Cover not available
Part of
Sociolinguistic Variation and Language Acquisition across the Lifespan
Edited by Anna Ghimenton, Aurélie Nardy and Jean-Pierre Chevrot
[Studies in Language Variation 26] 2021
► pp. 129–160

Chapter 6
Children’s sociolinguistic preferences

The acquisition of language attitudes within the Austrian dialect-standard continuum

ORCID logo | University of Salzburg
ORCID logo | Private University of Education, Diocese Linz
The Bavarian-speaking part of Austria is often referred to as an instantiation of a dialect-standard continuum with a range of speech forms between (Austrian) Standard German and the respective base dialects. The socio-indexical meaning (i.e. the speaker characteristics associated with certain varieties) of different speech forms has been the object of several studies with adults in Austria. Our aim was to gain an understanding of the acquisition process regarding these socio-indexical values of L1-varieties. In order to do so, we studied the sociolinguistic preferences of Austrian children aged between 3 and 10 years, using adapted ‘matched-guise’ experiments in which the child had to choose between two doctors speaking different varieties (dialect, standard German). Whereas the younger children do not show consistent preferences, children from grade 2 (age 7/8) onwards prefer the standard-speaking doctor.
Keywords: variation, children, Austria, German, dialect, Bavarian, preferences, language attitudes, matched-guise, acquisition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sociolinguistic background: German in Austria
    • 2.1Varieties of German in Austria
    • 2.2Patterns of use
    • 2.3The socio-indexical meaning of Austrian German varieties
  • 3.Acquisition of attitudes towards varieties of an L1 – results from international studies
  • 4.Austrian children’s attitudinal preferences in a ‘matched-guise’ task
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Materials and procedure
    • 4.3Results: Overall attitudinal preferences
    • 4.4Predictors of attitudinal preferences
      • 4.4.1Age
      • 4.4.2Socio-economic status (SES)
      • 4.4.3Parental language input
      • 4.4.4Participants’ gender
  • 5.Summary and discussion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 16 August 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.26.06kai
References (66)
References
Albarracín, Dolores, Mark P. Zanna, Blair T. Johnson, and G. Tarkan Kumkale. 2005. “Attitudes. Introduction and Scope.” In The Handbook of Attitudes, ed. by Dolores Albarracín, Blair T. Johnson, and Mark T. Zanna, 3–19. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ammon, Ulrich. 2003. “Dialektschwund, Dialekt-Standard-Kontinuum, Diglossie: Drei Typen des Verhältnisses Dialekt – Standardvarietät im deutschen Sprachgebiet“. In „Standardfragen“. Soziolinguistische Perspektiven auf Sprachgeschichte, Sprachkontakt und Sprachvariation, ed. by Jannis K. Androutsopoulos, and Evelyn Ziegler, 163–171. Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2005. “Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations”. In Perspectives on Variation. Sociolinguistic, Historical, Comparative, ed. by Nicole Delbecque et al., 7–42. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Sprachliche Heterogenität im Deutschen. Linguistik zwischen Variation, Varietäten und Stil.“ Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 42 (166): 7–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano. 2010. “Identifying dimensions of linguistic variation in a language space.” In Language and space: theories and methods: an international hand-book of linguistic variation, ed. by Jürgen Erich Schmidt, and Peter Auer, 226–240. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Barbour, Stephen, and Patrick Stevenson. 1998. Variation im Deutschen. Soziolinguistische Perspektiven. Übersetzt aus dem Englischen von Konstanze Gebel (= de Gruyter Studienbuch). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbour, Stephen. 2000. “Accents, dialects and languages. National differences in the evaluation of language varieties.” Sociolinguistica 14: 5–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbu, Stéphanie, Nathael Martin, and Jean-Pierre Chevrot. 2014. “The maintenance of regional dialects: a matter of gender? Boys, but not girls, use local varieties in relation to their friends’ nativeness and local identity.” Frontiers in Psychology 5: Article 1251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbu, Stéphanie, Aurélie Nardy, Jean-Pierre Chevrot, and Jacques Juhel. 2013. “Language evaluation and use during early childhood: Adhesion to social norms or integration of environmental regularities?” Linguistics 51 (2): 381–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, John. 2012. Language Attitudes in England and Austria: A Sociolinguistic Investigation into Perceptions of High and Low-Prestige Varieties in Manchester and Vienna. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Brouwer, Dede. 2011. Gender Variation in Dutch: A Sociolinguistic Study of Amsterdam Speech. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bundesministerium für Bildung. 2012. Lehrplan der Volksschule. BGBl. Nr. 134/1963 in der Fassung BGBl. II Nr. 303/2012 vom 13. September 2012. [URL]
Charlotte-Bühler-Institut. 2009. Bildungsplan-Anteil zur sprachlichen Förderung in elementaren Bildungseinrichtungen. Aktualisierte Version, Juni 2009. Retrieved from: [URL]
Cheshire, Jenny. 2002. “Sex and gender in variationist research.” In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. by Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Shilling-Estes, 423–443. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cremona, Christiana, and Elizabeth Bates. 1977. “The development of attitudes toward dialect in Italian children.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 6 (3): 223–232.Google Scholar
Day, Richard R. 1980. “The Development of Linguistic Attitudes and Preferences.” TESOL Quarterly 14: 27–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cillia, Rudolf. 2016. “Sprache(n) im Klassenzimmer. Spracheinstellungen und Varietätengebrauch in der Schule aus Sicht der Lehrer/innen und der Schüler/innen.“ Ergebnisse aus einem Forschungsprojekt zum österreichischen Deutsch als Unterrichts- und Bildungssprache. Presentation at: Formen der Mehrsprachigkeit in sekundären und tertiären Bildungskontexten. Verwendung, Rolle und Wahrnehmung von Sprachen und Varietäten. Internationale Tagung an der Universität Innsbruck. 15.-17.09.2016. [URL]
De Vogelaer, Gunther, and Jolien Toye. 2017. “Acquiring attitudes towards varieties of Dutch: a quantitative perspective.” In Acquiring sociolinguistic variation, ed. by Gunther de Vogelaer, and Matthias Katerbow, 117–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ender, Andrea, and Irmtraud Kaiser. 2009. “Zum Stellenwert von Dialekt und Standard im österreichischen und Schweizer Alltag – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage.“ Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 37(2): 266–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ensminger, Margaret E., and Kate Fothergill. 2003. “A decade of measuring SES: What it tells us and where to go from here.” In Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development, ed. by Marc H. Bornstein, and Robert H. Bradley, 13–27. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Garrett, Peter. 2010. Attitudes to language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Peter, Nikolas Coupland, and Angie Williams. 2003. Investigating language attitudes: social meanings of dialect, ethnicity and performance. Cardiff, Wales: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Chris Harrison, Clare Creber, Philip M. Smith, and Norman H. Freeman. 1983. “Developmental and contextual aspects of children’s language attitudes.” Language & Communication 3 (2): 141–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldgruber, Barbara Elisabeth. 2011. Einstellungen zu Dialekt und Standardsprache in Österreich: eine empirische Untersuchung in Graz und Wien. Nicht veröffentlichte Diplomarbeit. Wien: Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Häcki Buhofer, Annelies, Harald Burger, Hansjakob Schneider, and Thomas Studer. 1994. „Früher Hochspracherwerb in der Deutschen Schweiz: Der weitgehend ungesteuerte Erwerb durch sechs- bis achtjährige Deutschschweizer Kinder.“ In Spracherwerb im Spannungsfeld von Dialekt und Hochsprache, ed. by Annelies Häcki Buhofer, and Harald Burger, 147–198. Bern, Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hart, Betty, and Todd R. Risley. 1995. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Hoff, Erica. 2006. “How social contexts support and shape language development.” Developmental Review 26 (1): 55–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Irmtraud. 2006. ““Warum sagt ma des?” Code-Switching und Code-Shifting zwischen Dialekt und Standard in Gesprächen des österreichischen Fernsehens.“ Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 73 (3): 275–300.Google Scholar
. 2020. “Zwischen Standardsprache und Dialekt: Variationsspektren und Variationsverhalten österreichischer Kindergartenkinder.“ In Regiolekt – Der neue Dialekt? Akten des 6. Kongresses der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen (IGDD), ed. by Helen Christen, Brigitte Ganswindt, Joachim Herrgen, and Jürgen Erich Schmidt, 41–64. Stuttgart: Steiner (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. Beihefte).Google Scholar
Kaiser, Irmtraud, and Andrea Ender. 2013. “Diglossia or dialect-standard continuum in speakers’ awareness and usage. On the categorisation of lectal variation in Austria.” In Cognitive Sociolinguistics, ed. by Martin Pütz, Monika Reif, and Justyna Robinson, 273–298. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Irmtraud, and Gudrun Kasberger. 2018. “Children’s emerging ability to discriminate L1-varieties.” First Language. 38(5): 447–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Zum Erwerb von Variationskompetenz im Deutschen im österreichisch-bairischen Kontext.“ In Dialekt und Logopädie (Germanistische Linguistik), ed. by Mirja Bohnert-Kraus and Roland Kehrein, 159–198. Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Olms (Germanistische Linguistik).Google Scholar
Kasberger, Gudrun / Irmtraud Kaiser. 2019. ““I red normal” – eine Untersuchung der varietätenspezifischen Sprachbewusstheit und -bewertung von österreichischen Kindern.” In Dimensions of Linguistic Space: Variation – Multilingualism – Conceptualisations. Dimensionen des sprachlichen Raums: Variation – Mehrsprachigkeit – Konzeptualisierung, ed. by Lars Bülow, Ann K. Fischer, and Kristina Herbert, 319–340. Frankfurt/Vienna: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kasberger, Gudrun, and Stephan Gaisbauer. 2020. “Spracheinstellungen und Varietätengebrauch in der kindgerichteten Sprache.“ In Wahrnehmungsdialektologie, Sektionsband IGDD Marburg, ed. by Markus Hundt, Andrea Kleene, Albrecht Plewnia, and Verena Sauer, 103–131. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Katerbow, Matthias. 2013. Spracherwerb und Sprachvariation: eine phonetisch-phonologische Analyse zum regionalen Erstspracherwerb im Moselfränkischen. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinzler, Katherine D., and Jasmine M. DeJesus. 2013. “Northern = smart and Southern = nice: The development of accent attitudes in the United States.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (6): 1146–1158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Werner, Stephan Elspaß, and Robert Möller. 2015. Dtv-Atlas Deutsche Sprache. 18th ed. München: dtv-Verlag.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 1990. “The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change.” Language Variation and Change 2, 205–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E., Richard Hodgson, Robert C. Gardner, and Samuel Fillenbaum. 1960. “Evaluational Reactions to Spoken Language.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60: 44–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macha, Jürgen. 2006. “Dynamik des Varietätengefüges im Deutschen.“ In Variation im heutigen Deutsch: Perspektiven für den Sprachunterricht (= Sprache – Kommunikation – Kultur Soziolinguistische Beiträge 4 ), ed. by Eva Neuland, 149–160. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Maegaard, Marie. 2005. “Language attitudes, norm and gender. A presentation of the method and results from a language attitude study.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37 (1): 55–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maitz, Péter. 2010. “Sprachvariation zwischen Alltagswahrnehmung und linguistischer Bewertung. Sprachtheoretische und wissenschaftsmethodologische Überlegungen zur Erforschung sprachlicher Variation.“ In Variatio delectat, Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, ed. by Peter Gilles, Joachim Scharloth, and Evelyn Ziegler, 59–80. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Mannsberger, Gisela-Maria. 2015. Dialekt und Standardsprache in sprachlich heterogenen Volksschulkassen im Bezirk Neusiedl am See im Nordburgenland. Unpubl. MA-Thesis. Vienna: University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Moosmüller, Sylvia. 1991. Hochsprache und Dialekt in Österreich: soziophonologische Untersuchungen zu ihrer Abgrenzung in Wien, Graz, Salzburg und Innsbruck. Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy, and Howard Giles. 1996. “Linguistic accommodation.” In Contact Linguistics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, ed. by Hans Goebl, Peter Nelde, Zdeněk Stary, and Wolfgang Wölck, 332–342. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis. 2013. “The influence of regard on language variation and change.” Journal of Pragmatics 52: 93–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Julie. 1997. “Hitting a moving target: Acquisition of sound change in progress by Philadelphia children.” Language Variation and Change 9: 249–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Child Language Variation”. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Second Ed., ed. by J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling, 263–276. Hoboken: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, Elena. 2017. “Towards a typology of discourse-based approaches to language attitudes.” Language & Communication 56: 82–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 2003. “Variation in Language and Gender.” In The Handbook of language and gender, ed. by Janet Holmes, and Miriam Meyerhoff, 98–118. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Marilyn S. 1974. “The Magic Boxes: Pre-school children’s attitudes toward Black and Standard English.” The Florida FL Reporter: 55–93.Google Scholar
Sarnoff, Irving (1970). “Social Attitudes and the Resolution of Motivational Conflict” In: Attitudes, ed. by Marie Jahoda, and Neil Warren, 279–284. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Scheutz, Hannes. 2009. “Lautliche Dialekteigenschaften und ihre geographische Verteilung” In: Drent und herent. Dialekte im salzburgisch-bayerischen Grenzgebiet, ed. by Hannes Scheutz, Peter Mauser, and Sandra Aitzetmüller, 21–56. Salzburg-Berchtesgadener Land: EuRegio.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich, and Joachim Herrgen. 2011. Sprachdynamik. Eine Einführung in die moderne Regionalsprachenforschung (= Grundlagen der Germanistik 49). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
Sieber, Peter and Horst Sitta. 1994. “Zur Rolle der Schule beim Aufbau von Einstellungen von Dialekt und Standardsprache.“ In Spracherwerb im Spannungsfeld von Dialekt und Hochsprache (= Zürcher Germanistische Studien Bd. 38), ed. by Harald Burger, and Annelies Häcki Buhofer, 199–214. Bern et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Soukup, Barbara. 2009. Dialect Use as Interaction Strategy: A Sociolinguistic Study of Contextualization, Speech Perception, and Language Attitudes in Austria. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Austrian dialect as a metonymic device: A cognitive sociolinguistic investigation of Speaker Design and its perceptual implications.” Journal of Pragmatics 52: 72–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinegger, Guido. 1998. Sprachgebrauch und Sprachbeurteilung in Österreich und Südtirol: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage. Frankfurt/M. et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. “Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich.“ Language in Society 1 (2): 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Compernolle, Rémi A., and Lawrence Williams. 2012. “Reconceptualizing Sociolinguistic Competence as Mediated Action: Identity, Meaning-Making, Agency.” The Modern Language Journal, 96: 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warren-Leubecker, Amye, and Beth W. Carter. 1988. “Reading and Growth in Metalinguistic Awareness: Relations to Socioeconomic Status and Reading Readiness Skills.” Child Development 59 (3): 728–742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiesinger, Peter. 1983. “Die Einteilung der deutschen Dialekte.“ In Dialektologie: ein Handbuch zur deutschen und allgemeinen Dialektforschung, ed. by Werner Besch, 807–900. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “Zur Interaktion von Dialekt und Standardsprache in Österreich.“ In Dialect and Standard Language in the English, Dutch, German and Norwegian Language Areas, ed. by Jan A. van Leuvensteijn, and Johannes B. Berns, 290–311. Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2014. Das österreichische Deutsch in Gegenwart und Geschichte (= Austria: Forschung und Wissenschaft – Literatur, Band 2). Wien: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Zehetner, Ludwig. 1985. Das bairische Dialektbuch. Augsburg: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar