Cover not available
Part of
Stability and Divergence in Language Contact: Factors and Mechanisms
Edited by Kurt Braunmüller, Steffen Höder and Karoline Kühl
[Studies in Language Variation 16] 2014
► pp. 179–207

Gender and noun inflection

The fate of ‘vulnerable’ categories in Northern Norwegian

| Universitetet i Tromsø
| Universitetet i Tromsø
| Universitetet i Tromsø
Research has predicted an uncertain future for gender and noun inflection in Northern Norwegian varieties. Gender is expected to disappear and the noun inflection system to undergo simplification. The driving force is said to be contact between Norwegian, a gender language, and Sámi and Kven, non-gender languages. On the basis of data from the Nordic Dialect Corpus, we argue that these predictions are not borne out. Gender is a stable category and noun inflection has divergent patterns. These findings are interpreted in light of the sociohistorical background of language contact and shift characterising the region.
Published online: 26 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.16.09sol
References (40)
Bull, T. [1990] 1996. Målet i Troms og Finnmark. In Nordnorske dialektar, E.H. Jahr & O. Skare (eds), 157–174. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
. [1993] 1996. Språkskifte hos kvinner og menn i ei nordnorsk fjordsamebygd. In Nordnorske dialektar, E.H. Jahr & O. Skare (eds), 185–200. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
. 1995. Language maintenance and loss in an originally trilingual area in North Norway. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 115: 125–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Samisk-nordisk språkkontaktforsking – eit statusoversyn. In The Sámi and the Scandinavians, J. Kusmenko (ed.), 183–198. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar
. 2006. Språkkontakt, etnolekt og asymmetriske maktforhold. Norsk på samisk grunn. Nordand. Nordisk tidsskrift for andrespråksforskning 1(1): 37–50.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Enten man ville eller ikke, så lærte man samisk”. Genus og substantivbøying i ein nordleg norsk språkkontaktvarietet. In Grammatikk, bruk og norm. Festskrift til Svein Lie på 70-årsdagen, 15 April 2012, H.O. Enger, J.T. Faarlund & K.I. Vannebo (eds), 33–55. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Bull, T., Junttila, J.H. & Pedersen, A.K. 1986. Nominalfrasen i skibotnmålet i Troms. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 1(2): 60–71.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. 1994. Inflection classes, gender and the principle of contrast. Language 70: 737–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conzett, Ph., Johansen, �. M. & Sollid, H. 2011. Genus og substantivbøying i nord norske språkkontaktområder. Nordand. Nordisk tidsskrift for andrespråksforskning 6(1): 35–71.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. 2004. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity. Amsterdam: John ­Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dannemark, N. 2010. Variasjon og mønster: drag i det norske talemålet til ein del barn i Guovdageaidnu. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Duke, J. 2009. The Development of Gender as a Grammatical Category: Five Case Studies from the Germanic Languages. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Elstad, K. 1982. Nordnorske dialektar. In Nordnorsk. Språkarv og språkforhold i Nord-Noreg, T. Bull & K. Jetne (eds), 9–100. Oslo: Det Norske Samlaget.Google Scholar
Eriksen, K. & Niemi, E. 1981. Den finske fare. Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Friis, J.A. 1861. Ethnografisk Kart over Finnmarken. Available at [URL] (Read20.05.2013).
Hansen, L.I. & Olsen, B. 2004. Samenes historie frem til 1750. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk.Google Scholar
Hockett, C.F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Jahr, E.H. 1984. Language Contact in Northern Norway. Adstratum and Substratum in the Norwegian, Sami and Finnish of Northern Norway. Acta Borealia 1: 103–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jahr, E.H. & Skare, O. (eds). 1996. Nordnorske dialektar. Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
Jaklin, A. 2006. Historien om Nord-Norge. Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Johannessen, J.B., Priestley, J., Hagen, K., Åfarli, T.A. & Vangsnes, Ø. A. 2009. The Nordic dialect corpus – an advanced research tool. In Proceedings of the 17th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics NODALIDA 2009 . NEALT Proceedings Series Volume 4, K. Jokinen & E. Bick (eds). Available at: [URL].
Junttila, J.H. 1986. Språkkontakt i ei bygd i Nord-Troms. Nordlyd 12: 179–204.Google Scholar
. 1988. Språkval og språkbruk i Skibotn. Kven forstår kven?MA thesis, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Kusmenko, J. 2000. Entwicklung des Genussystems in den skandinavischen Sprachen. In Arbeiten zur Skandinavistik. 13. Arbeitstagung der deutschsprachigen Skandinavistik, F. Paul (ed.), 469–479. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
Le Page, R.B. & Tabouret-Keller, A. 1985. Acts of Identity. Creole-based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lødrup, H. 2011. Hvor mange genus er det i Oslo-dialekten? Maal og Minne 2: 120–136.Google Scholar
Martinussen, B. [1991] 1996. Mot én dialekt i Finnmark. In Nordnorske dialektar, E.H. Jahr & O. Skare (eds), 238–248. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Nesse, A. 2002. Språkkontakt mellom norsk og tysk i hansatidens Bergen. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
. 2005. Boken – han og Kua – den. Om endringer i norske genussystem. Maal og Minne 2: 136–146.Google Scholar
Paulsen, K.A. 1971. Litt om det norske språket i Sør-Varanger tidligere og i dag. Kort oversikt over lydverk og formverk i Sør-Varanger-dialekten. MA thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, T. & Nolan J.S. 2011. Reclaiming Sámi languages: Indigenous language emancipation from East to West. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 209: 35–55.Google Scholar
Rodina, Y. & Westergaard, M. 2013. The acquisition of gender and declension class in a non-transparent system: monolinguals and bilinguals. Studia Linguistica 67(1): 47–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. 1988. Pidgin and creole languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sollid, H. 2005. Språkdannelse og -stabilisering i møtet mellom kvensk og norsk. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
. 2013. Ethnolects in Northern Norway: From national negligence to local linguistic pride. In Multilingualism and Language Diversity in Urban Areas, P. Siemund, I. Gogolin, M. Schulz & J. Davydova (eds), 63–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, S.G. 2001. Language Contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, S.G. & Kaufman, T. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trosterud, T. 2008. Language assimilation during the Modernisation Process: Experiences from Norway and North-West Russia. Acta Borealia 25(9): 93–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1999. Language contact and the function of linguistic gender. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 35: 133–152.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Opsahl, Toril
2021. Dead, but Won’t Lie Down? Grammatical Gender among Norwegians. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.