Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Sociophonetics
Edited by Chiara Celata and Silvia Calamai
[Studies in Language Variation 15] 2014
► pp. 31–56

French liaison and the lexical repository

 | Université de Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, Institut Universitaire de France
 | CLLE-ERSS, CNRS & Université de Toulouse – Le Mirail
 | Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa
In this paper we propose a frequency analysis of French liaison that focuses on the liaison environments attested in the PFC database. The results of the analysis show the existence of a significant relationship (statistically interpreted as a power-law distribution) according to which a very restricted set of liaison environments has very high frequency of occurrence in the corpus and is substantially untouched by phonological and sociolinguistic variation, while a large “periphery” of infrequent uses appears to show significant aspects of style- and speaker-dependent variation. The study therefore demonstrates the importance of basing any variationist analysis on very large data sample, such as those provided by contemporary, well-reasoned linguistic corpora.
Published online: 12 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.15.02lak
References (54)
References
Ashby, William J. 1981. “French liaison as a sociolinguistic phenomenon”. Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages ed. by William W. Cressey & Donna J. Napoli, 46–57. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer, eds. 2000. Usage based models of language . Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Silke Hamann, eds. 2009 Phonology in perception . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert & Daan de Jong 1987. “The domain of liaison: theories and data”. Linguistics 25. 1005–1025. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brillouin, Léon 1959. La science et la théorie de l’information . Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1998. “A functionalist approach to grammar and its evolution”. Evolution of Communication 2. 249–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. “Frequency effects on French liaison”. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure ed. by Joan L. Bybee & Paul Hopper, 337–359. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2005. “La liaison: effets de fréquence et constructions”. Langages 158. 24–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. Frequency of use and the organization of language . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & James L. McClellan. 2005. “Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition”. The Linguistic Rreview 22/2-4. 381–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, Aurélie Nardy & Stéphanie Barbu. 2011. “Development dynamics of SES-related differences in children’s production of obligatory and variable phonological alternations”. Language Sciences 33. 180–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax . Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clédat, Léon. 1917. Manuel de phonétique et de morphologie historique du français . Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Clauset A., Shalizi C.R., And Newman M.E.J. 2009. “Power-law distributions in empirical data”, SIAM Review 51/4. 661–703.Google Scholar
Coquillon Annelise, Jacques Durand, Chantal Lyche & Julien Eychenne. 2010. “French Liaison: From global results to local varieties”. Colloque International PhonLex , Toulouse, Université de Toulouse II Le Mirail, 8th–10th September 2010.Google Scholar
de Jong, Daan 1994. “La sociophonologie de la liaison orléanaise”. French Generative Phonology : Retrospective and Perspectives ed. by Chantal Lyche, 95–131. Salford: ESRI.Google Scholar
Dell, François. 1973. Les règles et les sons : introduction à la phonologie générative . Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche. 2002. “La phonologie du français contemporain: usages, variétés et structures”. Romanistische Korpuslinguistik: Korpora und Gesprochene Sprache / Romance Corpus Linguistics: Corpora and Spoken Language ed. by Claus D. Pusch & Wolfgang Raible. 93–106.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Un corpus numérisé pour la phonologie du français”. La linguistique de corpus ed. by Geoffrey Williams, 205–217. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks, Basilio Calderone & Atanas Tchobanov. 2011. “Que savons-nous de la liaison aujourd’hui?”. Langue Française 169. 103–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche. 2009. “Le Projet PFC : une source de données primaires structurées”. Phonologie, variation et accents du français ed. by Jacques Durand, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche, 19–61. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar
Durand J. & Lyche, C. 2008. “French liaison in the light of corpus data”. Journal of French Language Studies 18/1. 33–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Encrevé, Pierre. 1988. La liaison avec et sans enchaînement: phonologie tridimentionnelle et usages du français . Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul. 2006. “Phonological variation: a global perspective”. Handbook of English Linguistics ed. by Bas Aarts & April M.S. McMahon, 625–669. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul & Gerard J. Docherty. 2006. “The social life of phonetics and phonology”. Journal of Phonetics 34/4. 409–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile, Jean-Philippe Goldman & Ulrich H. Frauenfelder. 2001. “Liaison and schwa deletion in French: an effect of lexical frequency and competition?” EUROSPEECH 2001 - 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Aalborg, September 3-7, 2001) ed. by Paul Dalsgaard, Boslashge Lindberg, Henrik Benner, Zheng-Hua Tan, 639–642.Google Scholar
Goldinger, Stephen D. 1998. “Echoes of echoes? an episodic theory of lexical access”. Psychological Review 105. 251–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grammont, Maurice. 1914. Traité pratique de prononciation française . Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar
Hornsby, David. 2012. “Getting It Wrong: Liaison, Pataquès, and Repair in Contemporary French”. On Linguistic Change in French: Socio-Historical Approaches. Festschrift for R. Anthony Lodge ed. by Tim Pooley & Dominique Lagorgette, 69–84. Chambéry: Editions de l’Université de Savoie.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith. 2006. “Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology”. Journal of Phonetics 34. 485–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 2004. “Quantitative analysis of linguistic variation”. Sociolinguistics. An international handbook of the science of language and society , Vol.1, ed. by Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier & Peter Trudgill, 6–22. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Sharon Ash & Charles Boberg. 2006. The Atlas of North American English . Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Laks, Bernard. 2005. “La liaison et l’illusion”. Langages 158. 101–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Phonologie et construction syntaxique”. Linx 53. 155–171.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Les hommes politiques français et la liaison (1908-1999)”. Modéliser le changement : les voies du français ed. by Luc Baronian & France Martineau. Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Pour une phonologie de corpus”. Journal of French Language Studies 18/1. 3–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “La phonologie du français et les corpus”. Langue Française 169. 3–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar I: Theoretical Prerequisite . Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2000. “A dynamic usage-based model”. Usage based models of language ed. by Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer, 1–65. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Le Prieult, Henri. 2006. Grammaticalité: traditions et modernités . Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.Google Scholar
Malécot, André. 1975. “French liaison as a function of grammatical, phonetic and paralinguistic variables”. Phonetica 31. 161–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mallet, Géraldine. 2008. La liaison en français, descriptions et analyses dans le corpus PFC . Thèse de doctorat, Université de Paris Ouest.Google Scholar
Pagliano, Claudine & Bernard Laks. 2005. “Problématique de la liaison dans l’analyse d’un corpus de français oral actuel”. Colloque Français fondamental, corpus oraux, contenus d’enseignement. 50 ans de travaux et d’enjeux , Ecole Normale Supérieure Lettres et Sciences Humaines, Lyon, 8–10 décembre 2005.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. 1970. Syllable, word, nexus, cursus . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ranson, Diana. 2008. “La liaison variable dans un corpus du français méridional: L’importance relative de la fonction grammaticale”. Congrès mondial de linguistique française ed. by Jacques Durand, Benoît Habert & Bernard Laks, 1657–1671. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schane, Scott A. 1965. The phonological and morphological structure of French , PhD Thesis, Boston, Massachussets Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage based theory of language acquisition . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. Origins of human cognition . Cambridge: MIT press.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard. 1995a. “Current issues in French phonology: Liaison and position theories”. The handbook of phonological theory ed. by John A. Goldsmith, 798–816. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1995b. “French final consonants and nonlinear phonology”. Lingua 95. 131–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change”. Directions for historical linguistics ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Gejza & Gabriel Altmann. 1999. Thesaurus of univariate discrete probability distributions . Essen: Stamm Verlag.Google Scholar
Zipf, George K. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort . Boston: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

De Faviis, Giulia, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba, S. Prévost & A. Steuckardt
2020. Liaison et conscience phonologique en Côte d’Ivoire : analyse des réponses épi- et métaphonologiques face à un test d’acceptabilité administré aux adultes abidjanais. SHS Web of Conferences 78 ► pp. 10007 ff. DOI logo
Sylvain Detey, Jacques Durand, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche
2016. Varieties of Spoken French, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.