Article published In:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 15:1 (2018) ► pp.103126
References (39)
Referencias
Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel. 2006. Variación morfosintáctica e interacción social: Análisis del paradigma de los clíticos verbales españoles en los medios de comunicación. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
. 2017. “The participants as objects: Variation and meaning of first- and second-person objects in Spanish”. Studia Linguistica 71 (2): 1–37.Google Scholar
Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel y María José Serrano. 2010. “The cognitive bases of linguistic style”. Sociolinguistic Studies 41: 115–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Style in Syntax. Investigating Variation in Spanish Pronoun Subjects. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ardehali, Paula Elizabeth. 1990. “Pronoun exchange as a barometer of social change”. Dialectal Anthropology 151: 82–86.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Accessibility theory: An overview”. En Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord y Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 29–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis. 2000. “Mire usted Sr. González…Personal deixis in Spanish political electoral debate”. Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Sociolingüística del español. Desarrollos y perspectivas en el estudio de la lengua española en contexto social. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger y Albert Gilman. 1960. “The pronouns of power and solidarity”. En Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in language. Cambridge: Massachussets University Press, 253–276.Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick y Dominique Maingueneau. 2005. Diccionario de análisis del discurso. Buenos Aires: Amorrotu Editores.Google Scholar
Croft, William y Allan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Miguel, José Miguel. 2015. “Variable coding and object alignment in Spanish: A corpus-based approach”. Folia Linguistica 491: 205–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction-grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette. K., Hedberg, Nancy y Ron Zacharski. 1993. “Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse”. Language 691: 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. “Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntax of bound person forms”. En Dik Bakker y Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 197–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Martin. 2010. “Reflexiones metodológicas y teóricas sobre el estudio de las formas de tratamiento en el mundo hispanoablante, a partir de una investigación en Santiago de Chile”. En Martin Hummel, Bettina Kluge y María Eugenia Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico. México: El Colegio de México, pp. 103–162.Google Scholar
Kendall, Martha B.. 1981. “Toward a semantic approach to terms of address. A critique of deterministic models in Sociolinguistics”. Language in Communication 1 (2–3): 237–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat Orecchioni, Catherine. 1992. Les interactions verbales. París: A ColinGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martiny, Thierry. 1996. “Forms of address in French and Dutch: a sociopragmatic approach”. Language Sciences 18 (3–4): 765–775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Medina López, Javier. 2009. “El del presidente. La ruptura del rol social”. Revista Española de Lingüística 39 (1): 77–109.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Martin. 2011. “The accountability interview, politics and change in the UK public service broadcasting”. En Mats Ekström y Marianna Patrona (Eds.), Talking Politics in Broadcast Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Political Interviewing, Journalism and Accountability. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 33–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter y Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People. Massachusetts: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
NGRAE: Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua. 2009. Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Obeng, Samuel G.. 1997. “Language and politics: indirectness in political discourse”. Discourse and Society 8 (1): 49–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romano, Manuela y María Dolores Porto. 2016. “Discourse, cognition and society”. En Romano, Manuela y María Dolores Porto (eds.) Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Serrano, María José. 2001. “La deixis social en los usos pronominales de cortesía en español”. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 9–101: 265–280.Google Scholar
. 2012. El sujeto pronominal usted/ustedes y su posición: variación y creación de estilos comunicativos. Spanish in Context 9 (1): 109–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “La variación sintáctica”. En Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.) Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica. Londres: Routledge, pp. 809–821.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Los objetos verbales de persona como variantes de tratamiento interpersonal canario en la red social Facebook”. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 30 (1).Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2014. Person. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 2006. “Image building through modality: The case of political interviews”. Discourse and Society 7(3): 389–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 1996. “Reconsidering power and distance”. Journal of Pragmatics 261:1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Miranda. 2003. “‘Pragmatic weight’ and face: pronominal presence and the case of the Spanish second person singular pronoun tú”. Journal of Pragmatics 351: 191–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard, Sachiko, Ide y Konrad Ehrlich. 1992. “Linguistic politeness and politic behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality”. En Richard Watts et al. (eds.) Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 21–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Serrano, María José
2021. Gradual objectivity. Variation in the use of the objectivizing second-person singular tú in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 176  pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Serrano, María José
2022. Desubjectivizing discourse through the use of the periphrasis haber que + infinitive in Spanish. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 17  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
2018. Not just you: The construction of radio audiences through second-person choice in Peninsular Spanish. Language & Communication 60  pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Aijón Oliva, Miguel Á.
2019. La elección de segunda persona y la construcción de identidades contextuales en el discurso radiofónico de una comunidad peninsular . Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 7:2  pp. 125 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.