Cover not available
Part of
Language Variation – European Perspectives VIII: Selected papers from the Tenth International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 10), Leeuwarden, June 2019
Edited by Hans Van de Velde, Nanna Haug Hilton and Remco Knooihuizen
[Studies in Language Variation 25] 2021
► pp. 227–246

Chapter 10
(Il)literacy and language change

Non-standard relative constructions in historical Basque

ORCID logo | University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU
ORCID logo | University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU
In this paper we examine a corpus of sixteenth- to nineteenth-century Basque private letters and administration documents from a historical sociolinguistic point of view. Because of the diglossic situation, such texts are rare but valuable in the historical corpus of Basque. In particular, we analyse relative clauses with the pronoun zein ‘which’. The construction was borrowed from Romance by highly literate bilinguals, but then spread, especially through formulaic language, to less literate writers too. We focus on the development of non-standard variants of this relative clause, which are common in our corpus, but not found in printed literary texts. We argue that the sociolinguistic context was crucial in the emergence, spread and syntactic change of the relative construction.
Keywords: historical sociolinguistics, syntax, relative clauses, literacy, Basque
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Basque and Romance relativisation strategies
  • 3.Writing in Basque before the twentieth century
    • 3.1The historical sociolinguistics of Basque
    • 3.2Literacy and biliteracy
  • 4. Zein RCs in administrative texts and letters
    • 4.1Non-canonical texts in Basque historical corpus
    • 4.2The frequency of zein RCs
    • 4.3Non-standard variants
    • 4.4Zein relatives and formulaic language
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations and glossing conventions
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 16 June 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.25.10kra
References (62)
References
Amorrortu, Estibaliz. 2003. Basque sociolinguistics: Language, society, and culture. Reno: Center for Basque Studies.Google Scholar
Auger, Julie. 1995. On the history of relative clauses in French and some of its dialects. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Historical linguistics, 1993: Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 19–32. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azkue, Resurrección María. 1891. Euskal izkindea. Bilbao: Astui.Google Scholar
. 1923–1925. Morfología vasca. Bilbao: Editorial Vasca.Google Scholar
. 1969 [1905–1906]. Diccionario vasco-español-francés. Bilbao: La Gran Enciclopedia Vasca.Google Scholar
Beaufort, Anne & Anna Iñesta. 2014. Author profiles: Awareness, competence, and skills. In Eva-Maria Jakobs & Daniel Perrin (eds.), Handbook of writing and text production, 141–158. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander. 2005. The role of the individual in language change from the point of view of Social Network Analysis. Logos and Language 6. 30–54.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 1990. Usages normatifs et non normatifs dans les relatives en français, en espagnol et en portugais. In Johannes Bechert, Giuliano Bernini & Claude Buridant (eds.), Toward a typology of European languages, 317–335. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branca-Rosoff, Sonia. 1990. Conventions d’écriture dans la correspondance des soldats. Mots 24(1). 21–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruneton-Governatori, Ariane & Bernard Moreux. 2015. Un modèle épistolaire populaire: Les lettres d’émigrés béarnais. In Daniel Fabre (ed.), Par écrit: Ethnologie des écritures quotidiennes, 79–103. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
Camino, Iñaki. 2012. Bi testu llabur Aezkoa eta Zuberoako. Garralda (1828) & Larraine (1817). Fontes Linguae Vasconum 114. 61–72.Google Scholar
Carter, Karen E. 2011. Creating Catholics: catechism and primary education in early modern France. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo. 2016. Changes from below, changes from above. Relative constructions in contemporary Italian. In Massimo Cerruti, Claudia Crocco & Stefania Marzo (eds.), Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian, 62–88. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. 1997. Du livre au lire. Réseaux 1. 271–290.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger, Dominique Julia & Marie-Madeleine Compère. 1976. L’éducation en France du XVIe au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Société d’Éducation d’Enseignement Supérieur.Google Scholar
Dávila, Pauli, Ana Eizagirre & Idoia Fernández. 1994. Los procesos de alfabetización y escolarización en Euskal Herria. Cuadernos de Sección. Educación 7. 63–99.Google Scholar
Elosegi, Xabier. 2018. Senpereko eta Lapurdiko euskara XVIII mendean. Senpere: Lapurdi 1609.Google Scholar
. 2019. Le Dauphin: 1757ko gutuneriari buruzko osagarriak eta gogoetak. Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15(2). 325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1972. The sociology of language. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg. 2004. A typology of relative clauses in German dialects. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology meets typology, 211–243. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna. 2008. Persistence and renewal in the relative pronoun paradigm: the case of Italian. Folia Linguistica Historica 25(1–2). 115–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosperrin, Bernard. 1984. Les petites écoles sous l’Ancien Régime. Rennes: Ouest France.Google Scholar
Guiraud, Pierre. 1966. Le système du relatif en français populaire. Langages 3. 40–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haase, Martin. 1992. Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel im Baskenland. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher. 2012 [1985]. Language of immediacy – language of distance: Orality and literacy from the perspective of language theory and linguistic history. In Claudia Lange, Beatrix Weber & Göran Wolf (eds.), Communicative spaces. Variation, contact, and change, 441–473. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Krajewska, Dorota. 2017. Euskararen sintaxi diakronikorantz: Egitura konplexuak / Towards a historical syntax of Basque: Complex constructions. Vitoria-Gasteiz: UPV/EHU doctoral dissertation. [URL]
Lafitte, Pierre. 1991 [1944]. Grammaire basque. Donostia: Elkar.Google Scholar
Lamikiz, Xabier, Manuel Padilla-Moyano & Charles Videgain. 2015. Othoi çato etchera. Le Dauphin itsasontziko euskarazko gutunak (1757) – Correspondance basque du corsaire Le Dauphin (1757). Special edition of Lapurdum 2.Google Scholar
Larramendi, Manuel. 1728. De la antigüedad y universalidad del bascuenze en España. Salamanca: Eugenio García de Honorato.Google Scholar
. 1729. El imposible vencido. Salamanca: Antonio Joseph Villargordo Alcaraz.Google Scholar
. 1745. Diccionario trilingüe del castellano, vascuence y latín. San Sebastián: Bartolomé Riesgo y Montero.Google Scholar
Lillis, Theresa. 2013. The sociolinguistics of writing. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, Martyn. 2012. The writing culture of ordinary people in Europe, c. 1860–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The power of the scribe: Delegated writing in Modern Europe. European History Quarterly 44(2). 244–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madariaga, Juan. 2014. Sociedad y lengua vasca en los siglos XVII y XVIII. Bilbao: Euskaltzaindia.Google Scholar
Martineau, France. 2007. Variation in Canadian French usage from the 18th to the 19th century. Multilingua 26(2–3). 203–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Michael. 1995. The linguistic value of Ulster emigrant letters. Ulster Folklife 41. 26–41.Google Scholar
Mounole, Céline & Joseba A. Lakarra. 2018. Euskara Arkaikoa. In Joakin Gorrotxategi, Iván Igartua & Joseba A. Lakarra (eds.), Euskararen historia, 345–468. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Eusko Jaurlaritza.Google Scholar
Murelli, Adriano. 2011. Relative constructions in European non-standard varieties. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oyharçabal, Bernard. 1987. Étude descriptive de constructions complexes en basque, propositions relatives, temporelles, conditionelles et consessives. Paris: Université de Paris VII doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
. 1999. Euskarazko irakaskintzaren historia ororen eskolen ildotik, iraultzaren frantses garaiko eskola liburuxka bat. Lapurdum 4. 81–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Relatives. In José Ignacio Hualde & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), A grammar of Basque, 762–821. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Padilla-Moyano, Manuel. 2015. Le Dauphin itsasontziko gutuneria (1757) edo euskararen historia behetik. Special edition of Lapurdum 2. 45–77.Google Scholar
Rijk, Rudolf Pieter Gerardus de. 1972. Studies in Basque syntax: Relative clauses. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1999. Syntax. In Richard M. Hogg & Roger Lass (eds.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 3, 187–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1982. Socio-historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. Towards a typology of relative-clause formation strategies in Germanic. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical syntax, 437–470. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert & Marijke van der Wal. 2012. Functions of epistolary formulae in Dutch letters from the seventeenth- and eighteenth centuries. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(2). 173–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Social and constructional diffusion: Relative clauses in seventeenth-and eighteenth-century Dutch. In Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar, 181–205. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Salaburu, Pello. 2018. El euskera contemporáneo: el largo camino de la unificación literaria. In Joaquín Gorrochategui, Iván Igartua & Joseba A. Lakarra (eds.), Historia del euskera, 799–869. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Eusko Jaurlaritza.Google Scholar
Sarasola, Ibon. 1975. Euskal literatura numerotan. San Sebastián: Kriseilu.Google Scholar
Stark, Elisabeth. 2016. Relative clauses. In Adam Ledgeway & Maiden Martin (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 1029–1040. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trask, Robert L. 1998. The typological position of Basque: Then and now. Language Sciences 20. 313–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trebiño, Imanol. 2001. Administrazio zibileko testu historikoak. Vitoria-Gasteiz: IVAP.Google Scholar
Urgell, Blanca. 2018. Lehen Euskara Modernoa. In Joakin Gorrotxategi, Iván Igartua & Joseba A. Lakarra (eds.), Euskararen historia, 549–657. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Eusko Jaurlaritza.Google Scholar
Vicari, Stefano. 2018. Rituels épistolaires dans les lettres des poilus peu et moins lettrés: Une analyse contrastive. SHS Web of Conferences 46. 06009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wal, Marijke van der & Gijsbert Rutten. 2013. The practice of letter writing: Skills, models, and Early Modern Dutch manuals. Language & History 56(1). 18–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. At the crossroads. Orality and literacy in Early and Late Modern Dutch private letters. In Ann-Catrine Edlund, Timothy G. Ashplant & Anna Kuismin (eds.), Reading and writing from below: exploring the margins of modernity, 197–214. Umeå: Umeå University.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison. 2005. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zuazo, Koldo. 2019. Standard Basque and its dialects. London-New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar