes (Eds.), L3
development after the initial
state (pp. 8–28). John Benjamins. (this
volume).
Flege, J. E. (2002). Interactions
between the native and second-language phonetic
systems. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An
integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of
Henning
Wode (pp. 217–244). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Gleitman, L. R. (1990). The
structural sources of verb
meanings. Language
Acquisition, 1, 3–55.
Golestani, N., & Zatorre, R. J. (2004). Learning
new sounds of speech: Reallocation of neural
substrates. NeuroImage, 21(2), 494–506.
González Alonso, J., Alemán Bañón, J., DeLuca, V., Miller, D. et al. (2020). Event
related potentials at initial exposure in third language
acquisition: Implications from an artificial mini-grammar
study. Journal of
Neurolinguistics, 56, 100939.
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental
control of the bilingual lexico-semantic
system. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 1(2), 67–81.
Green, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language
control in bilinguals: The Adaptive Control
Hypothesis. Journal of
Cognitive
Psycholology, 25, 515–530.
Hartsuiker, R. J., Beerts, S., Loncke, M., Desmet, T., & Bernolet, S. (2016). Cross-linguistic
structural priming in multilinguals: Further evidence for
shared syntax. Journal of
Memory and
Language, 90, 14–30.
Hicks, G., & Domínguez, L. (2020). A
model for L1 grammatical
attrition. Second Language
Research, 36(2), 143–165.
Jensen, I. N., Mitrofanova, N., Anderssen, M., Rodina, Y., Slabakova, R., & Westergaard, M. (2023). Crosslinguistic
influence in L3 acquisition across linguistic
modules. International
Journal of Multilingualism, 20(3), 717–734.
Kantola, L., & Van Gompel, R. P. G. (2011). Between-
and within-language priming is the same: Evidence for shared
bilingual syntactic
representations. Memory &
Cognition, 39(2), 276–290.
Kroll, J., Bobb, S. C., & Hoshino, N. (2014). Two
languages in mind: Bilingualism as a tool to investigate
language, cognition, and the
brain. Current Directions of
Psychological
Science, 23(3), 159–163.
Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A
new view of language
acquisition. Proceedings of
the National Academy of
Sciences, 97(22), 11850–11857.
Lago, S., Mosca, M., & Stutter Garcia, A. (2021). The
role of crosslinguistic influence in multilingual
processing: Lexicon versus
syntax. Language
Learning, 71(S1), 163–192.
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some
thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second
language acquisition. Second
Language
Research, 25(2):173–227.
Lidz, J., & Gagliardi, A. (2015). How
nature meets nurture: Universal Grammar and statistical
learning. Annual Review of
Linguistics, 1, 333–53.
Lightfoot, D. (1991). How
to set parameters. The MIT Press.
Mitrofanova, N., Leivada, E., & Westergaard, M. (2022). Crosslinguistic
influence in L3 acquisition: Evidence from artificial
language learning. Paper
presented at the Generative
Approaches to Second Language Acquisition XVI
conference, Trondheim, May
2022.
Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Towards
unified modules of working memory: Emerging consensus,
unresolved theoretical issues and future research
directions. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models
of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and
executive
control (pp. 442–458). Cambridge University Press.
Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural
priming: A critical
review. Psychological
Bulletin, 134(3), 427–459.
Pinker, S. (1979). Formal
models of language
learning. Cognition, 7, 217–83.
Pliatsikas, C., Johnstone, T., & Marinis, T. (2014). fMRI
evidence for the involvement of the procedural memory system
in morphological processing of a second
language. PLoS
One, 9(5), e97298.
Roeper, T. (1999). Universal
bilingualism. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 2(3), 169–186.
Roeper, T. (2016). Multiple
grammars and the logic of learnability in second language
acquisition. Frontiers in
Psychology, 7.
Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). What
variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3
initial state. Second
Language
Research, 26, 189–218.
Rothman, J., Gonzalez Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third
language acquisition and linguistic
transfer. Cambridge University Press.
Sharwood Smith, M. (2017). Introducing
language and cognition: A map of the
mind. Cambridge University Press.
Sharwood Smith, M., & Truscott, J. (2014). The
multilingual mind: A modular processing
perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Sheehan, M. (2021). Parameters
and linguistic
variation. In N. Allott, T. Lohndal, & G. Rey (Eds.), A
companion to
Chomsky (pp. 172–189). Wiley Blackwell.
Slabakova, R. (2017). The
Scalpel Model of third language
acquisition. International
Journal of
Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665.
Slabakova, R. & García Mayo, M. del P. (2015). The
L3 syntax–discourse
interface. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 18(2), 208–226.
Truscott, J., & Sharwood Smith, M. (2004). Acquisition
by processing: A modular perspective on language
development. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 7, 1–20.
Wartenburger, I., Heekeren, H. R., Abutalebi, J. et al. (2003). Early
setting of grammatical processing in the bilingual
brain. Neuron, 37(1), 159–170.
Westergaard, M. (2021a). Microvariation
in multilingual situations: The importance of
property-by-property
acquisition. Second Language
Research, 37(3), 379–407.
Westergaard, M. (2021b). L3
acquisition and crosslinguistic influence as co-activation.
Response to commentaries on the keynote “Microvariation in
multilingual situations: The importance of
property-by-property
acquisition.” Second Language
Research, 37(3), 501–518.
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2017). Crosslinguistic
influence in the acquisition of a third language: The
Linguistic Proximity
Model. International Journal
of
Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682.
White, L. (1990). The
verb-movement parameter in second language
acquisition. Language
Acquisition, 1(4), 337–360. [URL]
Yang, C. (2004). Universal
Grammar, statistics, or
both. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 8(10), 451–456.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Fernández-Berkes, Éva & Suzanne Flynn
Zhang, Linxi, Alfonso Morales-Front & Cristina Sanz
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.