Cover not available
Article published In:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 14:3 (2017) ► pp.413–439

Lexical frequency and morphosyntactic variation

Evidence from U.S. Spanish

 | University of California, Davis
 | Washington University
 | Colorado State University
The role of frequency in language variation has received a great deal of attention in recent years, especially in phonology. Recently, Erker and Guy (2012) extended the analysis of frequency to morphosyntactic variation and examined frequency effects in variation between null and overt subject personal pronouns (SPPs) in New York City Spanish. Their results suggest that frequency activates or amplifies the effects of other influences on speakers’ choices between overt and null pronouns, such as person and number. Here we attempt to replicate their study. Analysis of more than 8,600 examples of possible sites of SPP variation collected from Mexican immigrant and Mexican American Spanish shows that frequency has only a small effect on a speaker’s choice between an overt and a null pronoun. The results presented here suggest that factors such as a change in reference from the subject of the preceding tensed verb or the person and number of the verb operate independently of frequency effects and provide a better explanation of observed patterns of variation than frequency.
Keywords: frequency, subject pronouns, variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research
    • 2.1The study of subject personal pronouns
    • 2.2Frequency in language variation and change
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Speakers
    • 3.2Transcription and coding
      • 3.2.1Co-reference
      • 3.2.2Person and number
      • 3.2.3Ambiguity with respect to person
      • 3.2.4Tense, mood, and aspect
      • 3.2.5Verb semantics
      • 3.2.6Lexical aspect
      • 3.2.7Social factors
    • 3.3Atypical pronominal subjects
    • 3.4Exclusions
    • 3.5Frequency
    • 3.6Analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Co-reference
    • 4.2Person and number
    • 4.3Semantic class
    • 4.4Tense/mood/aspect and ambiguity
    • 4.5Lexical aspect
    • 4.6Combined analysis
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.14.3.04bay
References (61)
References
Amaral, Patricia Matos, and Scott Schwenter. 2005. “Contrast and the (Non-) Occurrence of Subject Pronouns.” In Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by David Eddington, 116–127. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceeding Project.Google Scholar
Avila-Shah, Barbara. 2000. “Discourse Connectedness in Caribbean Spanish.” In Research on Spanish in the United States, ed. by Ana Roca, 238–251. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Roger. 1991. “Developmental Sequences: The Emergence of Aspect Marking in Second Language Acquisition.” In Crosscurrents in Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theories, ed. by Thom Huebner and Charles A. Ferguson, 305–324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayley, Robert, and Brandon Loudermilk. 2008. “Frequency, Phonological Variation, and Lexical Exceptions: Evidence from Mexican American English.” Paper presented at the American Dialect Society Annual Meeting, Chicago, January 3–5.
Bayley, Robert, Cory Holland, and Kristen Greer. 2014. “Lexical Frequency and Syntactic Variation: Evidence from U.S. and Peninsular Spanish.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Methods in Dialectology XV, Groningen, The Netherlands, August 11–15.
Bayley, Robert, and Lucinda Pease-Alvarez. 1996. “Null and Expressed Pronoun Variation in Mexican-descent Children’s Spanish.” In Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis, ed. by Jennifer Arnold, Renée Blake, Brad Davidson, Scott Schwenter, and Julie Solomon, 85–99. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Null Pronoun Variation in Mexican-descent Children’s Narrative Discourse.” Language Variation and Change 91: 349–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002a. “Phonological Evidence for the Exemplar Storage of Multiword Sequences.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 211: 215–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. “Word Frequency and Context of Use in the Lexical Diffusion of Phonetically Conditioned Sound Change.” Language Variation and Change 141: 261–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Richard. 1992. “Pronominal and Null Subject Variation in Spanish: Constraints, Dialects, and Functional Compensation.” Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
. 1993. “Ambiguous Agreement, Functional Compensation, and Nonspecific túin the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico and Madrid, Spain.” Language Variation and Change 51: 304–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. “The Scope and Limits of Switch Reference as a Constraint on Pronominal Subject Expression.” Hispanic Linguistics 6/71: 1–28.Google Scholar
. 1996. “A Community-based Test of a Linguistic Hypothesis.” Language in Society 251: 61–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Richard, and Nydia Flores-Ferrán. 2004. “Perservation of Subject Expression across Regional Dialects of Spanish.” Spanish in Context 11: 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinkin, Aaron. 2008. “The Real Effect of Word Frequency on Phonetic Variation.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14 (1): 97–105.Google Scholar
Erker, Danny, and Gregory R. Guy. 2012. “The Role of Lexical Frequency in Syntactic Variability: Variable Subject Personal Pronoun Expression in Spanish.” Language 881: 526–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia. 2004. “Spanish Subject Personal Pronoun Use in New York City Puerto Ricans: Can We Rest the Case of English Contact?” Language Variation and Change 161: 49–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “A Bend in the Road: Subject Personal Pronoun Expression in Spanish after 30 Years of Sociolinguistic Research.” Language and Linguistics Compass 11: 624–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, Kimberly L., and Aarnes Gudmestad. 2010. “An Exploration of the Range and Frequency of Occurrence of Forms in Potentially Variable Structures in Second Language Spanish.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 321: 433–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gudmestad, Aarnes, and Kimberly L. Geeslin. 2010. “Exploring the Roles of Redundancy and Ambiguity in Variable Subject Expression: A Comparison of Native and Non-native Speakers.” In Selected Proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by Claudia Borgonovo, Manuel España-Echevarría, and Phillipe Prévost, 270–283. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Hochberg, Judith. 1986. “Functional Compensation for /s/ Deletion in Puerto Rican Spanish.” Language 621: 609–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E. 2009. “Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-effects Variable Rule Analysis.” Language and Linguistics Compass 31: 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel, Alan Bell, Michelle Gregory, and William D. Raymond. 2001. “Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production.” In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, ed. by Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper, 229–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kučera, Henry, and W. Nelson Francis. 1967. Computational Corpus of Present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2010. “Words Floating on the Surface of Sound Change.” Chapter 13 of Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. 3: Cognitive and Social Factors, 259–286. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Sharon Ash, and Charles Boberg. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Paul Cohen, Clarence Robins, and John Lewis. 1968. A Study of the Non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican Speakers in New York City (Cooperative Research Report 3288). Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoshi. 2014. “Frequency Effects in Subject Pronoun Use in Mandarin Chinese.” Paper presented at the Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation 44, Toronto, October 22–25.
Li, Xiaoshi, Xioqing Chen, and Wen-Hsin Chen. 2012. “Variation of Subject Pronominal Expression in Mandarin Chinese.” Sociolinguistic Studies 61: 91–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linford, Bret, and Shin, Naomi Lapidus. 2013. “Frequency Effects on L2 Spanish Subject Pronoun Expression.” In Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by Jessi Aaron, Jennifer Cabrelli Amaro, Gillian Lord, and Ana de Prada Pérez, 175–189. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, and Robert Bayley. 2010. “Variation in ASL.” In Sign Languages, ed. by Diane Brentari, 451–475. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcos-Marín, Francisco (ed.). 1992. Corpus de referencia de la lengua española contemporánea: Corpus oral peninsular ([URL]).
Martínez-Sanz, Cristina. 2011. “Null and Overt Subjects in a Variable System: The Case of Dominican Spanish.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Martínez-Sanz, Cristina, and Gerard Van Herk. 2013. “Saying Nothing: Frequency Effects in Dominican Spanish Null Subjects.” Paper presented at the Conference on Change and Variation in Canada, Toronto, May 4–5.
McKee, Rachel, Adam Schembri, David McKee, and Trevor Johnston. 2011. “Variable Subject Expression in Australian Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language.” Language Variation and Change 231: 375–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Naomi. 2015. “A Sociolinguistic View of Null Subjects and VOT in Toronto Heritage Languages.” Lingua 1641: 309–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orozco, Rafael, and Gregory R. Guy. 2008. “El uso variable de los pronombres sujetos: ¿qué pasa en la costa Caribe colombiana?” In Selected Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, ed. by Maurice Westmoreland and Juan Antonio Thomas, 70–80. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo, and Ana Celia Zentella. 2012. Spanish in New York: Language Contact, Dialect Leveling, and Structural Continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo, Ana Celia Zentella, and David Livert. 2007. “Language and Dialect Contact in Spanish in New York: Toward the Formation of a Speech Community.” Language 770–802.Google Scholar
Paredes Silva, Vera Lucia. 1993. “Subject omission and functional compensation: Evidence from Brazilian Portuguese.” Language Variation and Change 51: 35–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ranson, Diana. 1991. “Person Marking in the Wake of /s/ Deletion in Andalusian Spanish.” Language Variation and Change 31: 133–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, David, Sali A. Tagliamonte, and Eric Smith. 2012. “Goldvarb Lion: A Multivariate Analysis Application” [Computer program]. Toronto and Ottawa: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, and Department of Mathematics, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto. 1991. “Phonetic Simplification Processes in the English of the Barrio: A Cross-generational Sociolinguistic Study of the Chicanos of Los Angeles.” Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Schecter, Sandra R., and Robert Bayley. 2002. Language as Cultural Practice: Mexicanos en el norte. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shin, Naomi Lapidus. 2012. “Variable Use of Spanish Subject Pronouns by Monolingual Children in Mexico.” In Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by Kimberly L. Geeslin and Manual Díaz-Campos, 130–141. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Grammatical Complexification in Spanish in New York: 3sg Pronoun Expression and Verbal Ambiguity.” Language Variation and Change 261: 303–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, Naomi Lapidus, and Helen Smith Cairns. 2012. “The Development of NP Selection in School-age Children: Reference and Spanish Subject Pronouns.” Language Acquisition 191: 3–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, Naomi Lapidus, and Ricardo Otheguy. 2009. “Shifting Sensitivity to Continuity of References: Subject Pronoun use in New York City.” In Español en Estados Unidos: sociolingüística, ideología, pedagogía, ed. by Manel Lacort and Jennifer Leeman, 111–126. Madrid: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Shirai, Yasuhiro, and Roger Andersen. 1995. “The Acquisition of Tense-aspect Morphology: A Prototype Account.” Language 711: 742–763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1994. Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarenden Press.Google Scholar
Silva-Corválan, Carmen. 1996–97. “Avances en el estudio de la variación sintáctica”. Cuadernos del Sur 271: 35–49.Google Scholar
Solomon, Julie. 1999. “Phonological and Syntactic Variation in the Spanish of Valladolid, Yucatán.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith. 2014. “Sound Change without Frequency Effects: Ramifications for Phonological Theory.” In Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Naomi Danton, Daniela Kostadinovska, and Robert Santana-LaBarge, 457–465. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Travis, Catherine. 2007. “Genre Effects on Subject Expression in Spanish: Priming in Narrative and Conversation.” Language Variation and Change 191: 101–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. “Verbs and Times.” In Linguistics in Philosophy, ed. by Zeno Vendler, 97–120. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, James A. 2012. “Form, Function, and Frequency in Phonological Variation.” Language Variation and Change 241: 397–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1969. A Sociolinguistic Study of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wulf, Alyssa, Paul Dudis, Robert Bayley, and Ceil Lucas. 2002. “Variable Subject Presence in ASL Narratives.” Sign Language Studies 31: 54–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

GRADOVILLE, MICHAEL
2023. The Future of Exemplar Theory. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 527 ff. DOI logo
RIVAS, JAVIER
2023. The Future of Usage‐Based Approaches. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 473 ff. DOI logo
Lease, Sarah, Naomi L. Shin & Emily Bird-Brown
2022. Community Norms and Lexical Frequency Shape U.S. Bilingual Children’s Subject Pronoun Expression. Heritage Language Journal 19:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xiaoshi, Robert Bayley, Xinye Zhang & Yaqiong Cui
2022. Chapter 2. An investigation of the use of the multifunctional particle ‑le by second language learners of Mandarin Chinese. In Variation in Second and Heritage Languages [Studies in Language Variation, 28], ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Solon, Megan & Matthew Kanwit
2022. New Methods for Tracking Development of Sociophonetic Competence: Exploring a Preference Task for Spanish /d/ Deletion. Applied Linguistics 43:4 ► pp. 805 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Esther L., William D. Raymond, Earl Kjar Brown & Richard J. File-Muriel
2021. Lexically specific accumulation in memory of word and segment speech rates. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17:3 ► pp. 625 ff. DOI logo
Kanwit, Matthew & Virginia Terán
2020. Ideas Buenas o Buenas Ideas: Phonological, Semantic, and Frequency Effects on Variable Adjective Ordering in Rioplatense Spanish. Languages 5:4 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xiaoshi & Robert Bayley
2018. Lexical frequency and syntactic variation. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 4:2 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Bayley, Robert
2017. Presidential Address: Dialectology in a Multilingual America. American Speech 92:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.