Part of
The Interplay of Variation and Change in Contact Settings
Edited by Isabelle Léglise and Claudine Chamoreau
[Studies in Language Variation 12] 2013
► pp. 2352
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

CALUDE, ANDREEA
2019. The use ofheapsas quantifier and intensifier in New Zealand English. English Language and Linguistics 23:3  pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Calude, Andreea S.
2017. Sociolinguistic variation at the grammatical/discourse level. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:3  pp. 429 ff. DOI logo
Cerruti, Massimo
2020. Chapter 6. From dialect to standard: Facilitating and constraining factors. In Intermediate Language Varieties [Studies in Language Variation, 24],  pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Davey, Kira & Danielle Barth
2023. Directional constructions in Matukar Panau. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 9:2  pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Kanwit, Matthew, Virginia Terán & Silvia Pisabarro Sarrió
2017. Un fenómeno bien curioso: New methods for analyzing variable intensification across four dialects of Spain and Argentina. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 10:2  pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Mansfield, John
2015. Morphotactic variation, prosodic domains and the changing structure of the Murrinhpatha verb. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 1:2  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Ravindranath, Maya
2015. Sociolinguistic Variation and Language Contact. Language and Linguistics Compass 9:6  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.