Part of
Ditransitives in Germanic Languages: Synchronic and diachronic aspects
Edited by Eva Zehentner, Melanie Röthlisberger and Timothy Colleman
[Studies in Germanic Linguistics 7] 2023
► pp. 365375
Åfarli, Tor A.
1992The Syntax of Norwegian Passive Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderssen, Merete, Paula Fikkert, Roksolana Mykhaylyk, and Yulia Rodina
2012 “The Dative Alternation in Norwegian Child Language.” Nordlyd 39 (1): 24–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Askedal, John Ole
2005 “The Standard Languages and Their Systems in the 20th Century III: Norwegian.” In The Nordic Languages: An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages: Volume 2, ed. by Oskar Bandle, Kurt Braunmüller, Ernst Håkon Jahr, Allan Karker, Hans-Peter Naumann, and Ulf Teleman, 1584–1603. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barđdal, Johanna, Kristian E. Kristoffersen, and Andreas Sveen
2011 “West Scandinavian Ditransitives as a Family of Constructions: With a Special Attention to the Norwegian V-REFL-NP Construction.” Linguistics 49 (1): 53–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Jennifer Hay
2008 “Gradient Grammar: An Effect of Animacy on the Syntax of Give in New Zealand and American English.” Lingua 118: 245–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Marilyn Ford
2010 “Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English.” Language 86 (1): 168–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brøseth, Heidi
1998 “Dobbelt objekt og tilgrensende konstruksjoner i moderne norsk.” In MONS 7: Utvalde artiklar frå det 7. møtet om norsk språk i Trondheim 1007, ed. by Jan Terje Faarlund, Brit Mæhlum, and Torbjørn Nordgård, 13–34. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
2005A Semantic Approach to English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ebeling, Jarle
1998 “Using Translations to Explore Construction Meaning in English and Norwegian.” In Corpora and Cross-Linguistic Research: Theory, Method and Case Studies, ed. by Stig Johansson, and Signe Oksefjell, 169–195. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Ebeling, Signe Oksefjell
2003The Norwegian Verbs Bli andand Their Correspondences in English: A Corpus-Based Contrastive Study. Acta Humaniora. Oslo: Unipub forlag.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Svein Lie, and Kjell Ivar Vannebo
1997Norsk Referansegrammatikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Garretson, Gregory
2004 “Coding Practices Used in the Project Optimal Typology of Determiner Phrases.” Unpublished manuscript, Boston University, Boston, MA. [URL]. (accessed 02 Sept 2020).Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th
2003 “Towards a Corpus-Based Identification of Prototypical Instances of Constructions.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 1: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2013 “Ditransitive Constructions: The Verb ‘Give’.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (accessed 10 Oct 2018).Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D., and Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1924The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Levin, Magnus, and Jenny Ström Herold
2015 “give and take: A Contrastive Study of Light Verb Constructions in English, German and Swedish.” In Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Verb Constructions, ed. by Signe Oksefjell Ebeling, and Hilde Hasselgård, 144–168. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Lohndal, Terje
2011 “Freezing Effects and Objects.” Journal of Linguistics 47 (1): 163–199, 249–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehl, Seth
2019 “Light Verb Semantics in the International Corpus of English: Onomasiological Variation, Identity Evidence and Degrees of Lightness.” English Language and Linguistics 23 (1): 55–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molina-Plaza, Silvia, and Eduardo de Gregorio-Godeo
2010 “Stretched Verb Collocations with ‘Give’: Their Use and Translation into Spanish Using the BNC and CREA Corpora.” ReCALL 22 (2): 191–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato
2005English Ditransitive Verbs: Aspects of Theory, Description and a Usage-Based Model. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, John
1996Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ronan, Patricia, and Gerold Schneider
2015 “Determining Light Verb Constructions in Contemporary British and Irish English.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20 (3): 326–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Röthlisberger, Melanie, Jason Grafmiller, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2017 “Cognitive Indigenization Effects in the English Dative Alternation.” Cognitive Linguistics 28 (4): 673–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1891A New English Grammar, Logical and Historical. Part I: Introduction, Phonology, and Accidence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Jason Grafmiller, Joan Bresnan, Anette Rosenbach, Sali Tagliamonte, and Simon Todd
2017 “Spoken Syntax in a Comparative Perspective: The Dative and Genitive Alternation in Varieties of English.” Glossa 2 (1): 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tungseth, Mai Ellin
Vinay, Jean-Paul, and Jean Darbelnet
1995Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation, transl. and ed. by Juan C. Sager, and Marie-Josée Hamel. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1988The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar