Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Sociophonetics
Edited by Chiara Celata and Silvia Calamai
[Studies in Language Variation 15] 2014
► pp. 17–28

The sociophonetic orientation of the language learner

This paper is an effort to define the phonetic target of the language learner: what are the data that the child focuses on in becoming a native speaker? A number of studies are reviewed to show that children reject the idiosyncratic features of their parents’ phonetic system if they do not match the pattern of the larger speech community:  in the acquisition of the Philadelphia and New York City dialects;  the formation of a new dialect in Milton Keynes; the spread of the low back merger in eastern New England; the reduction of the future marker in Tok Pisin. The end result is a high degree of uniformity in both the categorical and variable aspects of language, where individual variation is reduced below the level of linguistic significance.
Published online: 12 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.15.01lab
References (16)
References
Bickerton, Derek. 1981. Roots of language . Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1895. Les Règles de la Méthode Sociologique . Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. “Stability and change across a dialect boundary: the low vowels of southeastern New England”. Publications of the American Dialect Society 95.
Kerswill, Paul & Anne Williams. 2000. “Children, adolescents and language change”. Language Variation and Change 8. 177–202. DOI logo
Holmes, Janet. 1969. “Sociolinguistics and the individual”. Te Reo 12. 41–47.
Labov, William. 1980. “The social origins of sound change”. Locating Language in Time and Space ed. by William Labov, 251–266. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 2: Social factors . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City . Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics. (2nd edition: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 2006.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Page, Robert B. & Andree Tabouret-Keller. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Arvilla. 1976. The acquisition of the phonological system of a second dialect . PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
. 1980. “Factors controlling the acquisition of the Philadelphia dialect by out-of-state children”. Locating Language in Time and Space ed. by William Labov, 143–178. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Hélène Blondeau. 2007. “Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French”. Language 83. 560–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Suzanne Laberge. 1973. “On the Acquisition of Native Speakers by a Language”. Kivung 6. 32–47.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1994. Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology . Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog. 1968. “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change”. Directions for Historical Linguistics ed. by Winfred Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel, 97–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Ann and Paul Kerswill. 1999. “Dialect levelling: continuity vs. change in Milton Keynes, Reading and Hull”. Urban Voices ed. by Paul Foulkes & Gerard Docherty, 141–162. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Celata, Chiara & Naomi Nagy
2024. Sociophonetic Variation and Change in Heritage Languages: Lexical Effects in Heritage Italian Aspiration of Voiceless Stops. Language and Speech 67:2 ► pp. 438 ff. DOI logo
WALKER, ABBY & ALEXANDER MCALLISTER
2023. (Un)Varied Experiences. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 491 ff. DOI logo
Adli, Aria & Gregory R. Guy
2022. Globalising the study of language variation and change: A manifesto on cross‐cultural sociolinguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass 16:5-6 DOI logo
Ortiz López, Luis A., Rosa E. Guzzardo Tamargo & Melvin González-Rivera
2020. Hispanic contact linguistics. In Hispanic Contact Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 22], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Blaxter, Tam, Kate Beeching, Richard Coates, James Murphy & Emily Robinson
2019. Each p[ɚ]son does it th[εː] way: Rhoticity variation and the community grammar. Language Variation and Change 31:1 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Dressler, Wolfgang U., F. Nihan Ketrez & Marianne Kilani-Schoch
2017. Chapter 13. Discussion and outlook. In Nominal Compound Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 61], ► pp. 287 ff. DOI logo
Suokhrie, Kelhouvinuo
2016. Clans and clanlectal contact. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 2:2 ► pp. 188 ff. DOI logo
Tamminga, Meredith, Laurel MacKenzie & David Embick
2016. The dynamics of variation in individuals. Linguistic Variation 16:2 ► pp. 300 ff. DOI logo
Troike, Rudolph C.
2015. CREOLE /L → /R IN AFRICAN AMERICAN English/Gullah: HISTORICAL FACT AND FICTION. American Speech 90:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2016. Editorial. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 2:2 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.