Article published In:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 15:3 (2018) ► pp.465489
References (47)
Referencias
Referencias bibliográficas
Aarts, Bas, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech, y Sean Wallis (eds.). 2013. The Verb Phrase in English. Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora. Cambridge: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. “A Lovely Little Example: Word Order Options and Category Shift in the Premodifying String.” En Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, ed. por Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach y Dieter Stein, 39–66. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agresti, Alan. 2015. Foundations of Linear and Generalized Linear Models. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix. 1992. “Interjections: The Universal yet Neglected Part of Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 181: 101–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azofra Sierra, Elena y Renata Enghels. 2017. “El proceso de gramaticalización del marcador epistémico deverbal sabes”. Iberoromania 851: 1–25.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1986. “On the investigation of Spoken/written differences.” Studia Linguistica 40 (1): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006a. “Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance. A cross-register comparison.” Journal of historical pragmatics 5 (1): 107–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. “Stance in spoken and written university registers.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 51: 97–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Register as a predictor of linguistic variation.” Corpus Linguistics and linguistic theory 8 (1): 9–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Mark Davies, James K. Jones y Nicole Tracy-Ventura. 2006. “Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: a multi-dimensional analysis.” Corpora 1 (1): 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas y Edward Finegan. 1992. “The linguistic evolution of five written and speech-based English genres from the 17th to the 20th centuries.” En History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics, ed. por Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen, y Irma Taavitsainen, 688–704. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blankenship, Jane. 1962. “A linguistic analysis of oral and written style.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 481: 419–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, y Albert Gilman. 1989. “Politeness Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies.” Language in Society 18 (2): 159–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2006. “From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition.” Language 82 (4): 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram. 2017. “Oral features in fiction.” En Pragmatics of fiction, ed. por Miriam A. Locher y Andreas H. Jucker, 235–263. Berlin/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Company, Concepción. 2004. “Gramaticalización por subjetivización como prescindibilidad de la sintaxis.” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 52 (1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan y Merja Kytö. 2000. “Data in historical pragmatics. Spoken interaction (re)cast as writing.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1 (2): 175–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2006. “Towards the first comprehensive survey of register variation in Spanish.” En Corpus Linguistics Beyond the Word: Corpus Research from Phrase to Discourse, ed. por Eileen Fitzpatrick, 73–86. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Egbert, Jesse y Douglas Biber. 2016. “Do all roads lead to Rome?: Modelling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enghels, Renata, Clara Vanderschueren y Miriam Bouzouita. 2015. “Panorama de los corpus y textos del español peninsular contemporáneo.” En Manuel des anthologies, corpus et textes romans ( Manuals of Romance Linguistics 7), ed. por Eugeen Roegiest y Maria Iliescu, 147–170. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, Andy, Jeremy Miles y Zoë Field. 2012. Discovering Statistics using R. London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2004. “What Counts as Evidence in Historical Linguistics?” En What counts as evidence in linguistics? The case of innateness, ed. por Martina Penke y Anette Rosenbach. Studies in Language 281: 710–740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1999. “What are discourse markers?Journal of Pragmatics 311: 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garachana, Mar. 2008. “En los límites de gramaticalización. La evolución de encima (de que) como marcador del discurso.” Revista de Filología Española 88 (1): 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2006. “Methodology in Cognitive Linguistics.” En Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, ed. por Gitte, Kristiansen, Michel Achard, René Dirven, y Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza, 21–49. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goetsch, Paul. 1985. “Fingierte Mündlichkeit in der Erzählkunst entwickelter Schriftkulturen.” Poetica 171: 202–2018.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2006. “Exploring variability within and between corpora: some methodological considerations.” Corpora 1 (2): 109–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. “On some principles of Grammaticization.” En Approaches to grammaticalization, ed. por Elizabeth C. Traugott, y Bernd Heine, 17–36. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. y Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Martin. 2014. “La reconstrucción diacrónica entre oralidad y escritura. El caso de los marcadores discursivos claro, entonces y total .” En Marcadores del discurso. Perspectivas y contrastes, ed. por M. Marta García Negroni, 35–61. Buenos Aires: Santiago Arcos editor.Google Scholar
Kabatek, Johannes. 2013. “¿Es posible una lingüística histórica basada en un corpus representativo?Iberoromania 771: 8–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter y Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgebrauch.” Romanistisches Jahrbuch 361: 15–43.Google Scholar
. 2007. Lengua hablada en la Romania: español, francés, italiano. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol 1. Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
López Serena, Araceli y Margarita Borreguero. 2010. “Los marcadores del discurso y la variación lengua hablada vs. lengua escrita.” En Los marcadores del discurso en español, hoy, ed. por Óscar Loureda y Esperanza Acín, 415–496. Madrid: Arco-Libros.Google Scholar
Narbona Jiménez, Antonio. 2015. Sintaxis del español coloquial. Sevilla: Editorial Universidad de Sevilla. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2014. “El siglo XX como diacronía: intuición y comprobación en el caso de o sea .” RILCE 30 (3): 985–1016.Google Scholar
Sell, Roger D. 2000. Literature as Communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 1995. “Interjections in Early Modern English: From Imitation of Spoken to Conventions of Written Language.” En Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, ed. por Andreas H. Jucker, 439–465. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma y Andreas H. Jucker. 2010. “Trends and Developments in Historical Pragmatics.” En Historical Pragmatics, ed. por Andreas H. Jucker y Irma Taavitsainen, 3–30. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. (ed.). 1982. Spoken and Written language: exploring orality and literacy. Norwood: New York: Ablex.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. y Anthony Mulac. 1991. “The Discourse Conditions for the Use of the Complementizer that in Conversational English.” Journal of Pragmatics 151: 237–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. y Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Enghels, Renata & Linde Roels

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.