Cover not available
Part of
Walking on the Grammaticalization Path of the Definite Article: Functional Main and Side Roads
Edited by Renata Szczepaniak and Johanna Flick
[Studies in Language Variation 23] 2020
► pp. 227–250

Die Capital – der Astra – das Adler

The emergence of a classifier system for proper names in German

German proper names can be divided into two large classes, i.e. one with and one without an obligatory definite article. It will be shown that this article is part of a classifier system, which provides semantic information about the referent. Furthermore, the inherited three-gender system in combination with the presence or absence of the article is used to create a new system of six proper name classes. This paper deals with a diachronic change where so-called junk is transferred into a new classifier system arguing for a case of exaptation with respect to the article and for a case of degrammaticalization with respect to gender. This development towards a classifier system has occurred rather recently. Its consolidation can be observed in Present-Day German and creates a high amount of variation.
Keywords: proper names, classifiers, definite article, onymic article, exaptation, degrammaticalization, language change, typological change, German
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.The system of German proper name classes
  • 2.Origin and function of onymic gender and the onymic article
    • 2.1Names without onymic articles
      • Names of towns
      • Names of countries
    • 2.2Personal names on their way to adopt onymic articles
    • 2.3Names with onymic articles (and their history)
    • 2.4Das Adler: Genesis of a beer brand’s name via a gender shift
  • 3.The current classifier system as a result of exaptation
    • 3.1+/− Article & gender as noun classifiers
    • 3.2Exaptation of the article to a classifier: A side road
    • 3.3Strengthening of gender to a classifier: A case of degrammaticalization
  • 4.Summary
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 April 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.23.08nub
References (44)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellmann, Günte. 1990. Pronomen und Korrektur. Berlin/New York. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2002. “Classification and the evolution of grammatical structures: a universal perspective.” Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 55 (3): 289–308.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2008. “Animacy and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and phylogeny.” Lingua 118: 141–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eroms, Hans-Werner. 1989. “Regionalsprachliche Artikelparadigmen und die grammatikalische Behandlung der Artikel im Deutschen.” In: Probleme regionaler Sprachen, ed. by Hans-Werner Eroms, 103–123. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Fahlbusch, Fabian, and Damaris Nübling. 2014. “Der Schauinsland – die Mobiliar – das Turm. Das referentielle Genus bei Eigennamen und seine Genese.” Beiträge zur Namenforschung 49 (3): 245–288.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Genus unter Kontrolle: Referentielles Genus bei Eigennamen – am Beispiel der Autonamen.” In: Formen und Funktionen, ed. by Andreas Bittner, and Constanze Spieß, 103–125. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraurud, Kari. 2000. “Proper names and gender in Swedish.” In: Gender in Grammar and Cognition, ed. by Barbara Unterbeck et al., 167–219. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Elvira. 2008. “Syntaktische Raumbilder.” In: Dialektgeographie der Zukunft, ed. Peter Ernst, and Franz Patocka, 85–111. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette. 2000. “A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers.” In: Systems of nominal classification, ed. by Gunter Senft, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Making sense of nominal classification systems. Noun classifiers and the grammaticalization variable.” In: New reflections on grammaticalization, ed. by Ilse Wischer, and Gabriele Diewald: 259–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 1997. Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase. Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Articles.” In: Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien, vol. 1, ed. by Martin Haspelmath et al., 831–841. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kalverkämper, Hartmut. 1978. Textlinguistik der Eigennamen. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
. 2014. “The Place of Classifiers in the History of Linguistics.” Historiographia Linguistica 41 (1): 33–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohlheim, Rosa, and Volker Kohlheim. 2013. Duden – Lexikon der Vornamen. Herkunft, Bedeutung und Gebrauch von über 8.000 Vornamen. Mannheim/Zürich: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Kolde, Gerhard. 1995. “Grammatik der Eigennamen.” In: Namenforschung. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Onomastik. Voll. 1, ed. by Ernst Eichler et al., 400–408. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael, and David Zubin. 1984. “Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation.” Linguistische Berichte 93: 26–50.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen.” In: Deutsch – typologisch, ed. by Ewald Lang, and Gisela Zifonun, 473–491. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael, and Davis Zubin. 2005. “Nominalphrasen ohne lexikalischen Kopf – Zur Bedeutung des Genus für die Organisation des mentalen Lexikons am Beispiel der Autobezeichnungen im Deutschen.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 24: 93–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael, and David Zubin. 2009. “Genus.” In: Deutsche Morphologie, ed. by Elke Hentschel, and Petra Maria Vogel, 132–154. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. “How to do things with junk: exaptation in language evolution.” J. Linguistics 26: 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. München/ Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Leys, Odo. 1967. “Zur Funktion des Artikels beim Eigennamen.” Onomastica Slavogermanica III: 21–26.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel, and Graeme Trousdale. 2016. “Exaptation from the perspective of construction morphology.” In: Exaptation and Language Change, ed. by Muriel Norde, and Freek van de Velde, 163–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nübling, Damaris. 2015. “Die Bismarck – der Arena – das Adler. Vom Drei-Genus- zum Sechs-Klassen-System bei Eigennamen im Deutschen: Degrammatikalisierung und Exaptation.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 43 (2): 306–344.Google Scholar
Nübling, Damaris, Fabian Fahlbusch, and Rita Heuser. 2015. Namen. Eine Einführung in die Onomastik. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1917. Deutsche Grammatik, Band II, Teil III: Flexionslehre. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. [Reprint 1968]Google Scholar
Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke. 2010a. “Der Numerus – das Genus – die Klammer. Die Entstehung der deutschen Nominalklammer im innergermanischen Sprachvergleich.” In: Kontrastive germanistische Linguistik, ed. by Antje Dammel et al., 719–748. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
. 2010b. “Die deutsche Nominalklammer: Geschichte, Funktion, typologische Bewertung.” In: Historische Textgrammatik und historische Syntax des Deutschen. Traditionen, Innovationen, Perspektiven, ed. by Arne Ziegler, 85–120. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmuck, Mirjam, and Renata Szczepaniak. 2014. Der Gebrauch des Definitartikels vor Familien- und Rufnamen im Frühneuhochdeutschen aus grammatikalisierungstheoretischer Perspektive. In: Linguistik der Familiennamen. Germanistische Linguistik 225–227, ed. by Friedhelm Debus, 97–137. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Senft, Gunter. 2000. “What do we really know about nominal classification systems?” In: Systems of nominal classification, ed. by Gunter Senft, 11–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Horst. 2010. “‘Exaptation’” in der Sprachwandeltheorie. Eine Begriffspräzisierung.” In: Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung, ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 41–57. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Szczepaniak, Renata. 2011. Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Is the development of linking elements in German a case of exaptation?” In: Exaptation and Language Change, ed. by Muriel Norde, and Freek van de Velde, 317–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek, and Muriel Norde. 2016. “Exaptation: Taking stock of a controversial notion in linguistics.” In: Exaptation and Language Change, ed. by Muriel Norde, and Freek van de Velde, 1–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Langendonck, Willy. 2007. Theory and typology of proper names. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Langendonck, Willy, and Mark van de Velde. 2009. “The Functions of (In)definiteness. Markers with Proper Names.” In: Names in Multi-Lingual, Multi-Cultural and Multi-Ethnic Contact. Proceedings of the 23rd ICOS congress, ed. by Wolf Ahrens et al., 1005–1011. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Werth, Alexander. 2014. “Die Funktionen des Artikels bei Personennamen im norddeutschen Sprachraum.” In: Linguistik der Familiennamen. Germanistische Linguistik 225–227, ed. by Friedhelm Debus, 139–174. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar